Systematic review of 40 studies out of 852 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Systematic review of 40 studies out of 852

Description:

diabetes care, effective health care, IJMI, JMIR, telemedicine and e-health, ... books, diabetes stories, diabetes information, news & research, insulin pumping ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Gem1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Systematic review of 40 studies out of 852


1
Contribution of e-health to diabetes care
  • Systematic review of 40 studies (out of 852)
  • Teleconsultation and videoconsultation

J (Lisette) Van Gemert-Pijnen PhD F (Fenne)
Verhoeven MSc Behavioural Sciences
j.vangemert-pijnen_at_utwente.nl
J (Lisette) Van Gemert-Pijnen PhD F (Fenne)
Verhoeven MSc Behavioural Sciences
j.vangemert-pijnen_at_utwente.nl
2
focus of review
  • Feasibility of technology
  • easy to use
  • Clinical values
  • e.g. HbA1c, dietary values, blood pressure
  • Quality of life social functioning, general
    health, well-being
  • Control of care
  • (patient) able to cope with diabetes/self-control
    (provider) better disease control
  • Communication
  • patient-provider among providers
  • Cost effectiveness saving time and reduction of
    service utilization
  • Transparency standardization of guidelines
  • Equity access to care

3
Bring your doctor into your home
4
teleconsultation
  • no face to face and no synchronous communication
    between patient and care providers, or among
    care providers. Via e-mail, internet, sms
    messages
  • monitoring and telecare

5
videoconsultation
  • Face to face , synchronous communication between
    care providers and one or more patients
    simultaneously
  • real-time contact via
  • video-equipment
  • personal feedback
  • from 2005 also combined
  • with telemonitoring

6
search and data extraction
  • medline, picarta, psychinfo, science direct,
    telemedicine information exchange, web of
    science, google scholar
  • diabetes care, effective health care, IJMI, JMIR,
    telemedicine and e-health, telemedicine and
    telecare
  • bibliographical details (design, population,
    intervention)
  • methodological quality, contribution to quality
    of care http//www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/clibsec1.pd
    f

7
40 studies..
  • Our research identified 852 potentially relevant
    articles. Of these studies only 40 were subjected
    to full review

8
inclusion criteria
  • developed for type 1, 2, and/ or gestational
    diabetics
  • electronic care taking place between care
    providers and patients(groups) or between care
    providers mutually and patients
  • synchronous or asynchronous communication between
    patient and care providers
  • at least one of the quality of care aspects
    behaviour, control of care, costeffectiveness
    (not solely clinical aspects)
  • no restrictions imposed for study design or
    nature of the results

9
exclusion criteria
  • aimed at broader target groups than diabetics
  • not aimed at patient-provider interaction but
    solely reporting technical aspects of the used
    technology, or solely aimed at reporting
    metabolic control and clinical outcomes
  • published before 1995
  • published in other language than English

10
effects teleconsultation (n23)
  • improved medical control (HbA1c, dietary levels)
  • monitoring and telecare
  • reliable disease control
  • intensified information exchange
  • patient-providers among providers
  • satisfied with technology
  • safety, consultation irrespective of time, place
  • cost effective
  • costs per patient saving time patients,
    reduction of unscheduled visits, hospital
    admissions

11
effects videoconsultation (n11)
  • improved Quality of life
  • physical functioning, general health, social
    functioning, emotional well-being
  • improved coping with diabetes
  • self consciousness, dialogue with care providers
  • better knowledge
  • patients, local physicians and specialists
  • cost savings
  • reduced service utilization, saving time
  • costs per patient, limited interference with
    daily life
  • less routine control consultations

12
limitations
  • interventions inevitably lead to improved control
  • selection of motivated, inexperienced patients
  • more involvement of clinicians
  • short intervention period, no follow-up
  • inadequate measurement of interventions
  • unclear relationship between interventions and
    outcomes
  • incompetent methods to assess changes in
    behaviour and costs
  • unclear vision about technology to support care
  • grounding lacks
  • focus limited to RCT (evidence based medicine)

13
limitations 2
  • lack of education
  • lack of training to solve health problems via
    internet, e-mail (patients as well as providers)
  • limited use of the full possibilities of
    technology
  • lack of cooperation
  • confrontation leads to frustration and
    obstruction of data sending (teleconsultation
    ceiling)

14
who benefits?
15
potentials
  • An integrated care approach seems to be the key
    for diabetes-care
  • a combination of clinical, organizational,
    economical and behavioural outcomes
  • wellsupported clinical infrastructure
  • conducive health policy environment
  • interventions aimed at individuals and community
  • training of staff and patients and (online)
    personal coach

16
  • Answers??

17
To Educate - To Enlighten - To Entertain people
with diabetes of all ages! They carry on, they
are super-heroes
18
resistance to change?
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Aimed and achieved objectives (3)
22
Aimed and achieved objectives(2)
23
Proven evidence achieved objectives
24
Strong evidence teleconsultation studies
  • Branger, 1999 (5)
  • Cheitlin-Cherry ,2002 (7)
  • Tsang, 2001 (36)
  • Rutten, 2001 (33)
  • Gomez, 2002 (19)
  • Biermann, 2002 (4)
  • Farmer, 2005 (14)
  • McMahon, 2005 (31)
  • Jansa,2006 (23)
  • Kim, 2006 (24)
  • Strong evidence SD intervention group

25
relevant studies videoconsultation
  • Dansky, 2001 (12) (SD intervention)
  • SD, but not limited to intervention group, or 1
    condition design
  • Abrahamian, 2002 (1) Yip 2002 (40)
  • Izquierdo, 2003 (22)
  • Wilbright 2004 (39)
  • Chan, 2005 (6)
  • Malassanos 2005 (27)
  • Clemensen, 2005 (11)

26
relevant studies video and teleconsultation
  • Chumbler, 2005 (8,9,10) Sd intervention group
  • SD, but not limited to intervention group, or 1
    condition design)
  • Whitlock, 2000 (37)
  • Gelfland, 2003 (18),
  • Starren, 2005 (34)

27
Diabetes Super Heroes
  • they are parents, children, workers, writers --
    they are many things. They live with diabetes,
    but they don't let it get in the way of their
    success. They carry on. They are Diabetes
    Super-Heroes.
  • Among our members are sites that concentrate on
    special diets, nutrition, celebrity diabetics,
    diabetes books, diabetes stories, diabetes
    information, news research, insulin pumping and
    diabetes monitors

28
In- and exclusionprocess (1)
  • Titles and abstracts of the studies identified by
    the outlined search strategy were read to
    determine their potential eligibility for the
    review.
  • Source material designated as in or uncertain
    was obtained for further review.
  • A second investigator assessed those studies on
    relevance to enhance interrater reliability.
  • Our research identified 852 potentially relevant
    articles. Of these studies, 40 were subjected to
    full review with the formal scoring methods.

29
improvements teleconsultation (n23)
  • HbA1c decreased(SDI, n3)
  • I compared to C periods (-0.825, Plt0.05)
    (cross-over design)
  • I (-1.15), increased in C (0.07), Plt0.05
  • I (-1.6) and in C (-1.2), plt0.05

30
(No Transcript)
31
monitoring, telecare
  • Patients send data daily or weekly via
    glucometers, pc, internet, websites, e-mail
  • data analysis automatically
  • computer generated feedback (alert, reminders) or
    personal feedback via e-mail, phone ..

32
in- and exclusion process
  • possible relevant studies identified

33
aimed and achieved objectives
34
Proven evidence achieved objectives
35
every day control
36
(No Transcript)
37
40 studies met our criteria (from 852)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com