Pair Density Wave in the Pseudogap State - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Pair Density Wave in the Pseudogap State

Description:

STM can see the Cooper pairs directly! Conclusion ... Pair-Density-Wave is consistent with STM experiments. STM can see the Cooper pairs directly! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: shouche
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pair Density Wave in the Pseudogap State


1
Pair Density Wave in the Pseudogap State of High
Temperature Superconductors
Handong Chen(Stanford) Oskar Vafek(Stanford) Ali
Yazdani(UIUC) Shoucheng Zhang(Stanford)
APS March Meeting Montreal, March 23 2004
2
Theoretical Motivation
  • For a superconductor with low superfluid
    density and short coherence length,
    superconductivity can be destroyed without
    breaking the hole pairs.
  • The insulating hole pair crystal states can
    occur at commensurate fractional occupation
    numbers. In these states, the translation
    symmetry is spontaneously broken and the new unit
    cell has integral number of pairs.

H.D. Chen, S. Capponi, F. Alet and S.C. Zhang,
cond-mat/0312660
3
Hole pair crystal vs hole crystal
  • For hole crystal, there is 1 hole per unit cell.
    If the unit cell is L x L, the doping is
  • x1/(L x L).
  • For hole pair crystal, there is 1 hole-pair (2
    holes) per unit cell. If the unit cell is L x L,
    the doping is x2/(L x L).

x 1/8 L 4
H.D. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89
137004(2002). H.C. Fu et al.,
cond-mat/0403001
4
Hole pair crystal vs hole crystal
  • For hole crystal, there is 1 hole per unit cell.
    If the unit cell is L x L, the doping is
  • x1/(L x L).
  • For hole pair crystal, there is 1 hole-pair (2
    holes) per unit cell. If the unit cell is L x L,
    the doping is x2/(L x L).

x 1/16 L 4
H.D. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89
137004(2002). H.C. Fu et al.,
cond-mat/0403001
5
STM
  • STM conductance map measures real space LDOS
    r(r,E)
  • Fourier transformation of r(r,E)
  • The FT of LDOS was first studied by Hoffman et
    al1.
  • It was argued that the energy dependence of
    r(q,E) can be used to identify the ordering that
    breaks translational symmetry2.
  • 1 J. E. Hoffman et al., Science 295, 466
    (2002).
  • 2 D. Podolsky et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 094514
    (2003).
  • C. Howald et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 014533
    (2003).

6
STM results
Vershinin et al, Science Feb. 12 (2004).
cond-mat/0402320 Hanaguri et al, submitted to
Nature (2004) See also, J. E. Hoffman et al.,
Science 295, 466 (2002) and C. Howald et al.,
Phys. Rev. B 67, 014533 (2003).
7
STM Theorems for the mean field BCS/pair density
wave state
  • Assuming particle-hole symmetry and the pseudogap
    state being dominated by classical
    (time-independent) phase fluctuations, we show
    that
  • for pair-density-wave with wavevector Q
  • for charge-density-wave of holes with wavevector
    Q

Note particle-hole symmetry breaking does not
change the results qualitatively.
H.D. Chen, O. Vafek, A. Yazdani and S.C. Zhang,
cond-mat/0402323
8
Energy dependence of ?(Q,E)
H.D. Chen, O. Vafek, A. Yazdani and S.C. Zhang,
cond-mat/0402323
9
Comparison with experiments
  • Pair-density-wave is consistent with BSCCO
    experiments.
  • The (2p/4.7a,0) peak picks up intensity when the
    pseudogap opens
  • There is a p phase difference at high energy for
    atomic peaks and supermodulation peaks.
  • There is no p phase difference at high energy for
    the new non-dispersive peak at (2p/4.5a,0)
  • Pair-density-wave is consistent with recent NCCOC
    experiment.
  • The periodicity of the new peak is commensurate
    4a x 4a, first predicted theoretically in H.D.
    Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 137004(2002).
  • The (2p/4a,0) peak is even function of energy.
  • The extra peak at (32p/4a,0) still needs to be
    understood.

10
Comparison with experiments
  • Pair-density-wave is consistent with BSCCO
    experiments.
  • The (2p/4.7a,0) peak picks up intensity when the
    pseudogap opens
  • There is a p phase difference at high energy for
    atomic peaks and supermodulation peaks.
  • There is no p phase difference at high energy for
    the new non-dispersive peak at (2p/4.5a,0)
  • Pair-density-wave is consistent with recent NCCOC
    experiment.
  • The periodicity of the new peak is commensurate
    4a x 4a, first predicted theoretically in H.D.
    Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 137004(2002).
  • The (2p/4a,0) peak is even function of energy.
  • The extra peak at (32p/4a,0) still needs to be
    understood.

11
Conclusion
  • Hole pair crystal is a natural competing state to
    a superconductor with low superfluid density and
    short coherence length.
  • For real doping x
  • the periodicity of hole pair crystal is
  • the periodicity of hole crystal is
  • ?(Q,E) is even for pair-density-wave and odd for
    charge-density-wave of holes
  • The width of (2p/4a,0) peak in Q-space increases
    as one moves away from the 1/8 filling.
  • Pair-Density-Wave is consistent with STM
    experiments. STM can see the Cooper pairs
    directly!

12
Conclusion
  • Hole pair crystal is a natural competing state to
    a superconductor with low superfluid density and
    short coherence length.
  • ?(Q,E) is even for pair-density-wave and odd for
    charge-density-wave of holes.
  • The width of (2p/4a,0) peak in Q-space increases
    as one moves away from the 1/8 filling.
  • Pair-Density-Wave is consistent with STM
    experiments. STM can see the Cooper pairs
    directly!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com