The Paris Peace Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Paris Peace Conference

Description:

... to punish Germany in a similar fashion to the French for her apparent sole ... with the aim of grouping together ethnic minorities in their own states, free ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:431
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: seanga
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Paris Peace Conference


1
The Paris Peace Conference The Treaty of
Versailles
2
The Paris Peace Conference
  • Treaty of Versailles (1919) was the peace
    treaty which officially ended World War I between
    the Allied and Associated Powers and the German
    Empire. After six months of negotiations, which
    took place at the Paris Peace Conference, the
    treaty was signed as a follow-up to the armistice
    signed in November 1918 (which had put an end to
    the actual fighting). Although there were many
    provisions in the treaty, one of the more
    important and recognized ones required that
    Germany accept full responsibility for causing
    the war and, under the terms of articles 231-247,
    make reparations to certain countries that had
    made up the Allies.

3
The Key Players
  • The "Big Three" that negotiated the treaty
    consisted of Prime Minister David Lloyd George of
    the UK, President Georges Clemenceau of France
    and President Woodrow Wilson of the USA. The
    Prime Minister of Italy, Vittorio Orlando, also
    played a minor part in the discussions. Germany
    was not invited to France to discuss the treaty.
    At Versailles, it was difficult to decide on a
    common position because their aims conflicted
    with one another. The result was said to be a
    compromise that nobody liked.

4
French Aims
  • France had suffered very heavy casualties
    during the war (some 1.24 million military and
    40,000 civilians dead), and much of the war had
    been fought on French soil. France wanted to be
    given control of many of Germany's factories. In
    wanting this, Clemenceau was representing the
    interests and opinions of the French public.
    Territorily, France felt that Germany should be
    punished. Obviously, he demanded the return of
    Alsace-Lorraine to France, but also the
    demilitarisation of the Rhineland to act as a
    buffer zone against future attacks. Furthermore,
    Germanys colonies should be taken from her and
    distributed between the victors.

5
  • Clemenceau's intentions were therefore simple
    punitive reparations and Germanys military to be
    not only weakened for the time being, but
    permanently weakened so as never to be able to
    invade France again. Clemenceau also wanted to
    symbolically destroy the old, militaristic
    Germany.
  • He also wanted to protect secret treaties and
    impose naval blockades around Germany, so that
    France could control trade imported to and
    exported from the defeated country.
  • Clemenceau was the most radical member of the Big
    Four, and received the nickname The Tiger".

6
Belgian Aims
  • Both France and Belgium argued that claims
    for direct damage should receive priority in any
    distribution of reparations. Belgium had been
    picked clean. In the heavily industrialized north
    of France, the Germans had shipped out what they
    wanted for their own use and destroyed much of
    the rest. Even as German forces were retreating
    in 1918, they found time to blow up France's most
    important coal mines.

7
British Aims
  • It is often suggested that Lloyd-George
    represented the middle ground between the
    idealistic Wilson and the vengeful Clemenceau.
    The British public wanted to punish Germany in a
    similar fashion to the French for her apparent
    sole responsibility for the outbreak of the war,
    and had been promised such a treaty in the 1918
    election that Lloyd George had won. There was
    also pressure from the Conservatives (who were
    part of the coalition government) demanding that
    Germany be punished severely in order to prevent
    such a war in the future as well as preserving
    Britains empire. Lloyd-George did manage to
    increase the overall reparations payment and
    Britains share by demanding compensation for
    widows, orphans, and men left unable to work
    through injury. Also, he wanted to maintain and
    possibly increase Britains colonies, and both he
    and Clemenceau felt threatened by Wilsons
    self-determination, which they saw as a direct
    threat to their respective empires. Lastly, like
    Clemenceau, he supported upholding secret
    treaties and the idea of a naval blockade.

8
  • However, Lloyd George was aware of the
    potential trouble that could come from an
    embittered Germany, and he felt that a less harsh
    treaty that did not engender vengence would be
    better at preserving peace in the long run.
    Another factor was that Germany was Britains
    second largest trade partner, and a reduced
    German economy due to reparations would lower
    Britains trade. Moreover, he (and Clemenceau)
    recognised that Americas status as an economic
    superpower would lead to the U.S. becoming a
    military superpower in the future, and
    subsequently, Wilsons idealistic stance could
    not be laughed at if Britain and France were to
    remain on good terms with the USA. This helps to
    understand why the League of Nations, Wilsons
    main idea (along with self-determination), was
    apparently jumped at by Britain and France when
    Wilson arrived at the peace conference.
    Furthermore, Britain wanted to maintain the
    'Balance of Power' - no country within Europe
    being allowed to become a lot more powerful than
    the others. If France's wishes were carried out,
    then not only would Germany be crippled, but
    France would soon become the main superpower, and
    so disrupt the Balance of Power in two ways.

9
  • Overall, Lloyd-George's aims can be summarised
    as follows 1) To defend British interests by
    preserving Britains naval supremacy that had
    been threatened by Germany in the run up to the
    war, maintaining Britains empire and possibly
    increased colonial expansion 2) To reduce
    Germanys future military power and to obtain
    reparations and lastly, 3) To not create an
    embittered Germany that would seek revenge and
    threaten peace in the long term future.

10
USAs Aims
  • The United States of America took a more
    peaceful view towards the reparations of Germany.
    They put forward fourteen points, which the
    German public thought that the Treaty would be
    based around.

11
  • The first five of Wilson's Fourteen Points were
    quite general
  • I. The Abolition of Secret Treaties
  • Secret treaties were common before the First
    World War, and many blamed them for helping spark
    the conflict.
  • II. The Freedom of the Seas
  • The freedom of the seas allowed for freedom of
    navigation outside territorial waters at times of
    war and peace, but also allowed for total and
    partial blockades "for the enforcement of
    international covenants." This proposal was
    opposed in particular by the United Kingdom.
  • III. Free Trade
  • Free trade provided for the removal of economic
    barriers between peaceful nations, also called
    for the introduction of equality in trading
    conditions.
  • IV. Disarmament
  • Disarmament "to the lowest point consistent with
    domestic safety."
  • V. Adjustment of Colonial Claims.
  • Wilson called for decolonization and national
    self-determination for formerly colonized
    countries, and for the people of the world to
    give equal weight to the opinions of the
    colonized peoples as to those of the colonial
    powers.

12
  • Points six through thirteen were more specific,
    dealing with the situation of specific countries
  • VI. Russia
  • In the aftermath of the October Revolution and
    the context of the ongoing Civil War, Russia was
    to be assured its independent development. This
    also called for a withdrawal from occupied
    Russian territory.
  • VII. The restoration of Belgium
  • Belgium to be evacuated and restored to prewar
    conditions
  • VIII. Alsace-Lorraine
  • France had lost Alsace-Lorraine to Germany
    following the 1870-71 Franco-Prussian War it was
    to be returned.
  • IX. Italy
  • The borders of Italy were to be redrawn on lines
    of nationality. Ignoring the territorial promises
    made under the secret 1915 London Pact, whereby
    Italy was persuaded to enter the war on the
    Allies' side, this became a source of resentment
    in that country.
  • X. Austria-Hungary
  • Autonomous development of the peoples of
    Austria-Hungary.
  • XI. Romania, Serbia, Montenegro, and other Balkan
    states
  • The integrity of Romania, Serbia, Montenegro, and
    other Balkan states was to be respected, their
    territories deoccupied, and Serbia was to be
    given access to the Adriatic Sea.
  • XII. Ottoman Empire
  • Sovereignty for the Turkish portion of the
    Ottoman Empire, autonomous development for other
    nationalities, and free navigation of the
    Dardanelles.
  • XIII. The Polish question
  • The establishment of an independent Poland with
    access to the sea.

13
The 14th Point
  • Wilson's final point was perhaps the most
    visionary
  • XIV. A general association of nations
  • Point 14 called for a multilateral international
    association of nations to enforce the peace,
    foreshadowing the League of Nations (and, after
    the Second World War, the United Nations).
  • The treaty had provided for the creation of
    the League of Nations, a major goal of U.S.
    President Woodrow Wilson. The League of Nations
    was intended to arbitrate international disputes
    and thereby avoid future wars. Only three of
    Wilson's Fourteen Points were realized, since
    Wilson was compelled to compromise with
    Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Orlando on some
    points in exchange for retaining approval of the
    "fourteenth point," the League of Nations.

14
Terms of the Treaty
  • Terms imposed by the treaty on Germany included
    losing a certain amount of its own territory to a
    number of surrounding countries, being stripped
    of all of its overseas and African colonies, and
    its ability to make war again was limited by
    restrictions on the size of its military.
  • Commercial transport vessels, including all
    oceanliners, locomotives, commercial
    motorvehicles, factory equipment and anything
    else that was not "nailed down" was confiscated.
  • Because Germany was not allowed to take part in
    the negotiations, the German government issued a
    protest to what it considered to be unfair
    demands, and soon afterwards withdrew from the
    proceedings. Later a new German foreign minister,
    Hermann Müller, agreed to sign it in June, 1919.

15
Lost European Territories
  • Besides the loss of the German colonial empire
    the territories Germany lost were
  • Alsace-Lorraine, were restored to French
    sovereignty without a plebiscite as from the date
    of the Armistice of November 11, 1918.
  • Northern Schleswig, after the Schleswig
    Plebiscite, to Denmark
  • The Prussian provinces Posen and West Prussia,
    which Prussia had annexed in Partitions of Poland
    (1772-1795), were returned to the reborn Poland.
  • West Prussia was given to Poland to provide free
    access to the sea, along with a sizeable German
    minority, creating the Polish corridor.
  • Upper Silesia to Czechoslovakia
  • The east part of Upper Silesia, to Poland
    although after plebiscite 60 voted for Germany
  • The area of German cities Eupen and Malmedy to
    Belgium
  • The northern part of East Prussia under control
    of France, later transferred to Lithuania without
    plebiscite.
  • The province of Saarland to be under the control
    of the League of Nations for 15 years, after that
    a plebiscite between France and Germany, to
    decide to which country it would belong. During
    this time the coal went to France.
  • The port of Danzig was made the Free City of
    Danzig, under the League of Nations.
  • Germany acknowledges and will respect strictly
    the independence of Austria.

16
Major Losses
17
The War Guilt Clause
  • Article 231 of the Treaty (the 'war guilt'
    clause) held Germany solely responsible for all
    'loss and damage' suffered by the Allies during
    the war and provided the basis for reparations.
    The total sum due was decided by an Inter-Allied
    Reparations Commission and was set at 6.6
    Billion (33 000 000 000). This would have taken
    Germany till 1984 to pay!

18
Other Key Terms
  • Germany has to cede the coal mines in the
    Saar-area to France.
  • Germany has to cede all colonies Togo en
    Cameroun, the territories in East- and South-West
    Africa, islands in the Pacific and possessions in
    China.
  • All German properties in foreign countries are
    confiscated.
  • Germany has to cede all war material to the
    allies.
  • German compulsory military service is abolished,
    as well as the General Staff.
  • Germany is not allowed to have tanks, airplanes,
    submarines, large warships and poison gas.
  • The total size of the Germany army is not to
    exceed 100 000 men.
  • The German navy has a maximum of 15.000 men.
  • Germany is allowed a total of 4 000 officers.
  • Germany is not to take part in the League of
    Nations.
  • Germany has to cede to the allies all seagoing
    ships. Furthermore one fourth of the fishing
    fleet and two fifths of the inland navigation
    fleet has to be ceded.
  • Germany has to cede large amounts of machinery
    and building materials, trains and trucks.
  • Germany has to deliver certain amounts of coal,
    chemicals, dye and fuel for many years.
  • All German sub-ocean telegraph cables are
    confiscated.

19
Ratification and Humiliation
  • The treaty was ratified by the League of Nations
    in January, 1920. In Germany, the treaty caused
    shock and humiliation that contributed to the
    collapse of the Weimar Republic in 1933,
    particularly because many Germans did not believe
    that they should accept the sole responsibility
    of Germany and its allies for starting the war.

20
Reaction to the Treaty
  • The French felt they had been slighted, and
    subsequently voted out Clemenceau at the next
    election. Britain as a whole was at first
    content, but then felt that the Treaty was too
    harsh, and of particular concern were Germanys
    eastern frontiers, which were seen as a potential
    trouble spot for the future. For the USA, it was
    seen as Europes problem, and that overall, the
    Treaty was too harsh.
  • Territorial adjustments were made with the aim of
    grouping together ethnic minorities in their own
    states, free from the domination of once powerful
    empires, specifically the Austro-Hungarian Empire
    and the Ottoman Empire. Secret treaties were also
    to be discouraged, and Britain and France greeted
    a call for the reduction in armaments by all
    nations with disapproval. This was supposed to
    reduce, indirectly, the ability of navies to
    create blockades.

21
Invasion of the Ruhr - 1923
  • The amount of these payments proved to be too
    great for the flagging German economy and in 1923
    Germany defaulted and French and Belgian troops
    occupied the Ruhr in response. This occupation of
    the center of the German coal and steel
    industries both outraged Germany and put further
    strain on its economy, being heavily responsible
    for the hyperinflation that year.

22
The Dawes Plan - 1924
To simultaneously defuse this situation and
increase the chances of Germany resuming
reparation payments, the Allied Reparations
Committee asked Charles G. Dawes to find a
solution to which all parties would agree. The
Dawes committee consisted of ten representatives,
two each from Belgium, France, Britain, Italy,
and the United States. It was entrusted with
finding a solution for the collection of the
German reparations debt following World War I,
set at almost 20 billion marks.
  • The main points of The Dawes Plan were
  • The Ruhr area was to be evacuated by Allied
    occupation troops.
  • Reparation payments would begin at 1 billion
    marks for the first year and should rise over a
    period of four years to 2.5 billion marks per
    year.
  • The German Reichsbank would be reorganized under
    Allied supervision.
  • Foreign loans (primarily from the United States)
    would be made available to Germany.
  • The plan went into effect in September 1924.

23
Results of the Dawes Plan
  • The Dawes Plan provided short term economic
    benefits to the German economy. It softened the
    burdens of reparations, stabilized the currency,
    and brought increased foreign investments and
    loans to the German market. However, it made the
    German economy dependent on foreign markets and
    economies, such that problems to come in America
    (e.g. the Great Depression) would directly and
    severely hurt Germany as it would the rest of the
    western world, which was subject to debt
    repayments for loans of American dollars. After
    World War I, this cycle of money from US loans to
    Germany, who made reparations to other European
    nations, who used the money to pay off their
    debts to America, locked the western world's
    economy on that of the US, a situation which
    would prove disastrous.

24
Young Plan 1929-1930
  • Although German business picked up and reparation
    payments were made promptly, it became obvious
    that Germany could not long continue those huge
    annual payments.
  • As a result, the Young Plan was substituted in
    1929. The Young Plan was presented by American
    Owen D. Young. The plan was formally adopted at
    the second Hague Conference in January 1930.
  • The Young Planwhich set the total reparations at
    26,350,000,000 to be paid over a period of 58½
    years (1988)was thus adopted by the Allied
    Powers in 1930 to supersede the Dawes Plan.
    Designed to substitute a definite settlement
    under which Germany would know the exact extent
    of German obligations and to reduce the payments
    appreciably, the Young Plan divided the annual
    payment, set at about 473 million, into two
    elementsan unconditional part (one third of the
    sum) and a postponable part (the remainder).

25
The Hoover Moratorium 1931-32
  • Between agreement and adoption of the Young Plan
    came the Wall Street Crash of 1929, of which the
    main consequences were twofold. The American
    Banking system had to recall money from Europe
    and cancel the credits that made possible the
    Young Plan. Moreover, the downfall of imports and
    exports affected the rest of the world. By 1933,
    almost two-thirds of world trade had vanished. A
    new trade policy was set with the Hawley-Smoot
    custom duty.
  • Unemployment soared to 33.7 in 1931 in Germany,
    and 40 in 1932.
  • Under such circumstances, US President Herbert
    Hoover issued a public statement that proposed a
    one-year moratorium of the payments. He managed
    to assemble support for the moratorium from 15
    nations, but the adoption of the moratorium did
    little to slow economic decline in Europe.

26
Lausanne Conference - 1932
  • A final effort was made at the Lausanne
    Conference in 1932 to assist Germany. Here,
    representatives from Great Britain, France,
    Italy, Belgium, Germany and Japan gathered to
    come to an agreement. By that time it was clear
    that the deepening depression had made it
    impossible for Germany to resume its reparations
    payments.
  • They agreed
  • not to press Germany for immediate payments.
  • To reduce indebtedness by nearly 90, reducing
    the German obligation from the original 32.3
    billion to 713 million.
  • It was also informally agreed among the delegates
    that these provisions would be ineffective unless
    the US government agreed to cancellation of war
    debts owed by the Allied government. Hoover made
    the obligatory public statement about the lack of
    any connection between reparations and war debts.
    When the moratorium expired, the situation
    returned to the terms of the Young Plan, but the
    system had collapsed. Germany did not resume
    payments and once the National Socialist
    government consolidated power, the debt was
    repudiated. After Germanys defeat in World War
    II, an international conference decided (1953)
    that Germany would pay the remaining debt only
    after the country was reunified. Nonetheless,
    West Germany paid off the principal by 1980 then
    in 1995, after reunification, the new German
    government announced it would resume payments of
    the interest.
  • This agreement had been preceded by bitter
    diplomatic struggles, and its acceptance aroused
    nationalist passions and resentment. It also
    weakened, rather than helped the advocates of a
    policy of international understanding.

27
In Summary
  • The Big Three had known even before they met that
    Germany was to be punished. France wanted
    revenge, Britain wanted a relatively strong,
    economically viable Germany as a counterweight to
    French dominance on Continental Europe, and the
    U.S. wanted the creation of a permanent peace as
    quickly as possible, with financial compensation
    for its military expenditures and the destruction
    of the old empires.
  • The result was a compromise that left nobody
    satisfied. Germany was neither crushed nor
    conciliated, which, in retrospect, did not bode
    well for the future of Germany, Europe or the
    world as a whole.
  • Implementing reparations also failed to achieve
    its punitive aims insofar as Germany profited
    from the treaty by neither repaying most of its
    foreign loans in the following decade nor
    completing her indemnity payments.

28
Recent Perspectives
  • The economic problems that the payments brought,
    and German resentment at their imposition, are
    usually cited as one of the more significant
    factors that led to the end of the Weimar
    Republic and the beginning of the dictatorship of
    Adolf Hitler, which eventually led to the
    outbreak of World War II. Some historians, such
    as Margaret MacMillan, have since disagreed with
    this assertion, originally popularised by John
    Maynard Keynes.

29
  • On first glance, the reparations seem excessive.
    However, according to William R. Keylor in
    "Versailles and International Diplomacy", 'An
    increase in taxation and reduction in consumption
    in the Weimar Republic would have yielded the
    requisite export surplus to generate the foreign
    exchange needed to service the reparation debt.'
  • In "American Reparations to Germany 1919-33",
    Stephen Schuker says that 'the Weimar Republic
    ended up paying no net reparations at all,
    employing the proceeds of American commercial
    loans to discharge its reparation liability
    before defaulting on its foreign obligations in
    the early thirties.'

30
  • More recently, however, a new point of view has
    gained currency (well-articulated by historian
    Gerhard Weinberg in his book A World at Arms)
    that the treaty was in fact quite advantageous to
    Germany and far more generous than she had a
    right to expect. More importantly, according to
    this view, the Bismarckian Reich was maintained
    as a political unit instead of being broken up,
    and Germany largely escaped post-war military
    occupation. (Mistakes that were not repeated
    following the Second World War.)
  • In retrospect, a good case can be made that
    Germany was in a superior strategic position in
    1919 than it had been five years earlier. Instead
    of having an economically expanding and
    threatening Russian Empire allied with France on
    her eastern flank, Germany now faced a
    diplomatically isolated Russia that was also
    embroiled in revolution and civil war. To the
    south, the large (though increasingly enfeebled)
    Austro-Hungarian monarchy had been replaced by a
    group of small, weak republics that were to prove
    easy prey for a revitalized Germany two decades
    later. Indeed, the ease with which Germany later
    shook off the treaty's restrictions argues
    strongly against its being the "Carthaginian
    peace" of John Maynard Keynes' formulation.

31
Sources WikipediaGoogle images
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com