For%20Whom%20The%20Booth%20Tolls - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

For%20Whom%20The%20Booth%20Tolls

Description:

Model Consistency. Total Wait Times. For Two Lanes. Minimum at n = 4. For Three Lanes ... Consistency. Simplicity. Flexibility. Weaknesses: No closed form ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: ITS8297
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: For%20Whom%20The%20Booth%20Tolls


1
For Whom The Booth Tolls
Brian CamleyPascal GetreuerBrad Klingenberg
2
Problem
Needless to say, we chose problem B. (We like a
challenge)
3
What causes traffic jams?
  • If there are not enough toll booths, queues will
    form
  • If there are too many toll booths, a traffic jam
    will ensue when cars merge onto the narrower
    highway

4
Important Assumptions
  • We minimize wait time
  • Cars arrive uniformly in time (toll plazas are
    not near exits or on-ramps)
  • Wait time is memoryless
  • Cars and their behavior are identical

5
Queueing Theory
  • We model approaching and waiting as an MMn
    queue

6
Queueing Theory Results
  • The expected wait time for the n-server queue
    with arrival rate ?, service ?, ? ?/?

This shows how long a typical car will wait - but
how often do they leave the tollbooths?
7
Queueing Theory Results
  • The probability that d cars leave in time
    interval ?t is

This characterizes the first half of the toll
plaza!
What about merging?
8
Merging
9
Simple Models
  • We need to simply model individual cars to show
    how they merge

10
Nagel-Schreckenberg (NS)
  • Standard rules for behavior in one lane
  • Each car has integer position x and velocity v

11
NS Behavior
12
NS Analytic Results
  • Traffic flux J changes with density c in inverse
    lambda

J
c
13
Analytic and Computational
14
Empirical One-Lane Data
Empirical data from Chowdhury, et al.
Our computational and analytic results
15
Lane Changes
  • Need a simple rule to describe merging

This is consistent with Rickert et al.s two-lane
algorithm
16
Modeling Everything
17
Model Consistency
18
Total Wait Times
19
For Two Lanes
20
For Three Lanes
21
Higher n is left as an exercise for the reader
  • Its not always this simple - optimal n becomes
    dependent on arrival rate

22
The case n L
23
Conclusions
  • Our model matches empirical data and queueing
    theory results
  • Changing the service rate doesnt change results
    significantly
  • We have a general technique for determining the
    optimum tollbooth number
  • n L is suboptimal, but a local minimum

24
Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • Consistency
  • Simplicity
  • Flexibility
  • Weaknesses
  • No closed form
  • Computation time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com