Measuring Student Perceptions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Student Perceptions

Description:

Classes: Marketing Management, Services Marketing, Principles of Marketing ... Recommended for future classes (mkt mgt) ... in what classes CBLs are ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: christin201
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Student Perceptions


1
Measuring Student Perceptions
  • The Community is Our Classroom
  • What students get from Community Based Learning
    activities

2
Community Based Learning
  • Business faculty have often shied away from
    service learning activities, commenting on
    whats serving soup in a kitchen have to do with
    (fill in the blank course topic)?
  • Staff and Faculty chose Community-Based Learning
    activities as a way to help students not only
    connect what they are learning in the textbook
    with real life,

3
(No Transcript)
4
Comparison
5
Areas of Examination
  • Men/Women Learning
  • Employment
  • Volunteerism
  • Previous Academic Experience w/Experiential
    Learning
  • Key Subjects Benefits, Skill sets, Career
    Preparation and Marketing Content Reinforcement

6
Methodology
  • Surveying 2006-present
  • Classes Marketing Management, Services
    Marketing, Principles of Marketing
  • Series of activities developed for each text
    books material. Students completed an activity
    per unit/written assignment.
  • End of Semester 50 item survey, Likert Scaled

7
Schedule of Surveys
  • Additional 40 surveys in principles additional
    35 in Services coming 4/28

8
Demographics
  • Male/Female 45.9/36.6
  • 2.9 African American
  • 14.6 Hispanic
  • 3.4 Asian
  • 4.9 Other
  • 35.1 Seniors
  • 46.8 Juniors
  • 4.4 Sophomores
  • 40 Marketing Majors
  • 12 Communication Arts
  • 12 Double Majors Mkt and Mgt

9
Experience
  • Employed 73.2
  • Average length 29 months,
  • 18 more than 4 years.
  • Range of hours worked 5-50 hours weekly
  • Average 22 hrs/weekly
  • 21 of students reported working 30 hrs/wkly
  • Non-paid Work 45.9
  • Length of time 9.6 months.
  • 8.7 more than 24 months
  • 3 more than 48 months.
  • Range 1-50 hours weekly
  • Average 5.76
  • 6 more than 20 hours/wkly
  • 49.8 of students reported they have completed
    academic projects that have contributed to their
    skill sets.

10
Gender
  • Reason to believe there would be differences
  • Literature
  • Previous research in client based projects, self
    marketing plans and internships did show
    statistically significant differences.

11
Hypothesis Group 1 Gender Based Differences
  • 1 Would one gender derive different benefits
    than the other gender?
  • 1a How men and women value client-based projects
    in the area of employer-requested skill set
    development.
  • 1b Would be differences between how men and
    women value community based learning projects in
    the area of career preparation.
  • 1c Would be differences between how men and
    women value community based learning projects in
    the area of marketing class content.

12
Group 1 Results
  • No statistically significant differences.

13
Employment Based Differences
  • Reason to believe there would be differences
  • Previous research in client based projects, self
    marketing plans and internships did show
    statistically significant differences.

14
Group 2 Employment Based Differences
  • 2 There would be differences between employed
    and non-employed students and how they value
    community based learning projects in the area of
    benefits.
  • 2a in the area of employer-requested skill set
    development.
  • 2b in the area of career preparation.
  • 2c in the area of marketing class content.

15
Group 2 Results
  • No statistically significant differences

16
Group 3 Unpaid Work Experiences
  • Reason to believe there would be differences
  • Previous research in client based projects, self
    marketing plans and internships did show
    statistically significant differences.

17
Group 3 Unpaid Work Experience
  • 3 Students who have volunteered or acted in an
    unpaid capacity, such as an internship, would
    benefit differently in their community based
    project experiences.
  • 3a .. employer-requested skills than their
    non-volunteering counterparts.
  • 3b in the area of career preparation.
  • 3c how each group saw class content reinforced
    in their community based learning projects.

18
Group 3 Results
  • No statistically significant differences

19
Group 4 Experiential Education
  • Reason to believe there would be differences
  • Previous research in client based projects, self
    marketing plans and internships did show
    statistically significant differences.

20
Group 4 Experiential Education
  • 4 Differences between students who have
    completed academic projects that contribute to
    their career skill sets, and those who have not,
    and how they derived benefits from their
    community based projects
  • 4a in the area of employer-requested skill set
    development.
  • 4b projects in the area of career preparation.
  • 4c in the area of marketing class content.

21
Group 4 Results
  • No statistically significant differences

22
Group 5 Course Comparisons
  • 5 differences between students in different
    marketing courses and how they perceived benefits
    from the community based learning projects.
  • 5a in the area of employer-requested skill set
    development.
  • 5b in the area of career preparation.
  • 5c in the area of marketing class content.

23
H5 Results
  • Principles of marketing students-
  • enjoyed completing the CBLs (mkt mgt)
  • the assignment would influence their career
    choices (mkt mgt/svcs)
  • More complete self marketing effort (mkt
    mgt/svcs)
  • Recommended for future classes (mkt mgt)
  • H5 Partially supported Principles students
    seemed to experience more benefits than marketing
    management, and somewhat more than services.

24
H5a Results
  • No statistically significant differences
  • H5a Not supported There was no difference
    between students in different courses improved
    their career skills through the Community Based
    Learning activities.

25
5b Results
  • Principles of Marketing students
  • Felt more confident in their marketing knowledge
    as a result of completing the project (mkt mgt)
  • H5b Partially supported Principles students
    seemed to experience slightly more career
    preparation benefits than marketing management,
    but no difference than services.

26
5c Results
  • Principles of Marketing students felt they
    understood
  • Pricing (mkt mgt)
  • Place (mkt mgt)
  • Promotions concepts (mkt mgt/svcs)
  • Segmentation (mkt mgt)
  • Strategy (mkt mgt/svcs)
  • IMC (mkt mgt)
  • Marketings role in the org (mkt mgt)
  • Marketings relationship w/other departments
    (mkt mgt)
  • Ethical Issues in marketing (mkt mgt/svcs)
  • H5c Supported Principles students seemed to
    experience more course content reinforcement than
    marketing management, and somewhat more
    reinforcement than services.

27
So what do we know?
  • Community Based Learning activities possibly
    better in intro classes or in specialized classes
    where there is no other competing activity.
  • Good for reinforcing content use other
    experiential activities to help reinforce career
    related skills or career preparation.

28
Recommendations
  • Start planning early.
  • Make the activities reflect student/ faculty
    interests
  • Explain to students that experiential learning
    isnt more its just different
  • Be selective in what classes CBLs are implemented
  • Draw clear connections between the activities,
    the course content and students lives
  • Listen be willing to revise activities based on
    feedback.

29
Thank you for the opportunity!
  • Chris McCale cmccale_at_regis.edu
  • 720-338-4202
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com