Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Today

Description:

... incentives towards cooperation, moderation & accommodation ... Conflicts resolved via negotiation and reciprocal cooperation, rather than simple majority rule ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: FLORINN3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Today


1
Today tomorrow
  • 2nd geography test
  • Electoral systems
  • Exam returned discussion
  • Regime type presidential vs. parliamentary
    regimes
  • Federalism (next week) Stepan article
  • http//muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_democracy/
    v010/10.4stepan.html

2
Next exams
  • Changes
  • More multiple choice questions
  • Readings and lectures
  • Movies included in the total grade (no extra
    credit)

3
Definitions
  • Civilization vs. ethnicity
  • Civilization highest cultural grouping short of
    what separates us from other species
  • Kuznets effect inequality increases, then
    decreases
  • Ethnicity no regional component
  • Newly Industrialized Countries vs. Second World

4
Multiple Choice
  • (1) Highest rates of growth
  • Neither mentioned nor true
  • (2) Corrupt form of government by the many
    democracy (see lecture notes)
  • (3) Huntington a conservative critique of
    modernization theory (Handelman, notes)
  • (4) Inglehart survival vs. well-being and
    traditional vs. secular-rational (notes)

5
Multiple Choice
  • (5) While both (a) and (c) may be true, only (b)
    supports Huntingtons thesis
  • Movies
  • (2) The shooting down of the airplane
  • (3) Reducing inequalities

6
Short answers
  • (3) Inglehart modernization 1 2 parts
  • (4) Huntington six reasons discussion
  • E.g., rise of fundamentalism correct, but
    why?
  • (5) Vertical accountability military?
  • Military vs. democratic hierarchy

7
Institutional Design Conflict Management
  • Regime type, electoral system, federalism

8
Institutional design
  • Three philosophies/approaches
  • Majoritarianism
  • Consensualism
  • Centripetalism

9
Three major institutions
  • Electoral system majoritarian or proportional
  • Regime type presidential or parliamentary
  • Territorial division of authority unitary vs.
    federal state

10
Reilly Centripetalism
  • Can democracy survive in divided societies?
  • The politics of outbidding
  • Extremist rhetoric and policies more
    rewarding than moderation

11
Classical model of electoral competition
(economic conflicts)
12
Incentives for moderation
  • Most voters centrists (moderate) position
  • Single-member district, first-past-the-post
    (plurality) elections
  • Two-party competition, with moderate
    candidates/parties vying for the center
  • Does this logic apply for ethnic conflict?

13
Cultural vs. economic conflicts
  • Huntington Cultural characteristics are less
    mutable than political and economic ones
  • Or, what are you? rather than which side are
    you on?
  • What works in a society characterized primarily
    by economic conflicts (left-vs.-right, or
    liberal-vs.-conservative), does not necessarily
    work in a society where the primary conflicts are
    cultural

14
Ethnic/cultural conflict (e.g., Ukraine)
15
Can formal institutions help?
  • What is the nature of ethnic identity?
  • Primordial vs. constructed
  • Divided society
  • Not just (i) ethnically diverse, but also
  • (ii) Ethnicity is a politically salient cleavage
    around which interests are organized for
    political purposes (e.g., elections)

16
Institutionalist claim
  • (Changing) political institutions
  • (Change in) political behavior
  • The design of political institutions is paramount
    in conflict management

17
(Electoral) Institutions
  • Institutions rules and constraints which shape
    human interaction and, as a consequence,
    behavioral incentives
  • Electoral systems
  • ? Some ES encourage hostile and uncooperative
    behavior,
  • ? While others provide incentives towards
    cooperation, moderation accommodation

18
Centripetalism centripetal institutions
  • Centripetal political system centrist, rather
    than extremist, political competition
  • Centripetal institutions designed to encourage
    moderate, centrist forms of political
    competition,
  • rather than polarizing centrifugal patterns

19
The theory of centripetalism
  • Democracy a continual process of conflict
    management
  • Conflicts resolved via negotiation and reciprocal
    cooperation, rather than simple majority rule
  • Cross-ethnic coalitions undermined by the
    dominance of overarching group identities and
    loyalties

20
Creating inter-group accommodation
  • One promising path present political parties and
    candidates with incentives to cooperate across
    ethnic lines
  • Electoral institutions (legislative executive
    elections)
  • Electoral sequences (federal systems)

21
Benefits
  • Encouraging moderate, centrist political
    competition
  • Creation of bargaining arenas reciprocal
    interactions are, in and by themselves, likely to
    facilitate cooperation

22
Centripetalism
  • A normative theory of institutional design
    designed to encourage three related but distinct
    phenomena in divided societies
  • Electoral incentives
  • Arenas of bargaining
  • Centrist, aggregative political parties

23
  • Electoral incentives politicians reach out and
    attract votes from various ethnic groups
  • Arenas of bargaining political actors have an
    incentive to bargain and negotiate
  • Centrist, aggregative political parties seeking
    multi-ethnic support

24
How?
  • Types of electoral systems
  • Outcomes Majoritarian vs. proportional
  • Incentives conflict vs. bargaining
    cross-group appeals
  • Preferential voting

25
Electoral systems
  • How votes are translated into seats
  • Votes
  • Electoral system
  • Seats

26
Choosing the electoral system
  • Two goals
  • (i) Proportionality accurate/fair
    representation
  • (ii) Efficiency choosing a government (a
    government that can govern)
  • (Third goal? Encouraging cooperation?)

27
Tradeoffs
  • Ideally, we would like to have the cake and eat
    it, too maximize both representation and
    efficiency
  • Hard to achieve in practice one tends to come at
    the expense of the other
  • Prioritize and choose accordingly

28
Two types of electoral formulas
  • (i) favor proportionality?
  • Choose proportional representation
  • (ii) favor efficiency/governability?
  • Choose a majoritarian system

29
Electoral systemstwo features
  • District magnitude (M) of representatives
    elected in one district
  • Formula the specific mechanism translating votes
    into seats

30
Majority/plurality systems
  • District magnitude M 1
  • Formula
  • plurality/FPTP (U.S., U.K., India, Papua New
    Guinea - new)
  • majority-runoff (France)
  • alternative vote (Australia, Papua New Guinea -
    old)

31
Proportional systems
  • District magnitude 1 lt M S (assembly size)
  • Formula
  • party list PR (Israel, W Europe)
  • STV (Single Transferable Vote Ireland, Malta)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com