Title: Performance Review
1Performance Review
2Goal
- Select a company to outperform the Nasdaq during
the period of October 2 through November 27 - Considerations
- BBY Best Buy Co., Inc.
- CHK Chesapeake Energy Corp.
- UNH UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
- JBLU Jetblue Airways Corp.
- PLA Playboy
- CAKE Cheesecake Factory
3Choice - Best Buy (BBY)
- Best Buy was selected for the following reasons
- Holiday Season
- Market Leader
- PS3 and Wii Release
- Prior NASDAQ Performance
- Best Buy Performance vs. NASDAQ
4Business Description
- Retail Electronics Market Leader Since1996
- Operates 1,100 retail stores
Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Company
5An Industry Innovator
- Compensation Structure
- Facing Commoditization
- Customer-Centricity Operating Model
6Competitive Strategy
- Best Buys competitive strategy is comprised of
six components - Conversions of Traditional Stores
- Store Expansion
- Small Business Growth
- Computer Services and Home Theater Installations
- Digital Services
- International Growth
7Sustainability
- New Competition
- Physical uniqueness
- Economic deterrence
- Existing Competition
- Ease of imitation
- Continued addition of new services
- International growth
8Risk Analysis
- New Technologies
- Customer Centricity strategy execution
- Consumer spending
- Execution of Best Buy for Business, Geek Squad,
and Magnolia Home Theater focus areas
9Risk Analysis
- New Technologies
- Long term demand for CDs and DVDs likely to fade
10Risk Analysis
- Customer Centricity execution risk
- First 32 stores showed 7 increase in Sales
- Goal to provide less cyclical results and gain
more stable relationships with high-value clients
- If remaining stores lag that rollout rate,
earnings will be negatively affected - While transitioning, there are two models and
therefore costs
11Risk Analysis
- Consumer spending
- Mortgage Equity Extraction
- People drawing equity out of homes to finance
consumption - Competitor Sales
- Sales by competitors erodes profits for BBY
- Gaming systems are 1/3 of BBY Entertainment SW
sales - During 2005, new gaming systems were 25 of
gaming sales. - Expecting 60 this year with new offerings
- After new launch, peak sales occur during second
holiday season, not the first
12Risk Analysis
13Risk Analysis
- Execution of Best Buy for Business, Geek Squad,
and Magnolia Home Theater focus areas - Risk comes from two areas
- Competition Circuit City, Walmart, Target, etc.
- Cost containment Geek Squad training, overhead
integration, etc.
14Time Frame Concerns
- Short Term (Day Trading)
- Advantages
- News, Rumors, Releases
- Prediction Strategies
- Quick Turnaround
- Disadvantages
- Greater Risk
- Large Capital Necessary
- High Commissions/Taxes
- Long Term
- Advantages
- Stability
- Predictability of Performance
- Lower Commissions/Taxes
- Disadvantages
- Lower ROI
- Neither (2 month, with set deadlines)
- Advantages
- ???
15Exxon (XOM) Example5 Years Prior to October 2,
2006
- Overall positive trend
- No splits
- Based on 20/share starting price annual gains
of approximately 22 - Outside of dip between Spring 2002 and Summer
2003, stock is fairly consistent with gains - Approximately 3-4 expected average return for 2
months
16Exxon (XOM) Example2 Month Time Frames
- Price increased nearly 50 over past 1 year (56
to 74) - There are approximately 4 months worth of time
during that year that a 2 month investment would
have lost money despite the overall success of
the time frame
17Market on Open Impact for BBY
- Historic Impact at Market on Open
- BBY 20ADV 6,890,050 shares
- MOO 20ADV 88,565 shares
- 100,000 BBY _at_ 53.56 - 1,867 shares
- Impact - 2.11 of MOO
- Minimal to No Impact
- Actual Impact at Market on Open
- Actual MOO on 10/2 46,700
- Impact - 4.00 of MOO
- Minimal to No Impact
18Example MOO Impact for PLA
- Historic Impact at Market on Open
- PLA 20ADV 192,995 shares
- MOO 20ADV 7,700 shares
- 100,000 PLA _at_ 9.48 - 10,549 shares
- Impact - 137 of expected MOO shares
- Significant Impact
- Actual Impact at Market on Open
- Actual MOO on 10/2 3,900
- Impact - 270 of MOO
- Significant Impact
19BBY - 5 Years Prior to Oct 2, 2006
- Upward Price Channel from February, 2004 to
Present - October 2003 to May 2005
- Support at 30/share (demand exceeding supply)
- Resistance at 42/share (supply exceeding demand)
- May 2005 to Present
- Previous resistance becomes new support at
42/share
201 Year Prior to October 2, 2006
- Gain of approximately 29 (4-5 expected return
over 2 months) - Support at 44/share level (demand exceeding
supply) - Resistance Zone between 56/share and 58/share
- September 12 positive BBY earnings report
- Early July poor electronics news (WMT, TGT),
Mid-East tensions pushes oil higher, markets
lower - July 16 - Downgrade by A.G Edwards (Buy to Hold)
- Discounting July - early September, support is
at 50/share level
213 Months Prior to October 2, 2006
- Prior to September 12th earnings call
- Support Zone between 44/share and 45/share
- Early July poor electronics news (WMT, TGT)
- July 12 - Upgrade by Matrix Research (Hold to
Buy) - July 16 - Downgrade by A.G Edwards (Buy to Hold)
- July 18 - Upgrade by Prudential (Neutral to
Overweight) - Post September 12th earnings call
- positive BBY earnings report takes stock from 45
to 56 - September 12 - Raymond James reaffirms Strong Buy
(imagine that) - Support at 54/share level
22BBY vs. NASDAQ5 Years Prior to October 2 ,2006
- BBY increases 150 (3.1 Bi-Monthly)
- NASDAQ (IXIC) increases 50 (1.3 Bi-Monthly)
23BBY vs. NASDAQ1 Year Prior to October 2 ,2006
- BBY increases 25 (3.8 Bi-Monthly)
- NASDAQ (IXIC) increases 5 (0.8 Bi-Monthly)
241 Year Ending November 27, 2006
- Support at 44/share level (demand exceeding
supply) - Resistance Zone between 56/share and 58/share
- Early July poor electronics news (WMT, TGT),
Mid-East tensions pushes oil higher, markets
lower - September 12 positive BBY earnings report
253 Months Ending November 27, 2006
- Actual gain from MOO October 2, 2006 to MOC
November 27, 2006 is 1.51 - Support Zone between 52/share and 54/share
- Resistance Zone between 56/share and 58/share
- Early July poor electronics news (WMT, TGT)
- July 12 - Upgrade by Matrix Research (Hold to
Buy) - July 16 - Downgrade by A.G Edwards (Buy to Hold)
- July 18 - Upgrade by Prudential (Neutral to
Overweight) - September 12 positive BBY earnings report takes
stock from 45 to 56
26BBY vs. CC
- Very similar performance
- Oct 9th Nov 13th CC is able to maintain 4-5
over BBY - Lead eventually disappears November 15, 2006
- BBY continues to trend upward while CC stays
fairly flat
27Actual Performance
- From MOO on October 2, 2006 until MOC on November
27, 2006 Best Buy Co. Inc gained 1.51 while the
NASDAQ (IXIC) gained 6.60 - 100,000 investment in BBY would have returned a
gain of 1,512 - 100,000 investment in the NASDAQ would have
returned 6,597 - Conclusion Team 6 would now be looking for a
new job.
28Alternative Pick Performance
- Investment across six initial picks yielded 13.7
return
29Q A