Title: Intertemporal Choice - SS200 Behavioural Economics
1Intertemporal Choice - SS200 Behavioural
Economics
- - 21 January 2004 by Martin Barner
2Papers
- Frederick, Loewenstein ODonoghue
- A review of intertemporal choice (2002)
- Angeletos, Laibson, Repetto, Tobacman
Weinberg - The hyperbolic consumption model (2001)
- Laibson
- Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting (1997)
3Agenda
- Motivation
- History of intertemporal choice
- Anomalies from discounted utility theory
- Two examples of hyperbolic discounting
- Results of simulations in Angeletos et al
- Conclusions and perspectives
4Motivation
- What is analyzed
- Why care
- What to learn
- Citation
5History of intertemporal choice
- Adam Smith (1776)
- John Rae (1834)
- Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1889)
- Irving Fisher (1930)
- Paul Samuelson (1937)
- Robert Strotz (1956)
- Phelps and Pollak (1968)
- David Laibson (1994, 1997)
6Discounted Utility Model
- Discount rate expresses motives
- Accepted as normative and descriptive
- Utility and consumption independence
- Time consistency
- Opposing forces
- Diminishing marginal utility
- Positive time preference
7Definitions
- Time discounting
- Reason for caring less about future
- Time preference
- Immediate utility over delayed utility
8Anomalies from DU
- Empirically discount rates not constant
- Over time
- Across type of intertemporal choices
- Sign effect (gains vs. losses)
- Magnitude effect (small vs. large amounts)
- Sequence effect (sequence vs. singly)
9Figure 1 - from Frederick et al
,
10Figure 2 - from Frederick et al
,
11Hyperbolic discounting
- Declining rate of time preference
-
-
12Example 1
- Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
- Substancial benefit in long run
- But temptation in short run
- Illiquid assets provide commitment
- Two-thirds of American wealth illiquid
- Not counting human capital
- Access to credit reduce commitment
- Explain decline in savings rate 1980s
13Figure 3 - from Laibson
,
14Example 2
- The hyperbolic consumption model
- Long run intentions and short run actions
- Hyperbolic preferences induce dynamic
inconsistency - Sophisticated consumers
- Model with simulations
15Example 2 (continued)
- Model features
- uncertain future labour income
- liquidity constraint
- allow to borrow on credit cards - limit
- hyperbolic discounting implications
- labour income autocorrelated shocks
- hold liquid and illiquid assets
- Results
16Figure 4 - from Angeletos et al
,
17Figure 5 - from Angeletos et al
,
18Figure 6 - from Angeletos et al
,
19Figure 7 - from Angeletos et al
,
20Table 1 - from Angeletos et al
,
21Table 2 - from Angeletos et al
,
22Conclusion
- Use insight from psychology
- Relinguish finding the right discount rate
- Intertemporal choice reflects considerations
- Descriptively adequate models are not easy
- Not general theory degrees of freedom
23Behavioural perspectives
- Other models (instantaneous utility function)
- Habit formation
- Reference point models
- Visceral influence
- Projection bias
- Multiple self