1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

1

Description:

PVt = PV of target (stand alone) PVa = PV of acquiring firm (stand alone) ... 56% are the target of some form of control activity. Boards not so effective in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: andyt4
Category:
Tags: target

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 1


1
Market for Corporate ControlFinance 7311
2
Terminology
  • Target
  • Potential takeover candidate
  • Acquirer (Bidder)
  • Firm doing the taking over
  • Merger
  • Friendly combination of two firms
  • Tender Offer (Hostile Takeover)
  • Opposed by target management

3
Terminology, cont.
  • Leverage Buyout
  • Takeover in a highly leveraged transaction
  • Advantages
  • Concentrates ownership in fewer hands
  • Takes cash out of management hands
  • Tax advantage of debt
  • Disadvantages
  • Effect of economic downturn

4
Terminology, cont.
  • Management Buyout
  • Same as LBO, except existing management is major
    shareholder
  • Proxy Contest
  • Voting by S/H on major corporate transactions
  • Restructuring
  • Significant change in allocation of corporate
    resources
  • Current management stays on

5
Defensive Tactics
  • Methods used by management to avoid being taken
    over
  • Poison Pill
  • White Knight
  • Greenmail
  • Just Say No
  • Supermajority Voting
  • Courts OK if only one bidder

6
Selecting and Valuing a Target
  • Business Plan or Objective
  • Vertical Integration
  • Excess Capacity
  • Product Distribution
  • Distribution Product
  • (Time Warner Paramount)
  • Strategic Enter a new market for example
  • Diversification (Later)

7
Valuation
  • PVt PV of target (stand alone)
  • PVa PV of acquiring firm (stand alone)
  • PVc PV of combined firm
  • TP tender price

8
Synergy Value Created
  • PVc - (PVa - PVt) Total Synergy
  • NPV of acquisition to acquiring firm
  • PVc - (Pva PVt) - (TP - PVt)
  • total synergy - synergy to target

9
Synergy
  • Sources of Synergy?
  • Economies of Scale in
  • Production
  • Distribution
  • Management/Administration
  • Strategic
  • Management better allocation of resources

10
Calculation of Synergy
  • Estimate combined cash flows and subtract sum
    of the parts
  • Estimate the change in cash flows
  • Must identify the source of value

11
Acquisition
  • What is reflected in Targets current price?
  • Value as is
  • Value with expected changes (current mgmt)
  • Value in play
  • How much of a change in control premium is
    already reflected in price?

12
Acquisition
  • Acquirer must offer a Premium to induce S/H to
    tender
  • Must bid less than total value (Neg NPV)
  • Do other Bidders exist? Is source of value
    generic or specific?
  • Provision of information to market
  • If value highest to you, you can win

13
Acquisition, cont.
  • Strategy Bid high enough to deter potential
    bidders, but low enough to retain value
  • Avoid Winners Curse
  • Target
  • Defensive Tactics

14
Motives or Reasons
  • Corporate Raiding
  • Raider buying company for less than value
  • Premiums average 30
  • Creation of Monopoly Power
  • Hard to test others should benefit
  • Wealth Transfer from other parties
  • Not much evidence
  • Taxes May support economics

15
Motives, cont.
  • Market Inefficiency
  • Firm is Undervalued by Market
  • Information to market
  • Unsuccessful takeovers
  • Target value goes back to preoffer price
  • No perm. Reevaluation of firm
  • Value created in combination

16
Diversification
  • Reduce Risk - may obtain better terms and/or
    better relationships from
  • Employees
  • Suppliers
  • Customers
  • Analagous to too much debt before
  • Management - much human risk and human capital
    tied up in firm S/H?

17
Diversification Evidence
  • Comment Jarrell (95 JFE)
  • Firm performance is increasing in firm focus
  • Lang Stulz (94 JPE)
  • Firms diversify when growth opportunities within
    industry exhausted
  • Such diversification does not benefit S/H

18
Diversification Evidence
  • Berger Ofek (95 JFE)
  • Compare stand-alone value of diversified firm
    segments to specialized firms
  • Diversified firm worth 13 - 15 less than sum of
    stand alone components
  • Day (95 JFE)
  • Examines motives for risk reduction

19
Day, cont.
  • Firms pursue equity variance reducing activities
  • Higher levels of personal wealth in firm
  • More years invested w/ firm
  • The poorer previous performance
  • CEO specialists invest in similar specialties

20
Performance Changes
  • Dennis Denis (95 JFE)
  • Turnover
  • Forced
  • Normal
  • Forced Operating Income/Assets decreases in 3
    years prior increases following
  • Normal Little difference prior small
    improvement afterward

21
Dennis Dennis, cont.
  • Forced resignations are rare
  • 68 preceded by active monitoring by large s/h,
    b/h or potential acquirers
  • 56 are the target of some form of control
    activity
  • Boards not so effective in isolation
  • Modern Trend Outside Directors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com