Title: Ensuring Maximum Public Health Benefits of USI: the Role of Monitoring
1Ensuring Maximum Public Health Benefits of USI
the Role of Monitoring
- Prof. Gregory Gerasimov
- UNICEF Consultant
- Central and Eastern Europe, CIS and Baltic States
2Global success in salt iodization
of households that consume iodized
salt Globally - 73 CEE/CIS/BS - from 5 to 90
Baltic States - up to 10 UNICEF 98 Report
3Definitions - MONITORING
- Monitoring is the process of collecting and
analysing on a regular basis information about
the program for the purpose of identifying
problems such as non-compliance, and taking
corrective actions so as to fulfill stated
objectives
4Definitions - INDICATOR
- An indicator is used to help describe a situation
that exists, and can be used to track changes in
the situation over time. - Indicators are usually quantitave, but may also
be qualitative. - Indicators may be direct and indirect.
5Indicators of IDD Control Program
- Process Indicators - for monitoring of salt
iodization - Impact (Outcome) Indicators - for biological
monitoring
6Process Indicators
- Is all imported salt iodized to the countrys
requirement? - Is adequately iodized salt reaching the target
population?
7Biological (Impact) Indicators
- Is there a significant IDD problem?
- What is the prevalence of IDD in a given
population? - What impact salt iodization has on iodine status
of the population? - Have IDD been eliminated as a public health
problem?
8PROCESS INDICATORS
9Factors That Determine Iodine Content in Salt
- Variability in the amount of added iodine
- Uneven distribution of iodine in the iodized salt
- The extent of iodine loss during storage and
distribution - Loss of iodine due to cooking and food processing
10Industry Standards for Iodized Salt
- Former USSR GOST 13830-91 required
- use of instable potassium IODIDE (KI)
- level of iodization 23/-11 ppm
- shelf life 3 months
- UNICEF/WHO recommendations
- use of stable potassium IODATE (KIO3)
- level of iodization 20-40 ppm
- shelf life more than 12 months
11MOST OF SALT PRODUCERS IN THE REGION THAT SUPPLY
IODIZED SALT TO THE BALTIC STATES COMPLY WITH
ABOVE RECOMMENDATIONS
12Determining Salt Iodine Levels
- Titration method
- Rapid test kits
- Semi-quantitative measurement kits
13MONITORING SYSTEM
- Government (External) Monitoring System
- The Producers Distributors (Internal)
Monitoring System - Household Level Monitoring
- Cross-sectional surveys
- Community based monitoring
14IMPACT INDICATORS
15Biological Indicators
- Goiter rate in school children (by palpation and
ultrasonography) - lt5 - no iodine deficiency
- Urinary Iodine
- gt100 mcg/l - no iodine deficiency
- Neonatal TSH screening
- samples with TSH level gt 5 mU/L - less than 3
16Goiter (Thyroid Size) Assessment
- Easy to perform
- Little training needed (for palpation)
- Reflects remote rather than present iodine status
- Observers variations
- Low sensitivity
- Expensive equipment (for ultrasonography)
17Urinary Iodine Assessment
- Reflects current iodine status of population
- Samples easy to collect
- Sensitive and reliable indicator
- Trained lab staff needed
- External and internal quality control required
- Rather expensive equipment
18Neonatal TSH
- No additional investments in impact (biological)
monitoring
- It is not recommended to set up neonatal TSH
screening program solely for purpose of IDD
monitoring
19SURVEY METHODS
- School surveys
- goiter rate (palpation ultrasonography)
- urinary iodine
- samples of salt from households
- Household surveys
- goiter rate (palpation)
- urinary iodine
- checking of iodine in salt
20WHO/UNICEF/ICCIDD criteria for monitoring
progress towards elimination of IDD as a public
health problem
21Universal Salt Iodization in Baltic States
- Legislation, Regulations, Standards
- Implementation Enforcement
- Monitoring and Impact Assessment
22ACHIEVABLE GOAL
- ELIMINATION OF IDD AS A PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM IN
THE BALTIC STATES IN THE NEXT 1-2 YEARS
23(No Transcript)