NSLSII Footprint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

NSLSII Footprint

Description:

Lattice Design effort has been centered in optimizing the achromatic super-period. ... lattice in a timely fashion to start building design and engineering design ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: tsha1
Category:
Tags: nslsii | footprint

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSLSII Footprint


1
NSLSII Footprint
  • F. Willeke, April 23, 07
  • Accomodation of Extra Long Straights
  • Considerations for Accommodating a possible ERL
    Upgrade into NSLSII

2
Outline
  • Extra Long Straights
  • reducing symmetry
  • quasi symmetry preserving solutions
  • footprint preserving solutions
  • Accommodating a possible ERL Upgrade into the
    NSLSII site
  • Requirements and constraints for an ERL
  • Performance of an ERL using the NSLSII Ring to
    distribute the Beams
  • A possible Parameter Set
  • Beam Loss and Shielding
  • Considerations which determine S.C. Linac
    Overall Length
  • A possible Footprint of a NSLSII-ERL Facility
  • Items to be included in present planning to ease
    later upgrade of an ERL

3
CD-1 Footprint
15-fold Lattice symmetry 27 Beam lines from
Insertion devices 30 Beam lines from bends 3
Utility straight sections 15 of which see hard
x-rays from 3-pole wiggler Symmetry will be
weakly broken to 3-or-5 fold Because of large
aperture dipoles in 3/5 locations
4
Integrations of Extra-Long Straights
Extra-Long Straight Motivation Nano-focussed
beam and experiments with inelastically scattered
soft X-rays would profit from extra long
straight sections with an active undulator
lengths of 10m-12m

Several Possibilities to implement Reducing the
lattice super-periodicity from 15 to 3 or 5 by
introducing different achromats with extra long
straights Inserting just two long straights
optically matched to the achromat with a
transparent lattice Dfx,y n x 2 p (Bengtsson)
3-fold or 5-fold symmetry
Quasi 15-fold symmetry
  • ? Impact on footprint

5
A solution based on Transparent Insertion
On-Energy Transparent Optics Dfx, Dfy n x 2p
23m Insert
  • xx-1.039, xy-3.01
  • Total length 23.73 m, free length 3 x 5.83 m
  • bx/by 1.8/1.4 , 3.0/1.3, 1.8/1.4

Courtesy Guo Wei Ming
Requires verification for realistic conditions,
(6D-beam, imperfections, .) ? Needs time
6
A Possible Strategy of Providing extra long
Straights
  • Problem
  • Lattice Design effort has been centered in
    optimizing the achromatic super-period.
  • Still to do Integration of the entire ring
    with damping wigglers and insertion devices
  • and verification of the stability and
    dynamic aperture
  • Deadline for freezing the foot print End of May
    (driven by start of CF Title I design )
  • ? There is not sufficient time to work out a well
    thought through concept of X-long straights,
    integrate it and assure stability of the entire
    ring.
  • Desirable to base long straights on solutions
    which are compatible with the food print of a
    15-fold symmetric lattice
  • Can finalize the symmetric lattice in a timely
    fashion to start building design and engineering
    design
  • Can continue to work on way to implement extra
    long straights and on assurance of single
    particle stability without time pressure of CD2

7
Two examples of implementation of extra-long
straightsin 15-fold symmetric footprint
Shorten Straights
Shorten Arcs
T T015 ? T T013? T1
T014
Decomposition of lattice map in linear, nonlinear
and chromatic parts
T1 T120T121T130T122 T140 T1h.o T0
Require
(breaks symmetry)
T020
T0210
T0220
T040
?T0h.o
T0300
8
Making a longer Long-Straights by Shortening two
Short-Straights
Lengthening long straight 2 x shortening the
short shtraight ? Maximum long 18m
9
Geometry and Optics
Geometry of the
Lattice
Possible Beam Optics
10
ERL Integration Considerations
(Nota bene this is no attempt to lay out an ERL)
11
Requirements and Constraints
I
  • Beam Losses critical, present Shielding
    insufficient
  • Should go for significantly larger brightness
  • should plan for higher energy than storage ring
  • Should allow for sufficient Linac length
  • Planning for ERL should minimize the additional
    effort for NSLSII
  • Bending for returns and injection into the ring
    should be minimized
  • Preserve an FEL option
  • No planning which modifies the site appearance
    in an unfavorable way
  • Necessary additional tunnels necessary should
    stay clear from existing buildings
  • ERL should be planned such, that construction
    and commissioning can be parallel to NSLSII
    running
  • Stay clear from road North of the site
  • Stay clear from road West of the site

12
Beam Losses
13
Short Parameter List
Energy 4 GeV Beam Current 200 mA Normalized
Emittance 0.5 mm Energy Spread
10 -4 Bunch Length
0.5 mm Linac gradient 10
MV/m Linac Length
723 m                                 
14
Comparison of Brightness

  • NSLS            NSLS-II              ERL
  • Energy, GeV             2.8                
    3                          4
  • Current, mA             275                
    500                      200
  • Emittance X, nm       53                  
    0.5                       0.1
  • Emittance Y, nm       0.117             
    0.005                   0.1
  • Energy spread,      0.084             
    0.1                       0.01
  • BetaX, m                  1.114             
    3.3                       7
  • BetaY, m                  0.407             
    1                          7
  • Dispersion X, m        0.15               
    0                          0
  •  
  • Undulator    
  •            
  • Period, cm                1.25                
    1.4                     14
  • Length, m                 0.3375            
    2                        18
  • K                              1.1                
      2                         2

15
Brightness
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
16
Flux Calculation
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
17
Possible Site Layout Compatible with NSLSII as
planned
Linac I
Return Arc
source
Linac II
FEL Hall
Dump
Possible Footprint
Scale in m
Vertical cut through the site
7m
18
Detail Footprint
FEL Exp Hall
s
Commissioning loop
D
s
Scale in m
Scale in m
Possible Injection Scheme
Lambertson septa
Horizontally separated vertical bends
19
What needs to be done now
  • Include a small radial vault underneath the
    Eastside of the Ring
  • Rotate the facility footprint clockwise by 25
    Degree

25degree
20
Conclusions
  • Due to a compressed schedule and limited
    resources it might not be possible to include
    extra long straights in a timely fashion in the
    NSLSII footprint
  • ? Intend to base a later upgrade to extra
    long straights on a footprint with 15-fold
    lattice symmetry
  • need to select potential positions soon,
    because we need
  • - to enlarge the tunnel at these locations
    somewhat
  • - to build-in some flexibility into the
    ratchet wall
  • In order to ease the later integration of
    an ERL/FEL driven by a superconducting LINAC as
    a major upgrade project, some small modifications
    of the NSLSII footprint appear to be advisable
  • A small clockwise rotation
  • A small piece of tunnel underneath the
    East-side of NSLSII
  • shielding issue cannot be resolved, would
    have to be addressed in a different way
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com