MEASUREMENT ISSUES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

MEASUREMENT ISSUES

Description:

Assumes stable construct (Trochim: Fig. 3-19 on p. 67) Parallel-Forms Reliability ... CONSTRUCT VALIDITY. Example - Goal Commitment Scale ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: fisherbu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MEASUREMENT ISSUES


1
MEASUREMENT ISSUES
  • I. INFORMATION GATHERING
  • II. MEASUREMENT
  • III. RELIABILITY
  • IV. VALIDITY
  • V. OTHER ATTRIBUTES

2
Gathering Information
  • What to look for
  • Hypotheses Variables
  • Whats known?
  • Anything missing?
  • Measures
  • How Operationalized
  • Reliability/Validity evidence
  • Sources of data

3
Gathering Information
  • What to look for
  • Where to look
  • Using what you find

4
MEASUREMENT
  • Nature of Measurement

5
MEASUREMENT
  • Levels of Measurement
  • Nominal
  • Ordinal
  • Interval
  • Ratio

6
Level of Analysis
  • Is the variable of interest an individual, team,
    or company (etc.) phenomenon?
  • Examples
  • Individual - Pay satisfaction, Turnover
    intentions, Product knowledge
  • Team - Norms, Cohesion, Decision quality,
  • Company - Climate, Turnover rate, Market share

7
RELIABILITY
  • Nature
  • Observed Score
  • True Score Error

8
Sources of Error
  • Respondent
  • Administrator
  • Conditions
  • Coder/Scorer
  • Attribute

9
RELIABILITY
  • Nature
  • Sources of Error
  • Systematic vs. Random Error

10
Random Error

(Trochim Fig. 3-7 on p. 61)
11
Systematic Error

(Trochim Fig. 3-8 on p. 62)
12
Test-Retest Reliability
  • Stability over time
  • Assumes stable construct

(Trochim Fig. 3-19 on p. 67)
13
Parallel-Forms Reliability
  • Stability across forms

(Trochim Fig. 3-20 on p. 67)
14
Split-Half Reliability
  • Consistency within a measure

(Trochim Fig. 3-23 on p. 69)
15
Split-Half Example
  • Navigation Dimension of Socialization Scale
  • 12. I have learned how to effectively deal with
    the bureaucracy or red tape in the MLHR
    program.
  • 15. I know how to act and behave in the MLHR
    program.
  • 16. I have not learned what it really takes to
    get ahead in the MLHR program. (R)
  • 22. I have learned the unwritten rules in the
    MLHR program for how to stay in good standing.
  • 25. I know what is expected of me in the MLHR
    program beyond my performance in classes.
  • Correlation of even items with odd items

16
Estimating Reliability
  • Cronbachs Alpha Reliability
  • Like the average of all possible split-half
    correlations.
  • Calculated as

17
Alpha Examples
  • SCALE ALPHA
  • Goal Commitment
  • Socialization
  • People
  • Navigation
  • Language
  • Engagement
  • Work Motivation
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Turnover Intentions

18
Inter-Rater Reliability
  • Consistency across observers

(Trochim Fig. 3-18 on p. 66)
19
What is Reliable Enough?
20
VALIDITY
  • To what extent do your inferences or conclusions
    reflect the truth?
  • Are you measuring the right thing?
  • Its better to measure the right thing with some
    error than to perfectly measure the wrong thing.

21
(No Transcript)
22
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY
  • Can we generalize to the constructs?

(Trochim Fig. 3-1 on p. 53)
23
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY
24
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY
  • Example - Goal Commitment Scale
  • Across multiple studies, settings, samples,
    the scale has consistently been shown to be
  • Reliable (alpha test-retest)
  • Related to its expected causes
  • Related to its expected effects
  • Unrelated to unexpected effects

25

CRITERION-RELATEDVALIDITY
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Observed Relationship
Observation
What you test
26
CRITERION-RELATEDVALIDITY
27
CRITERION-RELATEDVALIDITY
28
CRITERION-RELATEDVALIDITY
29
CONTENT VALIDITY
30
CONTENT VALIDITY
31
VALIDITY
32
CASE - Phonemin Co.
  • How was reliability estimated?
  • Are the tests reliable enough?
  • How were thy validated?
  • Are the tests valid enough?
  • Limitations to keep in mind?

33
Internal Validity
  • How confident are we that the conclusions reached
    in this study reflect the truth? Given our
    research design and measures, how confident are
    we in our results?
  • Did the independent variable variable cause the
    dependent variable or are there potential
    alternative explanations?

34
External Validity
  • How confident are we that the conclusions reached
    in this study would also be true in other
    contexts?
  • Can we generalize our findings to other persons,
    places, settings and times?

(Trochim Fig. 2-2 on p. 28)
35
OTHER ATTRIBUTES
  • NORMS
  • LEGALITY
  • RESPONDENT REACTIONS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com