Faculty Brown Bag Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Faculty Brown Bag Discussion

Description:

Faculty Brown Bag Discussion. Ripon College. August 26, 2004. Jill Gremmels ... Experts probably won't need to use librarians because they already know what ... Discussion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: ITS8299
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Faculty Brown Bag Discussion


1
Faculty Brown Bag Discussion
  • Ripon College
  • August 26, 2004
  • Jill Gremmels
  • College Librarian
  • Wartburg College

2
Expert Researcher Model(Leckie)
  • In-depth knowledge of discipline
  • Knows fields important scholars
  • Informal scholarly communication
  • Research is non-sequential and non-linear
    (ambiguity serendipity)
  • Learns on own
  • Has info-seeking strategies
  • Content, not skills issues KNOWLEDGE over
    mechanics
  • Long process of acculturation

3
Assumptions About Librarians from Experts
  • Experts probably wont need to use librarians
    because they already know what they want to find.
  • However, librarians are helpful and are there if
    trouble develops.
  • Librarians are good with technical questions
    about retrieval processes.

4
Novice Researcher Model(Leckie)
  • First exposure to discipline?
  • Important people/names to know?
  • No informal network (except professor).
  • Context is textbooks, lectures, reserves.
  • Cognitive development finds ambiguity and
    non-linear approaches threatening.
  • Strategies for coping, not info-seeking.
  • Masters one retrieval mechanism and sticks to it
    (appropriate or not).

5
Assumptions About Librarians From Novices
  • Novice researchers dont understand why
    librarians are there and what they can do for
    them.
  • Novices will approach peers, family, or friends
    first.
  • International students are more likely to ask
    librarians for help.
  • Novices hesitate to ask for assistance
  • OR
  • They want librarians to do it all narrow topics,
    find, fetch evaluate sources, etc.

6
Environmental Scan
  • More information resources
  • More technology to master
  • Diverse student population
  • (age, ethnicity, disabilities, part-time,
    distance)
  • No uniform skill level
  • Varied experience with libraries especially
    academic ones

7
Undergrads Are Often Not Aware Of.
  • Scholarly sources process and use
  • Primary sources
  • Why textbooks may not be an appropriate source
  • Encyclopedia articles process, when to use them
  • Types of authors and audiences
  • How to judge a source for a given discipline
  • Appropriate disciplinary databases
  • Free v. fee issues that affect resources
    research
  • How cognitive development affects learning
  • Citation sources following bibliographic
    trails, and that doing so is not cheating
  • Important scholars on a topic
  • Keywords, synonyms, and Boolean searching
    techniques

8
Discussion
  • What manifestations of the differences between
    expert and novice information-seeking behavior do
    you see in your students?

9
Do You Agree?
  • The disjuncture between
  • faculty expectations and the
  • capabilities of undergraduates
  • shows up in a required paper or
  • performance that is
  • research-based.

10
What to do?
  • Take students cognitive level and information
    experience into account
  • Chunk assignments
  • Collaborate with librarians at all stages
  • Encourage students to take advantage of mentors
    and librarians services

11
Information LiteracyDefined
  • A set of abilities requiring individuals to
    recognize when information is needed and have
    the ability to locate, evaluate, and use
    effectively the needed information.
  • Association of College Research Libraries
    (ACRL)

12
Making the Connection
  • At some point in a students educational
    experience, there must be a convergence
    of both information and disciplinary literacy if
    true learning is to be facilitated.

13
An Information Literate Individual is Able to.
  • ACRL Competency Standards
  • http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informat
    ionliteracycompetency.htm
  • Ripon College Information Literacy Competency
    Guidelines
  • Information Literacy the Basis
    for Lifelong Learning

14
Collaboration
  • Mutual goals
  • Mutual respect
  • Advance planning
  • Substantive contributions by all parties

15
Strengths
  • Faculty
  • expertise in their discipline
  • knowledge of students
  • skill in teaching
  • Librarians
  • information search skills
  • knowledge of resources
  • skill in teaching
  • understanding of research process
  • questioning strategies
  • Mentors
  • peer relationship

16
What we do at Wartburg
  • Information Literacy Across the Curriculum
  • 5 core lessons plus major strands
  • Reference consultations
  • Reinforce and practice without repetition

17
Bibliography
  • Information Literacy Competency Standards for
    Higher Education. American Association of
    College and Research Libraries, 2000.
  • Information Literacy? Seeking Clarification.
    School Libraries Worldwide. 4(1) 1998 59-72.
  • Leckey, Gloria J. Desperately Seeking
    Citations Uncovering Faculty Assumptions about
    the Undergraduate Research Process. The Journal
    of Academic Librarianship. May 1996 201-208.
  • Tagg, John. The Learning Paradigm College.
    Bolton, MA Anker Publishing, 2003.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com