7 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

7

Description:

Explain the four types of decision styles. ... Analytic style. Characterizes the high tolerance for ambiguity combined with a rational way of ... Behavioral style ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: charli137
Category:
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 7


1
  • Supervision in Organizations
  • Chapter 7
  • Solving Problems Making Decisions

2
Learning OutcomesAfter reading this chapter, I
will be able to
  • Describe the steps in the decision-making
    process.
  • Explain the four types of decision styles.
  • Identify and explain the common decision-making
    errors.
  • Compare and contrast group decision making and
    individual decision making.
  • List and describe three techniques for improving
    group decision making.
  • Explain three different ethical viewpoints.

3
Decision-making
  • Decision-making process
  • A set of seven steps that includes identifying a
    problem, selecting a solution, and evaluating the
    effectiveness of the solution
  • Problem
  • A discrepancy between an existing and a desired
    state of affairs
  • Decision criteria
  • Factors that are relevant in a decision

4
Examples of Planning-Function Decisions
  • What are the organizations long-term objectives?
  • What strategies will best achieve those
    objectives?
  • What should the organizations short-term
    objectives be?
  • What is the most efficient means of completing
    tasks?
  • What might the competition be considering?
  • What budgets are needed to complete department
    tasks?
  • How difficult should individual goals be?

Exhibit 4.1
5
The Decision-Making Process
6
Step 1 Identifying the Problem
  • Problem
  • A discrepancy between an existing and a
    desired state of affairs (p. 186)
  • Ask the question, Why?
  • Determine the reason
  • Separating the symptoms from problems
  • Example
  • A physician must identify reasons for a fever.
    Once the cause is identified, the problem has
    been determined

7
Step 2 Collect Relevant Information
  • Gather facts information relevant to the
    problem
  • Ask questions
  • When did the problem start appearing?
  • Why is appearing now?
  • What are the affects of the problem?
  • What are the costs associated with the problem?

8
Step 3 Develop Alternatives
  • Generate a full range of alternatives for solving
    the problem
  • Creativity is critical
  • The more alternatives generated, the greater
    likelihood the best choice is among the
    possibilities

9
Step 4 Evaluate Each Alternative
  • Evaluation of all the strengths and weaknesses of
    each alternative
  • Guard against biases
  • Estimate the cost of each alternative
  • Estimate the implementation time of each
    alternative
  • Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each
    alternative
  • Approximate the expected outcome of each
    alternative
  • Favorable Unfavorable

10
Step 5 Select the Best Alternative
  • Selection of the best alternative will depend on
  • Comprehensiveness and accuracy of information
    gathered
  • Creativeness of alternatives
  • Quality of analysis

11
Step 6 Implement the Decision
  • Establish a plan
  • When will the decision be implemented?
  • Who will be involved?
  • What will be involved?
  • What changes will take place?
  • How will they occur?
  • Convey the decision to those affected
  • Assign responsibilities
  • Allocate necessary resources
  • Identify and clarify deadlines
  • Get commitment from those involved in the
    implementation

12
Step 7 Follow Up Evaluate
  • Continually monitor outcomes
  • Did your choice accomplish the desired result?
  • Did it correct the identified problem

13
Decision Tools
  • Supervisors face three possible conditions
    when making decisions
  • Certainty
  • The implication that the outcome of every
    possible alternative is known.
  • Risk
  • The probability that a particular outcome will
    result from a given decision. Must rely on
    personal experiences, secondary information, and
    historical data.
  • Uncertainty
  • A condition under which there is not full
    knowledge of the problem and reasonable
    probabilities for alternative outcomes cannot be
    determined.

14
Decision Tools
  • What is the Expected Value Analysis?
  • Expected Value Analysis
  • A procedure that permits decision makers to
    place monetary value on various consequences
    likely to result from the selection of a
    particular course of action (p. 190)

15
Decision Tools cont
  • How are Decision Trees Helpful?
  • Decision Tree
  • A diagram that analyzes hiring, marketing,
    investment, equipment purchases
  • Encompass expected value analysis by assigning
    probabilities to each possible outcome and
    calculating payoffs for each decision path

16
Decision Tools cont
  • Marginal Analysis
  • A decision method that helps decision makers
    optimize returns or minimize costs by dealing
    with the additional cost in a particular
    decision, than the average cost (p. 192)
  • Example Taking on a new customer
  • What additional revenue would be generated by
    the new customer
  • What additional costs would be generated by the
    new customer
  • If the increased revenue exceeds the
    increased costs, total profits would be increased
    by accepting the new customer

17
Decision Making Styles
  • Directive style
  • Characterizes the low tolerance for ambiguity and
    a rational way of thinking of individuals who are
    logical and efficient and typically make fast
    decisions that focus on the short term.
  • Analytic style
  • Characterizes the high tolerance for ambiguity
    combined with a rational way of thinking of
    individuals who prefer to have complete
    information before making a decision.
  • Careful decision makers with the ability to adapt
    or cope with new situations
  • Example Supervisors, business students, top
    executives

18
Decision Making Styles (contd)
  • Conceptual style
  • Individuals who tend to be very broad in outlook,
    to look at many alternatives, and to focus on the
    long run and often look for creative solutions.
  • Behavioral style
  • Individuals who think intuitively but have a low
    tolerance for uncertainty they work well with
    others, are open to suggestions, and are
    concerned about the individuals who work for them.

19
Decision-Making Styles
20
Common Decision-making Errors
  • Heuristics Using judgmental shortcuts
  • Availability heuristic
  • The tendency to base judgments on information
    that is readily available.
  • Representative heuristic
  • The tendency to base judgments of probability on
    things (objects or events) that are familiar
  • Example Not hiring certain types of people based
    upon previous performance of
    similar person
  • Escalation of commitment (Blackjack Strategy)
  • An increased commitment to a previous decision
    despite negative information about the decisions
    present outcomes.

21
How Do Problems Differ?
  • Well-structured problems
  • Straightforward, familiar, easily defined
    problems (use programmed decision to solve)
  • Ill-structured problems
  • New problems in which information is ambiguous or
    incomplete
  • (hire consultants to solve problem)
  • Programmed decision
  • A repetitive decision that can be handled by a
    routine approach
  • Nonprogrammed decisions
  • Decisions that must be custom-made to solve
    unique and nonrecurring problems
  • New laws
  • New organizational/departmental strategy

22
Group Decision Making
  • Advantages
  • Make more accurate decisions
  • Provides more complete information
  • Offers a greater diversity of experiences and
    perspectives
  • Generates more alternatives
  • Increases acceptance of a solution
  • Increases the legitimacy of a decision.
  • Disadvantages
  • Is more time-consuming and less efficient
  • Minority domination can influence decision
    process
  • Increased pressures to conform to the groups
    mindset (groupthink)
  • Ambiguous responsibility for the outcomes of
    decisions

23
When Are Groups Most Effective?
  • Creativity
  • Groups tend to be more creative than individuals.
  • Acceptance of the final solution
  • Groups help increase the acceptance of decisions.
  • Effectiveness of group decision making
  • Groups of five to seven members are optimal for
    decision process speed and quality.

24
Improving Group Decision Making
  • Brainstorming
  • An idea-generating process that encourages
    alternatives while withholding criticism.
  • Nominal group technique
  • A decision-making technique in which group
    members are physically present but operate
    independently.
  • Electronic meeting
  • A type of nominal group technique in which
    participants are linked by computer.

25
Ethics and Business
  • Ethics
  • A set of rules or principles that defines right
    and wrong conduct
  • Code of ethics
  • A formal document that states an organizations
    primary values and the ethical rules it expects
    managers and operatives to follow

26
Three Views of Ethics
  • Utilitarian view of ethics
  • Making decisions solely on the basis of their
    outcomes or consequences.
  • Providing the greatest good for the greatest
    number
  • Rights view of ethics
  • Respecting and protecting individual liberties
    and privileges
  • Decision consistent with Bill of Rights
  • Theory of justice view of ethics
  • Fairly and impartially imposing and enforcing
    rules.
  • Union pay is equal, seniority decides layoff,
    etc
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com