MAP Results 2006 Fourth Cycle MSIP

1
MAP Results 2006Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Salem R-80 School District
• 1400 Tiger Pride Drive
• Salem, Missouri 65560
• November 3, 2006

2
MAP Results 2006Salem R-80

• Communication Arts
• Math
• Science
• Social Studies

3
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
Comparison
4
Communication Arts 3rd grade5 year trend
5
Communication Arts 7th grade5 year trend
6
Communication Arts 11th grade5 year trend
7
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State Comparison
8
Math 4th grade5 year trend
9
Math 8th grade5 year trend
10
Math 10th grade5 year trend
11

• Disaggregated Data

12
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
ComparisonGender/Female
13
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
ComparisonGender/Male
14
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State
ComparisonGender/Female
15
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State
ComparisonGender/Male
16
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
ComparisonFree/Reduced Lunch
17
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State
ComparisonFree/Reduced Lunch
18
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
ComparisonTitle I
19
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State
ComparisonTitle I
20
MAP 2006Communication Arts District vs. State
ComparisonIn building lt1 year
21
MAP 2006Mathematics District vs. State
ComparisonIn building lt1 year
22
MAP Results - Science2002-2006
23
Science 3rd grade5 year trend
24
Science 7th grade5 year trend
25
Science 10th grade5 year trend
26
MAP Results Social Studies2002-2006
27
Social Studies 4th grade5 year trend
28
Social Studies 8th grade5 year trend
29
Social Studies 11th grade5 year trend
30

• Fourth
• Cycle
• MSIP

31
Fourth Cycle MSIPSource Becky Kemna,
Coordinator 2006 SMCAA Fall Conference

• Resource Standards
• No changes to the resource standards
• Resource standards are evaluated on an annual
  basis and districts are provided with a report of
  resource strengths and concerns on an annual
  basis
• Resource standards on the Items Not Waived
  checklist must be met in order for a district to
  be eligible for a limited or full MSIP waiver

32
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Process
• Customized review depending upon needs of
  district
• Paperwork primarily focus on quality and
  implementation issues
• MSIP reports provide information regarding the
  teams findings
• All districts, regardless of review type (full
  review, limited waiver, or partial waiver),
  receive an MSIP report
• Reviews are coordinated with other DESE program
  areas and accountability system (i.e. priority
  schools, schools in school improvement, etc.)
• Advance questionnaires administered on-line for
  all districts (parent questionnaires are
  available in paper form)

33
How is Salem addressing the process requirements?

• An implemented curriculum is currently being
  developed throughout the district
• Required elements in the implemented curriculum
  for this year include GLE, Objective, and Depth
  of Knowledge
• Administrators have been instructed in the
  research-based Instructional Practices Inventory
  developed by Dr. Jerry Valentine

34
(No Transcript)
35
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Performance
• Performance determines accreditation
• Fourteen performance standards
• Graduation rate replaces dropout rate standard
• Subgroup evaluation of Adequate Yearly Progress
  (AYP) data becomes a new standard
• Bonus points for Closing the Achievement Gap
  will be awarded beginning in 2007 (with new
  scoring guide)
• MAP data are evaluated using the MAP Performance
  Index (MPI) MAP standards are evaluated using
  data fro a single subject area within a grade
  span to determine if a standard is met. (CA and
  Math used to be combined and now have been
  separated. In the past, a district could have
  met this standard based on good scores in one
  are while scoring poorly in another)
• Reading standards are not evaluated as separate
  measures
• No overall performance points are awarded
• MAP grade level tests are phased in and both
  grade level tests and grade snap tests are
  evaluated
• All performance standards are evaluated using
  both Status and Progress measures
• Annual Distinction in Performance awarded for
  high achievement (Status) and improvement
  (Progress)

36
12
37
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Full Waivers (Mini-Review)
• Reserved for the highest performing school
  districts
• Maintained until no longer qualified for 2
  consecutive years
• Mini-Review with State Supervisor
• Items Not Waived Checklist
• Advance Questionnaire
• State/Federal Programs Monitoring (where
  required)

38
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Limited Waivers (Targeted Review)
• School districts with good overall performance
  but need improvement in some area(s) at the
  building, grade, subject level
• Qualified based upon APR Status and Progress
• Maintained until no longer qualified for 2
  consecutive years
• Targeted (Focused) Review
• May consist of (1) a mini-review/desk audit and
  for the district to submit a plan to address the
  area in need or improvement or (2) a short,
  targeted review with small team
• Classroom observations, teacher and student focus
  groups
• Items not waived checklist
• Compliance paperwork submitted prior to review
• Advanced questionnaire (online)
• District response to the standards (where
  applicable)
• CSIP (where applicable)
• Curriculum may be submitted depending upon area
  in need of improvement
• Sample student assessments may be submitted
  depending upon area in need of improvement
• Report of findings to district

39
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Full Reviews
• Provisionally Accredited or Unaccredited School
  Districts
• Very thorough, in-depth review
• Classroom observations, teacher and student focus
  groups
• Items not waived checklist
• District Documentation submitted prior to review
  
• Advanced questionnaire (online, except parent)
• District response to the standards online
• CSIP
• Curriculum
• Sample student assessments
• PD Plan
• Program Evaluation Plan
• Building-Level Bell Schedules, Building Maps, and
  Master Schedule of Courses w/ Room Numbers and
  Teacher Names
• Findings cited and reported to districts

40
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Curriculum Review
• Who Panel of Experts in cooperation with the
  Show-Me Curriculum Administrators Association
  (SMCAA)
• What District submits curriculum for two areas
• -Math or Communication Arts
• -One other area
• When Districts submit by October 1
• Where Schools undergoing full reviews or
  targeted MAP standard reviews
• Why To help answer essential curriculum
  question, If full implemented, will this
  curriculum lead to improved student performance?

41
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• How will the Panel of Experts determine if the
  curriculum will lead to improved student
  performance?
• The alignment of the implemented curriculum
• Assessment of and for learning
• Quality of questioning
• -Michael Muenks

42
Fourth Cycle MSIP

• Sample Assessments
• Who DESE-selected sampling of teachers from all
  subject areas
• What All assessments (except daily practice
  homework) used during two-week window)
• When The first two weeks of October
• Where Schools undergoing full reviews or
  targeted MAP standard reviews
• Why To help answer essential curriculum
  question, Is the written curriculum implemented
  within buildings and classrooms in the district?

43
How is Salem addressing the essential curriculum
requirements?

• The district is currently developing an
  implemented curriculum
• A curriculum map will be developed from the
  implemented curriculum which will help align GLEs
  internally and externally, leading to integration
• A scope and sequence will be developed from
  information gained from the curriculum map
• The district will sponsor a Curriculum Camp next
  July. Experts from SMCAA will lead faculty
  members in assessment of and for learning to
  improve the quality and alignment of assessments
  to the implemented curriculum
• The Professional Development Committee scheduled
  Liz Condray for an in-service on improving the
  quality of questions on various types of
  assessments
• Mrs. Rumpf will serve on the Panel of Experts as
  one of 15 reviewing curriculum from across the
  state

44
It is really all about classroom instruction!

• Effective curriculum is written from the
  learners point of view it specifies what the
  learner will do, not just what the teacher will
  do.

45
The Bottom Line

• The bottom line is
• If kids do well on MAP-like assessments, they
  should be successful in life because they have
  obtained the skills to reason, analyze, explain,
  plan, organize, problem solve, and make good
  decisions.

46
(No Transcript)
47

• Questions/Comments

48
Analysis Summary

• Content
• 2
• Content 2 represents the Content Standard on the
  placemat. In this case the 2 represents
  geometric and spatial sense involving
  measurement (including length, area, volume),
  trigonometry, and similarity and transformations
  of shapes M2

49
Analysis Summary

• A1A3
• A1A3 is the GLE. The first A is the Strand
  Algebraic Relationships. The 1 refers to the
  Big Idea Understand patterns, relations, and
  functions. The second A is the Concept
  Recognize and extend patterns. The 3 is the
  Grade Level - extend geometric (shapes) and
  numeric patterns to find the next term.

50
Analysis Summary

• 2
• Skill
• 2 Skill represents the Depth of Knowledge of the
  question. In this case the Depth of Knowledge is
  2/Skill applying skills (in a familiar
  situation) and concepts (compare, cause-effect),
  requires deeper knowledge than definition
  explaining how or why making decisions,
  estimating interpreting in order to respond one
  right answer.

51
Analysis Summary

• MC/1
• .40
• MC is the question type in this case, multiple
  choice. CR refers to constructed response and PE
  is performance event. The number 1 refers to how
  many points the question was worth. The number
  .40 refers to the average points earned for the
  group tested. If the target percent for this
  year is .50, obviously this question should be
  discussed.

52
Analysis Summary

• 1/13
• The number 1 refers to the session, and the
  number 13 refers to the question.

53
Analysis Summary

• extend geometric (shapes) and numeric 
• patterns to find the next term
• The actual description of the GLE is in the last
  column under Concepts and Process.

54
Analysis Summary

• Process Standards
• The process standard for each question is found
  below the content standard.
• The process standard follows the same type of
  format just described.
• The average points earned are showed in tens
  because of printing issues, but they are very
  close to the actual number.

55
Analysis Summary

• The analysis summary shows all information
  available in regard to each question on the MAP
  test.
• Some districts have tracked the total number of
  many items on the test such as question type,
  Depth of Knowledge, and GLEs tested to name a
  few.