NEW STAFF SELECTION SYSTEM DPI 30 May 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NEW STAFF SELECTION SYSTEM DPI 30 May 2002

Description:

Why system is introduced, how it fits in ... job profile (GJP)data bank facilitates preparation of vacancy announcements ... Case by case examination of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: cms9
Learn more at: https://www.un.org
Category:
Tags: dpi | new | selection | staff | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NEW STAFF SELECTION SYSTEM DPI 30 May 2002


1
NEW STAFF SELECTION SYSTEMDPI30 May 2002
2
Introduction
  • Best known features of new system
  • Selection decisions will be made by HoD
  • Mobility
  • Not so well known features
  • Checks Balances monitoring accountability
  • Benefits
  • Why system is introduced, how it fits in
    Secretary-Generals vision

3
Introduction
  • Subjects to be covered
  • Features of prior and new systems
  • Central Review bodies
  • Checks and balances underlying principles,
    supporting mechanisms, and automated tools
  • External monitoring and accountability mechanisms
  • Benefits of the system
  • Relationship with HR reform and SGs vision
  • Some practical suggestions, including mobility

4
FEATURES OF THE NEW SELECTION SYSTEM
5
NEW SYSTEM
PRIOR SYSTEM
Managers set ad hoc evaluation criteria (often
late in the process)
6
NEW SYSTEM
PRIOR SYSTEM
One candidate recommended
Head of Department/Office selects from list of
candidates
  • Mobility is ad hoc
  • Mobility is managed
  • post occupancy time limit on all posts
  • all posts available first for lateral moves
  • link to promotion and career development

7
NEW SYSTEM
PRIOR SYSTEM
Paper based system
Web-based automated support tool allows for
application and selection to be undertaken
online promotes consistency and timely processing
  • Average selection
  • decision takes 275 days
  • Multiple features reduce time required to reach
    selection decision - should be no longer than 120
    days

8
CENTRAL REVIEW BODIES
  • Review process of staff selection
  • Main functions
  • Consider the evaluation criteria submitted by the
    department or office to ensure that they are
    objective, related to the functions of the post
    and reflect the relevant competencies.
  • Pre-approval of the evaluation criteria is
    essential before evaluation of the candidates may
    begin.

9
CENTRAL REVIEW BODIES
  • Main functions (contd)
  • Review the process and determine that the
    selection is in compliance with the pre-approved
    evaluation criteria.

10
REVIEWING THE PROCESS
  • The CR bodies determine the process has been
    complied with by considering the following
  • The proposed selection is reasoned and
    justifiable based on the pre-approved evaluation
    criteria

11
REVIEWING THE PROCESS (contd)
  • The record indicates no mistake of fact, law or
    prejudice which could have prevented a full and
    fair consideration of the requisite qualification
    and experience of the candidates
  • Certification by the head of department/office
    that the proposal has taken into account the
    Organizations overall HR objectives with respect
    to geography and gender balance.

12
DETERMINATIONS BY CR BODIES
  • Here are two possible scenarios of what can
    happen
  • Scenario One
  • The CR bodies are satisfied with the integrity of
    the process
  • The Head of the Department makes final selection

13
DETERMINATIONS BY CR BODIES (contd)
  • Scenario Two
  • The CR bodies are not satisfied that the
    evaluation criteria were properly applied and
    that the applicable procedures were followed
  • The CR bodies consult with the Programme Manager
    or Head of the Department to seek clarification
  • If satisfied with the explanation, then it
    follows the actions listed in scenario one
  • If not satisfied with the explanation, it submits
    its views to the Department of Management for
    further review and final decision

14
Accountability Mechanismschecks balances
  • Within the system
  • CRB process
  • Evaluation criteria reviewed up front
  • GJP accessible to all staff
  • Withdrawal of delegation when process not
    followed
  • Training HoDs, Programme Managers, CR bodies
  • Automated systems enhance transparency
    consistency, monitoring, speed-up process

15
Accountability Mechanismschecks balances
(contd)
  • External to the new selection system, but
    integral to HR management
  • HR action plans including gender and geography
    targets
  • Heads of Departments compact with
    Secretary-General
  • Accountability Panel

16
HR action plans
  • Facilitates mainstreaming HR as management
    function among managers and supervisors
  • Reviews HR situation in every department
    (vacancy, PAS, training, stuck staff,
    staff-management relationship)
  • Sets agreed quantifiable targets (geography,
    gender GA mandate)
  • Dovetails into annual compact between USGs and
    the Secretary-General

17
The driving forces
  • Secretary-Generals vision
  • Empowered and responsible staff and managers
  • Member States
  • Faster recruitment
  • Geography and Gender
  • Accountability
  • HoD
  • Selection decision
  • Right staff at the right time
  • Staff
  • Transparency
  • Fairness
  • Equitable opportunity

18
An Integrated Programme of HR Reform
10 Building Blocks
A MORE PRODUCTIVE, FLEXIBLE AND RESULTS ORIENTED
UN
Streamlined Rules Procedures
HR Planning
Recruitment Placement Promotion
Mobility
Contractual Arrangement
Administration of Justice
Performance Management
Conditions of Service
19
Benefits for Member States
  • Responsibility and accountability lines defined
  • Efficiency enhanced
  • Faster recruitment
  • Mobile, versatile staff

20
Benefits for Staff
  • Managed mobility
  • GJPs clarify job expectations and requirements
  • Incentive to learn and develop personal skills
    and competencies
  • Elimination of seniority-in-grade requirements
  • Improved career opportunities
  • Networking in occupational networks

21
Benefits for Staff (contd)
  • Possibility to come back from mission service at
    SPA level, if selected for an advertised post at
    that level
  • Possibility to legitimize an organization-wide
    status for those with contracts limited to a
    particular organizational unit
  • More transparency status of cases available
    on-line
  • Broader perspective/global belonging

22
Practical suggestions
  • All staff are required to move periodically
    start planning before 1 May 2007
  • Lateral move Move to a different position at
    the same level.
  • The new position may be
  • - in the same or in another department or
    office,
  • - in the same or in a different duty station,
  • - in the same or in a different occupational
    group.
  • - in another organization of the United Nations
    common system.

23
Practical suggestions (contd)
  • Review compendium of vacancies regularly.
    Apply early because
  • Lateral move 15-day-point
  • Promotion 30-day point
  • All candidates 60-day point
  • Vacancies will be posted at http//jobs.un.org
  • To prepare for different jobs, check out GJP to
    see what is required
  • Use PAS discussion for development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com