selim PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 69
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: selim


1
Presentation Summary
  • Introduction Background and Projects
  • Emerging materials assessment methodologies.
  • Life Cycle Assessment methods, softwares,
    examples
  • Process Based Cost Modelling method, examples
  • Need for innovative methods Envt. Value Market
    potential
  • New Materials the Biopolymer challenge
  • Definition, production/market data
  • Main Suppliers
  • Properties, tech. Data, samples
  • Market developments, trends, takes
  • Biopolymers biodegradable, compostable or
    sustainable
  • Possible applications injection devices
  • Assessment Tools applications, enhancing products
    sustainability cartridges and injecting devices.
    Primary secondary packaging materials rubbers,
    silicones, glasses, polystyrols, PVC, PP..
  • Green Marketing, regulations
  • Biopolymer substitution
  • Conclusions and suggestions

2
  • Introduction background and projects
  • Materials assessment methods and tools the
    process engineer touch
  • Biopolymer challenge
  • Possible applications
  • Injections devices
  • Biopolymer substitution
  • Suggestions

OUTLINE
Novo Nordisk, Hilleröd September 7th, 2004
3
Selim Nouri MSc Injénieur process, Institut
National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy,
France.?
  • Education, background
  • Born near Versailles.
  • Imperial Park junior and senior high school in
    Nice
  • schools specialising in preparing pupils to take
    Grandes Écoles entrance, Lycée Massena, Nice
  • Grande Ecole, ENSIC, Nancy

4
Selim Nouri MSc Injénieur process, Institut
National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy,
France.(? me)
  • Recent History and Projects
  • Jan 04 - Now AGS Project Engineer
  • 2003 AirLiquide graduate trainee
  • 2002 French Agronomy Institute
  • 2000 Atofina hands-on internship
  • Previous Chalmers Exchange student in
    sustainable development (Environmentally
    Sustainable Process Technology Master Programme)

5
  • Heat shock enhanced hgH production project
  • Heating devices and thermocontrol techniques
  • Clean room environement
  • Biologists, geneticians

6
  • Process integration, Aspentech soft,
    International RD work Environment
  • Sustainable process, emissions reduction, waste
    management

7
  • AGS international partnership MIT-ETHZ-CTH-UT
  • Application and refinement of the sustainability
    assesment methodology sustainable polymers.
  • Work Environment ESA (LCA, Envt, technical
    change) MIT (PBCM, , early developement)
  • Industries

Etc..
8
Emerging material assessment Methodologies LCA
  • Life Cycle Assesment definition
  • Cradle to Grave snapshot which can be used to
    evaluate economic, social and environmental
    issues associated with a product/process.
  • A holistic approach to identify opportunities to
    reduce cost and environmental impact.

9
LCA procedure


10
LCA CTH competence
  • Environmetal System Analysis Department
    specialised in LCA för 10 år
  • The research focus on two perspectives, how the
    environmental tools (i.e. LCA, EMS, etc.) are
    used
  • "Tools seen from within", i.e. tools development
    and use (case studies).
  • "Tools seen from the outside", i.e how the
    environmental tools and methods are used in
    decision making
  • CiT Ekologik (a Chalmers Industriteknik company)
    Developps and sell LCA software

11
LCA softwares
  • consumer oriented software light-version
  • Professional software online databased,
    integrated Software, LCA button

12
LCA results example
  • GWP
  • NRR use
  • Conclusions?
  • Cf. The new danish
  • packaging tax

Patel 2001
13
Two types of LCA
  • State-oriented (accounting)
  • Change oriented (effects of change)

2004
Sanden 2004
14
Two types of LCA
  • State-oriented (accounting)
  • Change oriented (effects of change)

2004
Sanden 2004
15
Two types of LCA
  • State-oriented (accounting)
  • Change oriented (effects of change)

2004
Sanden 2004
16
Process-Based Cost Modeling (PBCM) the
engineering approach to techno-economics
questions (R. Kirchain MIT)
  • Objective
  • - Map from Process Description To Operation
    Cost
  • Purpose
  • - Inform Decisions Concerning Technology
    Alternatives BEFORE Operations are in place

Kirchain 2004
17
PBCM Forecasts Manufacturing Requirements and
Costs
  • PBCM builds cost up from technical detail,
    forecasting
  • - Processing requirements
  • Cycle times, equipment specifications
  • - Resource requirements
  • Number of tools, equipment, and laborers

Kirchain 2004
18
PBCM Provides Key Insights to StrategicPerformanc
e
  • Strategic strengths and weaknesses
  • Production volumes
  • Factor conditions
  • Key cost drivers
  • Allows detailed scenario analysis
  • Widely applied to explore component production

Kirchain 2004
19
PBCM for Early Stage Technologies
  • Process-based Cost Models can be applied to
    explore very early stage technologies
  • Based on known technical details
  • Early stage estimates are more uncertain
  • Identifies cost drivers
  • Quantifies needed technical hurdles
  • Allows technology-driven sensitivity analyses
  • Confirms strategic strengths
  • Case example
  • Emerging processes for Titanium production
    Three competing technologies

Kirchain 2004
20
PBCM Main advantages
  • Process based cost model affords robust method
  • Identifies cost drivers
  • Quantifies needed technical hurdles
  • Allows technology Allows technology-driven
    sensitivity analyses
  • Confirms strategic strengths
  • PBCM can be applied to early stage technologies
  • Can forecast the impact of technical change

Kirchain 2004
21
Need for Innovative Integrated Methods
  • Adress the issues that drive a materials
    potential for commercialization including those
    that determine its resource and envt. Impact.
  • Require an internally consistent synthesis of all
    current analytical methods

22
  • Require examining materials substitution from 5
    perspectives
  • Cost, tech. and Envt. Performance to lead to
    adoption
  • Potential for material/process to achieve those
    characteristics
  • The net impact on environment from an emerging
    technology over the entire material cycle
  • The manner new material markets are expected to
    evolve on demand
  • The mechanisms for communicating those info to
    decision makers and product designers

23
Current research status at ESA
  • Tools to Answer questions like How to assess the
    environmental impact of investments in new
    technologies?
  • We work along two lines
  • Adapt and extend LCA methodology PBCM
  • Develop new methodology
  • Technology path assessment (Sanden, Jonasson)

24
Ultimate Goal
  • Development of an integrated assessment
    methodology/software that enable positioning its
    user to be a world leader in identifying
    sustainable materials alternatives.
  • ? new materials

25
New Materials The biopolymers challengeDefinitio
n
  • Polymers from renewable natural resources, are
    called biopolymers
  • Often biodegradable and not toxic to produce
  • Can be produced by biological systems
    or chemically synthesized
  • Alternative to petroleum-based polymers
  • Starch-based polymers are often blends of starch
    and PE

26
Production and Market data
  • Production 200 million pounds (prediction) vs
    200 billion lbs plastics in the US alone
  • Consumption biodegradable polymers US 50 W.
    Europe (40) and Japan (10)

27
Main Producers
  • Polylactic acid (PLA)
  • Cargill Dow (NatureWorks)
  • Mitsui (Lacea)
  • Cellulose (acetates)
  • Eastman (Tenite)
  • IFA (Fasal)
  • Mazzucchelli (Bioceta)
  • UCB (Natureflex)
  • Starch blends
  • Biotec (Bioplast)
  • Novamont (MaterBi types)
  • Lactide/glycolide polymer
  • PURAC (Purasorb)
  • Boehinger-Ingelheim (Resomer)
  • Polyesters
  • BASF (Ecoflex)
  • DuPont (Biomax)
  • Eastman (Eastar Bio)
  • Showa Denko (Bionolle)
  • Solvay (Capa)
  • Plant base starch
  • Novamont (MaterBi)
  • Rodenburg Biopolymers (Solanyl)
  • Pollyhydroxyalkanoates
  • Biomer (Biomer)
  • PHB Industries (Biocycle)
  • ICI (Biopol)

28
Market developments
  • What attracts biopolymers to the market?
  • decrease (landfill) waste
  • save fossil fuels/energy
  • become more independent of fossil fuels
  • reduction of GHG-emissions
  • specific material properties

29
Biopolymer market size and longevity
  • World market could grow 30 per year for next
    decade
  • Biopolymer plastics could eventually capture
    10-20 of overall plastic market
  • Major drivers
  • Oil/crop price ratio
  • Disposal issues
  • Technology advances
  • Climate change concerns

30
Market developments, financial data
  • Packaging Market (high volume, low price)
  • High value applications drug delivery, medical
    care (low volume, high price)
  • Global drug delivery market expected to be 70
    Billion by 2005
  • Injectable market worth 16 Billion today
  • - Expected to double by 2005
  • Biotechnology drugs are losing patent protection
  • New biotechnology products will require drug
    delivery solutions to reach their potential

31
Strong pipeline to support sales growth
(NovoZymes Financial results 1H 2004)- more than
100 projects - approx. 13 of sales spent on RD
32
Biopolymers biodegradable, compostable or
sustainable?
  • Biopolymers should fit the waste management
    system look at the whole picture.
  • Germany packaging waste recycled 75 (2001)
  • Ireland packaging waste recycled 28 (2001)
  • Singapore 10 plastic recycled (2001)
  • USA less than 10 plastic recycled (2001)

33
Possible application injection devices
  • Green marketing
  • is made of environmentally friendly materials
    (polypropylene) which, after incineration, breaks
    down into water and carbon dioxide.
  • Helping in the material choice for products
  • Primary Packaging material - silicons, glass
  • Packaging cartridges inserted into trays made of
    polystyrol or PVC
  • Help in the early development phase and material
    substitution.

34
Possible application injection devices. Why?
  • Need of injection devices
  •  Simplify drug administration
  •  Increase dosing accuracy
  •  Reduce admix labor
  •  Minimize needle phobia (cf. Antares growth)
  •  Comply needle safety law
  • Reduce injection pain
  •  Differentiate a product
  • Enhance product value ?
  • AAPS Drug Delivery Device Workshop Judy Y. Chang

35
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Injection Devices
  •  Auto-injectors
  •  Pen systems Novo, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis
  • Mini pumps/patch systems
  •  Needle free injectors Antares
  •  Other injectors
  •  Needle safety devices
  • AAPS Drug Delivery Device Workshop Judy Y. Chang

36
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Industry Trend
  •  Pre-fill drugs in syringes or cartridges
  •  Incorporate injection devices
  •  Moving toward disposable devices
  • (cf. The Novo Nordisk insulin volume
  • split by injection method)

?? Enhance convenience and compliances ? ??
Increase competitive edge ?
Chang 2004
37
Pathways to product competition
patterns of product competition as markets mature
In this stage products that are disruptively
simple and convenient ? become most successful
Functionality
38
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Multiple Discipline Interrelationship
Commercial need
? Primary container
Target product profile
  • Product differentiation ?
  • Competition
  • User profile
  • Desire alternate configurations?
  • Syringe/cartridge
  • Rubber components
  • Component process
  • Filling operation/contractors

Device Development
Formulation
?
  • Protein concentration
  • Viscosity
  • Excipient
  • Device selection ?
  • Device features specifications

Chang 2004
39
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Device Development Activities

Device Design ?
Regulatory ?
Handling Studies
Clinical Acceptability
Device Performance ?
Risk Analysis
Syringe/cartridge physical property ?
Assembly
Product Quality ?
Chang 2004
40
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Multiple Partners
  •  Syringe/cartridge manufacturer (Shott?)
  •  Rubber stopper and lined seal manufacturer
  •  Device design/manufacturer
  •  Filling contractor
  •  Packaging machines contractors

?? Project management is complex ? ?? Efficient
open communication is the key ?
41
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Device Development
?
?
Chang 2004
42
Possible application injection devices. Why?
Summary
  •  Biotechnology pharmaceutical markets are
    confronted to significant structural changes (cf.
    integration of injection device in the
    development process) ?
  •  Multiple disciplines are required ?
  •  Multiple partners make the development project
    complex and challenging ?

43
Biopolymer substitution injection devices
Biomer (PHB) Properties
44
Biopolymer substitution injection devices
PHB vs PP
45
Biopolymer substitution injection devices
46
Cost, energy, and emissions
47
What can we bring you
  • Methodology to identify sustainable materials
  • Answer questions like How to assess the
    environmental impact of investments in new
    technologies?
  • Sustainable analysis for CONVENIENT solutions
  • EXAMPLE

48
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
time
time
(WMS)
WMS
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
49
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
time
time
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
50
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
time
time
DOES NOT FIT
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
51
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
time
Time/RD
DOES NOT FIT
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
WMS
INFLUENCE
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
BDP trend
52
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
BDP
time
Time/RD
DOES NOT FIT
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
WMS
INFLUENCE
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
BDP trend
53
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
BDP
time
Time/RD
DOES NOT FIT
FIT
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
WMS
INFLUENCE
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
BDP trend
54
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
BDP
time
Time/RD
DOES NOT FIT
DOES NOT FIT
FIT
FIT
(WMS)
WMS
WMS
INFLUENCE
INFLUENCE
Polymer industries
BDP trend
55
CONVENIENCE PRICE - SUSTAINABILITY
Home care trend
BDP
time
Convenience/green
(WMS)
56
the future is at hand.Thank you
Pic. Sanden 2004
57
Backup slides
58
Reloading Drug Eluting Coatings
Concentration Gradient
Drug Molecules
Controlled Magnetic Field
Polymer Coating
Nanomagnetic layer
Substrate
59
Surface Elution on Demand
Particle type A Drug A
Controlled Magnetic Field A
Controlled Magnetic Field B
Polymer Coating
Nanomagnetic layer
Substrate
60
Guided Drug Delivery
Other options for targeting A - Direct injection
into tumor site B - Coating NMP with antibodies
to target tumor
Solid tumor
3 - Apply magnetic field to concentrate particles
in tumor
1 - Inject NMPs IV
2 Particles circulate in blood stream
61
Backup slides
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
PBCM Allows Technology Driven Sensitivity
Example Plasma Quench
65
PBCM Allows Scenario Based Assessment of
Production Economics
66
PBCM Quantifies Technological Hurdles Example
Cambridge Process
67
Possible application injection devices.
?
The Basis of Competition in the Disk Drive
Industry
68
  • Contacts
  • Novamont (Roberto Marengon)
  • Dupont Biomax (Laurent Ziche)

69
Sources of Information
  • AAPS Drug Delivery Device Workshop Judy Y. Chang
    Genentech, Inc.May 20, 2004
  • Eli Lilly and Company Innovation in Diabetes
    Care
  • Dr Roger G Harrison PhD - CEO Antares
    presentation
  • Assessing the Impact of Emergent Technologies.
    Randolph Kirchain MIT.
  • Green Plastics Dr. R. Rangaprasad Dr. Y.B.
    Vasudeo
  • Company Websites
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com