Title: Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis of Food Webs
1Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis
of Food Webs
- Jonathan L. Bowers, Meridith Bartley, Dr. Albert
J. Meier - Center for Biodiversity Studies, Department of
Biology, - Western Kentucky University
2Why Study Food Web Ecology?
- Best method for depicting feeding relationships
- Provide, although complex, models of species
interactions and biodiversity - Whats not interesting about this ?????
3Major Contributors
- Charles Elton (1927)
- Lindeman, R.L. (1942)
- May (1973)
- Pimm Lawton (1975)
- Also, Joel Cohen, Bernard Patten, Gary Polis
4Concepts of Research Interest
- Trophic Levels of Food Webs
- Pyramid Scheme or Semi-Cyclic Flow
- Compartmentalization of Systems
- Energy Flows
- Applications of properties (connectance, linkage
density) toward trophic pathways in food webs - But.
5What about Indirect Pathways?
- Importance of Indirect Pathway Study
- Mathematical Modeling
- Study Greater Effects of Predator and Prey Gain
and Loss - Use of Theoretical Connectance Modification
Species B Consumes A
A
B
VERSUS
C
A
B
INDIRECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES A AND
C
6Predator and Prey Connectance Modification
- Artificial introduction, not of new species, but
change in feeding patterns of existing species - Limits on variability
- Test Predators and Preys effect on increases of
indirect pathways and the variable distribution
of such
7Method for Depicting Food Webs
- Food Webs depicted mathematically by adjacency
matrices - Binary matrices
- Zeros denote no direct link
- Ones denote feeding link
- In the matrices, the predator is in the column
consuming prey in row - Column Eats Row
- So, energy transfer is from row to column in
these adjacency matrices
A
B
C
8Simple Food Web Construct vs. Lavigne
Spaghetti Model (1992)
9A Method For Obtaining Indirect Links
- Since the adjacency matrix shows direct links and
the length of those paths are simply one, to get
paths of length two, you would square the matrix
(multiply by itself)
X
10Methods, Tests, and Materials
- 12 Food Webs ranging from Maine, North Carolina,
and New Zealand - Pine Forest, Tussock and Pasture Grassland,
Broadleaf Forest - Diversity of habitat and climate
- Presence of ooze or detrital organic matter in
original web was criterion for selection
(Lindeman 1942) - Common and highly significant in the nutrient
cycling of systems
11Methods (Cond)
- Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
- In square matrices, there exists eigenvalues and
eigenvectors (together named eigenpairs) that
satisfy the following equation - Ax ?x
- Where A is a square matrix, ? is the eigenvalue,
and x is the assoicated eigenvector - By taking each eigenvector and dividing by the
sum of all eigenvectors, the relative
distribution of direct and indirect pathways are
obtained as a percentage - The largest of these shows the compartment with
the most pathway potential (dominant eigenpair of
the matrix)
12Artificial Selections
- Each food web had modified adjacency matrices for
predator and prey - Chosen artificial introductions are
super-predators and universal prey either
consuming or being consumed by all in the system - Second analysis has connectance modification such
that a chosen predator and prey have connectance
C 50 in column - Selected by linkage density
- Reasoning for
- Each adjacency (original or modified) taken to
powers two and three (squared and cubed) - Returns indirect pathways (potential energy flow)
of length two and three, respectively
13Grouping and Graphing
- Grouping of indirect pathways
- 3 Groups
- Top Predators
- Middle Predators
- Bottom Trophic Organisms
- Distribution and relative changes in total
indirect links
14Results
Table 1 Matrix A2
Table 2 Matrix A3
15Results through Eigenvector AnalysisPredator/Prey
Modification 100 C
Table 3 Comparative Regionalization of Indirect
Links Of Length 2
Table 4 Comparative Regionalization of
Indirect Links Of Length 3
16Results through Eigenvector AnalysisPredator/Prey
Modification 50 C
Table 3 Comparative Regionalization of Indirect
Links Of Length 2
Table 4 Comparative Regionalization of
Indirect Links Of Length 3
17Conclusions
- Changes in the sums of indirect links showed
increases with the introduction of universal
predator and prey species - Introductions of universal predators tended to
have localized indirect effects across the twelve
webs whereas universal prey species experienced
much more diverse indirect links in the three
groupings. - Although to a lesser degree, similar results were
observed when predator and prey were modified
such that C 50 - Eigenvector analysis can be used to observe the
relative spatial distribution of direct and
indirect pathways as percentage values
18Conclusions (Cond)
- Modifying the connectance of these food webs in
this fashion introduces cycles known as closely
connected components (K) (Borrett and Patten) - The introduction of these cycles yields an
exponential increase in pathways known as pathway
proliferation (Borrett and Patten)
19Future Direction
- This study looks not at the weight of indirect
effects but rather the potential indirect
pathways - Adjacency matrices are not weighted (all links
treated as equal) and represent potential, rather
than realized, energy flow - Future analysis will incorporate weighted graphs,
taking the eigenvectors of the matrix to explain
the distribution of indirect effects in the
system - This, in a trophic sense, would show (through the
dominant eigenpair), which node in the system
experiences the most energy through-flow - Can view this as a net energy exchange or as
separate entities of energy input and output to
any given node - May contribute in part to the quantification of
keystone species in a trophic cascade
20Special Thanks
- Dr. Stuart Whipple, Institute of Ecology,
University of Georgia - Dr. Stuart Borrett, Dept. of Biology, University
of North Carolina-Wilmington - Dr. Claus Ernst, Dept. of Mathematics, WKU