Mike Lowndes, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Mike Lowndes,

Description:

(Right-click or click-hold (Mac) and ... contains must be structured in a logical, comprehensible and transparent fashion. ... b2b. education. institutions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Mik7171
Category:
Tags: lowndes | mike

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mike Lowndes,


1
A Beginners Guide to the Semantic Web
UKMW 2005 The future of the Digital Object
  • Mike Lowndes,
  • Interactive Media Manager,
  • Natural History Museum, London

(Right-click or click-hold (Mac) and press k or
select Speaker Notes)
2
Contents
  • Web futures.
  • Digital objects.
  • The semantic web Definitions, goals and
    components.
  • Steps along the way, short, medium and long term.
  • Examples from Museums.
  • Is it actually going to happen?
  • Conclusions for Museums and a call to action.

3
Web Futures
  • The future web is an unknown country. Whatever we
    propose today, the reality will very likely be
    different.
  • Technology progresses and conceptual thought
    keeps playing catch-up with it. New ideas
    supplant old.
  • The future web will be as messy as the past.
  • So
  • For Museum purposes, we should strive toward a
    greater signal to noise ratio.

4
Web futures Other Developments
  • Convergence
  • The web becomes TV-like, but remains interactive
    and always available.
  • More and deeper layers of information.
  • It will become optionally immersive degrees of
    immersion depending on how you interact with it.
  • Internet 2 www.Internet2.org
  • Infrastructure, for massive bandwidth.
  • Grid computing www.gridcomputing.com
  • Shared processing increasing available power
    when connected.
  • Computing power becoming a utility like
    electricity.
  • Towards instant processing of everyday tasks (in
    the human timeframe).

5
Web Futures Internet Ubiquity.
  • All technological devices connected.
  • The intelligent fridge, RFID, mobiles with GSM,
    GPRS, G3.
  • Future mobile device operate your bank account,
    hifi and front door lock, turn the car heater on
    before you get to it these things are not that
    far away.
  • The web is already old-school.
  • We dont yet have a simple word for the continuum
    between digital radio, TV, the web, mobile
    internet, sms and multimedia kiosk interactions,
    though internet technology underpins it all.
  • We can no longer limit our thinking to the needs
    of the desktop browser-based web.

6
Back to the Digital Object
  • Digital object.
  • Named Anomalocaris.
  • Did that help?
  • If we need help to make sense of many digital
    objects, Google etc need even more.
  • A digital object should include or connect to the
    supporting data that allows both humans and
    machines to understand it.
  • The semantic web will
  • Provide standards and tools for attaching,
    extending and making available the meaning of
    digital objects.
  • Make the digital medium self-explaining.

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
7
What are the worst things about todays web?
  • Its manual a pull technology.
  • Google is currently the most popular way to begin
    exploring a topic.
  • It relies on humans to link sensibly to
    interesting and relevant content.
  • Hyperlinks. They are mostly dumb.
  • They do not explain themselves.
  • Can you trust them?
  • When you create them, you need to keep validating
    them.
  • Searching for new links to make requires a search
    engine.
  • Metadata can improve this, but metadata is poorly
    used.
  • Answer The semantic web

8
Web Issues For Museums
  • People trust museums and their links more than
    others, perhaps.
  • But our knowledge and collections are not
    available easily for the public, as a single
    collection relevant to their needs.
  • We all see this interoperability as a difficult
    thing. It is.
  • Our metadata is easy to publish, but nothing out
    there uses it to improve searching.
  • Attempts are being made (e.g. OAI-PMH- see notes)
  • Answer The semantic web.

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
9
The Semantic Web
  • Tim Berners-Lee Visionary.
  • Leading W3C, hes ahead of the game.
  • Goal is the solution to information overload.
  • Via global use of metadata., leading to vastly
    improved browsing and agents which may seem
    intelligent, because they can process a web that
    describes itself.
  • Adding logic to the web
  • If youre 38 and some available content is aimed
    at six year-olds, then its not appropriate to
    prioritise display (unless youre searching for
    your kids). This kind of logic is built into the
    semantic web.
  • Turning the web into a global database
  • Semantic web software should be able to find,
    sort, classify, interpret, and present relevant
    content in context.

10
W3C Definition
  • TBL
  • The Semantic Web is an extension of the current
    Web in which information is given well-defined
    meaning, better enabling computers and people to
    work in cooperation.
  • For the Web to become a truly machine-readable
    resource, the information it contains must be
    structured in a logical, comprehensible and
    transparent fashion.
  • This is the primary work required to enable the
    semantic web.

11
What the Semantic Web Will Require
  • DigiCULT (Themed issue 3, 2003)
  • Adoption of metadata standards.
  • The development of tools for automatic and
    semiautomatic multilingual knowledge mark-up.
  • Modelling relationships. E.g between types of
    metadata.
  • Construction of ontologies (and mappings
    between them).
  • Stay awake!

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
12
Boxes and arrows no clouds!
Context
User profile
Other ontologies
Maps to
User query, or query generated by user behaviour
Semantic Web Agent
Maps to and is constrained by
Identified ontologies
  • Accurate,
  • meaningful
  • Answers
  • Actions
  • Views of information
  • A digital object

Associated metadata
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
13
The Building Blocks
  • How do we get to the semantic web?

14
XML
  • XML underpins the next step.
  • It can describe the 'data' on the web by wrapping
    that data in tags that explain it.
  • E.g.ltproductgtltfruitgtorangelt/fruitgtltpricegt20lt/price
    gtlt/productgt
  • XML is a framework.
  • Ad-hoc files can be created in it for specific
    uses, using any tags you like.
  • There is no need to formally describe them unless
    you want them to be understood outside your
    particular use.

15
XML Languages for Describing Content
  • You can formalise a tag set written in XML by
    creating a config file for it, known as a
    Document Type Definition, or more recently, a
    Schema.
  • e.g.
  • Summary Metadata Dublin Core and its
    derivatives.
  • Rich Metadata Encoded Archival Description.
  • XML can also format and transform itself with XML
    stylesheets XSL/XLSt.
  • Formal XML languages for structuring,
    communicating and understanding data will
    underpin the semantic web.
  • Web Services will enable machine-tomachine
    communications using these XML languages.

16
Current Semantic Web Work of W3C (2005)
  • A roadmap.
  • Two formal technologies now part of the first
    generation semantic web
  • RDF for holding the information.
  • OWL for describing relationships and inferring
    meaning.
  • There is a lot more in development
  • E.g. FOAF friend of a friend.

17
1. W3C Semantic Web RoadMap
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
18
2. RDF Resource Description Framework
  • W3C supports the development of the Resource
    Description Framework .
  • RDF is the official current encoding format for
    semantic web data.
  • Can contain data, metadata and relationships.
  • E.g. Dublin Core, RSS.
  • Makes web resources self-describing.
  • RDF-S (a more recent development)
  • Schema provides some ontology support to RDF.

19
3. Ontologies - OWL
  • W3C supports the development of the Web Ontology
    Language,usually abbreviated as OWL.
  • What is an ontology?
  • A dictionary defines the meaning of words.
  • A taxonomy or classification system describes
    hierarchical relationships between things but not
    usually other kinds of relationships.
  • In a faceted taxonomy things exist on more than
    one branch of the hierarchical tree.
  • E.g Nature contains Life (biology etc) and
    Earth (geology etc) Dinosaurs Life gt Reptiles gt
    Dinosaurs, or Earth gt Fossils gt Dinosaurs
  • A thesaurus deals with wider relationships
    between words but meaning by inference only.
  • Ontologies join these together and can derive
    logic and inference.
  • OWL is the latest iteration of this idea.
  • (partly based on yet another DAMLOIL)
  • It is a vocabulary extension of RDF not
    something different.

20
FenFire
  • Ouch, my brain hurts.

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
21
Definitions and Properties of an Ontology
  • James Hendler
  • a set of knowledge terms, including the
    vocabulary, the interconnections in meaning, and
    some simple rules of inference and logic for some
    particular topic.
  • Standards for describing and showing
    relationships between data.
  • DigiCULT
  • The most typical kind of ontology for the Web
    has a taxonomy and a set of inference rules.
  • TBL
  • An ontology may express the rule "If a city code
    is associated with a state code, and an address
    uses that city code, then that address has the
    associated state code.
  • the functionality of a database (query) and a
    thesaurus (meaning by context).

22
How Will Ontologies Be Used In The Semantic Web?
  • Ontologies can be domain-oriented, task-oriented,
    application-oriented or general purpose. Also
    called class taxonomies.
  • Upper Ontologies are more general and can tie
    more specific ones together by mapping them.
  • e.g.
  • watercolour links to a definition URL.
  • watercolour is a type of painting.
  • a necklace is a type of jewellery.
  • painting and jewellery are both types of
    art.
  • Someone needs to build these relationships.
  • They will be built in RDF/OWL (at least, for
    now).
  • Now, do it all again in multiple languages.

23
Visual navigation of ontology (Sculpteur)
  • Visualising RDF metadata An aid for Museum
    professionals, not the public.
  • Addis, M., et al., New Ways to Search, Navigate
    and Use Multimedia Museum Collections over the
    Web, Figure 3, in J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.).
    Museums and the Web 2005 Proceedings, CD-ROM
    ISBN 1-885626-31-2 Toronto Archives Museum
    Informatics, March 31, 2005

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
24
Boxes, arrows and Acronyms
Context
User profile
OWL
FOAF
Other ontologies
Maps to
User query, or query generated by user behaviour
RDF-S/ OWL (CIDOC-CRM)
Semantic Web Agent
Maps to and is constrained by
Identified ontology
  • Accurate,
  • meaningful
  • Answers
  • Actions
  • Views of information

RDF
  • A digital object

Associated metadata
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
25
Building blocks 2
  • Steps on the way to the
  • semantic web

26
Short Term some current applications
  • Making digital resources self-describing
  • RSS
  • rich site summary, making simple summary
    information self-describing.
  • Mobile devices CC/PP.
  • called Composite Capability/Preference Profile
    (CC/PP).
  • will let cell phones and other non- standard Web
    clients describe their characteristics to other
    software and agents.
  • Business XBRL.
  • describes/classifies content of financial
    statements.
  • makes report generation easier.
  • FOAF
  • Friend of a Friend.
  • Describes people and their interests, plus
    network of peers.
  • www.foaf-project.org/
  • Topic Maps.
  • A framework for creating and browsing
    relationships.
  • Works within and between between systems and
    disciplines.
  • Works with RDF.
  • Human friendly relatively easy to grasp how it
    works -browsers in development. (Omnigator)

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
27
Medium Term e.g. 'smart links'
  • As semantic content appears browsers can be
    modified to use it.
  • On mouseover.
  • Metadata of target.
  • More information on evolution.
  • Author the natural history museum.
  • Date published May 2005.
  • Description A website exploring evolution by
    natural selection.
  • Audience 12 years plus.
  • Language English (international).
  • Multiple targets.
  • More information on evolution.
  • Link definition of evolution.
  • Link evolution at the Natural History Museum.
  • Link evolution at the American Museum of Natural
    History.
  • Link evolution at New Scientist magazine.
  • Definition Evolution part of natural history.

(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
28
Long Term Agents
  • DigiCULT
  • Agents are the final product of the semantic
    web automatic, even artificially intelligent
    software that does all your searching for you
    (the process of narrowing down) and much more.
    However, this is a very long term goal and there
    are many steps on the way, each of which can
    help.
  • Examples
  • The agent attached to your diary automatically
    organises travel etc, and can change your travel
    tickets when you alter your diary.
  • The agent attached to your house automatically
    organises food purchasing, bill payment,
    lighting, heating, alarms etc.

29
  • What is the cultural sector doing?

30
We Have A Role.
  • Were are the holders of knowledge and authority,
    and can help to define the semantic web.
  • Thesauri owned and created by Museums could
    become ontologies and act as part of the
    backbone.
  • Museums are currently behind and will remain
    behind as other areas see competitive advantage
    business, commerce, even research.
  • DigiCULT Thematic issue 3, 2003 museums need
    to take a lead. We need to do a big project
    together Standardise thesauri, develop
    ontologies.

31
Examples The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model
  • A common language and extensible semantic
    framework to which any cultural heritage
    information can be mapped. The interoperability
    glue.
  • Provides the words and relationships we can
    use to map our stuff together.
  • Proposed as an international standard.
  • Exposed in RDF already RDF-S/OWL to follow?
  • http//cidoc.ics.forth.gr/
  • For an introduction, download
  • http//www.rlg.org/en/downloads/2002metadata/gill/
    gill.PPT

32
Example Sculpteur
  • Several collections brought together into one
    place, one meta database or portal.
  • Content from the VA among others.
  • Visual display of relationships.
  • A published ontology in RDF.
  • Concept-based searching based on a semantic
    network.
  • Content-based searching of images and 3d models.
  • http//www.sculpteurweb.org/ (Browser needs
    downloading)

33
Richard Light Museum thesauri in Topic Maps
  • Ontology framework written to thesaurus
    standards.
  • Museum thesauri turned into ontologies in Topic
    Map format.
  • Topic Map browser provides a visual environment
    (Omnigator) for checking.
  • Aims to provide meaning an authoritative
    reference that software can use when searching
    the web for Museum objects.
  • Can become part of the future semantic web
    backbone.
  • MCG Newsletter, April 2004.

34
VICODI Visual Contextualization of Digital
Content
  • semi-automatic creation of contextual semantic
    metadata for digital historical resources, by
    users.
  • Visualisation of richly structured,
    contextualised content.
  • Interface uses historical maps and colour-coded
    links.
  • Felt to be not generally usable in hindsight by
    the developers but still in development.
  • http//www.vicodi.org/
  • http//www.eurohistory.net/Index.do

35
VICODI - powered
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
36
Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web
  • The most ambitious and realised attempt.
  • Uses RDF encoded Dublin Core metadata.
  • Brings 15 Museum collections together.
  • Appears as a basic, text based search and browse
    interface a bit like an automated Yahoo
    directory.
  • Difficult to assess as it is in Finnish, but has
    good critical reports from users.
  • A semantic web HTML generator is in development.
  • http//museosuomi.cs.helsinki.fi/

37
Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web
All the right buzzwords in all the right places.
38
Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
39
Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web
(right click/click-hold (Mac) for notes)
40
Coda Reality Check
  • Is the semantic web the right approach to
    information overload?

41
Problems with structuring knowledge
  • All knowledge codified? The web will always be
    chaotic.
  • Its hard to do, not easy like the current web.
  • Initially it will be used by the formal web.
  • commerce
  • academia
  • b2b
  • education
  • institutions
  • The informal web (most blogs/wikis, personal
    pages, link sets etc) will benefit from the work,
    and will get tools eventually.
  • Consider the speed of technological advance
  • by the time we get close to it, something better
    will come along.

42
Nay-sayers?
  • DigiCULT Janneke Van Kersen, Dutch Digital
    Heritage Association.
  • I do not believe in developing a fundamental
    ontology to give meaning to information on the
    Net. It looks to me like the 18th-century
    endeavour to write an encyclopaedia that contains
    all the knowledge in the world. I am afraid it
    does not work that way. A lot of knowledge, even
    scientific knowledge, cannot be described in a
    logical way. Especially in the arts a lot of
    knowledge is the result of heuristics and
    associative thinking.
  • Patel-Schneider and Siméon, Bell Labs Research.
  • there is a semantic discontinuity at the very
    bottom of the Semantic Web, interfering with the
    stated goal of the Semantic Web If semantic
    languages do not respect World-Wide Web data,
    then how can the semantic web be an extension of
    the World-Wide Web at all?

43
Then its impossible?
  • TBL sees the Semantic Web as based upon a whole
    bunch of ontologies mapped together.
  • Instead of asking machines to understand
    peoples language, ask people to make the extra
    effort
  • It is acknowledged that this is a vast and
    difficult thing to do.
  • The tools are not yet there.
  • The consensus.
  • Its utopian but the main goals are achievable.
  • It will be a part of the future web, but never
    all of it.
  • Any movement towards it increases the signal to
    noise ratio of the web.
  • It should and will be done where it can be.

44
Conclusions for Museums
  • DigiCULT
  • The Semantic Web is a direction, it is like
    North. You go North but you never arrive and say
    here it is.
  • Its going to be a large scale, collaborative,
    community thing.
  • Requires leadership and opportunity from the
    State.
  • We can and should make more starts now.
  • There are many valuable steps on the way.

45
Further Reading
  • Tim Berners-Lee
  • BERNERS-LEE,T., J. HENDLER, O. LASSILA The
    Semantic Web A new form of Web content that is
    meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution
    of new possibilities Scientific American, 17 May
    2001.
  • http//www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID0004814
    4-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21
  • DigiCULT
  • Themed Issue 3 Towards a Semantic Web for
    Heritage Resources, May 2003. PDF
  • http//www.digicult.info/pages/themiss.php
  • Brian Kelly, Introduction to the Semantic Web
    Powerpoint
  • More examples and a good introduction to the nuts
    and bolts of RDF (originally for local
    government)
  • http//www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conference
    s/lga-2002/

46
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com