Possible Development of CDM in the Post2012 Regime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Possible Development of CDM in the Post2012 Regime

Description:

To achieve emission reduction targets at lower economic cost ... Consistence with the process of policy and measure formulation. Technology CDM ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: del582
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Possible Development of CDM in the Post2012 Regime


1
Possible Development of CDM in the Post-2012
Regime
  • DUAN Maosheng
  • Tsinghua University
  • Beijing, Nov. 19, 2007

2
Outlines
  • Why CDM/flexible mechanisms
  • Proposals on future development of CDM
  • Main considerations under these proposals
  • Possible way forward

3
Why CDM/flexible mechanisms
  • To achieve emission reduction targets at lower
    economic cost
  • Environmental effects and integrity, not economic
    or any other concern, should always be the first
    consideration
  • Flexible mechanisms, in whatever forms, should
    always follow this principle
  • Flexible mechanisms may be used only when
    necessary and really help to solve the problem
  • Principles established by the convention should
    not be compromised

4
Proposals on future development of CDM
  • Sectoral crediting mechanism (sectoral CDM)
  • Benchmark crediting projects with emissions
    below the benchmark without further additionality
    test
  • No-lose target no penalty in case of higher
    emissions and trade in case of lower emissions
  • Cap-and-trade
  • Policy CDM crediting emission reduction policy
    and measures
  • Technology CDM crediting selected technologies
    without additionality test technology transfer
    and CERs transfer

5
Sectoral CDM
  • Benchmark
  • Similar to current CDM rules, while no
    additionality test
  • Crediting activities and no linkage with cap for
    the whole sector
  • Setting of the benchmark is crucial while
    difficult
  • Suitable for sectors with homogeneous products
  • No-lose target
  • Arbitrary targets and not necessarily reflection
    of efforts
  • Difficulties in aspects of data collection,
    quantification of individual efforts and
    incentives, etc.
  • Cap-and-trade
  • A type of targets and no linkage with CDM

6
Policy CDM and Technology CDM
  • Policy CDM
  • Additionality test of policies and measures
  • Quantification of emission reduction
    considerations
  • Consistence with the process of policy and
    measure formulation
  • Technology CDM
  • Promotion of technology transfer and emission
    reduction efforts
  • Risk reductions for both sides of CER
    transactions
  • Additionality assurance through identification of
    real qualified technologies and setting of
    baselines
  • Promotion of additional emission reduction
    efforts through underlying certainty

7
Main considerations under these proposals
  • Transaction cost
  • Distribution issue
  • Mobilization of investment for emission reduction
    efforts
  • Catalyzing technologies
  • Competence concern
  • Further reduction of compliance cost
  • Broader and deep involvement

8
Possible way forward
  • Sectoral approaches could be a useful attempt for
    broader involvement when very carefully designed
  • Sectoral approaches themselves do not necessarily
    assure the participation of developing countries
    as some major concerns of developing countries
    are not addressed automatically
  • Pledge and review may further limit the
    participation possibility of developing countries
  • Technical difficulty, such as data availability,
    verification possibility and related capacity,
    could be further major barriers

9
Possible way forward
  • Major emitting sectors should be chosen
  • Sectors with homogeneous products should be the
    first choice
  • Public and timely availability and verification
    possibility of data as well as cost should be
    considered
  • Electric power sector, iron and steel sector,
    cement sector, etc. could be possible choices
  • Different approaches maybe suitable for different
    sectors

10
Possible way forward
  • Developing countries have been making mitigation
    efforts very actively through CDM
  • Underlying economic incentives could be an
    impetus for small developing countries, but not
    for large countries
  • No political risks as well as additional
    financial and technical assistance could be an
    option for enhancing developing countrys
    mitigation efforts
  • The demonstration of leadership and feasibility
    by developed countries should be helpful for
    developing countries further involvement

11
Thanksduanmsh_at_mail.tsinghua.edu.cn 86 10 6277
2596
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com