The Role of the Principal in High Quality Reading First Implementation PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 86
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of the Principal in High Quality Reading First Implementation


1
The Role of the Principal in High Quality Reading
First Implementation
Ed Radigan eradigan_at_fcrr.org
  • Eastern Regional Reading First Technical
    Assistance Center, Florida State University and
    The Florida Center for Reading Research
  • www.fcrr.org

2
Overview for Reading First Instructional
Leadership
  • Understanding Scientifically Based Reading
    Research (SBRR) within
    Reading First
  • Promoting Instructional Effectiveness in Reading
    First Schools
  • Using Data to Promote
  • A Dynamic Reading Program
  • Monitoring
  • and Evaluating
  • Progress

3
Leadership Matters
Toto, I dont believe we are in Kansas anymore.
  • Initial findings cite evidence that excellent
    leadership can make a profound difference in
    schools where there is the greatest need.

4
Some Days Are Like This
5
Some Days Are Like This
6
Leadership Matters
  • Schools with STRONG INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS
    show SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER STUDENT GAINS in
    reading. (Andrews Soder, 1987)
  • Strong instructional leaders
  • are regularly in the classroom
  • work collaboratively with teachers
  • are key to ensuring successful readers

7
Leadership in the Classroom
  • Use data to guide instructional decisions
  • Make regular classroom visits
  • Clarify the difference between instructional
    visits and evaluative activities
  • Maintain a focus on teaching and learning
  • Promote collaboration
  • Engage in discussions related to instruction
  • Model the importance of setting goals
  • Communicate the importance of learning to read

8
Understanding Scientifically Based Reading
Research (SBRR) within
Reading First
9
Why SBRR?
  • Research on reading instruction, perhaps more
  • than any other area of education, is ready for
  • application in the classroom. To do that will
  • require that many deeply held beliefs be set
    aside
  • in favor of what the evidence has proven
    beyond
  • a reasonable doubt.


  • Sweet, 2004, p. 40

10
SBRR Resources
11
Explicit and Systematic Instruction in the Five
Essential Components of Reading
12
Changing Emphasis of Big Ideas
13
Explicit and Systematic
Explicit
  • Nothing is left to chance all skills are taught
    directly.
  • This is particularly helpful to students with
    weak phonological skills.
  • Provides examples to lead to generalization.
  • Systematic
  • Instructional is purposeful and sequential.
  • Programmatic Scaffolding.
  • The program of instruction is carefully sequenced
    so that students are explicitly taught the skills
    and knowledge they need for each new task they
    are asked to perform

14
Accelerate Reading Growth
15
Sample Curriculum Map Get To Know Your Core
Program In A Similar Way
16
Promoting Instructional Effectiveness in Reading
First Schools
17
Fully Implement a Comprehensive Research-Based
Reading Program
18
Classroom Observations
  • Principals greatly benefit as reading leaders
    when they understand research-based teaching
    strategies, recognize strengths in their
    teachers' practice, and note areas that need
    improvement. Observation and conferencing are
    primary responsibilities of instructional
    leaders.
  • (Glickman,1985 Pajak,1989Scholastic, 2005)

19
Classroom Observations
  • The purpose of a classroom visit is to help
    teachers improve their instruction and identify
    the best teaching practices in your school.
    Observation visits reflect your interest in
    instruction and in your staff's professional
    growth.
  • (Blase Blase, 1998 Scholastic, 2005)

20
Classroom Observations
  • Benefits
  • Critical in monitoring program implementation
    and student progress
  • Builds rapport, teamwork and professional
    credibility with staff
  • Improves accountability
  • Builds principal knowledge of instructional
    practices
  • Informs implementation decisions

21
Classroom Observations
  • Challenges
  • Time
  • Knowledge of effective reading instruction
  • Understanding what to look for
  • Collection and analysis of appropriate
    observational data

22
Materials
  • Teacher and student materials are accessible and
    organized.
  • Evidence exists of program materials being used
    as designed
  • Teacher uses the Teachers Edition during
    Instruction

23
Phonemic Awareness
  • Activities are oral and include segmenting and
    blending of individual sounds in words.
  • Teacher uses engaging activities and materials to
    support instruction (e.g., hand motions, moving
    blocks, Elkoninboxes, clapping, etc.)
  • Teacher clearly pronounces individual sounds that
    are the focus of the lesson with enough volume
    for students to hear.
  • Instruction appears to be fun and interactive as
    opposed to repetitive and dull.
  • Students are given ample opportunities to respond
    and receive feedback on their answers.

24
Phonics
  • Visual aids (Alphabet cards and letter/sound
    cards) are used as designed by the program.
  • Teacher provides explicit instruction of letter
    sounds and blending strategies.
  • Students are applying letter/sound knowledge in
    reading and writing activities.
  • Teacher is following an organized sequence of
    instruction guided by the core reading program.

25
Fluency
  • Students are reading oral reading, choral
    reading, partner reading, etc.
  • Oral reading is taking place in small groups with
    the teacher providing immediate scaffolded
    feedback.
  • Students are periodically assessed on oral
    fluency, as evidenced by repeated readings.
  • Teacher modeling of fluency is evident during
    read-aloud and shared reading activities.

26
Vocabulary
  • Teacher contextualizes words from the stories
    they read students (explain what the word means
    in the text).
  • Teacher develops an explanation of vocabulary
    words that is child-friendly.
  • Vocabulary instruction is purposeful and on-going
    as evidenced by lists of vocabulary words around
    the room.
  • Teacher reinforces students knowledge of
    vocabulary words via questioning activities.
  • Students are actively involved with thinking
    about and using words in multiple contexts.

27
Comprehension
  • Teacher models and encourages students to use
    comprehension strategies throughout instruction
    and shared reading
  • Summarizing
  • Monitoring and clarifying
  • Asking questions
  • Predicting
  • Making connections
  • Visualizing
  • Using graphic and semantic organizers
  • Students are discussing answers to higher level
    questions about selections read.

28
Instructional Focus Areas
  • Classroom Environment
  • Classroom Management
  • Whole Group Instruction
  • Small Group Instruction
  • Centers
  • Phonological/Phonemic Awareness
  • Phonics
  • Fluency
  • Vocabulary
  • Comprehension

29
Classroom Environment
  • Behavior system clearly visible
  • Daily schedule posted
  • Weekly objectives posted
  • Procedure boards displayed
  • Work Board/center Routines posted
  • Designated routine for students needing help
  • All materials clearly labeled
  • Furniture arranged so that the teacher can see
    classroom and all students and teacher is visible
    to students
  • Books are organized and leveled
  • Walls that teach.
  • Classroom library is adequate and has a variety
    of reading levels.

30
Classroom Management
  • Learner expectations / classroom rules posted
  • Daily schedule posted for all students
  • Appropriate space for whole group, small group
    and centers
  • Well designated/clear walkways
  • Established routines for partner/group activities
  • Procedure /time frame for transitions
  • Designated routine in place for students needing
    assistance
  • Procedures for distributing and collecting
    student work.

31
Whole Group Instruction
  • Core program material provides basis for
    instruction
  • Appropriate portion of literacy block designated
    to whole group instruction
  • Review/connections to previously learned material
  • Explicit instruction of skills
  • Brisk effective pacing of instruction
  • Active student engagement
  • Variety of student movement/ settings
  • Opportunities for students to engage in
    meaningful discussion.
  • Opportunities for student to respond/apply
    demonstrate knowledge in a variety of ways
  • Lesson conclusion on how, when, and why to apply
    newly acquired information

32
Small Group Instruction
  • Core / Supplemental materials provide basis for
    instruction
  • Students are grouped by common needs based on
    data
  • Flexible grouping is used (Groups are formed and
    reformed based on data)
  • Instruction is differentiated for each group
  • Materials for various groups prepared and readily
    accessible
  • Active student engagement
  • Students spend a significant time engaged with
    text

33
Small Group Instruction
34
Centers
  • Centers focus on Literacy ( The Fab Five)
  • Organizational pattern of centers is posted
  • Students practice/extend knowledge of previously
    taught material
  • Students have clear objectives
  • Students can articulate objectives
  • Centers are connected to core instruction
  • Centers maximize the use of time
  • Center tasks are meaningful
  • Center tasks are engaging
  • Materials are prepared, organized and accessible.

35
Centers
  • Centers include an assessment/accountability
    component
  • Centers have multiple tasks and finish early
    activities
  • Evidence of differentiation to meet the needs of
    a variety of learners
  • Students work in various groupings
  • Help system for students is evident
  • Specific location for student work (In-basket,
    file folder)
  • Student behavior follows classroom rules
  • Student movement between centers/transitions is
    organized.

36
  • What generally occurs when a student (or group of
    students) does not learn or master a skill?

37
Teachers Can Differentiate
Content (What)
Process(How)
Product(What students are able to do)
38
What is Differentiation?
  • Differentiation can be defined as a way of
    teaching in which teachers proactively modify
    curriculum, teaching methods, resources, learning
    activities, and student activities to address the
    needs of individual students and/or small groups
    of students to maximize the learning opportunity
    for each student in the classroom.

(Tomlinson, et al.)
39
Do all teachers have access
to the tools, knowledge and guidance that they
need to succeed?
Ask Yourself
40
Principals Motto
Leave No Teacher Behind
41
Staff Development that Supports Differentiation
Staff Development must be
  • Staff development should be built on a common
    vocabulary related to differentiation.
  • Staff development should attend to teachers
    levels of readiness, information, comprehension
    skills, and commitment.

powerful on-going long-term
42
(No Transcript)
43
Staff Development that Supports Differentiation
Staff Development must be
  • Staff development should be planned to ensure
    transfer of knowledge, understanding, and skill
    into the classroom.
  • Staff development should be consistent and
    aligned with district goals.
  • Staff development that asks much of teachers must
    recognize teachers efforts.

powerful on-going long-term
44
Principles Guiding Differentiation
  • The teacher focuses on the essentials
  • The teacher attends to student differences
  • Assessment and Instruction are inseparable
  • The teacher modifies content, process, and
    product
  • All students participate in thinking skills
  • Corrective Feedback is the key!

45
How do I begin forming small groups?
1st Grade Comprehension Outcome Measure
Oral Reading Fluency
26-40
26-44 WCPM
1-25
and
lt26 WCPM
gt 41
gt 44 WCPM
SCREENING RESULTS Beginning of Second Grade
46
Class Case Study Differentiating Student
Profiles
1st Grade Comprehension Outcome Measure
Oral Reading Fluency
26-40
26-44 WCPM
1-25 and lt26 WCPM
gt 41
gt 44 WCPM
47
Class Case Study Differentiating Student
Profiles
1st Grade Comprehension Outcome Measure
Oral Reading Fluency
26-40
26-44 WCPM
1-25 and lt26 WCPM
Penny Loafer
Penny Loafer
Dusty Eyre
Dusty Eyre
Willow Tree
Misty Wood
Rocky River
gt 41
gt 44 WCPM
Adam Apple
Adam Apple
Misty Wood
48
Assertions About Differentiation
  • Differentiated curriculum and instruction cant
    succeed if they are rooted in ineffective
    curriculum and instruction
  • Differentiation is not a set of strategies but
    rather a way of thinking about teaching and
    learning
  • Movement towards differentiation is movement
    toward expertise in teaching

49
Plan Instructional Adjustments
  • What instructional variables do we control that
    might make a difference?
  • See table of alterable variables

50
Alterable Variables
  • There are many things that affect a childs
    performance in school. We control some of them.
    Pursue those.
  • Optimizing the variables we differentiate what
    make a difference.

51
Please Keep in Mind
  • This is what we can do.
  • Change our objectives
  • Change the group size
  • Change the schedule of time
  • Change the resources
  • Change the methods
  • Provide Staff Development

The great end of life is not knowledge, but
action.
52
Alterable Variables Chart
53
Alterable Elements
  • Program Is the learner likely to benefit from
    the core? If not, what supplement or
    intervention/acceleration program is available?
  • Time A minimum of 30 30 minutes of small group
    intensive instruction in addition to typical
    whole group instruction.
  • Grouping/Organization As small a group as
    possible with the most skilled instructor
    available

54
Goals Will Drive Plans
  • At least 80 of Kindergarten students achieve
    grade level status
  • At least 80 of First Grade students achieve
    grade level status
  • At least a 50 movement in grades 2 3 of
    students who were one year below to grade level
    status
  • At least a 50 reduction of students in grades 2
    3 who are intensive
  • Retain Benchmark from Screening to Outcome

55
Using Data to Promote a Dynamic Reading Program
56
Use of Assessment Data to Inform Instruction and
Determine Student Progress( A Top 10 List)
  • Ensure that assessment methods are valid.
    reliable, and grounded in SBRR.
  • Ensure that the assessment methods measure
    progress in the five essential components of
    reading.
  • Stay informed about assessments.
  • Meet with reading coaches and teachers often.
  • Analyze assessment data.
  • Use assessment data to evaluate the instructional
    reading program and to plan for the future.

57
Use of Assessment Data to Inform Instruction and
Determine Student Progress( A Top 10 List)
  • 7. Use assessment to identify classrooms having
    problems.
  • 8. Intervene quickly when assessment indicates
    that students or teachers are struggling.
  • 9. Set goals and benchmarks for teachers to meet
    during the school year.
  • 10. Change classroom instruction in response to
    assessment results.
  • 11. (Bonus) Celebrate when assessment data are
    positive.

58
Data Does Not Fix Problems
  • Disaggregating data is not a problem-fixing
    strategy. Rather its a problem-finding
    strategy.
  • Lezotte 1999

59
Analyze Data
Place high value on data. Use data to trouble
shoot
Analyze, chart, and share data within the school
and across the district.
Use data the data to determine where help is
needed, but not to blame struggling teachers and
students.
60
Leadership Goals
Data
61
Percentage of Students Reading at Benchmark at
3rd Grade
90
80
70
65
62
58
60
53
50
40
A
B
C
S
30
20
10
62
(No Transcript)
63
Survey conducted by Grunwald Associates on
behalf of CoSN in 2004.
64
Table Discussion
  • At your table please take a few minutes to
    discuss the type of data you are now receiving.
  • Does it raise questions?
  • What type of questions?
  • Where do you go for the answers?

65
Data-Driven InstructionalDecision-Making
  • Use assessment data to determine your schools
    current status
  • Whats working
  • Whats not working
  • How different sub-groups performed (economically
    disadvantaged, racial and ethnic groups, students
    with disabilities or with limited English
    proficiency)
  • What actions are needed to improve classroom
    reading instruction and student outcomes

66
Data-Driven InstructionalDecision-Making (cont.)
  • Identify strengths
  • Students on target for achieving standards/
    benchmarks
  • Teachers who have consistently large numbers of
    students meeting or exceeding standards/benchmarks
  • Teachers who are implementing reading programs
    with fidelity and who can serve as mentors
  • Reading programs that are meeting students needs
  • Knowledge and skills from professional
    development

67
Data-Driven InstructionalDecision-Making (cont.)
  • Identify areas for improvement
  • Students at risk for or who have reading
    difficulties
  • Teachers with a significant number of students
    NOT meeting benchmarks
  • Achievement gaps
  • Specific reading components
  • Reading programs that need to be evaluated
  • Teachers who need support
  • Professional development needs

68
Progress Monitoring The Teachers Map
Aimline
69
Evaluating Reading First Progress
  • How are K-3 students performing in the middle of
    the year on essential components of beginning
    reading instruction within the district? Within
    each school?
  • Within a school, what are the outcomes when
    examined class by class?
  • What are the outcomes when examined by subgroups
    of students within the district? Within each
    school?

70
Evaluating (cont.)
  • Is there a significant increase in the percentage
    of students reaching targets in the winter from
    year to year within the district? Within each
    school?
  • For each grade and essential component, what
    percentage of students at benchmark remained at
    benchmark? What percentage of students moved into
    benchmark from strategic and intensive? What
    percentage of students moved into strategic from
    intensive? Address within the district and within
    each school.

71
Another way to think about improvements and
performance two indices of instructional
effectiveness
Effectiveness of Core Instruction (ECI) what
percentage of students who began the year at
grade level on the screening measures finish the
year at grade level?
Effectiveness of Interventions(EI) what
percentage of students who began the year at some
level of risk on the screening measures finish
the year at grade level?
72
First Look at the Big Picture
1st Grade
73
The ECI and EI
9 of 13 students who were at grade level
continue at grade level
ECI .69
One academic year
2 of 7 students who began the year at risk
finished the year at grade level
EI .29
74
Keep Constituents Informed About the Progress
75
How will the Principal Ensure that Effective and
Productive Grade Level Team Meetings Occur?
  • Knows how outcomes for meetings will be
    established.
  • Communicates expectation that all teachers on
    that grade level will attend.
  • State the purpose of the meeting and the
    importance of staying focused on the task.

76
Data Focused Grade Level Team Meetings, continued
  • Review the data before the meeting and be
    prepared to ask specific questions and to provide
    suggestions for teachers related to the data.
  • Have copies of the data prepared for each
    teacher.
  • Assist teachers in making informed instructional
    decisions

77
Grade Level Team Meeting, continued
  • Have teachers leave with an understanding of
    focused teaching targets, resources and the
    support of the coach.
  • Follow up with classroom visits and another
    meeting within the next 3-4 weeks.
  • Celebrate successes.

78
Sample Grade Level Team Meeting Sheet
79
Validate and Recalibrate
  • Analyze students performance on both internal
    and external tests.
  • Use the information to decide on changes for the
    up-coming year.

What must be changed? Make a plan.
What can be improved? Make a plan.
80
Expectations After Reporting Data
  • If schools administer screening and progress
    monitoring we should be giving them feedback and
    helping schools set goals.
  • Goals will drive plans.
  • Plans will drive implementation.
  • Implementation will drive staff development for
    teachers and better outcomes for students.

81
Evaluating (cont.)
  • Collaboratively make adjustments to get
    instruction on track

Assess
Monitor and Adjust
Analyze Data
Take Action and Implement Solutions
Identify Strengths and Areas for Improvement
Problem-Solve
82
Point to Ponder
Data-Driven Instructional Decision-Making Problem
At the end of February, a large number of
first-grade students in a number of classrooms
are NOT making adequate fluency progress toward
the end-of-year benchmark.
  • Based on the problem identified by the data,
    determine
  • Possible contributing factors
  • Potential actions to take to correct the problem

83
Lets Take a Look
84
What Needs to be Done
  • Set the tone for the building
  • Facilitate the teaching and learning process
  • Provide leadership and direction to their
    schools instructional programs and policies
  • Spend significantly more time evaluating staff
    and mentoring new teachers.
  • Sustain professional development for themselves
    and their staff members
  • Nurture personalized school environments for all
    students.

85
Final Thought
  • Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible,
    and achieves the impossible.

Heres hoping you all have success in your
Reading First endeavors.
86
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com