Lowenthal Fabricating Heritage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lowenthal Fabricating Heritage

Description:

Discussion. 1. Lowenthal gives a case study as an example of 'fabricating heritage' ... Discussion ... Discussion. 5. 'Heritage thrives on historical error! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: marijada
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lowenthal Fabricating Heritage


1
Lowenthal Fabricating Heritage
2
Discussion
  • 1. Lowenthal gives a case study as an example of
    'fabricating heritage'.
  • Give comparable examples from your knowledge and
    discuss the following
  • the heritage myth itself
  • the occasion at which its origin can be traced
  • infer the purposes
  • what individuals/institutions are promulgating
    this myth
  • what are the mechanisms by which this myth is
    recycled within popular imagination
  • the changes that it has undergone over time
  • your sources

3
Discussion
  • 2. If heritage today has the nature of popular
    cult, with unwavering public devotion in spite of
    realities that show its contradictions, what are
    the vehicles by which it is maintained?
  • How does this process differ from say medieval
    cults of relics (of which Lowenthal gives an
    example)?

4
Discussion
  • 3. What are the benefits of heritage myths for
    societies? What are the dangers? Who are the
    potential myth debunkers in the society?
  • 4. What is the role of the memory institutions in
    relation to myth-building (fabrication)? Give
    examples that show how the worship of the past
    may become a secular religion in the society and
    the role of these institutions in maintaining
    such legacies. Is it possible for memory
    institutions to avoid "morality" in interpreting
    the past?

5
Discussion
  • 5. "Heritage thrives on historical error!" //
    "Tribulations are crucial to identity" //
    (Lowenthal, p. 11). Explain these paradoxes!
  • 6. "We want the Smithsonian to reflect real
    America and not something that a historian
    dreamed up." (Lowenthal, 11). How does this
    statement relate to building library collections,
    archival practices, and the museum work.

6
Discussion
  • 7. "Time makes liars of all of us!" (Lowenthal,
    16).
  • Do you agree? How does this statement relate to
    the role of memory institutions in society? How
    does this relate to how they manage the relation
    of records and memory access to written past?
  • 8. Heritage and history are both built upon the
    knowledge of the past. The readings and
    misreadings of the past, the correct and the
    false knowledge of the past are integral to both,
    but what is the difference in the process? You
    may use the example of Biblical textual tradition
    / scholarship to discuss this distinction, or use
    a comparable example.

7
Discussion
  • 9. Lowenthal identifies six points that
    distinguish heritage as a phenomenon
  • HERITAGE IS NOT HISTORY (how heritage differs
    from history)
  • FABRICATION ESSENTIAL TO FEALTY (why heritage
    needs error and invention)
  • MODES OF FABRICATION (how heritage reshapes the
    past upgrades, updates, jumbles, selectively
    forgets, contrives genealogies, claims
    precedence)
  • PUBLIC ENDORSEMENT (public approval of
    fabrication)
  • HERITAGE AND LIFE HISTORY (autobiographical
    analogies)
  • WHY HERITAGE MUST BE 'OURS' (need to own our
    own heritage)
  • Briefly explain each of these aspects of
    'heritage' and give your own examples that either
    agree or contradict Lowenthal's position.

8
Global Culture, Modern Heritage Remembering the
Chinese Imperial Collections(Hamlish 2000)
9
Discussion
  • Chinese Imperial Collections and the Palace
    Museum (Beijing)
  • construction of collective memory in the Palace
    Museum
  • typical of the conceptual structure of museums
  • museums present polysemic possibilities
    (constructing various narratives from single
    collections)
  • visitors journey (controlled movement) along two
    pathways YUAN ZHUANG CHENLIE (period rooms)
    ZHUAN TI CHENLIE (exhibit halls)

10
Discussion
  • YUAN ZHUANG CHENLIE (period rooms) functional
    grouping of objects reconstruction only of Qing
    Ming Dynasty period visitors response
    appropriation palace intrigue, gossip, everyday
    life, popular imagery extension of tourist trade
    and sensationalized accounts
  • ZHUAN TI CHENLIE (exhibit halls) objects grouped
    by type subdivided by chronology to demonstrate
    historical development in technology
    aesthetics

11
Discussion
  • How are these two displays complementary? How
    does each display contribute to the construction
    of the imperial past?
  • What is the function of collective
    representations? How is memory related to
    political legitimacy on the global and the local
    level (p. 150)?
  • What is the meaning of break dancers and their
    appropriation of the public space in Liu Yirans
    short story, Rocking Tiananmen?
  • What are the implications of the existence of
    UNESCOs World Heritage Center for
    conceptualizing heritage at the global/local
    level? In that context, discuss the notion of
    universalizing rhetoric or erasure of difference
    (p. 157)?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com