Title: The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic Banking Sector: Issues and Dilemmas
1The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic
Banking SectorIssues and Dilemmas
- Seminar at the Central Bank of Iceland
- February 18, 2002
- Gudmundur Magnusson
- Saso Andonov
2I. The Original (Old) Basle Accord (1988) EU
and EEA (1993)
- Financial stability
- Levelling of the competitive field
- Minimum requirements
- Standardization
- Credit risk
- Simplicity
3II. The Basle Proposals for Market Risk VAR
(1993 and 1995)
- Internal Value at Risk models
- Approval by supervisory authorities
- Trade off between CAR and VAR
4III. The New Basle Accord Proposals
- Still more financial stability
- More differentiated measures of credit risk
- Other types of risk (liquidity, operational,
legal risk) - Supervisory review process
- More transparency
- Enhanced market discipline
5IV. Points for Discussion
- Comparison of the New and the Old rules and
potential implications of the new standards for
credit risk - (a) Choice between two alternative approaches
the standardized approach (SA) and the
internal ratings based approach (IRBA). - SA external credit assessment
- IRBA own internal rating of borrowers (two
options foundation approach or own
estimates) - (b) Supervisors could require higher that the
minimum capital target - (c) IRBA more risk sensitive good for big banks,
bad for small?
6Price Structure of Credits With and Without Use
of Credit Models
7Proposals and Practice
- Cost of capital versus risk-adjusted rate of
return - Credit risk models in practice
- VaR models, insurance-inspired models,
Option-based models - Acceptance by supervisory authorities
8Points for Disscusion cont.
- (d) More average capital needed as a cushion for
macroeconomic fluctuations? - (e) Small countries and small banks will suffer?
- (f) Manna from heaven for the rating agencies?
9V. Comprehensive Risk Management on the Banking
Industry Level
- Comprehensive versus narrow scope of banking
- Investment banks and commercial banks
- New types of instruments
- Accounting standards
- Disintegration of banking
- Globalisation
- Lender of last resort
- Regulatory arbitrage
10D.T. Llewellyn Assessing the New Basle Capital
Accord
- Criteria for judging the effectiveness of any
capital adequacy regime the following twelve
tests are suggested - Does it have the effect of aligning the
regulatory and economic capital? - Does it create incentives for effective and
efficient risk analysis, management and control
mechanisms - Does it create appropriate incentives for the
correct pricing of the risk? - Does it creates incentives for an efficient
allocation of capital within the bank?
11cont.
- Does it create perverse incentives for regulatory
arbitrage? - Does it create unwarranted entry barriers?
- Are the capital requirements competitively
neutral? - Are the requirements appropriate for overall
portfolio risk, as opposed to the sum of project
risks? - Does it have the effect of impairing competition
in banking markets? - Does it have unfavourable effects on the
macroeconomy - Is the new Accord unnecessarily complicated?
- Does it create or reinforce incentives for
shareholders and other official supervisors to
monitor the risks of banks and for market
discipline to be exercised?
12VI. CAR of the Icelandic Banking
System1989-2001
13Second the Alternative One
- Financial Supervisory Authority of Iceland
- "The FSE has also declared that large Icelandic
credit institutions, even showing an effective
risk management and internal control, should at
least aim for a minimum of a 10 CAD ratio. Other
credit institutions should aim for a higher CAD
ratio". Annual Report, 2000 - Central Bank of Iceland
- "The capital ratio of the financial institutions
as a whole has been declining in recent years. At
the end of 2000 it measured 9.9, down from 10.6
the previous year. The commercial banks failed to
reach their target of maintaining capital ratios
of 10 and above last year". CB of Iceland
Monetary Bulletin, Financial Stability, 2001, - International Monetary Fund
- "Decline in Icelandic banks CARs (both including
and excluding subordinated loans), reflect the
continued expansion of banks balance sheets
without a corresponding increase in capital, as
well as losses sustained on portfolio investments
as a result of the emerging pressures in the
domestic and foreign markets". IMF Iceland
Financial System Stability Assessment
14Third From an International Perspective
- Country 1997 1998
- Denmark 11.61 11.32
- Sweden 13.0 10.8
- Norway 12.6 12.6
- Iceland 9.8 9.1
- Finland 11.9 11.5
- USA 12.8
- Japan 9.1
- Israel 10.5
15VII. Vulnerability and CAR in the Nordic Countries
- Maintaining credible and prudent levels of CAR
may provide an efficient mechanism in case of
worsening macroeconomic conditions that may drive
the system into banking crises - It is a critical indicator of a disturbance of
any nature in the bank operational environment
and will ultimately be reflected in the changes
of this ratio - It can serve as an early warning signal
- Point for discussion Would the banking crises in
the Nordic countries in the early 90s have been
less adverse if agents had maintained higher than
the minimum capital standards? - Is the CAR safe at any speed?
16For Consideration CAR in the Early 90s
- Lesson Safety of the CAR depends both on its
quality and nature of the environment
17VIII. The Optimal Size of the CAR
- In economic terms, regulatory capital should not
be increased beyond the point where the marginal
cost outweighs the expected marginal benefit from
holding capital - The most quoted criteria in determining the size
of the CAR are - Cost of raising capital
- Economic cycles and their importance for capital
planning - Size of the agent and its importance for the
volatility of the income streams - Access to liquidity including the Central Bank
- Credibility and peer group pressures
18Modelling the Optimality of CAR
- In our opinion, optimality of the CAR should be
derived from basic characteristics of the
economy, both macroeconomic and microeconomic
ones - For that purpose, we are proposing four variables
(or their proxies) to be taken into account when
determining the desired capital ratio above the
regulatory minimum - The policy rule is based on the weighted
differences or relative differences of the
variables from matching peers (benchmarks)
19Variable Candidates
- Macroeconomic volatility measure
- Macroeconomic volatility - GDP real growth rate,
price level, productivity, terms of trade - Diversification measure
- Sectoral measures - such as loan concentrations
ratios across sectors - Overall portfolio measures - such as single
exposure limits
20continuing
- Microeconomic or banking sector-specific measure
- Capital strength - such as the size and structure
of the own capital - Banking-sector specific volatility, such as bank
deposits, bank credit to the private sector etc - Profitability measure
- Banking sector efficiency - measured through
pre-tax profits as single measure or through
weighted index of net interest income,
non-interest income, operating expenses and the
pre-tax profits.
21- Formally
- Hypothesis ?
? - Where
- First term stands for macroeconomic volatility
effect - Second for diversification effect
- Third for microeconomic or banking
sector-specific one and - Fourth for bank profitability effect.
22- Exposition
- Theoretically dCARa(0.026-0.0098) a0.0152
- where 0.08 is the mandatory capital requirement
- 0.26 is the standard deviation of
the GDP of Iceland 1989-2000 - 0.0098 is the standard deviation of the OECD
countries GDP over the same period - How to determine or calibrate a?
- The value of the parameter a can be treated as
adjustment parameter of the mandatory minimum and
it can be derived using cross-country panel data
estimates - In a logarithmic multiple regression framework, a
can be interpreted as an elasticity - One can also impose additional restrictions to
different parameters or group of parameters in
order to determine their relative importance.
23IX. Financial Stability Considerations
- Two-front approach
- Accounting for structural vulnerabilities
- Improving risk management practices.
- Structural vulnerabilities need to be located in
the main sectors of the economy and assessment to
be made as to how these can be met with
corresponding buffers - Concerning risk management practices, the optimal
trade-off needs to be found concerning market
induced vs. regulatory imposed risk management
practices, both at the banking industry level and
the individual firm level.
24Structural Vulnerabilities and Buffers
25Market-Based vs. Regulatory-Imposed Risk
Management Practices
- Regulation-Based
- Predominant role of
- FSA power
- Central Bank Regulations
- Accounting and Risk Management Standards
- Other government regulation
- Market-Based
- Predominant role of
- Comprehensive risk
- management practices
- within the banks VS.
- CAR, VAR, Credit Risk Modelling etc
- Banks and MUST
- Credit Rating Agencies Indications
- Transparency of market information and active
shareholders - Mandatory rolling-over of certain part of sub
loans on a secondary market.
26The Early Experience of the Old Basle Capital
Adequacy Framework 1988
271992
281996
29Model of Bank Behaviour Under Capital Regulation
- Variable BIS is defined as
L - commercial loans B - bonds D - deposits R
- subordinated debts K - capital C(.) - cost
function of BIS r - interest rates
30Nominator vs. Denominator Changes of the CAR in
G-10
- Number of cases where changes in capital and
risk-weighted assets contributed positively ()
or negatively (-) to the change in capital
adequacy ratio
31Areas of Impact of the Basle Capital Framework
- Impact on Banks Balance Sheets
- Level of Capital Ratios
- Structure of Capital
- Risk-taking Behaviour
- Capital Arbitrage Effects
- Real Sector Effects
- Impact on Net Domestic Credit
- Impact on Output
- Impact on Long-Run Competitiveness of Banks
- Banks vs. Other Credit Institutions
- International Competitiveness Considerations
32Contrasting Empirical Evidence
- In adjusting their balance sheets, banks
attempted to respond in the least costly way to
binding capital constraints, depending on the
cycle and the financial position - Large and growing capital arbitrage may be
motivated by other factors, such as taking
advantages of economies of scale, better
diversification of funding sources etc - Changes in bank capital affect lending
- Money matters vs. lending matters for output
growth - Evident shift in the funding share by type of
agents that can not be attributed solely to the
capital regulation - Cost of capital matters.
33The Real Meaning of the Capital Adequacy Ratio
- The Fundamental Rule
- Using the Basle model should not mean that the
system is faithfully copied or not, but whether
the appropriate adaptations were made to reflect
local conditions - Adaptations should be accounted for the risk
environment - Ratio analysis should always be complemented by
qualitative assessment of the banks ability to
manage its risks -
34Other Aspects Deserving Particular Attention
- Reliable market pricing of assets, particularly
loan portfolio review and assets classification - Collateral (re)valuation
- Loan loss provisioning and all that
- Interest income recognition policies
- Volatility and deepness of the markets of
operation
35Iceland Commercial and Savings Banks CAR and the
Risk Profile
36CAR, Macroeconomy and Banking Sector Indicators
Regression Results
- Does CAR reflects the macroeconomic development
and how macroeconomic shocks are accounted for? - The impact of CAR on bank lending has Icelandic
banking sector experienced credit crunch as a
result of the imposed capital constraint - Structural dimension of the CAR which parts tend
to add to the rise/fall in the CAR?
37Variables Included
- GDP - Real GDP growth rage, as proxy for the
overall macroeconomic stance and the demand side
of the bank lending - BLEND - Annual rate of change in bank lending
- BDEP - Bank deposits as share of GDP
- GRSAV Gross saving rate, annually, as supply
side factor of the bank lending - DISC Discount Rate, as proxy for the supply
side of the bank lending - SUBL Subordinated Loans
- TTRADE - Terms of trade, as proxy of the
macroeconomic fluctuations - DSHOCK - Dummy variable, having a value of 1 in
the years when economy was hit by shock, and zero
otherwise, as proxy for the shock performance
38Results
- Dependent Variables CAR (A1) BLEND (A2 A3)
- Independent Variables
39Results Interpretations
- Higher GDP growth rates and positive terms of
trade have profound demand effects on lending
causing increase in loans where excessively
deteriorating macroeconomic conditions reduce
credit - Sign of discount rate is positive contrary to the
theory where higher the discount rate the lower
should be the rise in credits - Increase in lending is accompanied by
deteriorating capital adequacy ratios
40Cont.
- On the other hand, capital ratio moves
anticyclically w.r.t. the movement of GDP growth
rate, while at the same time being negatively
affected by the macroeconomic shocks - Crucial issue is how banks are achieving higher
or maintaining the desired level of the CAR by
not reducing lending, for example? - CAR level is approached in a residual fashion by
the changes in the other parts of the profit
function.
41Sub-Loans and Bank Capital
42Iceland CAR and Sub-Loans
43The Impact of the New Basle Capital Adequacy
Framework
- Points for Discussion
- Size versus distribution of the CAR
- Procyclicality versus anticyclicality
- Banks behaviour versus CRAs behaviour
-
44Conclusion
- CAR is becoming one of the main financial
indicators along with the prevailing market
conditions that always require certain margin
over the minimum - If banks should set more capital aside as the
risk increases, how can one prevent sharp
portfolio reallocations in times of stress? - CRAs behaviour will be crucial for the financial
stability.