Title: PKE PP Mike Henry
1PKE PPMike Henry
Jean Petty Entrust CygnaCom
Santosh Chokhani
2Briefing Contents
- Common Criteria Background
- Goals of PKE PP
- Assumptions
- Approach in Constructing the PP
- Summary of Packages
- Planned Enhancements
3Common Criteria Sponsors
Common to Various Nations Only charter members
shown
4Common Criteria Key Concepts
- Protection Profile (PP)
- Specification of Security Requirements at what
level
- Implementation and product neutral
- Security Target (ST)
- Specification of Security Features at what and
how level
- Implementation and product specific
Target of Evaluation (TOE) Products Evaluated
against ST
5Common Criteria Standard Specification
Part 1 Introduction PP and ST Contents and For
mats
Part 2 Security Functional Requirements
Select from these for PP and/or ST
Can extend the requirements
Part 3 Security Assurance Requirements
Select from these for PP and/or ST
Can extend the requirements
6Common Criteria Standards Other Documents
- Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM)
- PP Evaluation Standard
- ST Evaluation Standard
- TOE Evaluation Standard
Guide to Writing PP and ST
7Common Criteria Part 2 Part 3 Hierarchy
Part 2 or 3
.
Class
....
Family
Component
....
....
Element
8Common Criteria Part 2 (functional) Classes
Comm
User Data Protection
Crypto
Audit
TSF Protection
IA
Security Management
Privacy
TOE Access
Trusted Path
Resource Utilization
9Common Criteria Part 3 (assurance) Classes
Delivery Operation
Development
Configuration Management
Guidance Documents
Vulnerability Assessments
Life-Cycle Support
Tests
Note CC also packages assurance requirements in
7 hierarchical packages called Evaluation Assuran
ce Levels (EAL)
10Common Criteria PP Contents
TOE Description
Introduction
Assumptions Threats Organizational Security Poli
cies
Security Environment
drives
Security objectives for TOE Security objectives f
or environment
Security Objectives
drives
Functional Assurance
Security Requirements
Rationale
11Common Criteria Functional Package Contents
Security objectives
drives
Functional Security Requirements
Rationale
12Common Criteria Evaluation Model
PP Evaluation (Internal)
ST Evaluation
(Internal Against PP Optional)
TOE Evaluation
(against ST)
13Project Goals
- Develop a tool for security evaluation of broad
range (all possible!!!) PKE applications in
Marine Corps
- PKI based cryptographic services vary from
application to application
- PKE toolkits have varying degree of functionality
for certification path validation logic
- Accommodate a variety of algorithms
- DoD Class 3
- Fortezza Class 4
- KMI
- Future enhancements
14Assumptions
- Need to accommodate COTS products with varying
degree of path validation capability
- PKI based security mechanisms will vary from
application to application
- Provide ability to evaluate OCSP and CRL
- Extend the CC for certification path validation
and other items
- Access control components are not appropriate for
certification path validation
- Existing CC components not appropriate for CRL
and OCSP response processing
15Challenge Balancing Act
Product Realities Current Implementations Variet
y of Solutions
Planned Enhancements Security Optional Features
16Challenge Requirements and Capability
Increasing Security, Functionality, etc.
Examples No trust anchor processing.F
ull trust anchor processing No policy processing
.Full policy processing
17Solutions
Use functional packages as needed
Example Policy processing
Use assignment operation for SFR to provide
additional granularity (Example trust anchor
processing)
18Approach
- Use functional packages to permit ST author to
select appropriate
- PKI based cryptographic mechanisms
- Certification path validation capability
- Revocation checking
- Certification path validation rules
- Non-procedural
- Attempt to preserve X.509 input, processing,
output
- Policy calculation all in output
19Approach Environmental Assumptions
- Cryptographic Module
- Protects private keys
- May protect trust anchors
- Performs cryptography
- Secure Computing and OS
- Protects keys and data
- Provides audit capability
- Protects audit logs
- Optional
20Approach
- Use mandatory functional package for PKI
Credentials
- Required to accommodate cases where cryptographic
module does not manage trust anchors
- Can be met by
- application, or
- environment
- OS, or
- Cryptographic module
21Approach
- Public Key Based Cryptographic Services
- Encryption
- Authentication
- Integrity
Association
Path Validation Engine
Need for
PKI Cryptographic Functional Packages
22Approach Handling Lack of Current Revocation
Information
- Ability to specify acceptance of certification
path in case of no revocation information or old
revocation information
- Past experience shows that flexibility may be
needed to provide
- Configurability
- User interaction
23Functional Packages Certificate and CRL
Full
Full Policy
CRL Processing
Basic Policy
Basic
OCSP Response Processing
- Path Validation
- Select one from four hierarchical
- Selection based on product capability
24Functional Packages Cryptography Related
PKI Credential Management
Key Transfer Encryption
Key Agreement Encryption
Key Transfer Decryption
Sign
PKI Based Entity Authentication
Key Agreement Decryption
Verify
25Enhancements (made or being made)
- PKI Based Entity Authentication Functional
Package
- Clean up some language and CC dependencies
- Add trust anchor processing as optional
- Neither X.509 nor PKIX require it
- Match issuer and subject DN
- Verify signature using subject public key and
parameters (if applicable)
- Verify validity period
- EKU application note may go away when MS makes
changes
26Enhancements (made or being made)
- Optional audit functional package
- Optional because many applications may not
support auditing, e.g., e-mail client
- Will cover only PKE specific event
- Will also cover audit review and protection
- Some or all of the requirements may be satisfied
by the environment
27Enhancements (future)
- Delta CRL
- Partitioned CRL (??)
- Support for SCVP and/or OCSP v2 (??)
28Questions