Title: Thank Your for Attending Arden House 2004
1Thank Your for Attending Arden House 2004
- Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D.
- US Coordinator/Chairperson
2At the end of this conference..
- Attendees should gain a sufficient level of
understanding of the terms used to describe the
desired state of pharmaceutical development and
manufacturing to - Improve the current articulation of the desired
state - Be able to connect-the-dots (e.g., process
understanding - risk to quality risk based
regulatory requirements such as CMC specs and
validation) - Contribute to within company dialogue and debate
on the future direction of these initiatives and
assist in enhancing the utility of pharmaceutical
science and engineering principles - Identify areas of further self-study of new
principles and tools (e.g., multivariate
statistics, risk assessment tools such as FMEA,
knowledge management tools) - Identify future work/activities to shape the
evolution and realization of these concepts -
3Desired State
http//www.fda.gov/cder/gmp/21stcenturysummary.htm
- Product quality and performance achieved and
assured by design of effective and efficient
manufacturing processes - Product specifications based on mechanistic
understanding of how formulation and process
factors impact product performance - Continuous "real time" assurance of quality
4Desired State
http//www.fda.gov/cder/gmp/21stcenturysummary.htm
- Regulatory policies tailored to recognize the
level of scientific knowledge supporting product
applications, process validation, and process
capability - Risk based regulatory scrutiny relate to the
- level of scientific understanding of how
formulation and manufacturing process factors
affect product quality and performance, and - the capability of process control strategies to
prevent or mitigate risk of producing a poor
quality product
5 Ignoring the Long Run
Effects of Feedback Can Lead to Unintended
Consequences
6Arden House 2004
- Builds on Arden House 2003 Process Analytical
Technology (PAT)
PAT Process Understanding
7Adding PAT to FDAs Alphabet Soup
PAC? - Post Approval Change
8A Historical Note on Quality Lurching from Fad
to Fad?
- Sampling Plans (50s)
- Zero-Defect Movement (60s)
- ISO-9000 (80s)
- QS-9000
- Malcolm Baldrige Award
- European Quality Award
- Total Quality Management
- Six Sigma
- The Ultimate Six Sigma - The Big Q
PAT
K. R. Bhote and A. K. Bhote. World Class Quality
(2000) ISBN 0-8144-0427
9BCS, PAT You want to do WHAT?!?
PAT
Regulatory Department
RD
Manufacturing
Formulations Department
Pharmacokinetics Department
Regulatory Department
BCS
Jack Cook, Pfizer.
10A Perspective on PAT One piece of the puzzle
- Vision 2020 - I can see clearly now
- Quality performance by design Continuous
real time monitoring of quality - Specifications based on mechanistic understanding
of how formulation and process factors impact
product performance - High efficiency and capacity utilization
- Science based regulatory decisions focused on
product and process quality
http//www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3804
s1_02_hussain.ppt
11PAT Teams ORA, CDER CVM
PAT Steering Committee Doug Ellsworth,
ORA/FDA Dennis Bensley, CVM/FDA Mike Olson,
ORA/FDA Joe Famulare, CDER/FDA Yuan-yuan Chiu,
CDER/FDA Frank Holcomb, CDER/FDA Moheb Nasr,
CDER/FDA Ajaz Hussain Chair, CDER/FDA
PAT Review - Inspection Team Investigators Rober
t Coleman (ORA/ATL-DO) Rebecca Rodriguez
(ORA/SJN-DO) Erin McCaffery (ORA/NWJ-DO) George
Pyramides (PHI-DO) Compliance Officers Albinus
DSa (CDER) Mike Gavini (CDER) William Bargo
(CVM) Reviewers Norman Schmuff (CDER) Lorenzo
Rocca (CDER) Vibhakar Shah (CDER) Rosario
DCosta (CDER) Raafat Fahmy (CVM)
PAT Policy Development Team Raj Uppoor,
OPS/CDER Chris Watts, OPS/CDER Huiquan Wu,
OPS/CDER (Ali Afnan, OPS/CDER)
PAT Training Coordinators John Simmons, Karen
Bernard and Kathy Jordan
12Product and Process Quality Knowledge
Science-Risk Based cGMPs
13Regulatory Violations and Enforcement
Good Citizens
FDA Focus on High Risk
Kagan and Scholz. Perspectives on Regulation
Law, Discretion, and Bureaucratic behaviour, May
1980.
Low Risk