Title: Policy options for responding to the growing challenge from obesity Polish results
1Policy options for responding to the growing
challenge from obesity Polish results
- Lucjan Szponar, Janusz Ciok,
- Agnieszka Dolna, Maciej Oltarzewski
- Consulted by prof. dr hab. n. med. Miroslaw
Jarosz - Director of National Food and Nutrition Institute
- National Counterpart for Nutrition within the WHO
European Region
2Epidemic of Obesity in Poland
3L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
4L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
5Other surveys on children and adolescents
- Oblacinska A. et al. survey carried out in the
year 1994/95 on children falling into 7-17 age
group - Chrzanowska et al. survey carried out in the year
2000 on children and adolescents falling into
3-18 age group and the findings of this research
team of the survey in Cracow performed earlier
using both own centile grids and measurements of
the fatty skinfolds in three body areas. - Mazur et al. survey on children at the school age
using the IMID centile grids criterion for BMI
and IOTF criterion for overweight and obesity - Malecka- Tendera survey on children at the school
age using centile grid criterion for BMI and IOTF
criteria - E. Rychlik survey on children in the 11-15 age
group dating back to the 1996-2000 period using
IMID centile grids - J. Charzewska survey dating back to 1988-1991 and
1999-2000 on children in the 11-15 age group - and S. Koziel et al. survey on the conscripts in
the 18.5-19.5 age group dating back to 1986, 1995
and 2001
6L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
7L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
8Comparison with other results in adults
- Overweight, male population
- In the year 2000 in 41.0 of the surveyed (L.
Szponar et al., as above) - In the year 2002 in 42.0 of the surveyed
(Zdrojewski T. et al., as above) - In the year 2003-2005 in 40.4 of the surveyed
/U.Biela et al., as above) - Overweight, female population
- In the year 2000 in 28.7 of the surveyed
(Szponar L et al., as above) - In the year 2002 in 29.0 of the surveyed
(Zdrojewski T. et al., as above) - In the year 2003-2005 in 27.9 of the surveyed
(Biela U. et al.)
9- Obesity, male population
- In the year 2000 in 15.4 of the surveyed
(Szponar L. et al. - In the year 2002 in 19.0 of the surveyed
(Zdrojewski T. et al. - In the years 2003-2005 in 20.6 of the surveyed
(Biela U. et al.) - Obesity, female population
- In the year 2000 in 18.9 of the surveyed
(Szponar L. et al.) - In the year 2002 in 19.0 of the surveyed
(Zdrojewski T. et al.) - In the years 2003-2005 in 20.2 of the surveyed
(Biela U. et al.) - Morbid obesity, men
- In the year 2000 in 0.3 of the surveyed (Szponar
L. et al.) - In the year 2003-2005 in 0.6 of the surveyed
(Biela U. et al.) - Morbid obesity, women
- In the year 2000 in 1.0 of the surveyed (Szponar
L. et al.) - In the year 2003-2005 in 2.2 of the surveyed
(Biela U. et al.)
10Conclusions
- The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the
group of boys in accordance to IOTF criteria,
accounts for more than 20. - The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the
group of girls in accordance to IOTF criteria,
accounts for 16. - In the group of men in accordance to WHO criteria
from 2002 the prevalence of overweight is about
40 but the prevalence of obesity exceeds 15. - In the group of women the frequency of overweight
is approximately 30 and the frequency of obesity
achieve the 20.
11- Moreover abdominal fatness is more frequent in
female than in male population. - Overweight more frequently occurs in men than in
women, while women more often suffer from
obesity, including extreme obesity than men. - The data sets presented in the Report with regard
to the occurrence rates of overweight and obesity
in the populations of children and adolescents,
and adults show that the problem occurs
throughout the lifecycle of the individual. - The growth rate of disadvantageous health changes
in individual phases of lifecycle of the
individual seems to vary a great deal and to
depend not only on the quality of diet and
nutritional pattern, but also on several other
lifestyle drivers, including in particular the
physical activity.
12Dietary energy, nutrients and food intake
13Low activity for adolescents and adults
L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
14L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
15L. Szponar et al. National Survey on Dietary
Habits and Nutritional Status of Polish
Population in 2000
16Source Szponar L. Sekula W., Rychlik E. et al.
Badania indywidualnego spozycia zywnosci i stanu
odzywienia w gospodarstwach domowych (Household
Food Consumption and Anthropometric Survey),
Prace IZZ 101. Warsaw 2003
17Source Food balance sheets Sekula et al.
18Source Food balance sheets Sekula et al.
19Situation in Poland with regard to physical
activity at ones leisure in the adult population
according to WOBASZ survey results
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Policy Making Institutional Framework
25Under this scheme the prevention and control of
overweight and obesity become the national
scheme. The leading role in the respect of
scientific risk assessment and risk communication
in this area play the National Food and Nutrition
Institute. Risk management in the area of
prevention and overcoming of overweight and
obesity is under responsibility of Minister of
Health. This process can be successful, if it
will be supported by other Ministries. Minister
of Health, as a member of Council of Ministries
have possibilities by law, to ask other
Ministries for support, to diminish the frequency
of overweight and obesity.
26For the first time in Poland a small budget was
allocated to prevent and control overweight and
obesity, starting from 2007, though a number of
specific projects were designed for
implementation already in 2006. Based on the
above Government Document a detailed
implementation schedule for the scheme will be
developed for the nearest five years but with a
10-year-long time horizon.
27Key findings of the Polish PorGrow Study
28Options
- All participants were willing to score all of the
7 core options. - Engagement with the discretionary options in
Poland was variable, but the 3 that focus on
education (except research) were the most widely
retained for scoring (6 categories selected
these) by participants. - Several discretionary options were not appraised
by a number of participants 5 of these were
rejected for scoring by all of participants - Common Agricultural Policy reform
- Incentives to improve food composition
- Increased use of medication to control body weigh
- Increased use of synthetic fats and artificial
sweeteners - Create new governmental body to co-ordinate
policies relevant to obesity
29- Participants introduced 13 additional options for
scoring - Promotion of physical activity / Cat. 2
- Setting up a platform for co-operation in the
area of fighting obesity / Cat. 2 - Making health products more attractive / Cat. 3
- Implementation of a network of user-friendly fast
food bars serving health meals / Cat. 5 - Involvement of public persons in the campaign
propagating healthy lifestyle. / Cat. 13 - Making physical education classes more attractive
at schools / Cat. 13 - Setting up a network of POS offering health
products / Cat. 15 - Taking measures so that slim figure becomes
fashionable / Cat. 16 - Preparation of the list of recommended foodstuffs
/ Cat. 16 - Setting up an agency certifying healthy products
/ Cat. 18 - Making healthy lifestyle fashionable / Cat. 18
- Activities aimed at the improvement of
self-acceptance by people / Cat. 20 - Propagation of family physical activities / Cat.
21
30Criteria
- In Poland, all participants chose from 5 to 9
criteria to appraise options. - All 133 criteria defined by participants were
grouped into 9 Issue groups - I. Societal benefits
- II. Additional health benefits
- III. Efficacy in addressing obesity
- IV. Economic impact on public sector
- V. Economic impact on individuals
- VI. Economic impact on commercial sector
- VII. Economic impact unspecified
- VIII. Practical feasibility
- IX. Social acceptance
- Efficacy in reducing obesity was used the most to
judge the performance of options, followed by
practical feasibility, and other societal
benefits.
31- Public interest NGOs Perspective appears to give
more emphasis to the affairs related to cost to
state budget, practical feasibility of options
and their efficacy in reducing obesity. - Representatives of Food chain, large industrial
and commercial organisations selected criteria
quite evenly and all fields met with their
similar interest. - Small food and fitness commercial organisations
Perspective was mostly interested in issue of
practical feasibility of options and their
efficacy. Representatives revealed rather little
interest to question of additional health
benefits and economic impact on all sectors. - Large non-food industrial and commercial
organizations Perspective emphasised positive
health benefits and efficacy of options in
reducing obesity. Practical feasibility of
options, costs and additional health benefits
were less important for representatives of this
perspective. - Policy-makers attached importance to practical
feasibility of options, economic impact on public
sector and social acceptance. They did not chose
any criteria related to additional health
benefits and cost to entrepreneurs. - Public providers selected mostly efficacy in
reducing obesity, positive societal benefits and
economic impact on public sector. Less important
issue for this group was practical feasibility of
options. - Public health specialists Perspective were
concerned about the practical feasibility of
options, economic impact on public sector and
individuals. Representatives revealed little
interest to question of positive societal
benefits and (unexpectedly) additional health
benefits.
32(No Transcript)
33- Efficacy, feasibility, and societal benefits were
the 3 groups of criteria given the most
importance by stakeholders when assessing policy
options.
34(No Transcript)
35Performance of options under different criteria
- The educational cluster of options (except
research) and exercise and physical
activity-oriented cluster, controlling marketing
terms and mandatory nutrition labelling are
widely seen as having positive social benefits. - Improving communal sports facilities, providing
healthier menus and Including food and health in
the school curriculum are widely seen as
affording additional health benefits. - Educational cluster of options (except research),
controls on food composition, controlling
marketing terms, mandatory nutrition labelling
and improve communal sports facilities are seen
as practically feasible. - Taxes and increase obesity research are seen as
the least feasible options by almost all
perspectives. - Cluster of options Exercise and physical
activity-oriented, Information-related
initiatives, Educational and research initiatives
are seen as the most effective options in
reducing obesity. - Control sales of foods in public institutions are
seen as costly to industry.
36(No Transcript)
37Average ranks for all participants showing ranks
by favoured order under optimistic conditions
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Public Interest Perspective (A) gave the most
favourable scores to the education cluster of
options, i.e. general health education, food and
health education in schools, and training for
health professionals. The lowest ranks were
assigned to the following options the controls
on food in public institutions and taxation of
unhealthy food.
41The Food Chain Perspective (B) gave favourable
scores to improving sports facilities and the
education cluster of initiatives (apart from the
option involving changes in town planning and
urban transport). They gave lowest scores to
taxation and subsidising to some food products.
Additionally low rank was also assigned the
option of improvement of controls on food
advertising.
42Small food and fitness commercial organisations
Perspective (C) gave favourable scores to three
options improved availability of physical
activity facilities and equipment, mandatory food
labelling and subsidising healthy food. The
lowest ranks were assigned to the idea of higher
taxes on unhealthy food and controls on food
sales in public institutions
43The Non-food Commercial Perspective (D) gave most
favourable scores to educational options. Low
ranks were assigned to the controls on food sales
in public institutions, controls on food
advertising and fiscal options subsidising and
taxation system applied to some food categories.
44The Policy Makers Perspective (E) gave high
scores for improvement of availability of
physical activity facilities and equipment,
mandatory food labelling and controls on light,
lite marketing terms. Low scores were given to
subsidising some food categories and
implementation of varied food taxation system.
45The Public Providers Perspective (F) gave
particularly favourable scores to food and health
education in schools and in all the population.
The lowest scores were given to options for
subsidising some food categories and varied
taxation on food.
46Public Health Specialists (G) mostly favoured
improving health education in schools, and for
the general public and health professionalists.
Three lowest pessimistic ranks included controls
on food sales in public institutions, higher
taxes on some foodstuffs and improved catering
menus.
47Examples of rankings given by all participants
for several options
48Examples of rankings given by all participants
for several options
49Overall Performance of options
- The highest ranking options overall were those in
the cluster of educational and research
initiatives which were all discretionary
options these were seen by stakeholders as
relatively low cost, socially beneficial,
feasible, and effective in changing behaviour.
There is strongest support for improved health
education of school-aged children in relation to
eating well and physical activity. Other health
education and training options are also well
regarded. Many interviewees also argued that it
would be important to improve the training
provided to health professionals, to enable them
more effectively to identify and respond to
examples of overweight and obesity with which
they come into contact.
50- Information-related initiatives had a mixed
reception. Calls for mandatory nutrition
labelling met with an unenthusiastic response, as
there was wide shared doubt about whether
consumers read labels, and even if they do
whether they have an influence on behaviour.
There were reservations about the over simplicity
of the proposed traffic light labelling system by
many stakeholders, especially representatives of
food chain. Controlling marketing terms such as
lite and diet was also well received, even
though it was not widely scored it was the most
favoured of the information-related initiatives
proposed.
51- There was wide support for providing improved
facilities for physical activity and recreation.
There was less enthusiasm for changes to
transport and planning policies, which were seen
as costly and complex, and would be unacceptable
to some citizens. - Economic instruments, such as taxes on obesogenic
foods and/or subsidies on relatively healthy
foods met almost unanimous objection subsidies
were slightly less unacceptable, but were not a
part of the solution. Policies that modify
supply and demand on a local or smaller scale
were more acceptable, and incentives to provide
healthier catering menus was widely favoured, if
it focussed on settings where people ate on a
regular basis, such as schools and workplaces,
rather than commercial restaurant settings, where
it was seen to have a negative impact on business
and would be socially unacceptable, as citizens
eat out for pleasure, rather than for health.
52- There was a broad agreement that several of the
options were unlikely to be valuable for
countering the obesity epidemic, specifically the
options concerning - physical activity monitoring devices,
- medication for controlling weight, and
- the use of synthetic food ingredients.
- Most participants did not deem these options
worthy of scoring and others gave them low scores.
53- There are some relatively sharp disagreements,
but these are between representatives of
particular contrasting interest groups rather
than between the broader Perspective groupings. - One pattern that can clearly be identified from
the data is that no single option emerges as
universally or generally most favoured. No
participant argued that any single option on its
own would be sufficient to address the problem of
obesity. - On the other hand, there is almost universal
consensus that at least some options are required
in each of the 4 groups of options, namely those
concerned with - A) levels of physical activity
- B) the supply of, and demand for, foodstuffs
- C) improved information and
- D) education and research.
54Options considered as having chance of successful
implementation.
- Increase opportunities and incentives for
physical activity improving communal sports
facilities was preferred out of the exercise and
physical activity cluster of options. - Modify patterns of demand and supply for food
stuffs and beverages Controlling sales of food
in public institutions was the preferred core
option in the modifying supply and demand
cluster, and controlling food composition was the
most favoured discretionary option in this
cluster. - Augment the quantity and quality of information
available to citizens concerning food, diet,
physical activity and health controlling food
and drink advertising was the preferred core
option in the information-related initiatives
cluster and controlling marketing terms was the
most favoured discretionary option in this
cluster. - Improve levels of knowledge and understanding
about food, diet, health and physical activity
Food and health education in school was the most
favoured in the Education and research
initiatives cluster.
55Rank means for Countries - Polish results
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 2
Option 1
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 3
Option 4
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
56Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 6
Option 5
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Option 7
Cyprus
Finland
France
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Spain
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
57Rank Means for Countries
Rank Means for Countries
Option 8
Option 10
Cyprus
Cyprus
Finland
Finland
France
France
Greece
Greece
Hungary
Hungary
Italy
Italy
Poland
Poland
Spain
Spain
UK
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rank Means for Countries
Option 15
Cyprus
Finland
France
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Spain
UK
0
20
40
60
80
100