Title: AllEmployee Share Ownership Plans in the UK
1All-Employee Share Ownership Plans in the UK
- Andrew Pendleton
- University of York, UK
2Various plans
- Main all-employee plans
- SAYE (Save As You Earn) share option plan
(a.k.a.Sharesave). Established 1980. - Share Incentive Plan (SIP) free shares, share
purchases, matching shares. Established 2000. - Discretionary plans that can be used for all
employees - Enterprise Management Incentives (EMI). Share
option plan for smaller firms. Est. 2000 - Company Share Option Plans (CSOP) primarily an
executive plan but can be used for all-employees.
Est. 1984
3SAYE
- Further details
- Subscribe to options for 3 or 5 years time
- Subscribe to monthly savings plan (5 - 250 per
month) to raise cash to exercise options - Options can be granted at 20 discount on market
price, income tax-free - Many companies make annual SAYE offers
4Share Incentive Plan
- modular plan
- Free shares Up to 3,000 shares can be awarded
annually - Partnership shares up to 1,500 can be
subscribed each year by employees - Matching shares company can match employee
subscriptions to Partnership shares at up to 2 to
1 - Dividend shares dividends from shares can be
re-invested in shares
5ESO Coverage 2006-7
- SAYE live schemes 940. 570,000 employees take
out options in this year - SIP live schemes 960. Around one million
awarded/purchase shares (my estimate) - EMI 2790 firms award options. 27,000
beneficiaries - CSOP 3000 live schemes. 130,000 awarded options
- See www.HMRC.gov.uk for further information
6The taxation regime for UK share ownership plans
- Benefits free from income tax. Instead, capital
gains tax due on gains from increases in share
value. - For example SAYE
- - savings scheme is income tax free
- - discount on market price is income tax free
- - growth in value between award and sale of
shares is liable to CGT rather than income tax. - SIP has significant tax benefits employee
contributions made from pre-tax income. Gains on
share sale taxed through CGT if all plan
conditions met
7History of ESO tax regime
- Initially CGT had lower marginal rates than
income tax 25 vs 40 for top earners - CGT then harmonised with income tax because of
abuse (top execs paid in capital assets rather
than cash) - Blair-Brown government introduced business
assets taper relief the longer shares held the
lower the CGT liability down to 10 per cent (5
for lower earners). - 2008 Brown government changes CGT regime in
response to political furore over perceived
abuses by private equity fund partners. CGT tax
rates harmonised at 18 per cent ie an increase
for share ownership plans. - BUT quite generous CGT allowances remain (_at_
9,000 per annum) meaning that most employee
shareholders will not pay any CGT if plan sensibly
8ESO and smaller enterprises
- All-employee share ownership plans typically
operated by large, listed firms. Blair-Brown
government sought to extend ESO in smaller,
privately-owned firms - SIP can use non-voting shares (assuage owner
fears about losing control) - SIP Free and Matching shares can be forfeited if
employees leave the firm. - EMI has light touch regulatory regime with no
need to seek prior HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
approval
9But continuing barriers to use by smaller firms
- Requirement for approval of share valuation by
HMRC seen as cumbersome by some firms. - SIP perceived by firms as complex (ironic, given
government concern to promote flexibility) - Difficult to use SIP in private equity buy-outs
(SIPs cannot be used when a company is under the
control of another)
10Evaluation and conclusions
- Blair-Brown government has not met policy
objective of doubling the number of share plan
firms - However, some extension of share plans to
unlisted firms. - Overall, share ownership plans fairly stable
currently. Not bad result given some unfavourable
circumstances (introduction of IFRS2, market
movements etc) - Big question is what will happen when there is a
change of government highly likely that New
Labour will be replaced by Conservatives in the
next election. Currently, Conservatives are
broadly favourable to ESO but do not have any
specific policies. Will they develop any?