Title: Mario Pezzini
1 2Trends seen with traditional glasses
3 Growth in OECD regions dwarfed by growth in
(some) Asian regions
- Shanghai aims to increase RD intensity to
3.3 by 2020
4The Nature of Innovation
Concentration of Innovation Patent applications
per million inhabitants (2005)
Research-intensive innovation remains highly
concentrated
5Regions with the highest number of patent
applications per million population compared to
their country average, 2005
Source OECD Regions at a Glance 2009
6More than one third of OECD regions have less
than 10 patents per million population. These
regions tend to invest less in RD and have lower
shares of employment in high technology sectors
Correlation between RD expenditures and patent
applications, 2000-2005
Source OECD Regions at a Glance 2009
7The Nature of Innovation
Features related to Innovation
- Regions that experience higher levels of
patenting activity are doing so through - Greater RD expenditure
- Greater involvement of the private sector in
innovation projects - Higher employment shares in high-tech sectors
8The Nature of Innovation
Collaboration for Innovation Patents with
co-inventors (2005)
Collaboration for innovation is also concentrated
in few places.
9Patents with at least one co-inventor by
residence of the co-inventor, 2005
Correlation between business and non-business
patenting activities (pooled 2000-2004)
Source OECD Regions at a Glance 2009
10What are the results of the analysis on
innovation?
- If.
- Research-intensive innovation remains highly
concentrated - Some regions are catching up (Shanghai 2.3
RD/GDP), but many will not - .the future appear uncertain
- However, regions vary greatly in how they
innovate and indicators capture only part of
this. - There is a changing nature of innovation that
reinforces the opportunities for dynamics in all
regions -
11The policy supply
12Why adopting a regional approach?
- The systems focus serves to identify different
kinds of gaps and failures for policy
intervention - Weaknesses in one part of system limit economic
growth - Market failure is not the only problem
- National policymakers are struggling with how to
incorporate the RIS concept into policy - What is the most efficient spatial allocation of
resources? - How are different RIS served by a uniform
policy? - How to exploit trans-border effects?
- How to exploit trans-national externalities?
13What are the main problems and issues with the
RIS approach?
- Many regional strategies are not adapted to their
context - Not all regions can be Silicon Valley
(knowledge-generation leader) - But capacity to absorb knowledge to innovate is
needed everywhere - Be careful in producing fashion trends
- RIS is frequently a recast science- and
research-based approach - Most innovation principles are not recognised
in supply-driven RIS plans - Respective roles of national, regional and local
level unclear - Programme proliferation duplication creates
confusion waste - Administrative boundaries dont usually map to an
RIS
14Regional Innovation Systems
15Regional Innovation Systems
16Eppur si muove!
17The New Regional Paradigm
- EU funds have been allocated following a
convergence logic - However, for a group of the relatively richer
regions, funds seem to grow as well.
- Growth period refers to 1994-2006 for Belgium,
Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy,
Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK
1995-2006 for Austria, Finland and Sweden and
2000-2006 for the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland
and the Slovak Republic. - Initial year for per capita GDP in the horizontal
axis is determined according to the growth
period. - Source Own calculations based on DGRegio.
18The New Regional Paradigm
- While infrastructure is still an important part
of EU funds, competitiveness enhancing objectives
comprise now more than half of all allocations.
- Business-environment objectives refers to
assisting large business organisations, assisting
SMEs and the craft sector and productive
environment. - Infrastructure refers to basic infrastructure,
energy infrastructure, environmental
infrastructure, planning and rehabilitation,
social infrastructure and public health, telecom
infrastructure and information society, and
transport infrastructure. - Labour market refers to human resources, labour
market policy, and positive labour market actions
for women. - Innovation refers to research, technological
development and innovation technical assistance
and innovation actions and workforce
flexibility, entrepreneurial activity,
innovation, information and communication
technologies. - Social refers to social inclusion.
- Rural refers to promoting the adaptation and the
development of rural areas. - Tourism refers to tourism.
- Primary sector refers to agriculture, fisheries
and forestry. - Education refers to developing educational and
vocational training. - Source Own calculations based on DGRegio.
19The New Regional Paradigm
- Following a convergence logic, funds for
infrastructure are allocated according to the
degree of regional development. - This remains a valid cohesion objective, but can
be related also to compensatory regional policies
- Infrastructure refers to basic infrastructure,
energy infrastructure, environmental
infrastructure, planning and rehabilitation,
social infrastructure and public health, telecom
infrastructure and information society, and
transport infrastructure. - Source Own calculations based on DGRegio.
20The New Regional Paradigm
- In contrast, Regions regardless of their income
levels, are supported with funds to develop
innovation. - This is in line with the Lisbon Strategy.
- Innovation refers to research, technological
development and innovation technical assistance
and innovation actions and workforce
flexibility, entrepreneurial activity,
innovation, information and communication
technologies. - Source Own calculations based on DGRegio.
21The New Regional Paradigm
- The same applies in allocation of funds for
labour markets.
- Labour market refers to human resources, labour
market policy, and positive labour market actions
for women. - Source Own calculations based on DGRegio.
22Risks
- Policy imitation
- Mere redistribution on equal standards
- Administrative rather than strategic management
- Lack of expertise at national and regional level
- Lack of a conceptual framework
23Action
- Identify comparative advantages
- Reveal information
- Group investments
- Experiment