How SwedishBased Scientists Can Win More Nobel Prizes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

How SwedishBased Scientists Can Win More Nobel Prizes

Description:

Inspires and stimulates the entire research community. Indicates that a Government's science policies are correct ... Leads to concentration on fashionable fields ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: donbr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How SwedishBased Scientists Can Win More Nobel Prizes


1
How Swedish-Based Scientists Can Win More Nobel
Prizes
  • Donald W Braben
  • Department of Earth Sciences
  • University College London
  • don.braben_at_btinternet.com
  • www.es.ucl.ac.uk/people/braben
  • Visby, Sweden
  • 30 June 2009

2
Nobel Prizes in the Sciences
  • A nations tally of science Nobels is an
    internationally-endorsed indicator of
  • creativity
  • scientific leadership
  • a nations scientific health
  • A high tally of Nobels
  • Inspires and stimulates the entire research
    community
  • Indicates that a Governments science policies
    are correct
  • Provides excellent foundations for economic
    growth
  • Raises public awareness and appreciation of
    science

D W Braben, 2009
3
Percentage of Science Nobel Prizes Won by
Nation-based Scientists
D W Braben 2009
4
Academic Research
  • Before 1970
  • Universities autonomous
  • Scientific freedom the norm
  • Peer review used mainly for large grant
    applications
  • After 1970
  • Use of peer review progressively increased
  • UK became by far the most peer reviewed nation
    in the world
  • Last 10-20 years
  • Peer review of proposals mandatory
  • Increased concentration on high-priority fields
  • Reduction in the number of small grants
  • Erosion of trust

D W Braben 2009
5
Peer Review
  • Has two components
  • Peer review of completed work
  • Peer review of research proposals peer
    preview
  • Peer review
  • Is as old as the hills
  • Is based on assessments of actual performance
  • Discoveries may be controversial, but their
    existence cannot be denied
  • Sooner or later, justice will probably be done
  • Peer preview
  • Claimed to be the gold standard for assessing
    future performance
  • Implicitly assumes that science is democratic
  • Is usually carried out anonymously, and often
    in secret
  • Has the power to veto proposals
  • Restricts scientific freedom
  • Leads to concentration on fashionable fields
  • Therefore, it favours nations with the highest
    investments in RD

D W Braben 2009
6
Swedish Research Council Policy 2009-2012
  • Extracts
  • Swedish research funding must be strengthened.
  • Research policy needs to be long-term.
  • Quality and competition should be leading
    principles of resource allocation.
  • Quality and renewal are best fostered if
    research resources are distributed after peer
    review.
  • These points seem reasonable. However, which
    Nobel Prize winning work would have survived
    competiveness or peer-review assessments when it
    was starting?

D W Braben 2009
7
Venture Research Strategy
  • Aims to stimulate unpredictable discoveries of
    Nobel Prize-winning calibre. Fosters individual
    freedom, and creates an environment in which
    radical researchers can select themselves.
  • Some details
  • Funds should be "free"- that is available for
    use as required
  • No boundaries
  • No deadlines
  • No milestones
  • No peer preview
  • No priorities
  • No specific objectives other than to understand
    or explore
  • Researchers free to go in any direction at any
    time
  • Risk to be selected and managed by the
    researchers
  • Above all, it aims to foster mutual trust and
    respect

D W Braben 2009
8
Venture Research 1980 1990
  • Supported radical research in any field,
    anywhere
  • Total BP expenditure 15 million
  • Final number of research programmes 26
  • All except one had been rejected by peer preview
  • Number of scientific breakthroughs at least
    14
  • The initiative ended in 1990. Subsequently,
    theres been strong industrial interest in the
    development of Venture Research outcomes.
    Estimated value over the next decade 1 billion

D W Braben 2009
9
Some Venture Research Discoveries
  • Mike Bennett
  • and Pat Heslop-Harrison Discovered a new
    pathway for evolution and genetic control
  • Terry Clark Pioneered the study of macroscopic
    quantum objects
  • Stan Clough
  • and Tony Horsewill Solved the quantum-classical
    transition problem by developing new
    relativity and quantum theories
  • Steve Davies Developed small artificial enzymes
    for efficient chiral selection
  • Nigel Franks,
  • Jean Louis Deneubourg,
  • Simon Goss, Chris Tofts Quantified the rules
    describing distributed intelligence in animals
  • Herbert Huppert
  • and Steve Sparks Pioneered the new field of
    geological fluid mechanics
  • Jeff Kimble Pioneered squeezed states of light
  • Graham Parkhouse Derived a novel theory
    of engineering design relating performance to
    shapes and materials
  • Alan Paton, Eunice Allen,
  • Anne Glover Discovered a new symbiosis between
    plants and bacteria
  • Martyn Poliakoff
  • Ken Seddon Transformed Green Chemistry
  • Colin Self Demonstrated that antibodies in
    vivo can be activated by light
  • Gene Stanley

D W Braben 2009
10
The Nobel Solution
  • A patron (public or private) recognises the
    limitations of current selection procedures and
    wants to correct them
  • Sets up an agency to promote Venture Research to
    be run in parallel with existing funding
    arrangements
  • Venture Research methodology has proved that it
    can identify researchers of potentially Nobel
    Prize winning calibre
  • Selection process will use novel but proven
    techniques. They are researcher- neutral and
    carried out openly in dialogue with applicants at
    every stage

D W Braben 2009
11
Messages to governments
  • Academic research
  • Is enhanced when its focused on originality
  • Is devalued when its focused on
    competitiveness, impact, etc
  • Relationships between universities and industry
    should be partnerships of equals. Neither should
    dictate what the other does.
  • Governments must be persuaded of the special
    nature of science.
  • Academic research uses public money, but the
    return on investment before 1970 when academics
    were largely free was huge and transformed 20th
    century life.
  • Under todays arrangements, academics struggle to
    exist.

D W Braben 2009
12
Academic Research Policies for the 21st century
  • Governments should
  • Seek to enhance the national Nobel tally. There
    is at least one proven way (Venture Research) of
    identifying researchers capable of making
    discoveries of comparable calibre to those that
    win Nobel Prizes. Initial costs would be low,
    and economic benefits would follow very quickly
  • Move towards restoring scientific freedom.
    Progressively arrange that tenured researchers
    are allocated modest funds they can use freely.
    This transition will be long (probably more than
    10 years) and painful, but eventually it must be
    made.
  • Stimulate the creation of new relationships with
    commerce and industry based on partnerships of
    equals
  • The return on investment in academic research
    before 1970 was huge and transformed 20th
    century life. The above policies, effectively
    pursued, therefore offer the most sensible way of
    taking into account the need to justify public
    expenditure

D W Braben 2009
13
Scientific Freedom The Elixir of Civilization
Donald W Braben, Wiley 2008.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com