Title: First AllSky Measurement of Muon Flux with IceCube
1First All-Sky Measurement of Muon Flux with
IceCube
- IceCube REU Summer 2008
- Kristin Rosenau
- Advisor Teresa Montaruli
2IceCube Neutrino Telescope
- Located at the geographic South Pole
- Buried beneath roughly 1.5 km of ice, extending
down to 2.5 km. - Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector Array
(AMANDA) was the proof of concept for IceCube - 4,800 Digital Optical Modules (DOMs), or
photomultiplier tubes, are inserted into the ice
on 80 cables referred to as "strings." - Each string holds 60 DOMs.
3IceCube Neutrino Telescope
- Works on the principle of Cherenkov Light
- Muons produced by cosmic rays in the atmosphere
are background for astrophysical searches - Neutrinos cannot be detected directly
- Neutrinos convert into muons inside the Earth
- Earth is used as a filter against background
4IceCube Neutrino Telescope
5Project Objective
- Goal The first all-sky measurement of muon flux
with IceCube. - Muons are a calibration tool for IceCube.
- Unprecedented statistics for these events
- Project Steps
- Initial Cuts (weak)
- Final Cuts (hard)
- Compare IceCube-22 (IC-22) data with Monte Carlo
simulation
6 Ideal Situation
(Horizon)
(Horizon)
7Useful Variables
- Variables with highest degrees of correlation to
the angular resolution (which indicate a quality
parameter) - Sigma Paraboloid
- Direct Length
- Reduced Likelihood
8Effect of Cuts
where ?efficiency
1.5º
1º
9Determining cut parameters based on optimization
10Optimization
Misreconstructed Muons
(Horizon)
Reduction in misreconstructed muons
11Optimization
- The ratio of good events to bad events
70º
70º
12Angular Resolution
Before cuts
After cuts
13Coincident Muons
14Coincident Muons
- The Monte Carlo coincident muon data only saves
the data for one track - Case 1
- The reconstructed track belongs to the correct
true track. - Minimum Zenith Angle Error
- Case 2
- The reconstructed track belongs to the wrong true
track. - Maximum Zenith Angle Error
- Case 3
- The muon is misreconstructed.
15Single vs. Coincident Muons
Effect from muon filtered data
- Coincident Muons compose about 5 of all
downgoing muons.
16Single vs. Coincident Muons
Coincident Muons dominate below the horizon
17Background Suppression
- The following cut parameters were chosen because
they eliminated the misreconstructed muons close
to and below the horizon.
18Background Suppression
quality parameter
before cuts
after cuts
angular resolution
19Single vs. Coincident Muons
Single and coincident muons have been eliminated
past the horizon.
20Coincident Muons
21Optimization
- 1 No Cut
- 2 Minimum Cut
- 3 s_zenlt3
- 4 s_zenlt3 and L_dirgt300m
- 5 s_zenlt3 and L_dirgt300m and L_redlt9 and
N_hitgt7 - 6 s_zenlt3 and L_dirgt300m and L_redlt9 and
N_dirgt7 and Split_psilt.7 and .15lt Line Fit Speed
lt.4 and -.4lt Smoothness lt.4 and N_hitgt7
22Quality Cuts Conclusion
- The initial cuts improved the angular resolution
of the detector while keeping a significant
number of the events. - Although the final cuts were optimized at 3-4,
the less optimal cuts at 6 were chosen because
they eliminated all of the misreconstructed muons.
23IceCube-22 Data
- Minimum Bias Data
- Keeps every 200th event
- Muon Filtered Data
- Keeps all events below 70º because the neutrinos
below the horizon are the focus
24IceCube-22 Data
- The initial cut was applied to the Minimum Bias
Data
- The final cut was applied to the Muon Filtered
Data
25Results
26Results
27In the Future
- The muon flux can be used to compare and contrast
IceCube with other detectors - It will be used extensively in calibration of the
IceCube detector
Desiati P. et al. 2003. Response of AMANDA-II to
Cosmic Ray Muons Universal Academy Press, Inc.
1373-1376
28Acknowledgements
- A special thanks to the following people for all
the advice and help with this project - Patrick Berghaus
- Teresa Montaruli
- Paolo Desiati
- Albrecht Karle
- IceCube Collaboration
- UW-Madison Astrophysics REU Program
- NSF