By: Brianna Butchart, Sara Blazar, and Jessie Cooperkline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

By: Brianna Butchart, Sara Blazar, and Jessie Cooperkline

Description:

By: Brianna Butchart, Sara Blazar, and Jessie Cooperkline ... Human activities. runoffs come from streets, malls, etc. non-direct pollution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: osc4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: By: Brianna Butchart, Sara Blazar, and Jessie Cooperkline


1
  • By Brianna Butchart, Sara Blazar, and Jessie
    Cooperkline

2
A research presentation on the Great Miami
Watershed
3
Methodology
  • Step 1 We studied the land use map and compared
    the Great Miami to the Big Darby.
  • Step 2 We began to compare certain things
    together and began to form hypotheses.
  • Step 3 We researched and tested our hypotheses.
  • Step 4 We formed our conclusions.

4
Point Sources of Pollution
  • Wastewater treatment plants
  • animals wastes from nearby farms
  • industrial discharges
  • a point source is when chemicals or wastes are
    directly dumped into the stream

5
Non Point Sources of Pollution
  • Human activities
  • runoffs come from streets, malls, etc.
  • non-direct pollution
  • when snow melts and runs over the land
  • when fertilizer washes over fields into the river
  • a non-point pollution is when something is
    indirectly put into the river

6
Hypothesis 1
  • Hypothesis 1 is the more urban areas there are
    the more BOD there is.

7
Did the data support hypothesis 1?
  • Yes the data supported hypothesis 1.

8
Conclusion for hypothesis 1
  • For hypothesis 1 we discovered through the data,
    when you have urban areas around the river the
    BOD goes up. While agriculture has very little
    effect if any on the BOD in most cases.

9
Hypothesis 2
  • Hypotheses 2 is that The IBI rate depends on the
    maximum BOD rate

10
Did the data support hypothesis 2?
  • Yes the data supported the hypothesis

11
Conclusion for hypothesis 2
  • As the maximum BOD increases the IBI does
    decrease.

12
Hypothesis 3
  • The hypothesis is when the total Nitrogen
    increases the IBI decreases.

13
Did the data support hypothesis 3?
  • No it didnt support hypothesis 3.

14
Conclusion for hypothesis 3
  • The data did not support the hypothesis. Only
    when there was an unusual amount of Nitrogen the
    hypothesis was correct. As youve seen on the
    graph the Nitrogen has no affect on the IBI.

15
Acknowledgements
  • Our parents and teachers for helping us get here
  • Our counselors for putting up with us
  • Our speakers for increasing our knowledge
  • The staff at OSC for making this possible
  • And last of all Steve Gordon and Sue Brown for
    the YWSI program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com