Moderation Statements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Moderation Statements

Description:

Program effects on tobacco use were greater for persons who were more likely to ... differs depending on whether the person has a certain genetic disposition. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: caps6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Moderation Statements


1
Moderation Statements
  • Treatment effects differ for males and females.
  • Program effects on tobacco use were greater for
    persons who were more likely to believe the
    positive consequences of tobacco use at baseline.
  • A program works for middle school students but
    not high school students.
  • Program effects differ as a function of outcome
    variable use at baseline.
  • Nicotine patch treatment differs depending on
    whether the person has a certain genetic
    disposition.

2
Moderators
  • Moderators determine for whom the program is
    effective.
  • Mediation assumes no moderation effect It is
    assumed that the relation from X to M and from M
    to Y are homogeneous across subgroups or other
    characteristics of participants in the study.

3
Importance of Moderation in Prevention and
Treatment Research
  • Information on moderating variables can be used
    to identify the groups of persons who will
    benefit the most (and least) from a program.
  • In some cases, important theoretical predictions
    can be tested. For example, if program effects
    depend on the level of risk.

4
Mediator versus Moderator
  • Moderator is a variable that affects the strength
    or form of the relation between two variables.
    The variable is not intermediate in the causal
    sequence, so it is not a mediator.
  • Moderator is also an interaction, the relation
    between X and Y depends on a third variable.
    There are other more detailed definitions of a
    moderator.
  • Tested by including interaction effects in
    addition to main effects of X.

5
Moderation Analysis 1
  • Group 1
  • Y1 i1 d1 X e1
  • Group 2
  • Y2 i2 d2 X e2
  • Combined Groups
  • Y i1 c1 X c2 Z d3 XZ e2
  • d3 d1 - d2 and provides a general way to test
    moderator/interaction effects.

6
Moderation Analysis 2
  • Centering is important in moderation analysis in
    order to reduce multicollinearity and
    interpretation of interaction effects. Centering
    consists of subtracting the mean from each
    observed score for X and Z (see Aiken West,
    1991).
  • The combined model and test for d3 is a general
    way to test moderator effects for both continuous
    and categorical moderators.
  • In regression analysis, the interaction variable,
    XZ, is the product of the centered X variable and
    the centered Z variable.
  • Power to detect moderator effects is often very
    low (Aiken West, 1991)
  • Plots are important for the interpretation of
    moderator effects.

7
Models with Moderation and Mediation
  • Moderated and Mediation may occur simultaneously
    in several different ways.
  • Relation of X to M may differ across levels of X.
  • Relation of M to Y may differ across levels of X.
  • Both X to M and M to Y relations may differ.

8
Moderated and Mediation
c1
a1
b1
Group 1
X
M
Y
a2
b2
Group 2
X
M
Y
c2
Separate mediated effect in each group a1b1, a2b2
9
Mediation and Moderator Models
  • Ho a1- a2 0 is a test of homogeneous action
    theory, called mediated moderation in Baron and
    Kenny (1986)
  • Ho b1- b2 0 is a test of homogeneous
    conceptual theory, called moderated mediation in
    Baron and Kenny (1986).
  • Ho c1- c2 0 is a test of equal direct
    effect.
  • Ho a1b1 a2b2 0 is a test of moderated
    mediation. A test of whether the mediated effect
    differs between groups.
  • Extend to more than two groups by forming
    contrasts among mediated effects.

10
Separate and Combined Group Moderation and
Mediation
  • Group 1
  • Y1 i11 c11' X b11 M e11
  • M1 i21 a11 X e11
  • Group 2
  • Y2 i12 c12' X b12 M e12
  • M2 i22 a12 X e22
  • Combined Groups
  • Y i1 c1' X c2' Z c3' XZ b1 M b2 MZ
    e2
  • M i1 a1 X a2 Z a3 XZ e3

11
Mediation and Moderator Models
  • Ho a11- a12 0 is the same as Ho a3 0. Test
    of homogeneous action theory, called mediated
    moderation in Baron and Kenny (1986)
  • Ho b11- b12 0 is the same as Ho b2 0. Test
    of homogeneous conceptual theory, called
    moderated mediation in Baron and Kenny (1986).
  • Ho c11- c12 0 is the same as Ho c3 0.
    Test of equal direct effect.

12
Mediation of Baseline by Treatment Interactions
(MBTI)
  • Program effects are often largest for persons
    lowest on the mediator at baseline.
  • The mediation effect may differ at the levels of
    the baseline mediation variable.
  • If the interaction is nonsignificant then assume
    constant mediation effect.
  • If the interaction is significant then the size
    of the mediated effect depends on baseline
    values.

13
MBTI (Morgan-Lopez, 2003)
a
1
X
M
1
2
a
2
a
3
M
1
b
c

1
c

2
X
M
1
1
c

3
c

Y
4
Y
2
1
14
Summary
  • Mediation and Moderation analyses address
    important questions in prevention and treatment
    research--How and for whom do programs work?
  • Some research investigating mediation and
    moderation separately but still too few studies.
  • Actual program effects may contain mediation and
    moderation simultaneously.
  • Equations to test these models were described.
  • Models with mediation and moderation reflect the
    complexity and richness of drug research.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com