Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT

Description:

... conversion to any formalism based on first order logic, thus to any DL formalism ... Logic-based formalism. Single hierarchies with formal definitions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hjage
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT


1
Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT
  • Gergely Héja MSc., György Surján MD., Péter Varga
  • MSc.
  • National Institute for Strategic Health Research,
    Budapest, Hungary

2
Aims
  • ESKI needs a reference terminology
  • To represent of classification systems (ICD,
    ICPM) and public health indicators
  • To provide pre co-ordinated code lists for
    enabling semantic interoperability in Hungary
    (and potentially in the EU)
  • SNOMED CT seems to be a first choice candidate

3
Needs for classification systems
  • Combinatory representation of categories based on
    a reference ontology to enable
  • supporting statistical analysis
  • formal consistency checking
  • (semi)automatic interconnection of different
    classification systems (e.g. ICD and ICPM)
  • A high-quality formal ontology is needed, but it
    needs not to be very detailed

4
Needs for interoperability
  • Detailed common terminology covering the whole
    domain of medicine
  • Mapping the concepts of the HIS to the concepts
    of the common terminology and vice versa
  • A common, consistent, comprehensive and decidable
    ontology is needed

5
Computational issues
  • Computability vs. comprehensiveness
  • Clean hierarchies
  • Less emphasis on coverage (the multitude of
    non-defined leaf categories) and greater emphasis
    on rich and well-organized high-level categories
    is needed
  • SNOMED CT contains too much concepts

6
Methods
  • Based on DOLCE formal top-level ontology
  • Review of high and low-level concepts needed for
    the representation of classification systems and
    public health indicators
  • Is the subsumption relation valid?
  • Meaning derived from the FSN vs. meaning derived
    from synonyms vs.meaning derived from formal
    definition

7
Error types - 1
  • Misplacing concepts in the hierarchy
  • smoker (an agent) is subsumed by tobacco smoking
    behaviour finding (a role)
  • severe asthma is not a kind of asthma, but a kind
    of asthma finding.
  • Mixing the subsumption relation with other roles
    (typically part of)
  • haemoglobin subsumes haemin (instead of
    constitutional part)
  • exacerbation of asthma attack is subsumed by
    asthma (instead of temporal part)

8
Error types - 2
  • Hierarchy violating medical thinking and
    biomedical knowledge
  • Disease, observation and finding are subsumed by
    clinical finding
  • acute on chronic, which is both subsumed by acute
    and chronic
  • polycarbonate is a polymer (instead of synthetic
    polymer)

9
Error types - 3
  • Contracting disjoint entities into one concept
  • Smoker (an agent) and smoker (finding) (a
    description of a situation)
  • additional pathologic finding in tumor specimen
    (observable entity) and additional pathologic
    finding
  • Function is classified as an observable entity
  • Ontological definition ability of an object to
    play a certain role in a certain kind of activity
  • functions (e.g. gene function, adaptation)
  • measures (quality) that evaluate the realisation
    of a function (e.g. respiratory rhythm, excretory
    rate)
  • Inflammation (morphological abnormality) (a
    physical object) and inflammatory reaction
    (perdurant)

10
Additional problems - 1
  • Categories taken form classification systems
  • pneumonia in other diseases classified elsewhere
    (marked as ConceptStatus Limited)
  • The danger of taking over concepts from other
    conceptual systems the context of the concept is
    lost. What is meant by other diseases classified
    elsewhere?
  • relations (such as part of) are represented also
    as concepts
  • It prohibits the direct conversion to any
    formalism based on first order logic, thus to any
    DL formalism

11
Additional problems - 2
  • Underspecification
  • roles are not quantified (existential /
    universal)
  • criteria are not specified (necessary /
    sufficient)
  • conversion to DL do we have to decide in each
    particular case, or can it be done universally?
  • Multiple hierarchy
  • alcoholic beverage (through its parent ingestible
    alcohol) is subsumed by central depressant, ethyl
    alcohol and psychoactive substance of abuse
    non-pharmaceutical. Alcoholic drinks contain
    ethyl alcohol, which plays a role of depressant
    and substance of abuse (with respect to human
    beings)
  • Is this a general phenomenon in SNOMED?
  • Which relations are asserted and which are
    inferred?

12
Discussion - 1
  • The intended meaning of the categories is not
    always clear possible translation errors
  • Is it reasonable to import categories from
    medical classifications?
  • Size
  • Artificial concepts
  • Consistency errors

13
Discussion - 2
  • Real world entities listed heterogeneously
  • Mars bar and Kit Kat (chocolate candy would
    suffice)
  • UFO is subsumed by transport vehicle
  • tendon pulley reconstruction is represented, but
    tendon pulley not

14
Solutions
  • Use SNOMED as a plain or loosely structured list
    of terms (with extending the coverage). Not
    appropriate for intelligent services.
  • Restructure SNOMED into a high-quality ontology.
  • Build a new medical ontology from scratch
    (partial reuse of the existing ones), and to
    restrict the use of SNOMED for interoperability
    by mapping concepts to it.

15
Restructuring SNOMED
  • A formal top level ontology (e.g. DOLCE).
  • A high level core reference ontology of general
    medical knowledge (e.g. anatomy, physiology,
    pathology, medical procedures).
  • Logic-based formalism
  • Single hierarchies with formal definitions
  • (sub)domain ontologies of specialities
  • Compound entities (e.g. tonsillitis)
  • Manual assertion (e.g. autism)

16
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com