SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELFCONTROL AND SOCIAL COOPERATION

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELFCONTROL AND SOCIAL COOPERATION

Description:

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELF-CONTROL AND SOCIAL COOPERATION ... ADDICTS PLAY A SELF-CONTROL AS IF IT WERE A SOCIAL COOPERATION GAME. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: UAB

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELFCONTROL AND SOCIAL COOPERATION


1
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELF-CONTROL
AND SOCIAL COOPERATION
  • IMPLICATIONS FOR AN ACCOUNT OF ADDICTION
  • BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 2007

2
RULES OF PRISONERS DILEMMA GAME
  • 1. IF YOU CHOOSE Y YOU GET 100 TIMES N
  • 2. IF YOU CHOOSE X YOU GET 100 TIMES N 300
  • 3. N THE NUMBER OF PLAYERS WHO CHOOSE Y

3
PRISONERS DILEMMA
4
ALCOHOLICS DILEMMA(Primrose Path)
5
DIMENSION OF SOCIAL SPACE SOCIAL COOPERATION
PROBLEMDIMENSION OF TIME SELF-CONTROL PROBLEM
6
HYPERBOLIC DELAY DISCOUNTING
7
HYPERBOLIC SOCIAL DISCOUNTING
8
  • HYPERBOLIC DELAY DISCOUNTING
  • HYPERBOLIC SOCIAL DISCOUNTING

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
  • Instead of a one-dimensional maximizing entity,
    or even the two-dimensional individual who
    allocates intertemporally, this model envisages a
    three-dimensional surface with an interpersonal
    distance dimension replacing the concept of
    altruism.
  • The conceptual framework employed here obviates
    the age-old question about whether an act of
    giving by one individual to another should
    properly be labeled altruism, or whether
    instead one is really being selfish by making
    oneself feel good. An individuals discount
    weights vis-à-vis other individuals may be
    considered a full description of the individual
    in this connection, assuming that the
    individuals behavior corresponds to his or her
    discounts in relation to other individuals. In
    this scheme, there is no place for intentions,
    and hence there are no false intentions. Revealed
    preferences constitute the entire system.
  • Julian Simon, 1995

13
SELF-CONTROL AND ALTRUISM TOGETHER
14
CONTINGENCIES OF THE PRISONERS DILEMMA GAME
15
PRISONERS DILEMMA GAME BOARD
16
REWARDS 1-2-3-4
17
REWARDS 1-2-5-6
18
WHAT THEN IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADDICTS AND
NON-ADDICTS?
  • ADDICTS PLAY A SELF-CONTROL AS IF IT WERE A
    SOCIAL COOPERATION GAME.
  • ADDICTS DEFECT AGAINST THEIR LONG-TERM INTERESTS
    BECAUSE THEIR FUTURE SELVES ARE STRANGERS TO THEM.

19
ONGOING EXPERIMENTS
  • Social discounting with real money.
  • Obtaining relationships and personal
    characteristics for each value of N.
  • Looking for correlations (or their lack) among
    delay discounting, social discounting, and
    smoking.
  • How social discounting correlates with play in
    prisoners dilemma games versus tit-for-tat and
    versus another subject.

20
FUTURE EXPERIMENTS
  • PREDICTING CHOICE OF BOTH DELAYED AND SOCIALLY
    DISTANT REWARDS (AS WHEN PLEDGING TO GIVE TO
    PUBLIC TELEVISION IN THE FUTURE) FROM INDIVIDUAL
    DELAY AND SOCIAL DISCOUNT FUNCTIONS.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)