Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes

Description:

... Statement 109. A future event, such as an employee's disqualifying disposition ... For each disqualifying disposition of an ISO granted 1995 or later, record a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Delo212
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes


1
Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes
TAXATION COMMITTEE MEETING
  • Michael Reno
  • Deloitte Tax LLP
  • June 27, 2005

2
Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes
  • Agenda
  • Tax Deduction for Qualified Production Activities
  • Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision
  • Federal Subsidies for Prescription Drug Plans
  • Employee options and warrants
  • Uncertain Tax Positions

3
Tax Deduction for Qualified Production Activities
  • FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-1
  • 4. The FASB staff believes that the qualified
    production activities deductions characteristics
    are similar to special deductions illustrated in
    paragraph 231 of Statement 109 because the
    qualified production activities deduction is
    contingent upon the future performance of
    specific activities, including the level of
    wages. Accordingly, the FASB staff believes that
    the deduction should be accounted for as a
    special deduction in accordance with Statement
    109.

4
Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision
  • FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-2
  • 6. The FASB staff believes that the lack of
    clarification of certain provisions within the
    Act and the timing of the enactment necessitate a
    practical exception to the Statement 109
    requirement to reflect in the period of enactment
    the effect of a new tax law.
  • 10. The following information shall be provided
    in an enterprises financial statements for the
    period in which it completes its evaluation of
    the repatriation provision
  • The total effect on income tax expense (or
    benefit) for amounts that have been recognized
    under the repatriation provision. For annual
    financial statements, any effect should be shown
    separately in the same place (either on the face
    of the income statement or in the footnotes) that
    the amounts of current and deferred taxes are
    disclosed for the period.

5
Federal Subsidies for Prescription Drug Plans
  • Code Section 139A
  • Gross income shall not include any special
    subsidy payment received under section 1860D-22
    of the Social Security Act. This section shall
    not be taken into account for purposes of
    determining whether any deduction is allowable
    with respect to any cost taken into account in
    determining such payment.
  • FSP 106-2
  • 19. In the periods in which the subsidy affects
    the employers accounting for the plan, it shall
    have not effect on any plan-related temporary
    difference accounted for under Statement 109
    because the subsidy is exempt from federal
    taxation. That is, the measure of any temporary
    difference shall continue to be determined as if
    the subsidy did not exist.

6
Employee Options and Warrants
  • FAS 123 was issued in 1995.
  • Background
  • FAS The statement provides rules for applying a
    fair value method to account for stock based
    compensation.
  • Entities could either adopt FAS 123 or they could
    choose to continue accounting for stock based
    compensation using APB 25 a statement that
    allows the use of intrinsic value at grant date
    as the measure of compensation.
  • Entities choosing to remain on APB 25 were (and
    continue to be) required to disclose the pro
    forma net income effect of FAS 123 (as if it was
    adopted) including additional tax effects (FAS
    123 par. 45).
  • Pro forma disclosures apply FAS 123 to options
    granted in fiscal years beginning after December
    15, 1994 (FAS 123 par. regarding Effective Date
    and Transition).
  • FASB 123R effective for first interim or annual
    reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.

7
Employee Options and Warrants
  • FAS 123, Par. 44
  •  
  • If a deduction reported on a tax return for a
    stock-based award exceeds the cumulative
    compensation cost for that award recognized for
    financial reporting, the tax benefit for that
    excess deduction shall be recognized as
    additional paid-in capital. If the deduction
    reported on a tax return is less than the
    cumulative compensation cost recognized for
    financial reporting, the write-off of a related
    deferred tax asset in excess of the benefits of
    the tax deduction, net of the related valuation
    allowance, if any, shall be recognized in the
    income statement except to the extent that there
    is remaining additional paid-in capital from
    excess tax deductions from previous stock-based
    employee compensation awards accounted for in
    accordance with the fair value based method in
    this Statement. In that situation, the amount of
    the write-off shall be charged against that
    additional paid-in capital.

8
Employee Options and Warrants
  • FAS 123, Par. 227
  •  
  • The temporary difference related to a
    stock-based award is measured by the cumulative
    compensation cost recognized rather than the
    expected future tax deduction based on the
    present intrinsic value of the award. Therefore,
    a deferred tax asset recognized for that
    temporary difference should be reduced by a
    valuation allowance only if, based on the weight
    of the available evidence, the entity expects
    future taxable income will be insufficient to
    recover the deferred tax asset in the periods the
    tax deduction for the stock-based award will be
    recognized or in an applicable carry-back or
    carry-forward period.

9
Employee Options and Warrants
  • FAS 123, Par. 224
  •  
  • The Board believes that recognition of deferred
    tax benefits related to stock-based awards for
    financial reporting should be based on provisions
    in the tax law that govern the deductibility of
    stock-based compensation. Some stock-based
    compensation plans result in tax deductions.
    Examples under existing U.S. tax law are
    so-called nonstatutory stock options (which are
    options that do not qualify for preferential tax
    treatment as incentive stock options) and
    nonvested stock. However, under existing U.S.
    tax law, an entity does not receive tax
    deductions for so-called incentive stock options
    (provided that employees comply with the
    requisite holding periods).

10
Employee Options and Warrants
  • FAS 123, Par. 42
  •   The cumulative amount of compensation cost
    recognized for a stock-based award that
    ordinarily results in a future tax deduction
    under existing tax law shall be considered to be
    a deductible temporary difference in applying
    FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
    Taxes. The deferred tax benefit (or expense)
    that results from increases (or decreases) in
    that temporary difference, for example, as
    additional service is rendered and the related
    cost is recognized, shall be recognized in the
    income statement. Recognition of compensation
    cost for an award that ordinarily does not result
    in tax deductions under existing tax law shall
    not be considered to result in a deductible
    temporary difference in applying Statement 109.
    A future event, such as an employee's
    disqualifying disposition of stock under existing
    U.S. tax law, can give rise to a tax deduction
    for an award that ordinarily does not result in a
    tax deduction. The tax effects of such an event
    shall be recognized only when it occurs.

11
Employee Options and Warrants
  • Tax Effects of FAS 123
  • Some temporary differences do not relate to a
    book/tax basis difference but rather relate to a
    financial statement event for which a future tax
    deduction can be expected and a deferred tax
    asset (or DTA) should be recorded (FAS 123 par.
    225 citing par. 15 of FAS 109).
  • Future deductions can be expected for NQSOs but
    not for ISOs (FAS 123 par 225).
  • This temporary difference is measured by the
    compensation expense recorded for books (FAS 123
    par. 226).
  • The book expense is measured by the fair value at
    grant and the tax deduction is measured by the
    intrinsic value at exercise. These amounts are
    almost certain to be different. The DTA, once
    recorded, is not re-measured or valued due to
    stock price fluctuations but is considered in
    applying normal valuation considerations -
    regarding adequacy of future income to recover
    all DTAs (FAS 123 par. 227).

12
Employee Options and Warrants
  • Tax Effects of FAS 123 - continued
  • Any excess tax benefits are recorded as equity
    pursuant to par. 36e of FAS 109 (FAS 123 par.
    228).
  • A FAS 123 related DTA might not be fully
    recovered (i.e., the tax deduction - based on
    spread at exercise - turns out to be less than
    the book expense - based on fair value at
    grant). When a DTA is not fully recovered, the
    amount not recovered is written off to APIC to
    the extent that prior accounting for FAS 123
    options created APIC on account of excess tax
    benefits. Any remaining DTA is written off to
    tax expense (FAS 123 par. 229).
  • In the event that a tax benefit is realized for
    an ISO (due to a disqualification) the related
    tax benefit is recorded as a provision benefit
    for not more than the tax benefit attributable to
    the book compensation expense. Any excess tax
    benefit is recorded as equity (FAS 123 par. 231).

13
Employee Options and Warrants
  • Process requirements - FAS 123 disclosure
  • Identify and track options granted 1995 and later
    (assuming calendar year company).
  • Determine fair value of options pursuant to FAS
    123
  • Determine tax effect of book compensation expense
    as recorded to PL.
  • Re-measure tax effect for subsequent adjustments
    to book compensation expense required by FAS 123.
  • Determine the DTA associated with each option
    grant as of the date of the exercise or
    expiration of the option.
  • Determine with respect to each DTA (step 5)
    whether it was under recovered or over recovered.
    If over recovered, credit APIC. If under
    recovered, write-off under recovery to APIC to
    extent of APIC pool, expense remainder.
  • For each disqualifying disposition of an ISO
    granted 1995 or later, record a provision benefit
    limited to the tax effect of the original book
    expense and record APIC for any excess (no DTA
    can be under recovered since none was recorded).

14
Uncertain Tax Positions
  • Through its deliberations, the Board decided
  • An entity shall recognize the benefit of tax
    positions when it is probable, in the context of
    FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for
    Contingencies, that the position will be
    sustained when challenged by taxing authorities.
  • An entity shall presume that a taxing authority
    will review a tax position when evaluating
    whether the position is probable of being
    sustained. Therefore, consideration of the risk
    of detection is inappropriate.
  • The benefit of tax positions shall be
    derecognized when it is more likely than not that
    the position will not be sustained.

15
Uncertain Tax Positions
  • A taxpayer shall record the financial statement
    benefit of an uncertain tax position based on the
    best estimate of the amount that will be
    ultimately sustained upon resolution of the
    litigation or appeals process.
  • If a tax return is filed with a tax position that
    does not meet the probable criterion, a liability
    shall be calculated on the difference between the
    probable tax basis and the as-filed tax basis.
  • The liability that results from the difference
    between the probable tax basis in the financial
    statements and the as-filed tax basis shall be
    classified based on the expected timing of cash
    flows to settle underpayment controversies with
    taxing authorities.
  • Changes in judgment about sustainability of a tax
    benefit or in the amount to be sustained shall be
    recognized in the current interim period and not
    spread over future interim periods.

16
Uncertain Tax Positions
  • An interest expense accrual for the settlement of
    underpayment controversies shall be recognized
    based on the amounts reflected on the tax return
    for which a benefit has not been recognized in
    the financial statements.
  • Disclosures shall continue to be made in
    accordance with Statement 5.
  • The impact of adopting the new pronouncement
    shall be accounted for as a cumulative effect of
    a change in accounting principle.
  • The proposed Interpretation shall be effective
    for all companies for the first annual period
    ending after December 15, 2005. Early adoption
    is encouraged.
  • The comment period for the proposed
    Interpretation will be 60 days.

17
Recent Changes in Accounting for Income Taxes
  • The information contained in this publication is
    for general purposes only and is not intended,
    and should not be construed, as legal,
    accounting, or tax advice or opinion provided by
    Deloitte Tax LLP to the reader. This material
    may not be applicable or suitable for the
    readers specific circumstances of needs.
    Therefore, the information should not be used as
    a substitute for consultation with professional
    accounting, tax, or other competent advisors.
    Please contact a local Deloitte Tax LLP
    professional before taking any action based upon
    this information.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com