Agent Based Software Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Agent Based Software Development

Description:

B2B exchanges. Agents versus Objects. Like objects, agents encapsulate state and behaviour ... agents to pursue overarching goals in a cooperative fashion. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: michae748
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Agent Based Software Development


1
Agent Based Software Development
  • Michael Luck, Ronald Ashri and Mark dInverno

2
1 Agent Based Computing
  • Modern computing is defined by the
    interconnection of computers
  • The World Wide Web now provides a basic
    infrastructure for dynamic provision of online
    services
  • The information society arises from the use of
    distributed, dynamic and open systems across all
    aspects of everyday life
  • Computers are in embedded devices, support
    systems as well as the traditional desktop

3
Dynamic and open environments
  • Networked computers
  • Dynamic interactions to form new system
    configurations
  • Enable increased flexibility
  • May span organisational boundaries
  • Can operate
  • in rapidly changing circumstances
  • with changing information
  • Traditional models of computation are inadequate

4
Autonomy
  • Need
  • to respond dynamically to changing circumstances
  • while trying to achieve overarching objectives
  • without user intervention
  • Web Services, for example
  • offer new ways of operating through standardized
    tools
  • support a service-oriented view of software
  • Agent technologies offer a way to tackle the
    problems and manage the resulting complexity

5
Agents
  • Agents can be viewed as autonomous,
    problem-solving computational entities capable of
    effective operation in dynamic and open
    environments.
  • They are often deployed in environments in which
    they interact, and possibly cooperate, with other
    agents (including both people and software) that
    may have conflicting aims.

6
Agent-Based Systems
  • Agent-based systems have emerged from a
    convergence of technologies in
  • Distributed object systems
  • Distributed artificial intelligence
  • Agent technologies are already providing benefits
    in, for example,
  • Manufacturing
  • Supply chain management
  • B2B exchanges

7
Agents versus Objects
  • Like objects, agents encapsulate state and
    behaviour
  • But objects are essentially passive
  • They have no choice over interaction
  • They are invoked by other objects
  • Agents decide whether to perform the desired
    operation
  • Agents are autonomous

8
Agents versus Objects Modeling
  • Objects provide a valuable way to model the world
  • But agents provide a more natural representation
    of real-world systems in which different
    individuals interact according to their own
    agendas and priorities.
  • They can come together to achieve overarching
    objectives that might not, or not as easily, be
    achieved by the individuals alone

9
Agents versus Objects
  • When agent goals are closely aligned, and if
    agents are benevolent and honest, then the
    resulting systems may resemble an object-oriented
    system.
  • The object-oriented paradigm may be adequate, but
    is unlikely to be flexible.
  • Agents may be constructed using object
    technology.
  • Agents typically run in their own thread of
    control, while standard object systems have one
    thread.

10
Agents basic notions
  • Agents are
  • Situated
  • Embodied
  • Agents
  • receive input through some sensory device
  • act so as to affect the environment through
    effectors

11
Agents definitions
  • There is no consensus over what constitutes an
    agent, but some properties are agreed
  • Autonomy self-starting, independent entities,
    that can function without direct user or
    programmer intervention
  • Reactiveness can monitor environment and respond
    quickly to changes
  • Proactiveness have overarching goals that guide
    behaviour over longer periods
  • Social ability open environments require the
    ability to interact and communicate with other
    agents

12
Other Agent Properties
  • Learning ability
  • Mobility
  • Benevolence
  • Rationality
  • Temporal continuity
  • Believable personality
  • communication ability
  • Adaptability
  • Mobility
  • Veracity

13
Weak and Strong Notions
  • Weak notion involves
  • Autonomy
  • Social ability
  • Reactiveness
  • Proactiveness
  • Strong or intentional notion of agents also
    requires control architectures comprising mental
    components such as
  • Beliefs
  • Desires
  • Motivations

14
Definitions
  • Franklin and Graesser autonomous agent is a
    system situated within and a part of an
    environment that senses that environment and acts
    on it, over time, in pursuit of its own agenda
    and so as to affect what it sense in the future.

15
Types and Applications
  • Generic autonomous agents, software agents,
    intelligent agents
  • Specific interface agents, virtual agents,
    information agents, mobile agents
  • Applications operating systems interfaces,
    processing satellite imaging data, electricity
    distribution management, air-traffic control,
    business process management, electronic commerce,
    computer games.

16
History
  • Rooted in
  • Distributed artificial intelligence
  • Distributed object technologies
  • Basic notions stem from the work of Brooks
  • Objected to traditional view of AI as symbol
    manipulation
  • Argued for construction of situated and embodied
    systems.
  • Wanted to address brittleness of existing systems
  • Sought more flexible and robust complete systems
    that exhibited effective behavior in changing
    environments.

17
Distributed Artificial Intelligence
  • Dates back to mid to late 1970s
  • Concerned with development of mechanisms to
    enable systems of interacting agents to pursue
    overarching goals in a cooperative fashion.
  • Gave rise to the Functionally-Accurate,
    Cooperative (FA/C) paradigm
  • Provided a model for task decomposition
  • Enabled agent interaction in a distributed
    problem-solving system
  • Agents no longer needed to have all information
    locally to solve subproblems
  • Worked through synchronous exchange of partial
    results
  • Evolved into much of field of multi-agent systems

18
Distributed Object Technologies
  • Provided a supporting infrastructure
  • For example, the CORBA distributed computing
    platform handled low level interoperation of
    heterogeneous distributed components
  • CORBA can underpin the development of agent
    systems without the need for reinvention of
    fundamental techniques.

19
World Wide Web
  • Distribution of information and associated
    technologies lend themselves almost ideally for
    multi-agent systems
  • Problems that arise suggest agents
  • The dual aspect of this interaction with the
    World Wide Web has thus been a major driving
    force

20
Obstacles to Deployment
  • Fundamental obstacle to take-up lack of mature
    agent development methodologies
  • Requires
  • Basic principles of software and knowledge
    engineering augmented to suit the differing
    demands of agents
  • sophisticated yet easy-to-use agent-oriented CASE
    environments for all aspects of system
    development process
  • Some systems already have rudimentary elements of
    these
  • Success is likely through use of evolving (and
    current) systems integration technologies (such
    as Jini and UDDI)

21
Ambient Intelligence
  • Aimed at seamless delivery of services and
    applications
  • Relies on
  • ubiquitous computing,
  • ubiquitous communication
  • intelligent user interfaces
  • Environment of potentially thousands of embedded
    and mobile devices interacting to support user
    centered goals and activity.
  • Component-oriented view of the world
  • Key characterizing features are autonomy,
    distribution, adaptation, responsiveness, etc.

22
Grid Computing
  • High performance computing infrastructure for
  • large scale distributed scientific endeavor
  • more general applications involving large scale
    information handling, knowledge management and
    service provision
  • Many services
  • spread over a geographically distributed
    environment
  • new services join and existing ones leave
  • Agents
  • act for service owners, managing access to
    services, ensuring that contracts are fulfilled
  • act for service consumers, locating services,
    agreeing contracts, and receiving and presenting
    results
  • collaborate and form coalitions with different
    capabilities in support of new virtual
    organisations.

23
eBusiness
  • Agents already used in product and merchant
    discovery and brokering
  • Next step is real trading, negotiating deals and
    making purchases
  • Major impact will be on the supply chain
  • Direct consumer contact with producer instead of
    reseller may produce increase in efficiency of
    overall supply chain
  • Will permit new markets to appear, old markets to
    change and the participation of new players.
  • In short term, travel agencies and retailing will
    be the primary B2C domains using agent technology

24
Simulation
  • Natural basis for training of decision makers in
    complex domains
  • Defense simulations enable planners to experience
    complex military operations and war games
  • Actual market dynamics can be simulated to give
    trainee decision makers exposure to many diverse
    experiences
  • Decision maker is allowed to learn through
    mistakes, without real-world consequences
  • Entertainment applications include
  • Single (human) player computer games
  • Multi-player games, where players may be both
    humans and agents
  • Interactive movies and television
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com