Title: Ecosystem Management
1Ecosystem Management
- Coupling Natural and Human Systems and the
Importance of Scale
Adina Merenlender, Environmental Science, Policy,
and Management
2Ecosystem?
- Biological communities associated with a defined
physical environment.
3Ecosystem Management
- Ecosystem Management is driven by explicit
goals, executed by policies, protocols, and
practices, and made adaptable by monitoring and
research based on our best understanding of the
ecological, physical, and social interactions and
processes necessary to sustain ecosystem
composition, structure, and function.
- Explicit Goals
- Sustainability
- Interdisciplinary collaborative
- Complex, connected, dynamic
- Humans are a component
- Scale and context
- Adaptive
- Ecological monitoring
- Best available ecological models and understanding
4Sustainability
- environmental health
- economic profitability
- social and economic equity
5Sustainable Use
6Interdisciplinary Collaborative
- Political Science
- Ecology
- Sociology
- Geology
- Hydrology
- Economics
- Planning
7Complex, connected, dynamic
- Determine the extent to which biophysical systems
are vulnerable to human-generated pressures. - Determine how social institutions are responsive
to and responsible for environmental conditions
and change. - Estimate levels of probability and uncertainty of
environmental degradation rather than thresholds.
8SCALE Complex interactions among human and
natural systems occur at diverse spatial,
temporal, and organizational scales.
- Spatial or temporal dimension of an object or
process, characterized by grain and extent - Grain finest level of spatial resolution
possible w/ a given data set (e.g. pixel size for
raster data) - Extent size of the study area or duration of
time under consideration - Cartographic scale ratio of distance on a map to
distance on the earth surface (e.g. 110,000)
9Ecological Consequences of Scale
- Scale at which measurements are taken influences
our ability to detect patterns and trends. - Abiotic and biotic processes vary in their
operating scale - Abiotic scale dependence results when physical
processes produce statistically similar
aggregations of abiotic resources (e.g. water,
minerals) - Biotic scale dependence originates from the
differential responses of organisms to the
abundance of a resource - Organisms operating at different scales may
perceive vastly different densities and
arrangements of resources - Social institutions operate at scales that may
influenced by the distribution of resources.
10What is a geographic information system (GIS)?
Wells (point)
Rivers (line)
Parcels (polygons)
Soils (polygons)
11GIS Can Integrate Data Taken at Different Scales
and Extrapolate Information From One Scale to
Another
- Most management and restoration projects are
conducted at the local scale (1200 - 110,000) - Most data is at the regional (110,000-180,000)
or global scale (180,000-11,000,000) - Extrapolating from data with a given grain and
extent to another area with different dimensions
is tricky - Difficult to combined digital data with different
scales, quality, map projection date of
production, digital format, classification system
-- all can lead to error
12Soils data 1250,000 STATSGO vs. 120,000 SURGO
1330-m DEM vs. 10-m DEM (Santa Rosa/Taylor Mountain
area)
14Natural Diversity Data Base Accuracy Polygons
15Temporal Scale
Land cover mapping and monitoring program
generates data that describes the magnitude and
cause of land cover changes.
16Context
- One size does not fit all
- Ecosystem management must be developed in situ
17Adaptive
- Adjusting management based on
- Improved data and/or understanding
- Monitoring results
18Ecological Monitoring How is monitoring
different from inventory, survey, and
surveillance?
- Detecting the degree of deviation from norm or
control - Hypothesis testing
- Purpose oriented (primarily consequences of human
action) - Monitor indicators to detect differences or
changes over time (signal)
19Explicit purpose of monitoring
- Biodiversity or ecosystem health monitoring
- Impact monitoring
- Target taxa monitoring
- Compliance monitoring
- Early warning monitoring
- Provide feedback for adaptive management
20Monitoring alone can not usually...
- ascertain the cause of change.
- help decide how much change is acceptable.
- determine threshold values to trigger a change in
management. - avoid false alarms.
21Designing a defensible monitoring program
- explicit purpose
- null hypothesis or expected response
- what type of information will be provided
- how will interpretation of the data improve
management - justify the selection of indicators and selected
measures - analyze the likelihood of detecting a given
magnitude of change using the proposed protocols - feasibility assessment including cost and time
22Deficiencies of past monitoring programs
- Minimal foundation in ecological theory/knowledge
(applied from wrong region) - No explicit hypotheses
- Little logic to support selection of indicators
- No power analysis
- No connection to decision making
23When the goal is to quantify actual impacts that
specific activities have induced in ecological
systems then need
- a design with sufficient power to distinguish the
effects of the activity from a diverse set of
other processes that drive variation in
ecological - field studies
- impact vs. control often does not separate
natural spatial variability from changes due to
impact - before-after does not separate natural temporal
variability from changes due to impact - traditional Before-After-Control-Impact assume
the control and impact sites track one another
perfectly through time
24In closing
- Do not judge data accuracy without accounting for
spatial and temporal scale. - Before believing there is no effect always
estimate the power of detecting the trend of
interest. - In order to achieve sustainability we must value
biodiversity conservation, practice forethought,
communicate across disciplines, and think
creatively. - Tomorrow some models that can help improve our
understanding.