Title: Systematic review of 40 studies out of 852
1Contribution of e-health to diabetes care
- Systematic review of 40 studies (out of 852)
- Teleconsultation and videoconsultation
J (Lisette) Van Gemert-Pijnen PhD F (Fenne)
Verhoeven MSc Behavioural Sciences
j.vangemert-pijnen_at_utwente.nl
J (Lisette) Van Gemert-Pijnen PhD F (Fenne)
Verhoeven MSc Behavioural Sciences
j.vangemert-pijnen_at_utwente.nl
2focus of review
- Feasibility of technology
- easy to use
- Clinical values
- e.g. HbA1c, dietary values, blood pressure
- Quality of life social functioning, general
health, well-being - Control of care
- (patient) able to cope with diabetes/self-control
(provider) better disease control - Communication
- patient-provider among providers
- Cost effectiveness saving time and reduction of
service utilization - Transparency standardization of guidelines
- Equity access to care
3Bring your doctor into your home
4teleconsultation
- no face to face and no synchronous communication
between patient and care providers, or among
care providers. Via e-mail, internet, sms
messages - monitoring and telecare
5videoconsultation
- Face to face , synchronous communication between
care providers and one or more patients
simultaneously - real-time contact via
- video-equipment
- personal feedback
- from 2005 also combined
- with telemonitoring
6search and data extraction
- medline, picarta, psychinfo, science direct,
telemedicine information exchange, web of
science, google scholar - diabetes care, effective health care, IJMI, JMIR,
telemedicine and e-health, telemedicine and
telecare - bibliographical details (design, population,
intervention) - methodological quality, contribution to quality
of care http//www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/clibsec1.pd
f
740 studies..
- Our research identified 852 potentially relevant
articles. Of these studies only 40 were subjected
to full review
8inclusion criteria
- developed for type 1, 2, and/ or gestational
diabetics - electronic care taking place between care
providers and patients(groups) or between care
providers mutually and patients - synchronous or asynchronous communication between
patient and care providers - at least one of the quality of care aspects
behaviour, control of care, costeffectiveness
(not solely clinical aspects) - no restrictions imposed for study design or
nature of the results
9exclusion criteria
- aimed at broader target groups than diabetics
- not aimed at patient-provider interaction but
solely reporting technical aspects of the used
technology, or solely aimed at reporting
metabolic control and clinical outcomes - published before 1995
- published in other language than English
10effects teleconsultation (n23)
- improved medical control (HbA1c, dietary levels)
- monitoring and telecare
- reliable disease control
- intensified information exchange
- patient-providers among providers
- satisfied with technology
- safety, consultation irrespective of time, place
- cost effective
- costs per patient saving time patients,
reduction of unscheduled visits, hospital
admissions
11effects videoconsultation (n11)
- improved Quality of life
- physical functioning, general health, social
functioning, emotional well-being - improved coping with diabetes
- self consciousness, dialogue with care providers
- better knowledge
- patients, local physicians and specialists
- cost savings
- reduced service utilization, saving time
- costs per patient, limited interference with
daily life - less routine control consultations
12limitations
- interventions inevitably lead to improved control
- selection of motivated, inexperienced patients
- more involvement of clinicians
- short intervention period, no follow-up
- inadequate measurement of interventions
- unclear relationship between interventions and
outcomes - incompetent methods to assess changes in
behaviour and costs - unclear vision about technology to support care
- grounding lacks
- focus limited to RCT (evidence based medicine)
13limitations 2
- lack of education
- lack of training to solve health problems via
internet, e-mail (patients as well as providers) - limited use of the full possibilities of
technology - lack of cooperation
- confrontation leads to frustration and
obstruction of data sending (teleconsultation
ceiling)
14who benefits?
15potentials
- An integrated care approach seems to be the key
for diabetes-care - a combination of clinical, organizational,
economical and behavioural outcomes - wellsupported clinical infrastructure
- conducive health policy environment
- interventions aimed at individuals and community
- training of staff and patients and (online)
personal coach
16 17To Educate - To Enlighten - To Entertain people
with diabetes of all ages! They carry on, they
are super-heroes
18resistance to change?
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Aimed and achieved objectives (3)
22Aimed and achieved objectives(2)
23Proven evidence achieved objectives
24Strong evidence teleconsultation studies
- Branger, 1999 (5)
- Cheitlin-Cherry ,2002 (7)
- Tsang, 2001 (36)
- Rutten, 2001 (33)
- Gomez, 2002 (19)
- Biermann, 2002 (4)
- Farmer, 2005 (14)
- McMahon, 2005 (31)
- Jansa,2006 (23)
- Kim, 2006 (24)
- Strong evidence SD intervention group
25relevant studies videoconsultation
- Dansky, 2001 (12) (SD intervention)
- SD, but not limited to intervention group, or 1
condition design - Abrahamian, 2002 (1) Yip 2002 (40)
- Izquierdo, 2003 (22)
- Wilbright 2004 (39)
- Chan, 2005 (6)
- Malassanos 2005 (27)
- Clemensen, 2005 (11)
26relevant studies video and teleconsultation
- Chumbler, 2005 (8,9,10) Sd intervention group
- SD, but not limited to intervention group, or 1
condition design) - Whitlock, 2000 (37)
- Gelfland, 2003 (18),
- Starren, 2005 (34)
27Diabetes Super Heroes
- they are parents, children, workers, writers --
they are many things. They live with diabetes,
but they don't let it get in the way of their
success. They carry on. They are Diabetes
Super-Heroes. -
- Among our members are sites that concentrate on
special diets, nutrition, celebrity diabetics,
diabetes books, diabetes stories, diabetes
information, news research, insulin pumping and
diabetes monitors
28In- and exclusionprocess (1)
- Titles and abstracts of the studies identified by
the outlined search strategy were read to
determine their potential eligibility for the
review. - Source material designated as in or uncertain
was obtained for further review. - A second investigator assessed those studies on
relevance to enhance interrater reliability. - Our research identified 852 potentially relevant
articles. Of these studies, 40 were subjected to
full review with the formal scoring methods.
29improvements teleconsultation (n23)
- HbA1c decreased(SDI, n3)
- I compared to C periods (-0.825, Plt0.05)
(cross-over design) - I (-1.15), increased in C (0.07), Plt0.05
- I (-1.6) and in C (-1.2), plt0.05
30(No Transcript)
31monitoring, telecare
- Patients send data daily or weekly via
glucometers, pc, internet, websites, e-mail - data analysis automatically
- computer generated feedback (alert, reminders) or
personal feedback via e-mail, phone ..
32in- and exclusion process
- possible relevant studies identified
33aimed and achieved objectives
34Proven evidence achieved objectives
35every day control
36(No Transcript)
3740 studies met our criteria (from 852)