PKE PP Mike Henry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

PKE PP Mike Henry

Description:

TOE Evaluation Standard. Guide to Writing PP and ST. Entrust CygnaCom ... Security objectives for TOE. Security objectives for environment. Functional. Assurance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:217
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: santoshc
Learn more at: https://csrc.nist.gov
Category:
Tags: pke | henry | mike | toe

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PKE PP Mike Henry


1
PKE PPMike Henry
Jean Petty Entrust CygnaCom
Santosh Chokhani
2
Briefing Contents
  • Common Criteria Background
  • Goals of PKE PP
  • Assumptions
  • Approach in Constructing the PP
  • Summary of Packages
  • Planned Enhancements

3
Common Criteria Sponsors
Common to Various Nations Only charter members
shown
4
Common Criteria Key Concepts
  • Protection Profile (PP)
  • Specification of Security Requirements at what
    level
  • Implementation and product neutral
  • Security Target (ST)
  • Specification of Security Features at what and
    how level
  • Implementation and product specific

Target of Evaluation (TOE) Products Evaluated
against ST
5
Common Criteria Standard Specification
Part 1 Introduction PP and ST Contents and For
mats
Part 2 Security Functional Requirements
Select from these for PP and/or ST
Can extend the requirements
Part 3 Security Assurance Requirements
Select from these for PP and/or ST
Can extend the requirements
6
Common Criteria Standards Other Documents
  • Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM)
  • PP Evaluation Standard
  • ST Evaluation Standard
  • TOE Evaluation Standard

Guide to Writing PP and ST
7
Common Criteria Part 2 Part 3 Hierarchy
Part 2 or 3

.
Class
....
Family
Component
....
....
Element
8
Common Criteria Part 2 (functional) Classes
Comm
User Data Protection
Crypto
Audit
TSF Protection
IA
Security Management
Privacy
TOE Access
Trusted Path
Resource Utilization
9
Common Criteria Part 3 (assurance) Classes
Delivery Operation
Development
Configuration Management
Guidance Documents
Vulnerability Assessments
Life-Cycle Support
Tests
Note CC also packages assurance requirements in
7 hierarchical packages called Evaluation Assuran
ce Levels (EAL)
10
Common Criteria PP Contents
TOE Description
Introduction
Assumptions Threats Organizational Security Poli
cies
Security Environment
drives
Security objectives for TOE Security objectives f
or environment
Security Objectives
drives
Functional Assurance
Security Requirements
Rationale
11
Common Criteria Functional Package Contents
Security objectives
drives
Functional Security Requirements
Rationale
12
Common Criteria Evaluation Model
PP Evaluation (Internal)
ST Evaluation
(Internal Against PP Optional)
TOE Evaluation
(against ST)
13
Project Goals
  • Develop a tool for security evaluation of broad
    range (all possible!!!) PKE applications in
    Marine Corps
  • PKI based cryptographic services vary from
    application to application
  • PKE toolkits have varying degree of functionality
    for certification path validation logic
  • Accommodate a variety of algorithms
  • DoD Class 3
  • Fortezza Class 4
  • KMI
  • Future enhancements

14
Assumptions
  • Need to accommodate COTS products with varying
    degree of path validation capability
  • PKI based security mechanisms will vary from
    application to application
  • Provide ability to evaluate OCSP and CRL
  • Extend the CC for certification path validation
    and other items
  • Access control components are not appropriate for
    certification path validation
  • Existing CC components not appropriate for CRL
    and OCSP response processing

15
Challenge Balancing Act
Product Realities Current Implementations Variet
y of Solutions
Planned Enhancements Security Optional Features
16
Challenge Requirements and Capability
Increasing Security, Functionality, etc.
Examples No trust anchor processing.F
ull trust anchor processing No policy processing
.Full policy processing
17
Solutions
Use functional packages as needed
Example Policy processing
Use assignment operation for SFR to provide
additional granularity (Example trust anchor
processing)
18
Approach
  • Use functional packages to permit ST author to
    select appropriate
  • PKI based cryptographic mechanisms
  • Certification path validation capability
  • Revocation checking
  • Certification path validation rules
  • Non-procedural
  • Attempt to preserve X.509 input, processing,
    output
  • Policy calculation all in output

19
Approach Environmental Assumptions
  • Cryptographic Module
  • Protects private keys
  • May protect trust anchors
  • Performs cryptography
  • Secure Computing and OS
  • Protects keys and data
  • Provides audit capability
  • Protects audit logs
  • Optional

20
Approach
  • Use mandatory functional package for PKI
    Credentials
  • Required to accommodate cases where cryptographic
    module does not manage trust anchors
  • Can be met by
  • application, or
  • environment
  • OS, or
  • Cryptographic module

21
Approach
  • Public Key Based Cryptographic Services
  • Encryption
  • Authentication
  • Integrity

Association
Path Validation Engine
Need for
PKI Cryptographic Functional Packages
22
Approach Handling Lack of Current Revocation
Information
  • Ability to specify acceptance of certification
    path in case of no revocation information or old
    revocation information
  • Past experience shows that flexibility may be
    needed to provide
  • Configurability
  • User interaction

23
Functional Packages Certificate and CRL
Full
Full Policy
CRL Processing
Basic Policy
Basic
OCSP Response Processing
  • Path Validation
  • Select one from four hierarchical
  • Selection based on product capability

24
Functional Packages Cryptography Related
PKI Credential Management
Key Transfer Encryption
Key Agreement Encryption
Key Transfer Decryption
Sign
PKI Based Entity Authentication
Key Agreement Decryption
Verify
25
Enhancements (made or being made)
  • PKI Based Entity Authentication Functional
    Package
  • Clean up some language and CC dependencies
  • Add trust anchor processing as optional
  • Neither X.509 nor PKIX require it
  • Match issuer and subject DN
  • Verify signature using subject public key and
    parameters (if applicable)
  • Verify validity period
  • EKU application note may go away when MS makes
    changes

26
Enhancements (made or being made)
  • Optional audit functional package
  • Optional because many applications may not
    support auditing, e.g., e-mail client
  • Will cover only PKE specific event
  • Will also cover audit review and protection
  • Some or all of the requirements may be satisfied
    by the environment

27
Enhancements (future)
  • Delta CRL
  • Partitioned CRL (??)
  • Support for SCVP and/or OCSP v2 (??)

28
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com