Title: 1
1Credit EssentialsNCSHAWashington DCJanuary 2008
2Background
- Tax Reform Act of 1986
- Section 42 of IRC of 1986
- Housing Program in the Tax Code
- Statute Amended Several Times, Including 2000
- Objective to Provide Investor Equity
- Credit is a Dollar-for-Dollar Tax Reduction
3Calculating Credits/Defining Terms
- Applicable Percentage Times Qualified Basis
Annual Credit Amount
4Applicable Percentage
- Two Credits
- 70 Percent Present Value Credit
- Also Known as the 9 Credit
- 30 Present Present Value Credit
- Also Known as the 4 Credit
- December 2007 Credit Rates
- 8.03 (9) 3.44 (4)
- Lock-in Election
54 New Construction/Substantial Rehab Credit
- Federally Subsidized
- Building Receives Tax Exempt Bonds or Below
Market Federal Loan - Below Market Federal Loan
- Interest Rate Below AFR (Long term annual rate is
4.72 in December 2007) - From Federally Appropriated Funds
6Exceptions From Federally Subsidized Definition
- HOME Loan if 40 at 50 Targeting
- Community Development Block Grants
- Loan is Subtracted from Eligible Basis
- Section 8 and Section 9 rent subsidies
- NAHASDA of 1996
74 Acquisition Credit
- Existing Buildings/Acquisition Costs
- Purchase from Unrelated Party
- Ten Year Rule
- Waiver of Ten Rule from Treasury
- Certain Placements in Service Ignored
- Carryover Basis
- Acquired from Decedent
8Acquisition credit (cont)
- Placement in Service by Governmental Unit or
Non-Profit Entity - Foreclosures
- Technical termination of partnership
9Substantial RehabilitationRequirement
- Greater of
- 3,000 per Low-Income Unit or 10 of Adjusted
Basis - Separate New Building
- Can Get 9 Credit on the Rehabilitation Plus 4
Credit on Acquisition if Rehab is not Federally
Subsidized
10Basis Calculations
- Start with calculation of Eligible Basis,
thencalculate Qualified Basis
11Eligible Basis
- New Construction Adjusted Basis
- Acquisition Acquisition Cost
- Substantial Rehab Capitalized Rehab
Expenditures - Must Subtract Federal Grants
- 130 Increase in QCTs and DDAs
12Qualified Basis
- Applicable Fraction Times Eligible Basis
- Applicable Fraction is the Lower of
- Number of Occupied Low-Income Units vs. Total
Units or - Floor Space Fraction
- Calculated building by building
13Example Of Tax Credit Calculation
- 100 Unit Project/70 Low-Income Units
- TDC (Including Land) 5.5M
- Land Cost 500K
- Eligible Basis 5.0M
- Qualified Basis 3.5M (5.0M x 70)
14Calculation (cont)
- Applicable Percentage 8.12(Not Federally
Subsidized) - Annual Credit 284,200 (3.5M x 8.12)
- 10 Year Credits 2,842,000
15Equity Calculation
- Pricing Primarily Based on Total Amount of 10
Year Credits Available to Investor and Market
Conditions - Expressed as Cents Per Tax Credit Dollar
- In Above Example, if Investor Will Pay 92 Cents
Per Tax Credit Dollar, Equity Equals 2,614,379
(2,842,000 x 99.99 x 92)
16Compliance Monitoring
- State Credit Agencies Monitor Projects
- Owners Recordkeeping Requirements
- Number of Low-Income Total Units
- Income certifications/Annual Re-certifications
Backup Verifications - Qualified Eligible Basis Amounts
- Rent Amounts
- Owner Annual Compliance Certifications
17Low Income Units
- Threshold Election of
- 20 of Units at 50 of Area Median Income or
- 40 of Units at 60 of AMI
- Election Upon Placement in Service
- Must Meet Minimum by End of 1st Credit Year
- HUD Publishes Area Income Figures Annually
18(Continued)
- Adjustments for Family Size like Section 8
- Family of 4 Qualifies at 60 (50) AMI
- Family of 3 Qualifies at 54 (45) AMI
- Family of 2 Qualifies at 48 (40) AMI
- Single Household Qualifies at 42 (35) AMI
19Rent Restricted
- Rent (including utilities) Cannot Exceed 30 of
Qualifying Income For Assumed Family Size, Based
on Bedrooms Per Unit - Occupancy Assumptions
- One Person for Studio
- 1.5 Persons per Bedroom
20Rent Calculation Example
- Median Income 50,000
- Two Bedroom Unit
- 3 Person (2 BR x 1.5) Income Limit 27,000
- 30 of Income Limit 8,100
- Monthly Rent (1/12) 675
21Additional Rent Rules
- Rent Limits Change Annually with Publication of
New Area Median Incomes - Rent Will Not Decrease Below Original Floor
- Gross Rent Does Not Include Section 8 (or Similar
Rent Subsidies) - Gross Rent Must Include Utility Allowance for
Tenant-Paid Utilities (i.e., Deduct from Rent to
Owner)
22Continued Compliance
- 15 Year Compliance Period
- Continued Tenant Qualification
- 40 Increase Above Eligibility OK
- Vacant Units/Over-Income Units OK if Next
Available Unit Rule Followed
23Recapture
- Recapture on Non-Compliance
- Accelerated Portion Recaptured (1/3 of Credit 1st
10 Years, Decreasing Through Year 15) - If Minimum Set-Aside Fails, All Accelerated
Credits Recaptured - Otherwise, Unit-by-Unit (Extent of Decrease in
Qualified Basis)
24Recapture
- Recapture on Change of More Than 1/3 in Ownership
or Sale of Project - Bond Posting Procedure
- New Owner Steps into Sellers Shoes Upon Sale of
Project
25Extended Use
- Recorded Extended Use Commitment
- Extended Use Period
- At Least 30 Years, May be Longer to Gain Points
under the State QAP - Termination
- Upon Foreclosure
- Qualified Contract
26Qualified Contract
- State to Find Buyer If Requested by Owner After
14th Year Pursuant to Qualified Contract - Contract
- Outstanding Debt
- Adjusted Investor Equity
- Other Capital Contributions, Less
- Cash Distributions
27Qualified Contract (cont)
- Adjusted Investor Equity Initial Investor
Equity to Project Inflated by COLA (up to 5) - If no Buyer Found Within 1 Year, Property May be
Sold or Converted to Non-Low-Income Housing,
Subject to 3 Year Vacancy Decontrol
28State Allocation Volume Limit
- In 2007 the cap per resident in the state is
1.95. - Adjusted annually for inflation
- The 2007 minimum is 2,275,000 for Small States
29Volume Limit Rules
- Example
- State With 2M Population has 3.9M in Credits in
2007 - Amount is for 1 Year of Credit
- 10 Non-Profit Set-Aside
- 50 Test Tax-Exempt Bonds Subject to Bond Volume
- No Credit Allocation Needed
30Qualified Allocation Plans
- State Must Adopt QAP to Allocate Credits
- QAP Must Set Forth Allocation Priorities
- QAP Must Give Preference to Projects with
- Lowest Income Tenants
- Longest Period of Low-Income Use
- Contributing to a Concerted Revitalization Plan
in a QCT
31Additional QAP Rules
- QAP Must Provide Procedure for Notifying IRS of
Non-Compliance - Bond Financed Projects Must Satisfy QAP
32Project Evaluation
- Credit May Not Exceed Amount State Agency
Determines is Necessary For Feasibility and
Viability - Agency Must Consider
- Sources and Uses of Funds
- Amounts Expected to be Generated by Tax Benefits
(Equity for Credits) - Reasonableness of Development and Operating Costs
33Project Evaluation (cont)
- Evaluation Occurs at Application, Allocation and
Completion - Owner Must Certify as to Amount of Subsidies
- For Tax-Exempt Bond Financed Projects, Issuer
Must Do Similar Evaluation - Agency Must Require Market Study Paid for by
Developer
34State Allocation Process
- Carryover Allocations
- 10 of Reasonably Expected Basis Must be
Incurred by 12/31 of Allocation Year or 6 Months
After Allocation, if Allocation After 7/1 - Building Must be Placed in Service by 12/31 of
2nd Year After Carryover - Carryover Basis Includes Costs of Land and
Depreciable Property
35Carryover Allocation Document
- Must be Issued by State Agency by 12/31 of
Allocation Year - 10 Elements Required in Document
- Agency Must Later Issue Forms 8609 After
Buildings Complete - State May Carry Forward Unused Credits for 1
Year Then Goes to National Pool
36Structure
SYNDICATOR GP
INVESTOR LP
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LP
LOCAL GP
DEVELOPER
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
37Key Business Terms
- Projects Generally Owned by Limited Partnership
or Limited Liability Company - LP Generally Owns Between 99--99.99 of Tax
Credits, Losses Profits - LP Pays in Capital Contributions in Multiple
Installments (generally 3 or 4), Based on
Negotiated Benchmarks - GP Guarantees Completion, Amount of Credits and
Funding of Deficits
38Who Can Use Credits?
- Individuals Limited Under Passive Loss Rules to
Approximately 8,750/Year - C Corporations Can Use Losses and Credits Against
Ordinary Income and Taxes - Cannot Use Credits Against AMT
- Limitations on Closely-Held Corporations