Policy options for responding to the growing challenge from obesity Polish results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Policy options for responding to the growing challenge from obesity Polish results

Description:

Policy options for responding to the growing challenge from obesity ... so that slim figure becomes fashionable / Cat. 16 ... lifestyle fashionable / Cat. 18 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: izz
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Policy options for responding to the growing challenge from obesity Polish results


1
Policy options for responding to the growing
challenge from obesity Polish results
  • Lucjan Szponar, Janusz Ciok,
  • Agnieszka Dolna, Maciej Oltarzewski
  • Consulted by prof. dr hab. n. med. Miroslaw
    Jarosz
  • Director of National Food and Nutrition Institute
  • National Counterpart for Nutrition within the WHO
    European Region

2
Epidemic of Obesity in Poland
3
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
4
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
5
Other surveys on children and adolescents
  • Oblacinska A. et al. survey carried out in the
    year 1994/95 on children falling into 7-17 age
    group
  • Chrzanowska et al. survey carried out in the year
    2000 on children and adolescents falling into
    3-18 age group and the findings of this research
    team of the survey in Cracow performed earlier
    using both own centile grids and measurements of
    the fatty skinfolds in three body areas.
  • Mazur et al. survey on children at the school age
    using the IMID centile grids criterion for BMI
    and IOTF criterion for overweight and obesity
  • Malecka- Tendera survey on children at the school
    age using centile grid criterion for BMI and IOTF
    criteria
  • E. Rychlik survey on children in the 11-15 age
    group dating back to the 1996-2000 period using
    IMID centile grids
  • J. Charzewska survey dating back to 1988-1991 and
    1999-2000 on children in the 11-15 age group
  • and S. Koziel et al. survey on the conscripts in
    the 18.5-19.5 age group dating back to 1986, 1995
    and 2001

6
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
7
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
8
Comparison with other results in adults
  • Overweight, male population
  • In the year 2000 in 41.0 of the surveyed (L.
    Szponar et al., as above)
  • In the year 2002 in 42.0 of the surveyed
    (Zdrojewski T. et al., as above)
  • In the year 2003-2005 in 40.4 of the surveyed
    /U.Biela et al., as above)
  • Overweight, female population
  • In the year 2000 in 28.7 of the surveyed
    (Szponar L et al., as above)
  • In the year 2002 in 29.0 of the surveyed
    (Zdrojewski T. et al., as above)
  • In the year 2003-2005 in 27.9 of the surveyed
    (Biela U. et al.)

9
  • Obesity, male population
  • In the year 2000 in 15.4 of the surveyed
    (Szponar L. et al.
  • In the year 2002 in 19.0 of the surveyed
    (Zdrojewski T. et al.
  • In the years 2003-2005 in 20.6 of the surveyed
    (Biela U. et al.)
  • Obesity, female population
  • In the year 2000 in 18.9 of the surveyed
    (Szponar L. et al.)
  • In the year 2002 in 19.0 of the surveyed
    (Zdrojewski T. et al.)
  • In the years 2003-2005 in 20.2 of the surveyed
    (Biela U. et al.)
  • Morbid obesity, men
  • In the year 2000 in 0.3 of the surveyed (Szponar
    L. et al.)
  • In the year 2003-2005 in 0.6 of the surveyed
    (Biela U. et al.)
  • Morbid obesity, women
  • In the year 2000 in 1.0 of the surveyed (Szponar
    L. et al.)
  • In the year 2003-2005 in 2.2 of the surveyed
    (Biela U. et al.)

10
Conclusions
  • The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the
    group of boys in accordance to IOTF criteria,
    accounts for more than 20.
  • The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the
    group of girls in accordance to IOTF criteria,
    accounts for 16.
  • In the group of men in accordance to WHO criteria
    from 2002 the prevalence of overweight is about
    40 but the prevalence of obesity exceeds 15.
  • In the group of women the frequency of overweight
    is approximately 30 and the frequency of obesity
    achieve the 20.

11
  • Moreover abdominal fatness is more frequent in
    female than in male population.
  • Overweight more frequently occurs in men than in
    women, while women more often suffer from
    obesity, including extreme obesity than men.
  • The data sets presented in the Report with regard
    to the occurrence rates of overweight and obesity
    in the populations of children and adolescents,
    and adults show that the problem occurs
    throughout the lifecycle of the individual.
  • The growth rate of disadvantageous health changes
    in individual phases of lifecycle of the
    individual seems to vary a great deal and to
    depend not only on the quality of diet and
    nutritional pattern, but also on several other
    lifestyle drivers, including in particular the
    physical activity.

12
Dietary energy, nutrients and food intake
13
Low activity for adolescents and adults
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
14
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
15
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
16
Source Szponar L. Sekula W., Rychlik E. et al.
Badania indywidualnego spozycia zywnosci i stanu
odzywienia w gospodarstwach domowych (Household
Food Consumption and Anthropometric Survey),
Prace IZZ 101. Warsaw 2003
17
Source Food balance sheets Sekula et al.
18
Source Food balance sheets Sekula et al.
19
Situation in Poland with regard to physical
activity at ones leisure in the adult population
according to WOBASZ survey results
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Policy Making Institutional Framework
25
Under this scheme the prevention and control of
overweight and obesity become the national
scheme. The leading role in the respect of
scientific risk assessment and risk communication
in this area play the National Food and Nutrition
Institute. Risk management in the area of
prevention and overcoming of overweight and
obesity is under responsibility of Minister of
Health. This process can be successful, if it
will be supported by other Ministries. Minister
of Health, as a member of Council of Ministries
have possibilities by law, to ask other
Ministries for support, to diminish the frequency
of overweight and obesity.
26
For the first time in Poland a small budget was
allocated to prevent and control overweight and
obesity, starting from 2007, though a number of
specific projects were designed for
implementation already in 2006. Based on the
above Government Document a detailed
implementation schedule for the scheme will be
developed for the nearest five years but with a
10-year-long time horizon.
27
Key findings of the Polish PorGrow Study
28
Options
  • All participants were willing to score all of the
    7 core options.
  • Engagement with the discretionary options in
    Poland was variable, but the 3 that focus on
    education (except research) were the most widely
    retained for scoring (6 categories selected
    these) by participants.
  • Several discretionary options were not appraised
    by a number of participants 5 of these were
    rejected for scoring by all of participants
  • Common Agricultural Policy reform
  • Incentives to improve food composition
  • Increased use of medication to control body weigh
  • Increased use of synthetic fats and artificial
    sweeteners
  • Create new governmental body to co-ordinate
    policies relevant to obesity

29
  • Participants introduced 13 additional options for
    scoring
  • Promotion of physical activity / Cat. 2
  • Setting up a platform for co-operation in the
    area of fighting obesity / Cat. 2
  • Making health products more attractive / Cat. 3
  • Implementation of a network of user-friendly fast
    food bars serving health meals / Cat. 5
  • Involvement of public persons in the campaign
    propagating healthy lifestyle. / Cat. 13
  • Making physical education classes more attractive
    at schools / Cat. 13
  • Setting up a network of POS offering health
    products / Cat. 15
  • Taking measures so that slim figure becomes
    fashionable / Cat. 16
  • Preparation of the list of recommended foodstuffs
    / Cat. 16
  • Setting up an agency certifying healthy products
    / Cat. 18
  • Making healthy lifestyle fashionable / Cat. 18
  • Activities aimed at the improvement of
    self-acceptance by people / Cat. 20
  • Propagation of family physical activities / Cat.
    21

30
Criteria
  • In Poland, all participants chose from 5 to 9
    criteria to appraise options.
  • All 133 criteria defined by participants were
    grouped into 9 Issue groups
  • I. Societal benefits
  • II. Additional health benefits
  • III. Efficacy in addressing obesity
  • IV. Economic impact on public sector
  • V. Economic impact on individuals
  • VI. Economic impact on commercial sector
  • VII. Economic impact unspecified
  • VIII. Practical feasibility
  • IX. Social acceptance
  • Efficacy in reducing obesity was used the most to
    judge the performance of options, followed by
    practical feasibility, and other societal
    benefits.

31
  • Public interest NGOs Perspective appears to give
    more emphasis to the affairs related to cost to
    state budget, practical feasibility of options
    and their efficacy in reducing obesity.
  • Representatives of Food chain, large industrial
    and commercial organisations selected criteria
    quite evenly and all fields met with their
    similar interest.
  • Small food and fitness commercial organisations
    Perspective was mostly interested in issue of
    practical feasibility of options and their
    efficacy. Representatives revealed rather little
    interest to question of additional health
    benefits and economic impact on all sectors.
  • Large non-food industrial and commercial
    organizations Perspective emphasised positive
    health benefits and efficacy of options in
    reducing obesity. Practical feasibility of
    options, costs and additional health benefits
    were less important for representatives of this
    perspective.
  • Policy-makers attached importance to practical
    feasibility of options, economic impact on public
    sector and social acceptance. They did not chose
    any criteria related to additional health
    benefits and cost to entrepreneurs.
  • Public providers selected mostly efficacy in
    reducing obesity, positive societal benefits and
    economic impact on public sector. Less important
    issue for this group was practical feasibility of
    options.
  • Public health specialists Perspective were
    concerned about the practical feasibility of
    options, economic impact on public sector and
    individuals. Representatives revealed little
    interest to question of positive societal
    benefits and (unexpectedly) additional health
    benefits.

32
(No Transcript)
33
  • Efficacy, feasibility, and societal benefits were
    the 3 groups of criteria given the most
    importance by stakeholders when assessing policy
    options.

34
(No Transcript)
35
Performance of options under different criteria
  • The educational cluster of options (except
    research) and exercise and physical
    activity-oriented cluster, controlling marketing
    terms and mandatory nutrition labelling are
    widely seen as having positive social benefits.
  • Improving communal sports facilities, providing
    healthier menus and Including food and health in
    the school curriculum are widely seen as
    affording additional health benefits.
  • Educational cluster of options (except research),
    controls on food composition, controlling
    marketing terms, mandatory nutrition labelling
    and improve communal sports facilities are seen
    as practically feasible.
  • Taxes and increase obesity research are seen as
    the least feasible options by almost all
    perspectives.
  • Cluster of options Exercise and physical
    activity-oriented, Information-related
    initiatives, Educational and research initiatives
    are seen as the most effective options in
    reducing obesity.
  • Control sales of foods in public institutions are
    seen as costly to industry.

36
(No Transcript)
37
Average ranks for all participants showing ranks
by favoured order under optimistic conditions
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Public Interest Perspective (A) gave the most
favourable scores to the education cluster of
options, i.e. general health education, food and
health education in schools, and training for
health professionals. The lowest ranks were
assigned to the following options the controls
on food in public institutions and taxation of
unhealthy food.
41
The Food Chain Perspective (B) gave favourable
scores to improving sports facilities and the
education cluster of initiatives (apart from the
option involving changes in town planning and
urban transport). They gave lowest scores to
taxation and subsidising to some food products.
Additionally low rank was also assigned the
option of improvement of controls on food
advertising.
42
Small food and fitness commercial organisations
Perspective (C) gave favourable scores to three
options improved availability of physical
activity facilities and equipment, mandatory food
labelling and subsidising healthy food. The
lowest ranks were assigned to the idea of higher
taxes on unhealthy food and controls on food
sales in public institutions
43
The Non-food Commercial Perspective (D) gave most
favourable scores to educational options. Low
ranks were assigned to the controls on food sales
in public institutions, controls on food
advertising and fiscal options subsidising and
taxation system applied to some food categories.
44
The Policy Makers Perspective (E) gave high
scores for improvement of availability of
physical activity facilities and equipment,
mandatory food labelling and controls on light,
lite marketing terms. Low scores were given to
subsidising some food categories and
implementation of varied food taxation system.
45
The Public Providers Perspective (F) gave
particularly favourable scores to food and health
education in schools and in all the population.
The lowest scores were given to options for
subsidising some food categories and varied
taxation on food.
46
Public Health Specialists (G) mostly favoured
improving health education in schools, and for
the general public and health professionalists.
Three lowest pessimistic ranks included controls
on food sales in public institutions, higher
taxes on some foodstuffs and improved catering
menus.
47
Examples of rankings given by all participants
for several options
48
Examples of rankings given by all participants
for several options
49
Overall Performance of options
  • The highest ranking options overall were those in
    the cluster of educational and research
    initiatives which were all discretionary
    options these were seen by stakeholders as
    relatively low cost, socially beneficial,
    feasible, and effective in changing behaviour.
    There is strongest support for improved health
    education of school-aged children in relation to
    eating well and physical activity. Other health
    education and training options are also well
    regarded. Many interviewees also argued that it
    would be important to improve the training
    provided to health professionals, to enable them
    more effectively to identify and respond to
    examples of overweight and obesity with which
    they come into contact.

50
  • Information-related initiatives had a mixed
    reception. Calls for mandatory nutrition
    labelling met with an unenthusiastic response, as
    there was wide shared doubt about whether
    consumers read labels, and even if they do
    whether they have an influence on behaviour.
    There were reservations about the over simplicity
    of the proposed traffic light labelling system by
    many stakeholders, especially representatives of
    food chain. Controlling marketing terms such as
    lite and diet was also well received, even
    though it was not widely scored it was the most
    favoured of the information-related initiatives
    proposed.

51
  • There was wide support for providing improved
    facilities for physical activity and recreation.
    There was less enthusiasm for changes to
    transport and planning policies, which were seen
    as costly and complex, and would be unacceptable
    to some citizens.
  • Economic instruments, such as taxes on obesogenic
    foods and/or subsidies on relatively healthy
    foods met almost unanimous objection subsidies
    were slightly less unacceptable, but were not a
    part of the solution. Policies that modify
    supply and demand on a local or smaller scale
    were more acceptable, and incentives to provide
    healthier catering menus was widely favoured, if
    it focussed on settings where people ate on a
    regular basis, such as schools and workplaces,
    rather than commercial restaurant settings, where
    it was seen to have a negative impact on business
    and would be socially unacceptable, as citizens
    eat out for pleasure, rather than for health.

52
  • There was a broad agreement that several of the
    options were unlikely to be valuable for
    countering the obesity epidemic, specifically the
    options concerning
  • physical activity monitoring devices,
  • medication for controlling weight, and
  • the use of synthetic food ingredients.
  • Most participants did not deem these options
    worthy of scoring and others gave them low scores.

53
  • There are some relatively sharp disagreements,
    but these are between representatives of
    particular contrasting interest groups rather
    than between the broader Perspective groupings.
  • One pattern that can clearly be identified from
    the data is that no single option emerges as
    universally or generally most favoured. No
    participant argued that any single option on its
    own would be sufficient to address the problem of
    obesity.
  • On the other hand, there is almost universal
    consensus that at least some options are required
    in each of the 4 groups of options, namely those
    concerned with
  • A)    levels of physical activity
  • B)     the supply of, and demand for, foodstuffs
  • C)    improved information and
  • D)    education and research.

54
Options considered as having chance of successful
implementation. 
  • Increase opportunities and incentives for
    physical activity improving communal sports
    facilities was preferred out of the exercise and
    physical activity cluster of options.
  • Modify patterns of demand and supply for food
    stuffs and beverages Controlling sales of food
    in public institutions was the preferred core
    option in the modifying supply and demand
    cluster, and controlling food composition was the
    most favoured discretionary option in this
    cluster.
  • Augment the quantity and quality of information
    available to citizens concerning food, diet,
    physical activity and health controlling food
    and drink advertising was the preferred core
    option in the information-related initiatives
    cluster and controlling marketing terms was the
    most favoured discretionary option in this
    cluster.
  • Improve levels of knowledge and understanding
    about food, diet, health and physical activity
    Food and health education in school was the most
    favoured in the Education and research
    initiatives cluster.

55
Rank means for Countries - Polish results
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 2
Option 1
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 3
Option 4
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
56
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 6
Option 5
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Option 7
Cyprus
Finland
France
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Spain
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
57
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 8
Option 10
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Option 15
Cyprus
Finland
France
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Spain
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com