Title: Weak Lensing
1Weak Lensing
- Pan-STARRS Seminar Series
- Nick Kaiser, IfA, U. Hawaii
- Dec 12th, 2004
2Outline
- Overview Goals of WL
- The standard model for cosmology
- Background model
- Theory of structure formation
- Probes of large-scale structure
- Galaxy-clustering CMB bulk flows WL
- Applications of WL
- Implications for Pan-STARRS
3Overview Goals of WL
- WL is the distortion of shapes (and sizes) of
distant galaxies (the cosmic wallpaper) by
intervening mass structure - Potent probe of mass distribution on a wide range
of scales (10kpc - 100Mpc) - Goals
- Constrain cosmological parameters
- Evolution of clusters
- Geometrical tests
- Test theories of structure formation
- Statistics of large-scale structure
4WL Movie
5Cosmological background model
- Inflation
- Early dynamics dominated by a relativistic scalar
field (the inflaton) ? - Analogous to electromagnetic vector field A?
(also bosonic) - Field is defined by its potential V(?)
- Might just be a mass term m?2, or self
interaction ??4 - Initial conditions (chaotic inflation)
- Finite region with large ?, small ???and ?? /?t
- Expanding da /dt 0
- ?slow roll inflation a exp(Ht) with H, H2
G? constant - Reheating
- Decay of energy in the inflaton field to ordinary
matter - ? radiation era ? matter era ? late-time
inflation?
6Cosmological structure formation
- Zero point fluctuations ? ??, ?? /?t ???
- A region with ?? 0 will undergo more inflation
and will end up with larger volume - ? spatial curvature fluctuations
- Constancy of conditions during inflation ?
scale invariant spectrum of curvature
fluctuations (fractal-like) - At end of inflation, curv. Fluctuations are
frozen in on super-horizon scales - Fluctuations re-enter horizon as density
fluctuations - Curvature peculiar Newtonian gravitational
potential - Post-inflation evolution depends on scale
- Small scale ? re-enter horizon in rad era ?
acoustic oscillations in baryon/plasma fluid,
stagnation of DM growth - Large scales grow continuously preserving initial
spectrum - Critical scale is horizon size at zeq
super-cluster scale
7Inflationary cosmology predictions
- Big, old, spatially flat Universe
- Specific predictions for the nature and spectrum
of density fluctuations (seeds for structure
formation) - Gaussian fluctuations (random phases)
- (Nearly) scale invariant fluctuations on large
scales - Detailed form (tilt) depends on scalar
potential - break at zeq horizon scale
- Sub zeq horizon spectrum depends on
- matter content, ?m ?rad, ??
- Matter type - cold, warm DM etc
8Probes of cosmological structure
- Galaxy Clustering
- Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy
- Bulk Flows
- Weak Lensing
9Galaxy clustering
- Measure P(k) (or ?(r)) directly from galaxy
distribution - Low-z redshift surveys (SDSS, 2df)
- In projection as w???from angular surveys
- Moderate z redshift surveys (e.g. DEEP) ?
evolution of structure - Problem of bias
- Different galaxy types are known to cluster
differently on small scales - Clusters are rich in early type galaxies
- Clusters have anomalously large clustering ?(r)
10Semi-analytic galaxy formation
- Semi-analytic galaxy formation theory
- MPA group
- Early type (low star formation rate) galaxies
reside in densest regions
11CMB anisotropy
- Large-scales
- Gravitational redshift ?T/T 1/3 ????G??/R
- Direct map of curvature/Newtonian potential
perturbations - Small-scales
- Acoustic oscillations (Doppler peaks)
- Sensitive to matter content
- Probe of conditions around decoupling
- Later for very large scales
12Bulk Flows
- Growth of density perturbations ???????a(t)
implies departures from pure Hubble expansion - ?? ?v2 constant ??v?v G?M/R ???v HR ????
- Measuring H is hard, measuring ?H is very hard
- Can only be measured locally ??large cosmic
(a.k.a. sampling) variance
13Weak Lensing
- In weak gravity, effective refractive index is
n1-2?? - For a single blob of size R the deflection
angle is ??????G?M/Rc2 - The deflection is not directly measurable, but
the gradient of the deflection is - this is
called the (image) shear ? - For 1 blob this is ?1 ??/? G?M D/R2c2
(H2RD/c2) ????, where D is the distance. - Similar to the velocity perturbations ?v/v for D
c/H - However, we generally have N D/R such blobs
along the line of sight, so the rms effect is - ? (H2 R1/2 D3/2 / c2) ????
14Applications of WL
- Mass distribution (and Mass vs Light) on
supercluster scales - Extended haloes of early type galaxies vs CDM
theory - Cosmic shear variance
- Equivalent to power-spectrum measurements
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Mass vs Light (early type galaxies)
18(No Transcript)
19Boxes mass Circles light Early type
galaxies trace the mass
20Mass vs Light in MACS Clusters
- MACS cluster sample
- SUBARU/SUPRIME imaging
- Donovan thesis
- Relation between mass and light distributions?
- Can we use Lx as a proxy for mass?
21MACS Cluster Sample(Harald Ebeling)
22(No Transcript)
23MACSJ2243mass contours over light
24MACSJ2243tangentialshear surface density
profiles
25Light vs Mass in MACSJ2243
26Masses of early type haloesfrom the UH 8K survey
27Early-type halo mass profile
28- Cosmic Shear ca 04/00
- 4 groups
- Good agreement at small scales
- UH results lower at large angles
29Combo-17(Brown et al)
30CTIO-75
31WL with Pan-STARRS
- WL will surpass current surveys (e.g. CFHT-LS) by
orders of magnitude in area coverage - All sky (30,000 sq deg) ecliptic plane (7,000
squ deg) surveys - Cosmic variance for P(k) will be greatly reduced
- Thousands of mass selected clusters - ?m, ??
- Selected medium deep field will allow higher
order moments, evolutionary tests - WL is usually systematics limited
- Correction for (generally color, position
dependent) anisotropic PSF - PS will take many, many short exposures and
combine these - Each galaxy will be observed under range of
conditions (telescope orientation, position on
focal plane) - Systematics can be either measured and corrected
for (if deterministic) or will average down like
root(N) (if not)
32The End