Title: PGENESIS Tutorial WAMBAMM 05
1PGENESIS TutorialWAM-BAMM 05
- Greg Hood
- Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
- Carnegie Mellon University
2Are your models running too slowly?
- In some situations PGENESIS can be used to speed
them up - Partitioning a large network across processors
- Running a large number of simulations
- Not appropriate for
- Large single-cell models (i.e., those with many
compartments)
3What is PGENESIS?
- Library extension to GENESIS that supports
- communication among multiple processes
- so nearly everything available in GENESIS is
- available in PGENESIS
- Allows multiple processes to perform multiple
- simulations in parallel
- Allows multiple processes to work together
- cooperatively on a single simulation
- Runs on workstations or supercomputers
- using the PVM or MPI message-passing
- libraries
-
4History
- PGENESIS developed by Goddard and Hood at PSC
(1993-1998) - Ported from PVM to MPI by Chukkpalli and Charman
(NPACI, 2000), and also by Panchev (Sunderland,
2003) - Current contact pgenesis_at_psc.edu
5Tutorial Outline
- What PGENESIS provides
- Using PGENESIS for parallel parameter searching
- Using PGENESIS for simulating large networks
more quickly - Selecting appropriate parallel hardware
- Strategies for development and testing
6PGENESIS Functionality
7How PGENESIS Runs in Parallel (1)
- PVM-based PGENESIS typically one process starts
and then spawns n-1 other processes - MPI-based PGENESIS all n processes are started
simultaneously by the mpirun or mpiexec command
8How PGENESIS Runs in Parallel (2)
- For both PVM and MPI-based versions
- mapping of processes to processors is nearly
always 1 to 1 - mapping of processes to processors is often 1 to
1, but may be many to 1 during debugging - every process runs same script
- this is not a real limitation
9Nodes and Zones
- Each process is referred to as a "node".
- Nodes may be organized into "zones".
- A node is fully specified by a numeric string of
the form ltnodegt.ltzonegt. - Simulations within a zone are kept synchronized
in simulation time. - Each node joins the parallel platform using the
paron command. - Each node should gracefully terminate by calling
paroff
10Every node in its own zone
- Simulations on each node are not coupled
temporally. - Useful for parameter searching.
- We refer to nodes as 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
11All nodes in one zone
- Simulations on each node are coupled temporally.
- Useful for large network models
- Zone numbers can be omitted since we are dealing
with only one zone we can thus refer to nodes as
0, 1, 2,
12Nodes have distinct namespaces
- /elem1 on node 0 refers to an element on node 0
- /elem1 on node 1 refers to an element on node
1 - To avoid confusion we recommend that you use
distinct names for elements on different nodes
within a zone. - The script writer (i.e., you) is responsible
for partitioning a network model across nodes.
13GENESIS Terminology
- GENESIS Computer Science
- Object Class
- Element Object
- Message Connection
- Value Message
-
14Who am I?
- PGENESIS provides several functions that allow a
script to determine its place in the overall
parallel configuration - mynode - of this node in this zone
- nnodes - of nodes in this zone
- (all numbering starts at 0)
- mytotalnode - of this node in platform
- ntotalnodes - of nodes in platform
- myzone - of this zone
- nzones - of zones
- npvmcpu - of processors in configuration
- mypvmid - PVM task identifier for this node
15Styles of Parallel Scripts
- Symmetric Each node executes the same script
commands in lock-step style (synchronized
explicitly or implicitly). - Master/Worker One node (usually node 0)
coordinates processing and issues commands to the
other nodes.
16Explicit Synchronization
- barrier - causes thread to block until all nodes
within the zone have reached the corresponding
barrier - barrier -wait at default barrier
- barrier 7 -wait at named barrier
- barrier 7 100000 -timeout is 100000
seconds - barrierall - causes thread to block until all
nodes in all zones have reached the corresponding
barrier - barrierall -wait at default barrier
- barrierall 7 -wait at named barrier
- barrierall 7 100000 -timeout is 100000 sec
17Implicit Synchronization
- Two commands implicitly execute a zone-wide
barrier - step - implicitly causes the thread to block
until all nodes within the zone are ready to step
(this behavior can be disabled with setfield
/post sync_before_step 0) - reset - implicitly causes the thread to block
until all nodes have reset - These commands require that all nodes in the zone
participate, thus the barrier.
18Remote Function Calls (1)
- An "issuing" node directs a procedure to run on
an "executing" node. - Examples
- some_function_at_2 params...
some_function_at_all params... some_function_at_other
s params... some_function_at_0.4 params...
some_function_at_1,3,5 params...
19Remote Function Calls (2)
- Each remote function call causes the creation of
a new thread on the executing node. - All parameters are evaluated on the issuing node.
- Example if called from node 1,
some_function_at_2 mynode will execute
some_function 1 on node 2
20Remote Function Calls (3)
- When does the executing node actually perform the
remote function call, since we don't use hardware
interrupts? - While waiting at barrier or barrierall.
- While waiting for its own remote operations to
complete, e.g. func_at_node, raddmsg - When the simulator is sitting at the prompt
waiting for user input. - When the executing script calls clearthread or
clearthreads.
21Threads
- A thread is a single flow of control within a
PGENESIS script being executed. - When a node starts, there is exactly one thread
on it the thread for the script. - There may potentially be many threads per node.
These are stacked up, with only the topmost
actually executing at any moment. - clearthread yield to one thread awaiting
execution (if one exists) - clearthreads yield to all threads awaiting
execution
22Asynchronous Calls (1)
- The async command allows a script to dispatch an
operation on a remote node without waiting for
its completion. - Example
- async some_function_at_2 params...
23Asynchronous Calls (2)
- One may wait for an async call to complete,
either individually, - future async some_function_at_2 ...
- ... // do some work locally
- waiton future
- or for an entire set
- async some_function_at_2 ...
- async some_function_at_5 ...
- ...
- waiton all
24Asynchronous Calls (3)
- Asynchronous calls may return a value.
- Example
- int future async myfunc_at_1 // start thread
on node 1
// do some work locally - int result waiton future // wait
for thread's result - Thus the term "future" - it is a promise of a
value some time in the future. waiton calls in
that promise.
25Asynchronous Calls (4)
- async returns a value which is only to be used as
the parameter of a waiton call, and waiton must
only be called with such a value. - Remote function calls from a particular issuing
node to a particular executing node are
guaranteed to be performed in the sequence they
were sent. - There is no guaranteed order among calls
involving multiple issuing or executing nodes.
26Advice about Barriers (1)
- It is very easy to reach deadlock if barriers are
not handled correctly. PGENESIS tries to warn you
by printing a message that it is waiting at a
barrier. - Examples of incorrect barrier usage
- Each node executes barrier mynode
- Each node executes barrier_at_all
- A single node executes barrier_at_others
barrier However async barrier_at_others
barrier will work!
27Advice about Barriers (2)
- Guideline if your script is operating in the
symmetric style (all nodes execute all
statements), never use barrier_at_ - If your script is operating in the master-worker
style, master must ensure it calls a function on
each worker that executes a barrier before the
master itself enters the barrier - barrier async barrier_at_others
will not work.
28Commands for Network Creation
- Several new commands permit the creation of
"remote" (internode) messages - raddmsg /local_element /remote_element_at_2 \
- SPIKE
- rvolumeconnect /local_elements \
- /remote_elements_at_2 \
- -sourcemask ... -destmask ... \
- -probability 0.5
- rvolumedelay /local_elements -radial 10.0
- rvolumeweight /local_elements -fixed 0.2
- rshowmsg /local_elements
29Tips for Avoiding Deadlocks
- Use lots of echo statements.
- Use barrier IDs.
- Do not execute barriers remotely (e.g.,
barrier_at_all). - Remember that step usually does an implicit
barrier. - Have each node do its own step command, or have
one controlling node do a step_at_all. (similarly
for reset) - Do not use the stop command.
- Keep things simple.
30Motivation
- Parallel control of setup can be hard.
- Parallel control of simulation can be hard.
- Debugging parallel scripts is hard.
31How PGENESIS Fits into Schedule
- Schedule controls the order in which GENESIS
elements get updated. - At beginning of step, all internode data is
transferred. - There will be equivalence to serial GENESIS only
if remote messages do not pass from earlier to
later elements in the schedule.
32How PGENESIS Fits into Schedule
- addtask Simulate /CLASSpostmaster -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSbuffer -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSprojection -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSspiking -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSgate -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSsegmentCLASS!membran
e\ - CLASS!gateCLASS!concentration -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSmembrane -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASShsolver -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSconcentration \
- -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSdevice -action
PROCESS - addtask Simulate /CLASSoutput -action
PROCESS
33Hello, world! for PGENESIS
- Contents of file hello.g
- paron parallel nodes 4 output hello.out
- barrier 17
- echo Hello from node mynode
- barrier 18
- paroff
- Execute on four nodes with
- pgenesis nox hello.g
34Parameter Searching with PGENESIS
35Model Characteristics
- The following are prerequisites to use PGENESIS
for optimization on a particular parameter
searching problem - Model must be expressed in GENESIS.
- Decide on the parameter set.
- Have a way to evaluate the parameter set.
- Have some range for each of the parameter values.
- The evaluations over the parameter-space should
be reasonably well-behaved. - Stopping criterion
36Choose a Search Strategy
- Genetic Search
- Simulated Annealing
- Monte Carlo (for very ill-behaved search spaces)
- Nelder-Mead (for well-behaved search spaces)
- Use as many constraints as you can to restrict
the search space - Always do a sanity check on results
37An Example Model
param2
- We have a one compartment cell model of a spiking
neuron. Dynamics are well-behaved. - Parameters are the conductances for the Na, Kdr,
Ka, and KM channels. We know the conductance
values to be in the range from 0.1 to 10.0 a
priori. - We write spike times to a file, then compare this
using a C function, spkcmp, to "experimental"
data. - Stop when our match fitness exceeds 20.0
38A Parallel Genetic Algorithm
- We adopt a population-based approach as opposed
to a generation-based one. - We will keep a fixed population "alive" and use
the workers to evaluate the fitness of candidate
individuals. - If a candidate turns out to be better than some
member of the current population, then we replace
the worst member of the current population
with the new individual.
39Mutations
- Pick a member of the population at random.
- Decide whether to do crossover according to the
crossover probability. If we are doing crossover,
pick another random member of the current
population, and combine the "genes" of those
individuals. If we aren't doing crossover, just
copy the bits of the original individual. - Go through each bit of the bit string, and mutate
it with some small probability.
40Master/Worker Paradigm (1)
41Master/Worker Paradigm (2)
- All nodes in a separate zone.
- Node 0.0 will control the search.
- Nodes 0.1 through 0.n-1 will run the model and
perform the evaluation.
42Commands for Optimization
- Typically these are organized in a master/worker
fashion with one node (the master) directing the
search, and all other nodes evaluating parameter
sets. Remote function calls are useful in this
context for - sending tasks to workers
- async task_at_worker param1...
- having workers return evaluations to master
- return_result_at_master result
43Main Script
- paron -farm -silent 0 -nodes n_nodes \
- -output o.out -executable nxpgenesis
- barrierall
- if (mytotalnode 0)
- init_master
- pb_search individuals population
- else
- init_worker
- end
- barrierall 7 1000000
- paroff
44Master Conducts the Search
- function pb_search
- ...
- for (i 0 i lt individuals \
- max_fitness lt stopping_criterion \
- i i 1)
- // pick random individual from population
- // decide whether to do crossover mutation
- // mutate bitstring
- // assign this task to a worker
- delegate_task (i)
- end
- finish
- print_results
- end
45Master Conducts the Search
- function delegate_task
- ...
- // send the parameters one by one
- for (p 0 p lt parameters p p 1)
- async set_param_at_0.try_node \
- p getfield \
- /paramsp bits
- end
- async worker_task_at_0.try_node index
- clearthreads
- ...
- end
46Worker Evaluates Individuals (1)
- function worker_task (index)
- compute_parameter_values
- // determine that fitness value for
- // this individual
- fit evaluate
- // return result to the master
- return_result_at_0.0 mytotalnode \
- index fit
- end
-
47Worker Evaluates Individuals (2)
- function evaluate
- float match, fitness
- // first run the simulation
- newsim getfield /params0 value \
- getfield /params1 value \
- getfield /params2 value \
- getfield /params3 value runfI
- call /out/sim_output_file FLUSH
48Worker Evaluates Individuals (3)
- // then find the simulated spike times
- gen2spk sim_output_file delay \
- current_duration total_duration
- // then compare the simulated spike
- // times with the experimental data match
spkcmp real_spk_file \ - sim_spk_file -pow1 0.4 -pow2 0.6 \
- -msp 0.5 -nmp 200.0
- fitness 1.0 / sqrt match return
fitness - end
49Master Integrates the Results
- function return_result (node, index, fit)
- ...
- end
50Comparison of Parallel Parameter Search with
Serial Parameter Search
- GA scales fairly well
- SA scales to a certain extent, but not as well as
GA - paths through search space will be different, but
if searches are successful, they will converge to
the same result
51Large Networks with PGENESIS
52Parallel Network Creation
- In parallel network creation make sure elements
exist before connecting them up, e.g. - create_elements(...)
- barrier
- create_messages(...)
53Goals of decomposition
- Keep all processors busy all the time on useful
work - Use as many processors as are available
- Key concepts are
- Load-balancing
- Minimizing communication
- Minimizing synchronization
- Scalable decomposition
- Parallel I/O
54Load balancing
- Attempt to parcel out the modeled cells such that
each CPU takes the same amount of time to
simulate one step - This is static load balancing - cells do not move
- Dedicated access to the CPUs is required for
effective decomposition - Easier if identically configured CPUs.
- PGENESIS provides no automated load-balancing but
there are some performance monitoring tools.
55Minimizing communication
- Put highly connected clusters of cells on the
same PGENESIS node. - Think of each synapse with a presynaptic cell on
a remote node as expensive. - The same network distributed among more nodes
will result in more of these expensive synapses
hence, more nodes can be counterproductive. - The time spent communicating can overwhelm the
time spent computing.
56Orient_tut Example
57Non-scalable decomposition
orient1
58Scalable decomposition (1)
- Goal as the number of available processors
grows, your model naturally partitions into finer
divisions -
59Scalable decomposition (2)
orient2
60Scalable decomposition (3)
- To the extent that you can arrange your
decomposition to scale with the number of
processors, it is a very good idea to create the
scripts using a function of the number of nodes
anywhere that a node number must be explicitly
specified. - E.g.
- createmap /library/rec /retina/recplane \
- NX / n_slices NY \
- -delta SEPX SEPY \
- -origin slice SEPX NX / n_slices 0
61Scalable decomposition (4)
- raddmsg is used to set up off-node messages.
- E.g.
- raddmsg /V1/vert/soma \
- /output/vert_at_output_node \
- SAVE io_index Vm
- raddmsg /V1/vert/soma \
- /xout/drawv/inputs_at_output_node \
- ICOORDS io_index x y z
- raddmsg /V1/vert/soma \
- /xout/drawv/inputs_at_output_node \
- IVAL1 io_index Vm
-
62Scalable decomposition (5)
- rvolumeconnect can be used to connect up a set
of source elements to a set of destination
elements on arbitrary nodes. - E.g.
- rvolumeconnect /retina/recplane/rec/input \
- /V1/horiz/soma/exc_syn_at_workers \
- -relative \
- -sourcemask box 0 0 0 1 1 0 \
- -destmask box -2.4 V1_SEPX \
- -0.6 V1_SEPY -5.0 V1_SEPZ \
- 2.4 V1_SEPX 0.6 V1_SEPY \
- 5.0 V1_SEPZ
63Selecting Appropriate Parallel Hardware
64Hardware for Parameter Searching
- Fast processors
- Network is not critical (100 Mbps suffices)
- Departmental clusters or even clusters of
workstations are adequate
65Hardware for Network Models
- Fast processors
- Fast network
- High bandwidth, low latency for message-passing
- Options GigE, 10GigE, Infiniband, Myrinet,
Quadrics - Critical factor for PGENESIS Is there an MPI
library optimized for that network? - Nice to have latencies lt 10µs
- Departmental clusters or supercomputers desirable
66PGENESIS Installation
- Install GENESIS on each machine in the
configuration - Install MPI or PVM package
- Run tests to make sure MPI or PVM works
- Install PGENESIS
- Test with Hello, world! script and then with
examples (param, orient1, and orient2)
67But I dont have access to a parallel machine
- Computing cycles are available through the
NSF-Funded Supercomputing Centers - Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
(http//www.psc.edu) - PGENESIS installed on 3000 processor Alpha
- NPACI (http//www.npaci.edu)
- Worked on MPI-based PGENESIS
- Alliance (http//www.ncsa.uiuc.edu)
- Grants of time are provided free-of-charge to
U.S. researchers upon approval of a short proposal
68Your simulations could be running here
- 3000-processor Terascale computer at PSC
- (6 Tflops)
or here
2000-processor Cray XT3 at PSC (10 Tflops)
69Strategies for Development and Testing
70Parallel Script Development/Testing (1)
- 1. Develop single cell prototypes using serial
GENESIS. - 2. (a) For network models, decide partitioning
and develop scalable scripts. (b) For parameter
searches, develop scripts to run and evaluate a
single individual, and a scalable script that
will control the search. - 3. Try out scripts on single processor using the
minimum number of nodes.
71Parallel Script Development/Testing (2)
- 4. Try out scripts on single processor but
increase the number of nodes. - 5. Try out scripts on small multiprocessor
platform. - 6. Try out scripts on large multiprocessor
platform.
72Summary and Questions
73Summary
- PGENESIS is a GENESIS extension which can let you
use multiple computers to - Perform large parameter searches much more
quickly - Simulate large network models more quickly
74References
- http//www.psc.edu/ghood/wam-bamm-05/
- Goddard, N.H. and Hood, G., Large-scale
simulation using parallel GENESIS, The Book of
GENESIS, 2nd ed., Bower, J.M. and Beeman, D.
(Eds), Springer-Verlag, 1998. - Goddard, N.H. and Hood, G., Parallel Genesis for
large scale modeling, Computational Neuroscience
Trends in Research 1997, Plenum Publishing, NY,
1997, p. 911-917. - Howell, D. F., Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Maex, R.,
Goddard, N., De Schutter, E., A large-scale model
of the cerebellar cortex using PGENESIS,
Neurocomputing, 32/33 (2000), p. 1041-1046.
75Questions / Discussion
- Parallelism will likely be integrated into
GENESIS 3, not treated as an add-on package - If you have suggestions about what you would like
to see in a parallel neural simulator, please
contact me (ghood_at_psc.edu)