Weak Lensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Weak Lensing

Description:

Different galaxy types are known to cluster differently on small scales ... Each galaxy will be observed under range of conditions (telescope orientation, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: nickk4
Category:
Tags: galaxy | lensing | weak

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Weak Lensing


1
Weak Lensing
  • Pan-STARRS Seminar Series
  • Nick Kaiser, IfA, U. Hawaii
  • Dec 12th, 2004

2
Outline
  • Overview Goals of WL
  • The standard model for cosmology
  • Background model
  • Theory of structure formation
  • Probes of large-scale structure
  • Galaxy-clustering CMB bulk flows WL
  • Applications of WL
  • Implications for Pan-STARRS

3
Overview Goals of WL
  • WL is the distortion of shapes (and sizes) of
    distant galaxies (the cosmic wallpaper) by
    intervening mass structure
  • Potent probe of mass distribution on a wide range
    of scales (10kpc - 100Mpc)
  • Goals
  • Constrain cosmological parameters
  • Evolution of clusters
  • Geometrical tests
  • Test theories of structure formation
  • Statistics of large-scale structure

4
WL Movie
5
Cosmological background model
  • Inflation
  • Early dynamics dominated by a relativistic scalar
    field (the inflaton) ?
  • Analogous to electromagnetic vector field A?
    (also bosonic)
  • Field is defined by its potential V(?)
  • Might just be a mass term m?2, or self
    interaction ??4
  • Initial conditions (chaotic inflation)
  • Finite region with large ?, small ???and ?? /?t
  • Expanding da /dt 0
  • ?slow roll inflation a exp(Ht) with H, H2
    G? constant
  • Reheating
  • Decay of energy in the inflaton field to ordinary
    matter
  • ? radiation era ? matter era ? late-time
    inflation?

6
Cosmological structure formation
  • Zero point fluctuations ? ??, ?? /?t ???
  • A region with ?? 0 will undergo more inflation
    and will end up with larger volume
  • ? spatial curvature fluctuations
  • Constancy of conditions during inflation ?
    scale invariant spectrum of curvature
    fluctuations (fractal-like)
  • At end of inflation, curv. Fluctuations are
    frozen in on super-horizon scales
  • Fluctuations re-enter horizon as density
    fluctuations
  • Curvature peculiar Newtonian gravitational
    potential
  • Post-inflation evolution depends on scale
  • Small scale ? re-enter horizon in rad era ?
    acoustic oscillations in baryon/plasma fluid,
    stagnation of DM growth
  • Large scales grow continuously preserving initial
    spectrum
  • Critical scale is horizon size at zeq
    super-cluster scale

7
Inflationary cosmology predictions
  • Big, old, spatially flat Universe
  • Specific predictions for the nature and spectrum
    of density fluctuations (seeds for structure
    formation)
  • Gaussian fluctuations (random phases)
  • (Nearly) scale invariant fluctuations on large
    scales
  • Detailed form (tilt) depends on scalar
    potential
  • break at zeq horizon scale
  • Sub zeq horizon spectrum depends on
  • matter content, ?m ?rad, ??
  • Matter type - cold, warm DM etc

8
Probes of cosmological structure
  • Galaxy Clustering
  • Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy
  • Bulk Flows
  • Weak Lensing

9
Galaxy clustering
  • Measure P(k) (or ?(r)) directly from galaxy
    distribution
  • Low-z redshift surveys (SDSS, 2df)
  • In projection as w???from angular surveys
  • Moderate z redshift surveys (e.g. DEEP) ?
    evolution of structure
  • Problem of bias
  • Different galaxy types are known to cluster
    differently on small scales
  • Clusters are rich in early type galaxies
  • Clusters have anomalously large clustering ?(r)

10
Semi-analytic galaxy formation
  • Semi-analytic galaxy formation theory
  • MPA group
  • Early type (low star formation rate) galaxies
    reside in densest regions

11
CMB anisotropy
  • Large-scales
  • Gravitational redshift ?T/T 1/3 ????G??/R
  • Direct map of curvature/Newtonian potential
    perturbations
  • Small-scales
  • Acoustic oscillations (Doppler peaks)
  • Sensitive to matter content
  • Probe of conditions around decoupling
  • Later for very large scales

12
Bulk Flows
  • Growth of density perturbations ???????a(t)
    implies departures from pure Hubble expansion
  • ?? ?v2 constant ??v?v G?M/R ???v HR ????
  • Measuring H is hard, measuring ?H is very hard
  • Can only be measured locally ??large cosmic
    (a.k.a. sampling) variance

13
Weak Lensing
  • In weak gravity, effective refractive index is
    n1-2??
  • For a single blob of size R the deflection
    angle is ??????G?M/Rc2
  • The deflection is not directly measurable, but
    the gradient of the deflection is - this is
    called the (image) shear ?
  • For 1 blob this is ?1 ??/? G?M D/R2c2
    (H2RD/c2) ????, where D is the distance.
  • Similar to the velocity perturbations ?v/v for D
    c/H
  • However, we generally have N D/R such blobs
    along the line of sight, so the rms effect is
  • ? (H2 R1/2 D3/2 / c2) ????

14
Applications of WL
  • Mass distribution (and Mass vs Light) on
    supercluster scales
  • Extended haloes of early type galaxies vs CDM
    theory
  • Cosmic shear variance
  • Equivalent to power-spectrum measurements

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Mass vs Light (early type galaxies)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Boxes mass Circles light Early type
galaxies trace the mass
20
Mass vs Light in MACS Clusters
  • MACS cluster sample
  • SUBARU/SUPRIME imaging
  • Donovan thesis
  • Relation between mass and light distributions?
  • Can we use Lx as a proxy for mass?

21
MACS Cluster Sample(Harald Ebeling)
22
(No Transcript)
23
MACSJ2243mass contours over light
24
MACSJ2243tangentialshear surface density
profiles
25
Light vs Mass in MACSJ2243
26
Masses of early type haloesfrom the UH 8K survey
27
Early-type halo mass profile
28
  • Cosmic Shear ca 04/00
  • 4 groups
  • Good agreement at small scales
  • UH results lower at large angles

29
Combo-17(Brown et al)
30
CTIO-75
  • 75 sq deg
  • Jarvis et al

31
WL with Pan-STARRS
  • WL will surpass current surveys (e.g. CFHT-LS) by
    orders of magnitude in area coverage
  • All sky (30,000 sq deg) ecliptic plane (7,000
    squ deg) surveys
  • Cosmic variance for P(k) will be greatly reduced
  • Thousands of mass selected clusters - ?m, ??
  • Selected medium deep field will allow higher
    order moments, evolutionary tests
  • WL is usually systematics limited
  • Correction for (generally color, position
    dependent) anisotropic PSF
  • PS will take many, many short exposures and
    combine these
  • Each galaxy will be observed under range of
    conditions (telescope orientation, position on
    focal plane)
  • Systematics can be either measured and corrected
    for (if deterministic) or will average down like
    root(N) (if not)

32
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com