ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL THINKING AMT IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL THINKING AMT IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM

Description:

Process/Concept Duality. IMAGE & DEFINITION ... PROCESS/CONCEPT DUALITY ' ... having to cope consciously with the duality of concept and process, the good ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: keith79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL THINKING AMT IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM


1
ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL THINKING (AMT) IN THE
COLLEGE CLASSROOM
  • Keith Nabb
  • Moraine Valley Community College
  • Illinois Institute of Technology
  • March 2009

2
(No Transcript)
3
AGENDA
  • Background on AMT
  • Foundations
  • Diverse Perspectives
  • Classroom Examples
  • Algebra
  • Calculus
  • Differential Equations
  • Challenges facing students and teacher

4
FOUNDATIONS
  • What is advanced?
  • Concept image and concept definition
  • Learning Obstacles
  • Process/Concept Duality

5
IMAGE DEFINITION
Concept image is defined as the total cognitive
structure that is associated with the concept,
which includes all the mental pictures and
associated properties and processes (Tall
Vinner, 1981)
6
LEARNING OBSTACLES
  • Didactic obstacles
  • Epistemological obstacles (Brousseau, 1997 Harel
    Sowder, 2005 Sierpinska, 1987)

7
PROCESS/CONCEPT DUALITY
Instead of having to cope consciously with the
duality of concept and process, the good
mathematician thinks ambiguously about the
symbolism for product and process. We contend
that the mathematician simplifies matters by
replacing the cognitive complexity of
process-concept duality by the notational
convenience of process-product ambiguity. (Gray
Tall, 1994)
Dubinsky Harel, 1992 Harel Kaput, 1991
Schwarzenberger Tall, 1978 Sfard, 1991
8
DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES
  • Criteria for AMT
  • Linking informal with formal
  • Advancing Mathematical Practice
  • A Human Activity
  • Professional Mathematician

9
CRITERIA FOR AMT
  • Thinking that requires deductive and rigorous
    reasoning about concepts that are inaccessible
    through our five senses (Edwards, Dubinsky,
    McDonald, 2005)
  • Overcoming epistemological obstacles (Harel
    Sowder, 2005)
  • Reconstructive generalization (Harel Tall,
    1991)
  • The concept image has to be radically changed so
    as to be applicable in a broader context. (Biza
    Zachariades, 2006)

10
LINKING INFORMAL AND FORMAL IDEAS
  • The move to more advanced mathematical thinking
    involves a difficult transition, from a position
    where concepts have an intuitive basis founded on
    experience, to one where they are specified by
    formal definitions and their properties
    re-constructed through logical deductions.
    (Tall, 1992)
  • Mathematical Idea Analysis (Lakoff and Núñez,
    2000)
  • Concept image and concept definition (Tall
    Vinner, 1981)
  • Horizontal and vertical mathematizing (Rasmussen
    et al., 2005)

11
ADVANCING MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE
  • Horizontal and vertical mathematizing (Rasmussen
    et al., 2005)
  • Teaching proof through debate (Hanna, 1991)
  • Pedagogical tools
  • Didactic engineering (Artigue, 1991)
  • Computer algebra systems (Dubinsky Tall, 1991
    Heid, 1988)
  • Pedagogical content tools (Rasmussen
    Marrongelle, 2006)
  • Play first, operationalize later

12
THE PROFESSIONAL MATHEMATICIAN
  • The working mathematician is using many
    processes in short succession, if not
    simultaneously, and lets them interact in
    efficient ways. Our goal should be to bring our
    students mathematical thinking as close as
    possible to that of a working mathematicians.
    (Dreyfus, 1991)
  • To observe and reflect upon the activities of
    advanced mathematical thinkers is in principle
    the only possible way to define advanced
    mathematical thinking. (Robert
    Schwarzenberger, 1991)
  • Mathematical point of view or mathematical way
    of viewing the world (Schoenfeld, 1992)
  • What comes first to mind is being alone in a
    room and thinking . . . I almost always wake up
    in the middle of the night, go to the john, and
    then go back to bed and spend a half hour
    thinking, not because I decided to think it just
    comes. (Paul Halmos, 1990 interview)

13
CLASSROOM EXAMPLES
  • Algebra
  • Calculus II
  • Differential Equations

14
ALGEBRA
  • Invent your own coordinate system. Explain any
    advantages and/or disadvantages of this system.
    Define clearly any letter(s) you are using. Also
    provide a picture so the context is clear.

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
CALCULUS
Product rule for differentiation (Brannen Ford,
2004 Dunkels Persson, 1980 Maharan
Shaughnessy, 1976 Perrin, 2007) Alternating
Series Test
18
STUDENT BENEFITS
  • Nature of mathematics
  • Where do I start?
  • Casting mathematics in a positive light
  • Ownership
  • The Stevenian Series
  • This is so cool because its mine!
  • Multiplicity of Solutions
  • Authenticity
  • Research oriented
  • Motivation

19
TEACHER CHALLENGES
  • Risk-taking Can I do this?
  • Uncertain outcome
  • (Initial) Student resistance/unwillingness

20
STUDENT FEEDBACK
  • This drove me nuts. I had trouble stopping
    thinking about it.
  • I have never worked so hard on one problem.
  • Hmmm, Ill never see AST the same way.
  • Is this like what Newton did?

21
DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
  • Chris Rasmussens Inquiry-oriented
  • Differential Equations (IO-DE)
  • Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K., Teppo, A.
    (2005). Advancing mathematical activity A
    practice-oriented view of advanced mathematical
    thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7
    (1), 51-73.
  • Rasmussen, C. Marrongelle, K. (2006).
    Pedagogical content tools Integrating student
    reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal
    for Research in Mathematics Education, 37 (5),
    388-420.
  • Rasmussen, C. King, K. (2000). Locating
    starting points in differential equations A
    realistic mathematics education approach.
    International Journal of Mathematical Education
    in Science and Technology, 31 (2), 161-172.
  • Rasmussen, C., Kwon, O.N. (2007). An
    inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate
    mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior,
    26, 189-194.
  • Wagner, J.F., Speer, N.M., Rossa, B. (2007).
    Beyond mathematical content knowledge A
    mathematicians knowledge needed for teaching an
    inquiry-oriented differential equations course.
    Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 247-266.

22
STUDENT FEEDBACK
23
STUDENT FEEDBACK
24
HOW CAN THESE TASKS BE DEVELOPED?
  • Open-ended and/or unusual exercises
  • Study the very content of mathematics
  • Why do mathematicians use the tools that they
    use?
  • Tasks share an element of invention (something
    newthinking like a mathematician)

25
Thanks for listening!
  • nabb_at_morainevalley.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com