The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic Banking Sector: Issues and Dilemmas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic Banking Sector: Issues and Dilemmas

Description:

... as a result of the emerging pressures in the domestic and foreign ... CAR level is approached in a residual fashion by the changes in the other parts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: sedla
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic Banking Sector: Issues and Dilemmas


1
The BIS Regulatory Framework and Icelandic
Banking SectorIssues and Dilemmas
  • Seminar at the Central Bank of Iceland
  • February 18, 2002
  • Gudmundur Magnusson
  • Saso Andonov

2
I. The Original (Old) Basle Accord (1988) EU
and EEA (1993)
  • Financial stability
  • Levelling of the competitive field
  • Minimum requirements
  • Standardization
  • Credit risk
  • Simplicity

3
II. The Basle Proposals for Market Risk VAR
(1993 and 1995)
  • Internal Value at Risk models
  • Approval by supervisory authorities
  • Trade off between CAR and VAR

4
III. The New Basle Accord Proposals
  • Still more financial stability
  • More differentiated measures of credit risk
  • Other types of risk (liquidity, operational,
    legal risk)
  • Supervisory review process
  • More transparency
  • Enhanced market discipline

5
IV. Points for Discussion
  • Comparison of the New and the Old rules and
    potential implications of the new standards for
    credit risk
  • (a) Choice between two alternative approaches
    the standardized approach (SA) and the
    internal ratings based approach (IRBA).
  • SA external credit assessment
  • IRBA own internal rating of borrowers (two
    options foundation approach or own
    estimates)
  • (b) Supervisors could require higher that the
    minimum capital target
  • (c) IRBA more risk sensitive good for big banks,
    bad for small?

6
Price Structure of Credits With and Without Use
of Credit Models
7
Proposals and Practice
  • Cost of capital versus risk-adjusted rate of
    return
  • Credit risk models in practice
  • VaR models, insurance-inspired models,
    Option-based models
  • Acceptance by supervisory authorities

8
Points for Disscusion cont.
  • (d) More average capital needed as a cushion for
    macroeconomic fluctuations?
  • (e) Small countries and small banks will suffer?
  • (f) Manna from heaven for the rating agencies?

9
V. Comprehensive Risk Management on the Banking
Industry Level
  • Comprehensive versus narrow scope of banking
  • Investment banks and commercial banks
  • New types of instruments
  • Accounting standards
  • Disintegration of banking
  • Globalisation
  • Lender of last resort
  • Regulatory arbitrage

10
D.T. Llewellyn Assessing the New Basle Capital
Accord
  • Criteria for judging the effectiveness of any
    capital adequacy regime the following twelve
    tests are suggested
  • Does it have the effect of aligning the
    regulatory and economic capital?
  • Does it create incentives for effective and
    efficient risk analysis, management and control
    mechanisms
  • Does it create appropriate incentives for the
    correct pricing of the risk?
  • Does it creates incentives for an efficient
    allocation of capital within the bank?

11
cont.
  • Does it create perverse incentives for regulatory
    arbitrage?
  • Does it create unwarranted entry barriers?
  • Are the capital requirements competitively
    neutral?
  • Are the requirements appropriate for overall
    portfolio risk, as opposed to the sum of project
    risks?
  • Does it have the effect of impairing competition
    in banking markets?
  • Does it have unfavourable effects on the
    macroeconomy
  • Is the new Accord unnecessarily complicated?
  • Does it create or reinforce incentives for
    shareholders and other official supervisors to
    monitor the risks of banks and for market
    discipline to be exercised?

12
VI. CAR of the Icelandic Banking
System1989-2001
13
Second the Alternative One
  • Financial Supervisory Authority of Iceland
  • "The FSE has also declared that large Icelandic
    credit institutions, even showing an effective
    risk management and internal control, should at
    least aim for a minimum of a 10 CAD ratio. Other
    credit institutions should aim for a higher CAD
    ratio". Annual Report, 2000
  • Central Bank of Iceland
  • "The capital ratio of the financial institutions
    as a whole has been declining in recent years. At
    the end of 2000 it measured 9.9, down from 10.6
    the previous year. The commercial banks failed to
    reach their target of maintaining capital ratios
    of 10 and above last year". CB of Iceland
    Monetary Bulletin, Financial Stability, 2001,
  • International Monetary Fund
  • "Decline in Icelandic banks CARs (both including
    and excluding subordinated loans), reflect the
    continued expansion of banks balance sheets
    without a corresponding increase in capital, as
    well as losses sustained on portfolio investments
    as a result of the emerging pressures in the
    domestic and foreign markets". IMF Iceland
    Financial System Stability Assessment

14
Third From an International Perspective
  • Country 1997 1998
  • Denmark 11.61 11.32
  • Sweden 13.0 10.8
  • Norway 12.6 12.6
  • Iceland 9.8 9.1
  • Finland 11.9 11.5
  • USA 12.8
  • Japan 9.1
  • Israel 10.5

15
VII. Vulnerability and CAR in the Nordic Countries
  • Maintaining credible and prudent levels of CAR
    may provide an efficient mechanism in case of
    worsening macroeconomic conditions that may drive
    the system into banking crises
  • It is a critical indicator of a disturbance of
    any nature in the bank operational environment
    and will ultimately be reflected in the changes
    of this ratio
  • It can serve as an early warning signal
  • Point for discussion Would the banking crises in
    the Nordic countries in the early 90s have been
    less adverse if agents had maintained higher than
    the minimum capital standards?
  • Is the CAR safe at any speed?

16
For Consideration CAR in the Early 90s
  • Lesson Safety of the CAR depends both on its
    quality and nature of the environment

17
VIII. The Optimal Size of the CAR
  • In economic terms, regulatory capital should not
    be increased beyond the point where the marginal
    cost outweighs the expected marginal benefit from
    holding capital
  • The most quoted criteria in determining the size
    of the CAR are
  • Cost of raising capital
  • Economic cycles and their importance for capital
    planning
  • Size of the agent and its importance for the
    volatility of the income streams
  • Access to liquidity including the Central Bank
  • Credibility and peer group pressures

18
Modelling the Optimality of CAR
  • In our opinion, optimality of the CAR should be
    derived from basic characteristics of the
    economy, both macroeconomic and microeconomic
    ones
  • For that purpose, we are proposing four variables
    (or their proxies) to be taken into account when
    determining the desired capital ratio above the
    regulatory minimum
  • The policy rule is based on the weighted
    differences or relative differences of the
    variables from matching peers (benchmarks)

19
Variable Candidates
  • Macroeconomic volatility measure
  • Macroeconomic volatility - GDP real growth rate,
    price level, productivity, terms of trade
  • Diversification measure
  • Sectoral measures - such as loan concentrations
    ratios across sectors
  • Overall portfolio measures - such as single
    exposure limits

20
continuing
  • Microeconomic or banking sector-specific measure
  • Capital strength - such as the size and structure
    of the own capital
  • Banking-sector specific volatility, such as bank
    deposits, bank credit to the private sector etc
  • Profitability measure
  • Banking sector efficiency - measured through
    pre-tax profits as single measure or through
    weighted index of net interest income,
    non-interest income, operating expenses and the
    pre-tax profits.

21
  • Formally
  • Hypothesis ?
    ?
  • Where
  • First term stands for macroeconomic volatility
    effect
  • Second for diversification effect
  • Third for microeconomic or banking
    sector-specific one and
  • Fourth for bank profitability effect.

22
  • Exposition
  • Theoretically dCARa(0.026-0.0098) a0.0152
  • where 0.08 is the mandatory capital requirement
  • 0.26 is the standard deviation of
    the GDP of Iceland 1989-2000
  • 0.0098 is the standard deviation of the OECD
    countries GDP over the same period
  • How to determine or calibrate a?
  • The value of the parameter a can be treated as
    adjustment parameter of the mandatory minimum and
    it can be derived using cross-country panel data
    estimates
  • In a logarithmic multiple regression framework, a
    can be interpreted as an elasticity
  • One can also impose additional restrictions to
    different parameters or group of parameters in
    order to determine their relative importance.

23
IX. Financial Stability Considerations
  • Two-front approach
  • Accounting for structural vulnerabilities
  • Improving risk management practices.
  • Structural vulnerabilities need to be located in
    the main sectors of the economy and assessment to
    be made as to how these can be met with
    corresponding buffers
  • Concerning risk management practices, the optimal
    trade-off needs to be found concerning market
    induced vs. regulatory imposed risk management
    practices, both at the banking industry level and
    the individual firm level.

24
Structural Vulnerabilities and Buffers
25
Market-Based vs. Regulatory-Imposed Risk
Management Practices
  • Regulation-Based
  • Predominant role of
  • FSA power
  • Central Bank Regulations
  • Accounting and Risk Management Standards
  • Other government regulation
  • Market-Based
  • Predominant role of
  • Comprehensive risk
  • management practices
  • within the banks VS.
  • CAR, VAR, Credit Risk Modelling etc
  • Banks and MUST
  • Credit Rating Agencies Indications
  • Transparency of market information and active
    shareholders
  • Mandatory rolling-over of certain part of sub
    loans on a secondary market.

26
The Early Experience of the Old Basle Capital
Adequacy Framework 1988
27
1992
28
1996
29
Model of Bank Behaviour Under Capital Regulation
  • Variable BIS is defined as

L - commercial loans B - bonds D - deposits R
- subordinated debts K - capital C(.) - cost
function of BIS r - interest rates
30
Nominator vs. Denominator Changes of the CAR in
G-10
  • Number of cases where changes in capital and
    risk-weighted assets contributed positively ()
    or negatively (-) to the change in capital
    adequacy ratio

31
Areas of Impact of the Basle Capital Framework
  • Impact on Banks Balance Sheets
  • Level of Capital Ratios
  • Structure of Capital
  • Risk-taking Behaviour
  • Capital Arbitrage Effects
  • Real Sector Effects
  • Impact on Net Domestic Credit
  • Impact on Output
  • Impact on Long-Run Competitiveness of Banks
  • Banks vs. Other Credit Institutions
  • International Competitiveness Considerations

32
Contrasting Empirical Evidence
  • In adjusting their balance sheets, banks
    attempted to respond in the least costly way to
    binding capital constraints, depending on the
    cycle and the financial position
  • Large and growing capital arbitrage may be
    motivated by other factors, such as taking
    advantages of economies of scale, better
    diversification of funding sources etc
  • Changes in bank capital affect lending
  • Money matters vs. lending matters for output
    growth
  • Evident shift in the funding share by type of
    agents that can not be attributed solely to the
    capital regulation
  • Cost of capital matters.

33
The Real Meaning of the Capital Adequacy Ratio
  • The Fundamental Rule
  • Using the Basle model should not mean that the
    system is faithfully copied or not, but whether
    the appropriate adaptations were made to reflect
    local conditions
  • Adaptations should be accounted for the risk
    environment
  • Ratio analysis should always be complemented by
    qualitative assessment of the banks ability to
    manage its risks

34
Other Aspects Deserving Particular Attention
  • Reliable market pricing of assets, particularly
    loan portfolio review and assets classification
  • Collateral (re)valuation
  • Loan loss provisioning and all that
  • Interest income recognition policies
  • Volatility and deepness of the markets of
    operation

35
Iceland Commercial and Savings Banks CAR and the
Risk Profile
36
CAR, Macroeconomy and Banking Sector Indicators
Regression Results
  • Does CAR reflects the macroeconomic development
    and how macroeconomic shocks are accounted for?
  • The impact of CAR on bank lending has Icelandic
    banking sector experienced credit crunch as a
    result of the imposed capital constraint
  • Structural dimension of the CAR which parts tend
    to add to the rise/fall in the CAR?

37
Variables Included
  • GDP - Real GDP growth rage, as proxy for the
    overall macroeconomic stance and the demand side
    of the bank lending
  • BLEND - Annual rate of change in bank lending
  • BDEP - Bank deposits as share of GDP
  • GRSAV Gross saving rate, annually, as supply
    side factor of the bank lending
  • DISC Discount Rate, as proxy for the supply
    side of the bank lending
  • SUBL Subordinated Loans
  • TTRADE - Terms of trade, as proxy of the
    macroeconomic fluctuations
  • DSHOCK - Dummy variable, having a value of 1 in
    the years when economy was hit by shock, and zero
    otherwise, as proxy for the shock performance

38
Results
  • Dependent Variables CAR (A1) BLEND (A2 A3)
  • Independent Variables

39
Results Interpretations
  • Higher GDP growth rates and positive terms of
    trade have profound demand effects on lending
    causing increase in loans where excessively
    deteriorating macroeconomic conditions reduce
    credit
  • Sign of discount rate is positive contrary to the
    theory where higher the discount rate the lower
    should be the rise in credits
  • Increase in lending is accompanied by
    deteriorating capital adequacy ratios

40
Cont.
  • On the other hand, capital ratio moves
    anticyclically w.r.t. the movement of GDP growth
    rate, while at the same time being negatively
    affected by the macroeconomic shocks
  • Crucial issue is how banks are achieving higher
    or maintaining the desired level of the CAR by
    not reducing lending, for example?
  • CAR level is approached in a residual fashion by
    the changes in the other parts of the profit
    function.

41
Sub-Loans and Bank Capital
42
Iceland CAR and Sub-Loans
43
The Impact of the New Basle Capital Adequacy
Framework
  • Points for Discussion
  • Size versus distribution of the CAR
  • Procyclicality versus anticyclicality
  • Banks behaviour versus CRAs behaviour

44
Conclusion
  • CAR is becoming one of the main financial
    indicators along with the prevailing market
    conditions that always require certain margin
    over the minimum
  • If banks should set more capital aside as the
    risk increases, how can one prevent sharp
    portfolio reallocations in times of stress?
  • CRAs behaviour will be crucial for the financial
    stability.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com