Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis of Food Webs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis of Food Webs

Description:

Since the adjacency matrix shows direct links and the length of those paths are ... of these food webs in this fashion introduces cycles known as closely connected ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: jonatha185
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis of Food Webs


1
Connectance Modification and Eigenvector Analysis
of Food Webs
  • Jonathan L. Bowers, Meridith Bartley, Dr. Albert
    J. Meier
  • Center for Biodiversity Studies, Department of
    Biology,
  • Western Kentucky University

2
Why Study Food Web Ecology?
  • Best method for depicting feeding relationships
  • Provide, although complex, models of species
    interactions and biodiversity
  • Whats not interesting about this ?????

3
Major Contributors
  • Charles Elton (1927)
  • Lindeman, R.L. (1942)
  • May (1973)
  • Pimm Lawton (1975)
  • Also, Joel Cohen, Bernard Patten, Gary Polis

4
Concepts of Research Interest
  • Trophic Levels of Food Webs
  • Pyramid Scheme or Semi-Cyclic Flow
  • Compartmentalization of Systems
  • Energy Flows
  • Applications of properties (connectance, linkage
    density) toward trophic pathways in food webs
  • But.

5
What about Indirect Pathways?
  • Importance of Indirect Pathway Study
  • Mathematical Modeling
  • Study Greater Effects of Predator and Prey Gain
    and Loss
  • Use of Theoretical Connectance Modification

Species B Consumes A
A
B
VERSUS
C
A
B
INDIRECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES A AND
C
6
Predator and Prey Connectance Modification
  • Artificial introduction, not of new species, but
    change in feeding patterns of existing species
  • Limits on variability
  • Test Predators and Preys effect on increases of
    indirect pathways and the variable distribution
    of such

7
Method for Depicting Food Webs
  • Food Webs depicted mathematically by adjacency
    matrices
  • Binary matrices
  • Zeros denote no direct link
  • Ones denote feeding link
  • In the matrices, the predator is in the column
    consuming prey in row
  • Column Eats Row
  • So, energy transfer is from row to column in
    these adjacency matrices

A
B
C
8
Simple Food Web Construct vs. Lavigne
Spaghetti Model (1992)
9
A Method For Obtaining Indirect Links
  • Since the adjacency matrix shows direct links and
    the length of those paths are simply one, to get
    paths of length two, you would square the matrix
    (multiply by itself)

X

10
Methods, Tests, and Materials
  • 12 Food Webs ranging from Maine, North Carolina,
    and New Zealand
  • Pine Forest, Tussock and Pasture Grassland,
    Broadleaf Forest
  • Diversity of habitat and climate
  • Presence of ooze or detrital organic matter in
    original web was criterion for selection
    (Lindeman 1942)
  • Common and highly significant in the nutrient
    cycling of systems

11
Methods (Cond)
  • Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
  • In square matrices, there exists eigenvalues and
    eigenvectors (together named eigenpairs) that
    satisfy the following equation
  • Ax ?x
  • Where A is a square matrix, ? is the eigenvalue,
    and x is the assoicated eigenvector
  • By taking each eigenvector and dividing by the
    sum of all eigenvectors, the relative
    distribution of direct and indirect pathways are
    obtained as a percentage
  • The largest of these shows the compartment with
    the most pathway potential (dominant eigenpair of
    the matrix)

12
Artificial Selections
  • Each food web had modified adjacency matrices for
    predator and prey
  • Chosen artificial introductions are
    super-predators and universal prey either
    consuming or being consumed by all in the system
  • Second analysis has connectance modification such
    that a chosen predator and prey have connectance
    C 50 in column
  • Selected by linkage density
  • Reasoning for
  • Each adjacency (original or modified) taken to
    powers two and three (squared and cubed)
  • Returns indirect pathways (potential energy flow)
    of length two and three, respectively

13
Grouping and Graphing
  • Grouping of indirect pathways
  • 3 Groups
  • Top Predators
  • Middle Predators
  • Bottom Trophic Organisms
  • Distribution and relative changes in total
    indirect links

14
Results
Table 1 Matrix A2
Table 2 Matrix A3
15
Results through Eigenvector AnalysisPredator/Prey
Modification 100 C
Table 3 Comparative Regionalization of Indirect
Links Of Length 2
Table 4 Comparative Regionalization of
Indirect Links Of Length 3
16
Results through Eigenvector AnalysisPredator/Prey
Modification 50 C
Table 3 Comparative Regionalization of Indirect
Links Of Length 2
Table 4 Comparative Regionalization of
Indirect Links Of Length 3
17
Conclusions
  • Changes in the sums of indirect links showed
    increases with the introduction of universal
    predator and prey species
  • Introductions of universal predators tended to
    have localized indirect effects across the twelve
    webs whereas universal prey species experienced
    much more diverse indirect links in the three
    groupings.
  • Although to a lesser degree, similar results were
    observed when predator and prey were modified
    such that C 50
  • Eigenvector analysis can be used to observe the
    relative spatial distribution of direct and
    indirect pathways as percentage values

18
Conclusions (Cond)
  • Modifying the connectance of these food webs in
    this fashion introduces cycles known as closely
    connected components (K) (Borrett and Patten)
  • The introduction of these cycles yields an
    exponential increase in pathways known as pathway
    proliferation (Borrett and Patten)

19
Future Direction
  • This study looks not at the weight of indirect
    effects but rather the potential indirect
    pathways
  • Adjacency matrices are not weighted (all links
    treated as equal) and represent potential, rather
    than realized, energy flow
  • Future analysis will incorporate weighted graphs,
    taking the eigenvectors of the matrix to explain
    the distribution of indirect effects in the
    system
  • This, in a trophic sense, would show (through the
    dominant eigenpair), which node in the system
    experiences the most energy through-flow
  • Can view this as a net energy exchange or as
    separate entities of energy input and output to
    any given node
  • May contribute in part to the quantification of
    keystone species in a trophic cascade

20
Special Thanks
  • Dr. Stuart Whipple, Institute of Ecology,
    University of Georgia
  • Dr. Stuart Borrett, Dept. of Biology, University
    of North Carolina-Wilmington
  • Dr. Claus Ernst, Dept. of Mathematics, WKU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com