Veblen in the Metropolis: Land Use Proximity in United States Urban Landscapes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Veblen in the Metropolis: Land Use Proximity in United States Urban Landscapes

Description:

Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN. Why no pawn shops in ... 19th century Europe, middle class cult of the family ('domestic ideology' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: frank8
Learn more at: http://capone.mtsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Veblen in the Metropolis: Land Use Proximity in United States Urban Landscapes


1
Veblen in the Metropolis Land Use Proximity in
United States Urban Landscapes
  • E. Anthon Eff
  • Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro,
    TN

2
  • Why no pawn shops in shopping malls?
  • No liquor stores near churches?
  • No adult bookstores near schools?
  • No nursing homes near cemeteries?
  • Tacit rules of land use proximity
  • Avoiding contagion of unlike things
  • Anthropology formation of taboos

3
  • Unconscious preferences ? Tacit rules ?
    Collective action ? Landuse regulations ? Landuse
    associations.
  • Empirical look at landuse associations can give
    sense of these unconscious preferences.
  • Data all parcels in Davidson County, Tennessee
    (Nashville) 216,898 parcels, classified in 77
    landuses.

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
  • Calculate the probability that one land use will
    be adjacent to another.
  • Adjacent two parcels adjacent when borders
    within 70 feet of each other.
  • 216,898 parcels related in 2,397,367 proximate
    parcel pairs.

14
Example of parcel proximity relationships
15
matrix M each cell mij gives the number of times
that a parcel of land use i is proximate to a
parcel of land use j. (M is 77x77, only eight
rows and columns shown)
16
Matrix M can be used to create the transition
matrix P, where each cell pij gives the
probability that a parcel of land use i is
proximate to a parcel of land use j.
(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
17
matrix X each cell xij gives the expected
probability that a parcel of land use i is
proximate to a parcel of land use j.
The expected proximity matrix X can then be
compared with the actual proximity matrix P to
give matrix D D P - X
18
Net Probability D P - X
These net probabilities represent the tacit rules
governing land use associations.
(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
19
From Table 1 7 landuses with highest openness
(all commercial or industrial) and 7 landuses
with lowest openness (all respectable housing or
common area)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Block Modeled Graph
24
  • Summary of tacit rules
  • Single family home on city lot is most isolated
    from other land uses.
  • Residential is isolated from commercial.
  • Lower-status housing (apartments, mobile homes)
    tends to be more associated with commercial or
    rural land uses.

25
  • How do tacit rules of land use associations vary
    across space?
  • Compliance less in low income areas?
  • Compliance less in older areas?
  • Use Jaccard distance (matrix E). For each parcel
    find mean of the distances between its landuse
    and the landuses of adjacent parcels. Call this
    mean distance.

26
Structural Equivalence In order to compare the
similarity between i and j in the pattern of
their associations, one can take the Jaccard
distance between row i and row j of matrix D,
giving matrix E
eij2bij/(1bij)

(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
27
For this parcel, calculate mean of distances
between its landuse and the landuses of adjacent
parcels
28
Map colors Local G z-score for mean distance.
Darkest color is significantly high distance,
lightest color is significantly low distance.
Chart mean distance of parcels along transect.
29
Inner City
30
Subdivisions
31
Subdivisions
32
Inner City
33
Tract means Mean distance for Single Family
Dwellings per Parcel, againstappraised value of
home and against median HH income
34
Tract means Mean distance for Single Family
Dwellings per Parcel, againstpercentage black
and percentage white
35
  • Summary of variation over space
  • Parcels more likely to be adjacent to unlike
    landuses toward city center.
  • Higher income tracts and higher home appraised
    value tracts have homes more isolated from unlike
    landuses.
  • Racial composition appears to have no effect on
    whether homes are adjacent to unlike landuses.
  • Structure and homogeneity of suburbs serve to
    isolate homes from unlike landuses.

36
  • 18th century Europe, emerging capitalist middle
    class, erosion of traditions (Möser, Simmel)
  • Old elite displaced (e.g., guild masters lose
    market to factory owners). Circulation of the
    elite (Pareto)
  • Pecuniary valuations displace traditional values.
  • Paternalistic relationships ? Instrumental
    relationships (e.g., serfs ? wage labor)
  • Fashion cycles intensify work areas move out of
    home to different part of city home separates
    into public and private areas (Braudel)
  • 19th century Europe, middle class cult of the
    family (domestic ideology), centered on home,
    provides new source of meaning (Frykman
    Löfgren)

37
  • Simmel
  • High status seek to differentiate selves from low
    status. Low status seek to emulate high status.
  • High status maintain distinctions through
  • Constant innovation (fashion)
  • Distinctions difficult to emulate (Veblen)
  • Conspicuous consumption to signal status in
    period with rapid change in elite. (home as a
    display good homes public areas filled with
    display goods)
  • Conspicuous leisure as the most potent signal of
    status. (Work areas removed from home. Work moved
    to different quarter of the city)
  • Sumptuary laws

38
  • Sumptuary laws are collective action by high
    status, to maintain differentiation
  • Boundary between status groups is a public good
    (Olson), benefiting all high status.
  • Sumptuary laws important in maintaining boundary
    when emulation relatively easy (location is easy
    to emulate)
  • Cheaters have incentive to help low status
    emulate high status location (chop elite homes
    infill with apartments)
  • Collective action to coerce cheaters landuse
    regulations.

39
  • Summary
  • Most salient separation is between single family
    home on city lot and commercial landuses.
  • This separation based on
  • the use of the home as a signal of status,
    removing from the home all trace of useful work.
  • the domestic ideology family as the focus of
    life, separated from external world
  • Landuse regulations function as sumptuary laws
    maintaining status boundary.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com