Title: Definitions
1FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Definitions
- Origins of Canadian Federalism
- Political
- Constitutional
- Judicial
- Evolution of Canadian Federalism
- Comparative Federalism
2FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Federalism a system of (territorially) shared
sovereignty - Unitary State
- Sovereignty held by one governing body
- Britain, Ireland, France, Sweden, Italy
- Federal State
- Sovereignty shared among governments
- Inherent versus delegated sovereignty
- US, Australia, Brazil, Germany
3Comparative Federalism
- Reasons for Federalism
- An additional check on power
- This was original Madisonian justification
- Policy flexibility sensitivity to local
concerns - This was more the case in Canada
- Policy experimentation
4FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Historical Origins of Canadian Federalism
- Two historical origins
- Province of Canada
- Atlantic Union
- The Canadian Situation
- Canadian (i.e., Province of Canada) politics of
1850s marred by - Gridlock (the double majority, failure of
Brown-Dorian coalition) - Sectarianism (Rebellion Losses, Gavazzi Riots,
Corrigan Trial) - Sectionalism (Movement of Capital question)
5FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Historical Origins of Canadian Federalism
- The Canadian Situation (cont.)
- Brown Reformers sought legislative union
rep by pop - Coalition w. Rouge Dorian fails in 1856 debacle
of the Double Shuffle - Quebecers demanded sectional equality religious
independence - Cartier sees that double-majority principle
cannot continue indefinitely - Sound economic and security reasons to maintain
Union - Deadlock resolved by proposal of federalism
6FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Historical Origins of Canadian Federalism
- The Atlantic Union
- Arthur Gordon (Lt Gov of NB) proposes Atlantic
Union - Leading Atlantic politicians (Tupper, Tilley,
McCully etc.) meet in Charlottetown in 1864 to
discuss matter - Canadians (Brown, Cartier, Macdonald et. al.)
invite themselves and propose wider union - Agree to meet at Quebec 1864
7FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
8FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Historical Origins of Canadian Federalism
- The Atlantic Union
- Arthur Gordon (Lt Gov of NB) proposes Atlantic
Union - Leading Atlantic politicians (Tupper, Tilley,
McCully etc.) meet in Charlottetown in 1864 to
discuss matter - Canadians (Brown, Cartier, Macdonald et. al.)
invite themselves and propose wider union - Agree to meet at Quebec 1864
9FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
The Quebec Conference, October 1864
10FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- The Quebec Conference
- The best interests and present and future
prosperity of British North America will be
promoted by a Federal Union under the Crown of
Great Britain, provided such Union can be
effected on principles just to the several
Provinces. - "Report of Resolutions Adopted at a Conference
of Delegates From The Provinces of Canada, Nova
Scotia And New Brunswick, And The Colonies of
Newfoundland And Prince Edward Island, Held at
The City of Quebec, 10th October, 1864, as The
Basis of a Proposed Confederation of Those
Provinces And Colonies." Journal of the House of
Assembly, 1865, Appendix, pp 854-73.
11FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- The Quebec Conference
- Macdonald in favour of legislative union Brown
Cartier, less so - Atlantic provinces worried about their influence
in larger union - Federalism as a compromise despite apparent
failure of American example
12FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Confederation
- Popular support for Confederation in Canada
- PEI Newfoundland opt out
- New Brunswick and Nova Scotia agree only
reluctantly - Initial union of Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick
and Nova Scotia consumated by BNA 1867 1 July
1867
13FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
14- "An Act to amend and continue the Act 32 and 33
Victoria, chapter 3 and to establish and provide
for the Government of the Province of Manitoba,"
Statutes of Canada 1870, c. 3, p. 20-27.
15FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Expansion of Confederation
16FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- Constitution (BNA) Act 1867
- Section 91
- Section 92
- Peace, Order, and Good Government (POGG) clause
17FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- Section 91 lists federal powers
- Trade Commerce
- Criminal Law
- Taxation
- Defence
- Residual Power
18FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- Section 92 lists provincial powers all matters
of strictly local or private nature in the
province. - Education
- Hospitals
- Municipalities
- Property
- Direct Taxation Licensing
19FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- POGG clauses vests residual power in the federal
government - It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with
the Advice of the Senate and House of Commons, to
make Laws for the Peace, Order, and Good
Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters
not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this
Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of
the Provinces
20FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- Constitution also provides federal government
with powers of reserve and disallowance of
provincial legislation - Lt. Gov. can reserve (i.e., delay grating Royal
Assent to) provincial laws so Ottawa can examine
21FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Constitutional Basis of Canadian Federalism
- Section 56, CA 1867 Disallowance
- ... if the Queen in Council... thinks fit to
disallow the Act, such Disallowance... being
signified by the Governor General, by Speech or
Message to each of the Houses of the Parliament
or by Proclamation, shall annul the Act...
22FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Why, if...
- the Fathers of Confederation intended such a
strong central government, and - the constitution so strongly favours the federal
government, - are the provinces so powerful and Canadian
federalism so decentralized?
23FederalismMalcomlson Myers Chapter 4
- Why, if...
- the Fathers of Confederation intended such a
strong central government, and - the constitution so strongly favours the federal
government, - are the provinces so powerful and Canadian
federalism so decentralized?
24Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Forces generating decentralization
- Judicial interpretation
- Regionalism
- Technological change events
- World Wars and Great Depression
- Income Corporate taxation, Socialized Medicine
- Failure of national party system
25Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Judicial Interpretation
- Russell vs. Queen (1882)
- Local Prohibition Case (1886)
- Maritime Bank Case (1892)
26Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Judicial Interpretation
- Russell v. The Queen (1882) Hodge v. The Queen
(1883) - Initial success in establishing power of POGG
clause - Enunciation of double aspect of powers, i.e., one
aspect of a function (e.g., funding) may be a
federal power, whilst another aspect (e.g.,
administration) may be a provincial power - Local Prohibition Case (1886)
- Maritime Bank Case (1892)
27Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Judicial Interpretation
- Russell vs. Queen (1882)
- Local Prohibition Case (1886)
- The exercise of legislative power of Canada,
in regard to all matters not enumerated in s. 91,
ought to be strictly confined to such matters as
are of unquestionably Canadian interest and
importance - Maritime Bank Case (1892)
28Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Judicial Interpretation
- Russell vs. Queen (1882)
- Local Prohibition Case (1886)
- Maritime Bank Case (1892)
- Lt Governors General Governors, i.e., Crowns
sovereignty equal whether exercised via national
or provincial government
29Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Forces generating decentralization
- Judicial interpretation
- Regionalism
- Technological change events
- World Wars and Great Depression
- Income Corporate taxation, Socialized Medicine
- Failure of national party system
30Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Regionalism
- Geographic distance and economic diversity create
divergent interests - Powerful premiers (e.g., Oliver Mowat, Duplessis)
resist Ottawas dominance - Alan Cairns The Government and Societies of
Canadian Federalism - a version of ambition-against-ambition
31Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Forces generating decentralization
- Judicial interpretation
- Regionalism
- Technological change events
- World Wars and Great Depression
- Income Corporate taxation, Socialized Medicine
- Failure of national party system
32Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Forces generating decentralization
- Judicial interpretation
- Regionalism
- Technological change events
- World Wars and Great Depression
- Income Corporate taxation, Socialized Medicine
- Failure of national party system
33Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Failure of the National Party System
- Two-party monopoly, 1867-1917
- Civil Service Reform, 1908
- Conscription Crisis Union Government, 1917
- Breakdown of Two-party monopoly, 1917-
- Progressives, CCF, NDP
- Dynamics of electoral system (winner-take-all)
- Institutional incentives to play regional politics
34Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Failure of the National Party System
- Two-party monopoly, 1867-1917
- Civil Service Reform, 1908
- Conscription Crisis Union Government, 1917
- Breakdown of Two-party monopoly, 1917-
- Progressives, CCF, NDP
- Dynamics of electoral system (winner-take-all)
- Institutional incentives to play regional politics
35Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Historical Development of Federalism
- Quasi-Federalism (1867-1896)
- Classical Federalism (1896-1914)
- Emergency Federalism (1914-1960)
- WW I II
- Rowell - Sirois
- Cooperative Federalism (1960-)
36Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- The Rowell-Sirois Report
- Provinces fail to cope with 1930s Depression
- JCPC deeply hostile to Bennett New Deal
- Report finds
- Provinces do too much with not enough
- Ottawa should handle taxation, unemployment
relief ensure equalization
37Federalism (cont)Malcolmson Myers, Ch. 4
- Patterns of Federalism
- Fiscal federalism
- Taxation (direct indirect)
- Federal spending power Conditional (Matching)
Unconditional (Block) - Equalization
- Executive federalism
- Asymmetric federalism
38Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in the United States
- Constitutional design points to a loose
federation, but the federal government now
dominates - Constitutional Basis
- Senate
- Equal representation by state
- Previously elected by state governments
- Amendment X The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people.
39Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in the United States
- Events
- Rejection of Articles of Confederation
- Civil War decisive rejection of states right to
secede - World Wars, the Great Depression the New Deal
40Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in the United States
- Judicial Interpretation
- Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, section 8,
paragraph 3) - Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) Trust-busting
- FDR, the New Deal, and the Court-Packing Plan
- Civil Rights Cases erosion of states rights
- Party Organization and the Party System
- Parties provide an integrated career ladder for
politicians
41Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in Australia
- Constitution suggests weak federal government,
but opposite is true - Constitutional Basis
- Consciously modelled on US
- Elected Senate 12 Senators per state
- Constitution lists a small set of exclusive
Commonwealth powers (interstate commerce,
taxation), with all else left to states - States limited in capacity to tax, e.g., state
sales tax prohibited
42Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in Australia
- Judicial Interpretation
- Courts protected Commonwealths near-monopoly on
revenue, taxation - Centralization in Australia flows mainly from
Canberras capacity to use its financial capacity
to involve itself in state policy areas (e.g.,
education)
43Comparative Federalism
- Federalism in Australia
- No major social cleavages
- Less hostility to Canberras involvement in state
policy areas - Early dominance of Labor Party
- strongly centralist in organization and outlook
- Career ladder for politicians