Title: Plagiarism: A Practical Guide for Academic Staff
1Plagiarism A Practical Guide for Academic Staff
- Learning Teaching
- Enhancement Unit
2Session Structure
- Fundamental principles
- Online resources
- JISC project
- Designing out plagiarism
- Auditing your own practice
3Fundamental Principle Inform Actively
- No one told me the most common, successful
legal defence - Present information actively and on more than one
occasion - It isnt enough to provide students with a
definition of plagiarism and leave it at that
Induction sessions arent enough - Spell out penalties for students
- Discuss forms of plagiarism in detail
- Set students exercises use Turnitin on webct to
check - Explain academic context and practice
4Fundamental Principle Uniformity
- Variation in practice undermines confidence in
the system and makes institutions vulnerable - Staff must be made aware of the Academic
Regulations/institutional practice and must act
accordingly - Staff who give students preferential treatment
must be warned against doing so Compassion
towards one is discrimination against another
(natural justice notwithstanding) -
5Put another way
6Dont make assumptions
- Students have very vague notions of
- Learning outcomes (what they are and what they
are for) - The link between learning outcomes and assessment
- Assessment criteria
- By discussing these with students you can
introduce positive notions of scholarship and
originality. Unless students are inducted how
will they understand conventions and practice? - Will help to counteract the negative messages
about plagiarism (and your students will
understand more about their module)
7The legal test
- Civil not criminal Thus a case brought without
the ability to cite an original text should be
strong enough to satisfy the requirements of
civil law - JISC report, p29
- On the balance of probabilities not beyond
reasonable doubt
8The developmental process
9A suggested minimum
- Year 1, Semester 1 1 hr initial workshop (using
staff from LTE Unit and their materials, perhaps
see later slide) in a compulsory module and
Turnitin software on webct - Year 1, Semester 1 Short top-up session before
the first major assignment remind students about
the basics (bibliographies, referencing, quoting
etc so that core information is fresh in their
minds). Someone from LTE Unit can come and give a
talk - Year 1, Semester 2 1 hr workshop on plagiarism
and penalties (using LTEU material perhaps see
later slide) - Year 2 Top-up session
- Year 3 Session dealing with lengthier
submissions and plagiarism - All years Sessions on different forms of
plagiarism (source code, composition,
choreography etc) - LTE Unit contact Adrian Chapman
10Sessions devised by the LTE Unit for general use
- Session 1 (1 hour)
- Year 1
- Awareness-raising
- Interactive
- Forms of plagiarism (a definition/detection
exercise) - Active plagiarism
- Plagiarism and the Academic Regulations
- Case Studies
- We provide generic handouts and a Powerpoint
slideshow
- Session 2 (1 1/2 hours)
- Any year
- More sophisticated session discussing actual case
- Mock Student Review Committee comprising students
- Students must agree on action and justify their
action - We provide generic handouts and a Powerpoint
slideshow - Under development
- Specific dissertation session
- Session for non-native English speakers
11Internal documents
- Dont forget to use How to theres a section on
plagiarism (and citations, essay writing and
bibliographies) - Guidelines for the Student Review Board when
hearing cases of Academic Misconduct (Paul
Hodges) - Guidelines for staff on dealing with plagiarism
12Reading more widely
- Evan and Gill, Universities Students. Read
Chapter 6 Keeping the Rules. Generally a good
introduction to the legal basis on which
universities (should) operate.
13Software for detecting plagiarism
- Google search is simplest
- Cross checking essays with a wordbank on webct
www.turnitin.com - Follow the link on webct
14PAS (Plagiarism Advisory Service)
- URL www.northumbria.ac.uk/jiscpas
- Started in September 2002
- Generic advice but wont get involved in
particular cases - Educational development material for use with
students in preparation (will be on website) - Plagiarism detection software is part of service
- 31 institutions/1/2 million students registered
(inc. Oxford, Aberdeen and the OU) - Enquiries from the US, Australia, New Zealand,
the Russian Federation
15Exactly what does the software do?
- Document submission and comparison software
- Compares all documents submitted and compares
them all with the unrestricted Web - In theory could compare every essay submitted in
the UK with every other essay (dissertations can
be submitted too) - Originality report Grades submissions from Hot
(heavily plagiarised) to Cool (not plagiarised)
and provides original sources for comparison - Will be free to UK HEIs for the first two years
then a charge will be made (c. 5k max)
16Web resources for aspiring plagiarists
- List of 150 sites at www.coastal.edu/library/mill
s2.htm - Popular sites are
- www.essaycrawler.com
- www.revise.it
- www.study-area.com/student
- www.schoolsucks.com
- Authoring services
- www.customwriting.com
- editmypaper.com
- Jim, the friendly research assistant
www.friendlyjim.com - Buthoney pots are predictable
17Designing out plagiarism 1
- Changing assessment frequently is the best method
- Reconsider learning outcomes
- Analysis, evaluation and synthesis not
regurgitation - Make information gathering/literature review a
learning outcome
18Designing out plagiarism 2
- Create individualised tasks
- Assess process and contribution
- Use formative tasks as checks (but you dont have
to assess them) i. short submissions in advance,
ii. literature reviews in advance, iii. student
learning logs, iv. plans, v. drafts - Group work i. signed logs, ii. online
collaboration with audit trail
19Designing out plagiarism 3
- Integrate assessment tasks
- If assessment tasks are cumulative and linked
its more difficult to use material from
elsewhere - Set a range of tasks within an assignment to test
process
20Example
- Original assessment for Baroque Performance
Practice (Music Year 2/3) - Essay To what extent can one perform
authentically? - Problem Limited number of sources and
intentional/unintentional plagiarism. Also its
tedious to read the same essay 30 times
- Revised assessment
- Read three position papers on authenticity (so
theres no mystery about the theoretical sources) - Attend concert or listen to CD (personalise data)
- Write review discussing the concert/CD from an
authentic perspective
21Designing out plagiarism 4
- The Meta Essay (under control conditions)
- Why I structured the essay in this way
- Which sources were particularly useful
- How I would do it differently next time
- What I learnt from writing it
- Random vivas
- In-class tasks
22Audit your own practice Student awareness
- What information is given to students?
- Is it presented actively?
- How often is it presented?
- Is it presented in different situations?
- Are they aware of the consequences of their
action? publicity aids prevention - Report on plagiarism through the Programme Annual
review
23Audit your own practice Staff awareness
- Are staff aware of the Academic
Regulations/institutional practice? - Is there evidence of inconsistency? What have you
done about it? - What are your strategies for embedding plagiarism
awareness in programme design? - Related issues the needs of particular student
groups - plagiarism is part of their culture
- what are you going to do to address problems?
24Bibliography/Webography
- Appleton, J. and J. Carroll (2001) Plagiarism A
Good Practice Guide, JISC/Oxford Brookes
University. Download from http//www.jisc.ac.uk/pl
agiarism/start.html - Carroll, J. (2002) Handbook for Deterring
Plagiarism in Higher Education, Oxford Oxford
Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Just
published. There is a companion website
http//www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/4_resource/
plagiarism.html. Order the handbook directly from
the OCSLD http//www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/
4_resource/books/bordf.html - Carroll, J. and L. Steffani (2001) A Briefing on
Plagiarism. Goto www.ltsn.ac.uk, click on
Projects then Assessment - Evans, G. R. and J. Gill (2001) Universities
Students, London Kogan Page. Chapter 6 Keeping
the Rules is relevant - JISC Plagiarism Project www.jisc.ac.uk/plagiarism
- JISC submission site www.submit.ac.uk
- JISC Plagiarism Advisory Service
www.northumbria.ac.uk/jiscpas