Ecosystem Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Ecosystem Management

Description:

Determine the extent to which biophysical systems are vulnerable to human-generated pressures. ... Purpose oriented (primarily consequences of human action) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: adi660
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecosystem Management


1
Ecosystem Management
  • Coupling Natural and Human Systems and the
    Importance of Scale

Adina Merenlender, Environmental Science, Policy,
and Management
2
Ecosystem?
  • Biological communities associated with a defined
    physical environment.

3
Ecosystem Management
  •  Ecosystem Management is driven by explicit
    goals, executed by policies, protocols, and
    practices, and made adaptable by monitoring and
    research based on our best understanding of the
    ecological, physical, and social interactions and
    processes necessary to sustain ecosystem
    composition, structure, and function.
  • Explicit Goals
  • Sustainability
  • Interdisciplinary collaborative
  • Complex, connected, dynamic
  • Humans are a component
  • Scale and context
  • Adaptive
  • Ecological monitoring
  • Best available ecological models and understanding

4
Sustainability
  • environmental health
  • economic profitability
  • social and economic equity

5
Sustainable Use
6
Interdisciplinary Collaborative
  • Political Science
  • Ecology
  • Sociology
  • Geology
  • Hydrology
  • Economics
  • Planning

7
Complex, connected, dynamic
  • Determine the extent to which biophysical systems
    are vulnerable to human-generated pressures.
  • Determine how social institutions are responsive
    to and responsible for environmental conditions
    and change.
  • Estimate levels of probability and uncertainty of
    environmental degradation rather than thresholds.

8
SCALE Complex interactions among human and
natural systems occur at diverse spatial,
temporal, and organizational scales.
  • Spatial or temporal dimension of an object or
    process, characterized by grain and extent
  • Grain finest level of spatial resolution
    possible w/ a given data set (e.g. pixel size for
    raster data)
  • Extent size of the study area or duration of
    time under consideration
  • Cartographic scale ratio of distance on a map to
    distance on the earth surface (e.g. 110,000)

9
Ecological Consequences of Scale
  • Scale at which measurements are taken influences
    our ability to detect patterns and trends.
  • Abiotic and biotic processes vary in their
    operating scale
  • Abiotic scale dependence results when physical
    processes produce statistically similar
    aggregations of abiotic resources (e.g. water,
    minerals)
  • Biotic scale dependence originates from the
    differential responses of organisms to the
    abundance of a resource
  • Organisms operating at different scales may
    perceive vastly different densities and
    arrangements of resources
  • Social institutions operate at scales that may
    influenced by the distribution of resources.

10
What is a geographic information system (GIS)?
Wells (point)
Rivers (line)
Parcels (polygons)
Soils (polygons)
11
GIS Can Integrate Data Taken at Different Scales
and Extrapolate Information From One Scale to
Another
  • Most management and restoration projects are
    conducted at the local scale (1200 - 110,000)
  • Most data is at the regional (110,000-180,000)
    or global scale (180,000-11,000,000)
  • Extrapolating from data with a given grain and
    extent to another area with different dimensions
    is tricky
  • Difficult to combined digital data with different
    scales, quality, map projection date of
    production, digital format, classification system
    -- all can lead to error

12
Soils data 1250,000 STATSGO vs. 120,000 SURGO
13
30-m DEM vs. 10-m DEM (Santa Rosa/Taylor Mountain
area)
14
Natural Diversity Data Base Accuracy Polygons
15
Temporal Scale
Land cover mapping and monitoring program
generates data that describes the magnitude and
cause of land cover changes.
16
Context
  • One size does not fit all
  • Ecosystem management must be developed in situ

17
Adaptive
  • Adjusting management based on
  • Improved data and/or understanding
  • Monitoring results

18
Ecological Monitoring How is monitoring
different from inventory, survey, and
surveillance?
  • Detecting the degree of deviation from norm or
    control
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Purpose oriented (primarily consequences of human
    action)
  • Monitor indicators to detect differences or
    changes over time (signal)

19
Explicit purpose of monitoring
  • Biodiversity or ecosystem health monitoring
  • Impact monitoring
  • Target taxa monitoring
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Early warning monitoring
  • Provide feedback for adaptive management

20
Monitoring alone can not usually...
  • ascertain the cause of change.
  • help decide how much change is acceptable.
  • determine threshold values to trigger a change in
    management.
  • avoid false alarms.

21
Designing a defensible monitoring program
  • explicit purpose
  • null hypothesis or expected response
  • what type of information will be provided
  • how will interpretation of the data improve
    management
  • justify the selection of indicators and selected
    measures
  • analyze the likelihood of detecting a given
    magnitude of change using the proposed protocols
  • feasibility assessment including cost and time

22
Deficiencies of past monitoring programs
  • Minimal foundation in ecological theory/knowledge
    (applied from wrong region)
  • No explicit hypotheses
  • Little logic to support selection of indicators
  • No power analysis
  • No connection to decision making

23
When the goal is to quantify actual impacts that
specific activities have induced in ecological
systems then need
  • a design with sufficient power to distinguish the
    effects of the activity from a diverse set of
    other processes that drive variation in
    ecological
  • field studies
  • impact vs. control often does not separate
    natural spatial variability from changes due to
    impact
  • before-after does not separate natural temporal
    variability from changes due to impact
  • traditional Before-After-Control-Impact assume
    the control and impact sites track one another
    perfectly through time

24
In closing
  • Do not judge data accuracy without accounting for
    spatial and temporal scale.
  • Before believing there is no effect always
    estimate the power of detecting the trend of
    interest.
  • In order to achieve sustainability we must value
    biodiversity conservation, practice forethought,
    communicate across disciplines, and think
    creatively.
  • Tomorrow some models that can help improve our
    understanding.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com