Title: Veblen in the Metropolis: Land Use Proximity in United States Urban Landscapes
1Veblen in the Metropolis Land Use Proximity in
United States Urban Landscapes
- E. Anthon Eff
- Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro,
TN
2- Why no pawn shops in shopping malls?
- No liquor stores near churches?
- No adult bookstores near schools?
- No nursing homes near cemeteries?
- Tacit rules of land use proximity
- Avoiding contagion of unlike things
- Anthropology formation of taboos
3- Unconscious preferences ? Tacit rules ?
Collective action ? Landuse regulations ? Landuse
associations. - Empirical look at landuse associations can give
sense of these unconscious preferences. - Data all parcels in Davidson County, Tennessee
(Nashville) 216,898 parcels, classified in 77
landuses.
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13- Calculate the probability that one land use will
be adjacent to another. - Adjacent two parcels adjacent when borders
within 70 feet of each other. - 216,898 parcels related in 2,397,367 proximate
parcel pairs.
14Example of parcel proximity relationships
15matrix M each cell mij gives the number of times
that a parcel of land use i is proximate to a
parcel of land use j. (M is 77x77, only eight
rows and columns shown)
16Matrix M can be used to create the transition
matrix P, where each cell pij gives the
probability that a parcel of land use i is
proximate to a parcel of land use j.
(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
17matrix X each cell xij gives the expected
probability that a parcel of land use i is
proximate to a parcel of land use j.
The expected proximity matrix X can then be
compared with the actual proximity matrix P to
give matrix D D P - X
18Net Probability D P - X
These net probabilities represent the tacit rules
governing land use associations.
(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
19From Table 1 7 landuses with highest openness
(all commercial or industrial) and 7 landuses
with lowest openness (all respectable housing or
common area)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Block Modeled Graph
24- Summary of tacit rules
- Single family home on city lot is most isolated
from other land uses. - Residential is isolated from commercial.
- Lower-status housing (apartments, mobile homes)
tends to be more associated with commercial or
rural land uses.
25- How do tacit rules of land use associations vary
across space? - Compliance less in low income areas?
- Compliance less in older areas?
- Use Jaccard distance (matrix E). For each parcel
find mean of the distances between its landuse
and the landuses of adjacent parcels. Call this
mean distance.
26Structural Equivalence In order to compare the
similarity between i and j in the pattern of
their associations, one can take the Jaccard
distance between row i and row j of matrix D,
giving matrix E
eij2bij/(1bij)
(Eight of 77 rows and columns shown)
27For this parcel, calculate mean of distances
between its landuse and the landuses of adjacent
parcels
28Map colors Local G z-score for mean distance.
Darkest color is significantly high distance,
lightest color is significantly low distance.
Chart mean distance of parcels along transect.
29Inner City
30Subdivisions
31Subdivisions
32Inner City
33Tract means Mean distance for Single Family
Dwellings per Parcel, againstappraised value of
home and against median HH income
34Tract means Mean distance for Single Family
Dwellings per Parcel, againstpercentage black
and percentage white
35- Summary of variation over space
- Parcels more likely to be adjacent to unlike
landuses toward city center. - Higher income tracts and higher home appraised
value tracts have homes more isolated from unlike
landuses. - Racial composition appears to have no effect on
whether homes are adjacent to unlike landuses. - Structure and homogeneity of suburbs serve to
isolate homes from unlike landuses.
36- 18th century Europe, emerging capitalist middle
class, erosion of traditions (Möser, Simmel) - Old elite displaced (e.g., guild masters lose
market to factory owners). Circulation of the
elite (Pareto) - Pecuniary valuations displace traditional values.
- Paternalistic relationships ? Instrumental
relationships (e.g., serfs ? wage labor) - Fashion cycles intensify work areas move out of
home to different part of city home separates
into public and private areas (Braudel) - 19th century Europe, middle class cult of the
family (domestic ideology), centered on home,
provides new source of meaning (Frykman
Löfgren)
37- Simmel
- High status seek to differentiate selves from low
status. Low status seek to emulate high status. - High status maintain distinctions through
- Constant innovation (fashion)
- Distinctions difficult to emulate (Veblen)
- Conspicuous consumption to signal status in
period with rapid change in elite. (home as a
display good homes public areas filled with
display goods) - Conspicuous leisure as the most potent signal of
status. (Work areas removed from home. Work moved
to different quarter of the city) - Sumptuary laws
38- Sumptuary laws are collective action by high
status, to maintain differentiation - Boundary between status groups is a public good
(Olson), benefiting all high status. - Sumptuary laws important in maintaining boundary
when emulation relatively easy (location is easy
to emulate) - Cheaters have incentive to help low status
emulate high status location (chop elite homes
infill with apartments) - Collective action to coerce cheaters landuse
regulations.
39- Summary
- Most salient separation is between single family
home on city lot and commercial landuses. - This separation based on
- the use of the home as a signal of status,
removing from the home all trace of useful work. - the domestic ideology family as the focus of
life, separated from external world - Landuse regulations function as sumptuary laws
maintaining status boundary.