Perceiving Dialects: A Magnitude Estimation Study

1
Perceiving Dialects A Magnitude Estimation Study

• L.A. Stowe
• J. Hoeksema
• R. Hartsuiker
• M Devos

2
Introduction

• In what ways do language variants differ?
• Under conditions of contact how are these
  differences processed?

3
Introduction

• Production
• Elicitation
• Corpus frequency
• Perception
• Grammaticality judgments
• Do these differ?

4
Two variants of Dutch

• Northern (Netherlands Standard Dutch)
• Southern (Belgian Standard Dutch)
• Syntactic differences
• Generally more a difference of frequency than of
  grammaticality

5
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption
• No agreement marker in definite neuter
• Verbal particle early in embedded clause
• Missing infinitive marker

• North South
• Rare Less rare
• Rare Frequent
• Frequent Less freq
• Rare Less Rare

6
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption

• North South
• Rare Less rare

7
Verbal Cluster Interruption

• PP/NP Inflected V Nonfinite Verb
• Inflected V PP/NP Nonfinite Verb
• more common in the Southern variant, although
  still rare
• Interrupted order relatively archaic
• More common in idiomatic expressions (ko0elmans,
  19??)

8
Materials

• Dat waren kwesties die de heren uit het oog
  hadden verloren
• Dat waren kwesties die de heren hadden uit het
  oog verloren
• Lit Those were questions that the gentlemen had
  out the eye lost (lost track of)

9
Procedure

• Self generated acceptability scale with
  intermediate graduations relative to other items
• For finer distinctions than grammaticality
• Items distributed across lists so matched without
  repetition

10
Anbalysis

• Self-generated acceptability judgment converted
  to Z-scores
• For comparability
• Average judgment per condition calculated for
  each subject and each item
• Subject and item AnoVas
• Language Variant, Cluster Interruption (Idiom)

11
Northern vs. Southern
12
Discussion

• Increased frequency within language variant
  increases acceptability
• But infrequent forms are still relativedly less
  acceptable
• Role of idiomaticity?

13
Non-idiomatic Sentences

• Dat waren brieven die de dames in hun tas hadden
  gestopt.
• ?Dat waren brieven die de dames hadden in hun
  tas gestopt.
• Lit Those were letters that the ladies had in
  their bags placed.

14
Northern Results
15
Southern Results
16
Discussion

• Data supports role for idiomaticity in perception
  as well as production
• Present in both dialects, although greater in the
  Southern variant

17
Noun Agreement

• Het oude huis
• Een oud huis

• de oude man
• Een oude man

18
Southern Variant(for some lexical combinations)

• de oude man
• Een oude man

• Het oud huis
• Een oud huis

19
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption
• No agreement marker in definite neuter

• North South
• Rare Less rare
• Rare Frequent

20
Noun Agreement

• Er werden tijdens het belangrijke gesprek een
  paar afspraken gemaakt.
• ?Er werden tijdens het belangrijk gesprek een
  paar afspraken gemaakt.
• Lit There were during the important conversation
  a couple-of agreements made.

21
Doubt

• If we see little difference,
• is this just because it is easy to miss the
  visual instantiation of agreement in a sentence?

22
Agreement Controls

• Er werden tijdens de lange vergadering een paar
  punten besproken.
• Er werden tijdens de lang vergadering een paar
  punten besproken.
• Lit There were during the long meeting a
  couple-of points discussed.

23
Southern Results
24
Northern Results
25
Discussion

• Perception clearly mirrors production
• Inflectionless form as acceptable as the
  inflected version for the Southern variant

26
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption
• No agreement marker in definite neuter

• North South
• Rare Less rare
• Rare Frequent

27
Discussion

• Rarity vs. grammaticality?
• More acceptable than verb cluster interruption
  even for Northern variant
• Salience?

28
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption
• No agreement marker in definite neuter
• Verbal particle early in embedded clause

• North South
• Rare Less rare
• Rare Frequent
• Frequent Less freq

29
Verbal Particle Position

• Inflected V Particle-Nonfinite Verb
• Particle Inflected V Nonfinite Verb
• less common in the Southern variant
• 1/10

30
Particle Placement

• De chef vroeg hoe het team de werkzaamheden zou
  indelen.
• ?De chef vroeg hoe het team de werkzaamheden in
  zou delen.
• Lit The manager asked how the team the tasks
  would apportion.

31
Effects of Length

• De chef vroeg hoe het team de erkzaamheden zou
  willen indelen
• ?De chef vroeg hoe het team de werkzaamheden in
  zou willen delen
• Lit The manager asked how the team the tasks
  would want to apportion.

32
Northern Results
33
Southern Results
34
Discussion

• Perception mirrors production
• But difference in production frequency does not
  lead to extreme differences in acceotability
• Contact?

35
Lexical SelectionInfinitive

• V to-VP
• V VP

36
Lexical SelectionInfinitive

• Het publiek begon (te) praten.
• Lit The audience began (to) talk
• De baby probeerde (te) lopen.
• Lit The baby tried (to) walk.

37
Control Conditions

• De ongenode gast durfde (te) zitten.
• Lit The uninvited guest dared (to) sit.
• Het was moeilijk om (te) reizen
• Lit It was difficult (to) travel.

38
Results
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Overview

• Embedded verb cluister interruption
• No agreement marker in definite neuter
• Verbal particle early in embedded clause
• Missing infinitive marker

• North South
• Rare Less rare
• Rare Frequent
• Frequent Less freq
• Rare Less Rare