A Linkage Approach to Managing Your Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

A Linkage Approach to Managing Your Business

Description:

... Approach to Managing Your Business. Kunal Gupta, Ph.D. Senior Consultant ... this image and tacit knowledge often is not documented and shared throughout the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: randyb69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Linkage Approach to Managing Your Business


1
A Linkage Approach to Managing Your Business
  • Kunal Gupta, Ph.D.
  • Senior Consultant
  • Decision Sciences
  • Kunal.gupta_at_burke.com

AMA Regional Conference May 2-3, 2005
2
Tutorial Overview
  • Introduction
  • Linkage Research and Analysis
  • Origins of linkage analysis
  • Focus of linkage analysis
  • Rational of linkage research and analysis
  • Critical linkages
  • Challenges
  • Case Studies
  • The Process of Linkage Analysis
  • Recommended Process
  • Overall Summary and Conclusion

3
Linkage Research and Analysis
4
Origins of Linkage Analysis
  • A variety of management perspectives have gained
    widespread acceptance during the last 15 years
  • Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance
    Excellence
  • European Foundation for Quality Management
  • Service-Profit Chain Model
  • The Balanced Scorecard
  • Linkage Research Model
  • Six Sigma and the Language of Xs and Ys
  • Action-Profit-Linkage Model
  • All of the above emphasize
  • Holistic, enterprise-wide perspective
  • Balanced organizational performance measurement
    and evaluation
  • Linkage, integration, and alignment

5
The Action-Profit-Linkage Model
Source Epstein, M. J. Westbrook, R. A.
Linking Actions to Profits in Strategic
Decision Making. MIT Sloan
Management Review, Spring, 2001 39-49.
6
Burkes Framework for Enterprise Value
Management (EVM)
Key organizational decision areas supported by
Burke are Leadership, People Management,
Product/Service Management and Process Management.
Leadership
People Management
Product/Service Management
Process Management
7
Kaplan and Nortons Perspective
The complexity of managing an organization today
requires that managers be able to view
performance in several areas simultaneouslyno
single measure can provide a clear performance
target, or focus attention on all critical areas
of a business.
The Balanced Scorecard Harvard Business Review
8
Focus of Linkage Analysis
Linkage research and analysis is rapidly-growing
as an area of importance to all organizations.
Linkage research and analysis is aimed at
establishing
  • How key business results are related to effective
    management of customer experiences and
    relationships
  • How effective management of customer experiences
    and relationships, in turn, is linked to and
    driven by effective alignment of people and
    processes within an organization.

9
Linking Business Results to Customer Experiences
Computer Supplies
88
90
80
57
70
Percentage of Retained Customers
60
50
30
25
40
30
20
10
0
Vulnerable
Dissatisfied
Secure
Satisfied
10
Linking Business Results to Customer Experiences
Telecommunications
11
Linking Business Results to Customer Experiences
Industrial Products
  • Customer Percent of Percent of Customers
  • Segment Classification Customer Base Where Share
    of Business
  • Increased Decreased
  • Secure/Loyal 55 61 2
  • Still Favorable 26 44 8
  • Moderate Risk 18 22 22
  • Dissatisfied 1 0 100

?
12
Linking Customer Experiences to Alignment of
Processes - Support
Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and
Process Cycle Time
Higher
Dis
/satisfaction
Threshold
Customer Satisfaction with Total Time To
Resolve Problem
Lower
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
28
Number of Hours to Close Trouble Call
13
Linking Customer Experiences to Alignment of
People - Banking
14
Rationale for LinkageResearch and Analysis
  • There are at least two trends that are driving
    the recent interest in and growth of linkage
    research and analysis
  • Desire for improved managerial confidence in and
    support for decisions regarding where/how to
    invest organizational resources
  • Growing need to understand and align performance
    management within and beyond organizational
    boundaries

15
Critical Linkages
  • Leading and lagging indicators, and/or multiple
    data sources reflecting a single enterprise
    dimension or voice, such as
  • Transactional and Relationship Customer and
    Market Surveys
  • Survey and Non-Survey Customer or Market Data
  • Linkages across multiple enterprise dimensions
    and data sources, such as
  • Customer Loyalty ? Financial/Market Results
  • Employee Engagement ? Customer Loyalty
  • Process Cycle Time ? Customer Satisfaction

16
The Challenge of Linkage
  • The ideal situation for analyzing and integrating
    data from multiple streams would involve common
    data points for which all relevant measures are
    available.
  • Unfortunately, the ideal situation almost never
    exists, especially at a single point-in-time.
  • As a result, linkage typically is a matter of
    approximating the business model by piecing
    things together.

17
Case Studies
18
The Intent
  • Linkage analysis is purported to provide a
    variety of benefits, including but not limited
    to
  • Decision support with strategic decision making
  • Proof of concept
  • Revitalizing existing measurement programs
  • Correcting measurement myopia
  • In this section of the session, we will share
    some selected case studies that have each
    addressed one or more of the objectives listed
    above.

19
Strategic Decision Making
20
Impacts of Cost Reduction
  • A leading retail bank was undertaking a cost
    reduction exercise that entailed reducing the
    number of tellers in each branch.
  • However, reduction in the number of tellers would
    have generated two counter forces
  • Increased profits because of cost reductions
  • Likely reduction in profits because of the
    detrimental impact on customer experience and
    therefore loyalty
  • More wait time in branches ? Reduced favorability
    of customer experience ? Reduced overall customer
    loyalty ? Reduced customer buying activity of
    various bank offerings
  • Burke was therefore asked to examine the
    empirical evidence, through linkage analysis, for
    estimating the second of the two objectives
    i.e. reduction in profits because of lower
    customer loyalty
  • We analyzed three types of data
  • In branch customer experience (survey) data
  • Overall customer loyalty / relationship (survey)
    data
  • Actual customer behavior data

21
Impacts of Cost Reduction (continued)
  • We then used the results of the linkage analysis,
    to provide an estimate of the reduction in branch
    level sales for every 1000 bank branch customers.
  • While we show the summary of (disguised) results
    below, the linkage model went through more
    detailed analysis to clearly identify
  • The impact of increased waiting time on the
    customers overall branch experience
  • The impact of a less favorable branch experience
    of overall customer loyalty towards the bank
  • The estimated reduction in current and future
    business that customers would give to the bank
    because of reduced overall loyalty
  • The impact of such behavior of branch level
    profits
  • The bank then used such information, along-with
    their internal information on cost savings
    associated with the planned reduction of tellers,
    to help them with the strategic discussion
    underway.

22
Resource Investment Priorities
  • A retail institution asked us to aid their
    resource investment decision process by analyzing
    data from their associate (i.e. employee),
    customer, demographic, and financial measurement
    at the store level.
  • We examined data across these different data
    streams in one comprehensive model to estimate
  • The direction of causality do more engaged
    associates create loyal customers, or does
    customer loyalty foster associate engagement
  • The time lag of causality is there a lag
    between customer loyalty and customer behavior,
    and if yes what is the period of lag
  • Everything else being equal do the
    characteristics of the store neighborhood have a
    significant impact on a stores financial
    performance
  • Identification of the store departments with
    maximal impact on customer loyalty
  • Estimated financial impact of each associate as
    well as customer survey measure on the
    profitability of individual stores

23
Resource Investment Priorities (contd.)
  • The results provided information that helped the
    firm take some strategic resource investment
    issues pertaining to
  • Areas of investment that could foster associate
    engagement and/or customer loyalty, and therefore
    the profitability of individual stores
  • An understanding of the immediacy of customer
    loyalty on the financial performance of the store
  • Identification of demographic properties of the
    store neighborhood (e.g. median HH income) with a
    strong impact on the financial performance of the
    store

24
Proof of Concept
25
Show me the Money!
26
The Eureka Moment
  • They worked with me to define the project and
    helped us when different turns were needed. They
    hung in there and together we achieved our goal.
    We were successful in our goal of doing financial
    linkage . Technology Firm, Audit Date 2002
  • Often times, the customer loyalty programs need
    to be rejuvenated to help their custodians earn
    a seat at the table.
  • Demonstrating the linkages between customer
    attitudes and customer behavior can provide the
    much needed impetus to customer loyalty programs
  • In the recently concluded IIR conference (Feb.,
    2005) organizations across industries were
    looking for such proof to present to senior
    management.
  • Overall, while it is very important to provide
    such proof of concept, there is no reason that
    such evidence cannot be extended closer to more
    operational linkage models.

27
Working the Momentum
L5 VOW
L4 Operational Metrics
L3 Transactional Surveys
L2 Product Specific Surveys
L0 Financial Results
L1 Relationship Surveys
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 4
Phase 3
Phase 5
Phase 6
28
Revitalizing Existing Measurement Programs
29
Missing Critical Information
  • Very early on in one of the linkage projects,
    through the blueprinting and linkage assessment
    phase, we identified the inability of current
    measurement programs to provide quality decision
    support to the senior management of the firm.
  • The financial success of this firm is strongly
    contingent on the willingness of sales
    individuals in various retail outlets to
    recommend the products of the firm.
  • However, despite the critical importance of such
    sales individuals for financial success, the firm
    recognized the lack of any systematic measurement
    data on its channel partners.
  • Absence of such data provided the firm with
    little, if any, information on creating more
    engaged channel partners.
  • Such recognition resulted in major re-allocation
    of measurement resources to provide funding for a
    channel partner study.

30
Correcting Measurement Myopia
31
The Concept of Measurement Myopia
  • Often times, firms have a multitude of measures
    (survey as well as non-survey) that all purport
    to aid the decision making ability of the firm.
  • More often than not however, these well
    established measures and metrics do not provide
    the level of seamless and integrated decision
    support they are designed to offer.
  • For instance, if the chosen metric of customer
    affinity does not link to favorable customer
    behavior, then increased customer affinity scores
    will not lead to improved financial performance
    of the firm.
  • In this section, we discuss one case study that
    demonstrates the ability of linkage analysis to
    overcome such measurement myopia.

32
Revisiting the Employee Engagement Index
  • A large financial institution has had an
    Employee Engagement Index (EEI) measure in
    place for years.
  • Individual managers as well as divisions take the
    index score very seriously because of the mandate
    from senior management.
  • Senior management believed that superior employee
    engagement scores, as defined, should lead to
    three key benefits
  • Superior customer experience
  • Reduced employee turnover
  • Improved employee productivity
  • In a recently concluded linkage assignment
    however, we observed that the existing EEI was
    sub-optimal in providing the first two of these
    three benefits.
  • This initiated the development and establishment
    of a new EEI-Revised that comprised of measures
    with stronger ability to link to
  • Favorable customer experience perceptions
  • Reduced employee turnover levels

33
The Process of Linkage Analysis
34
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

35
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

36
Create the Steering Team
  • To ensure the process is collaborative and to
    avoid the not invented here syndrome, a
    cross-functional group is required
  • The blueprinting team generally is comprised of
    representatives from
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Production/Operations
  • Business or Strategic Planning
  • Human Resources
  • Management Information/IT
  • Both managers and stewards of relevant data in
    each of the above areas are potential candidates
    for the steering team.

37
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

38
Rationale for Blueprinting
  • Most managers and executives have a mental
    picture of the road to business results, but
    this image and tacit knowledge often is not
    documented and shared throughout the
    organization.
  • A linkage blueprint furnishes a detailed
    illustration of the hypothesized relationships
    among key operational, product, employee, and
    customer elements which, if they are managed
    effectively, lead to desired financial and other
    business results.
  • Development of a blueprint is a critical first
    step towards successful linkage analysis and
    modeling. In fact, failure to develop such a
    blueprint is one of the main reasons that many
    organizations are ineffective in their linkage
    analysis and modeling efforts.


39
Balanced Performance Measurementin Most
Companies Today A Reality Check
  • Many companies believe they have solved the
    problem of balanced performance measurement by
    adopting a framework like the Balanced Scorecard,
    mistaking it for an off-the-shelf checklist
    procedure that is universally applicable and
    completely comprehensive. But using such a
    framework by itself wont help identify which
    performance areas and which drivers make the
    greatest contribution to a companys financial
    outcomes More successful companies have attacked
    the problem by choosing their performance
    measures on the basis of causal models, also
    called value driver maps, which layout the
    plausible cause-and-effect relationships that may
    exist between the chosen drivers of strategic
    success and outcomes.

Christopher Ittner and David Larcker Coming Up
Short on Nonfinancial Performance
Measurement Harvard Business Review (November,
2003)
40
What is a Blueprint Session
  • Interactive discussion with key business leaders
    to build the business model for each specific
    business.
  • The output is a business model that positions
    customer perceptions and behaviors as a central
    component between desired downstream financial
    results and upstream operations measures.

41
Why Conduct a Blueprint
Current mean income contribution to the
organization 611
Share of Wallet
725
391
Base
550
Low vs. Medium Significant at 95 Low vs. High
Significant at 99 Medium vs. High Supported
directionally
42
Questions to Build the Blueprint
  • Focus on customer-centricity to answer four key
    questions
  • How is income generated from buyers or customers?
  • What are the drivers and determinants of customer
    preference or loyalty?
  • What are operational enablers or means of
    addressing the key drivers of customer preference
    or loyalty?
  • What are employee enablers or means of addressing
    the key drivers of customer preference or
    loyalty?

43
A Case Illustration
44
Example of a Blueprint for Retail Banking
How is income generated from buyers or customers?
Commissions
Share of Financial Services Wallet

Income
Interest
Account Activity
Customer Preference or Loyalty
Number Type of Accounts
Fees
Profitability
Costs
45
Example of a Blueprint for Retail Banking
What are the drivers and determinants of customer
preference or loyalty?
Institutional Stability
Reputation
Products Services
.
Corporate Citizenship
Barriers to Switching
Perceptions of the Brand
Marketing Communications
.
Value Received
Customer Preference or Loyalty
Accessibility
.
Perceptions of Service Experiences
Quality of Facilities Channels
Evaluation of Alternatives
Interactions with Staff
Response to Requests or Problems
Account Performance or Usage
46
Example of a Blueprint for Retail Banking
What are employee enablers or means of addressing
the key drivers of customer preference or loyalty?
Barriers to Switching
Perceptions of the Brand
Service Orientation
.
Value Received
Customer Preference or Loyalty
.
Perceptions of Service Experiences
Employee Retention
Productivity Efficiency
Employee Satisfaction Commitment
Evaluation of Alternatives
47
Example of a Blueprint for Retail Banking
What are operational enablers or means of
addressing the key drivers of customer preference
or loyalty?
Barriers to Switching
Perceptions of the Brand
Channel Accessibility
.
Value Received
Customer Preference or Loyalty
Channel Availability
.
Perceptions of Service Experiences
Easy to Use Channels
Evaluation of Alternatives
Customer Information Systems
Service Cycle Time
Appearance of Facilities
48
Bringing the Pieces Together
Financial
Customers
Employees
Processes Operations
49
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

50
The Data Inventory
  • For each element of the blueprint, an attempt to
    identify a relevant measure or data source must
    be undertaken
  • The process of data inventory reveals several key
    insights
  • It identifies existing data that may be analyzed
    to breathe life into the blueprint.
  • It enables the linkage researcher to determine if
    the data are organized in a manner that provides
    appropriate units of analysis.
  • It reveals any gaps between the blueprint and
    currently available data that need to be filled.

51
Data Inventory Template
Data Source Location
Data Owner or Steward
Units of Organization
History or Longevity
Identifier
Financial Business Results
Customer Market
Employee Stakeholders
Process or Operations
52
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

53
Identify and Prioritize Links to be Investigated
  • Obviously, only elements of the blueprint for
    which appropriate data are available may be
    investigated.
  • Prioritization of the links that are capable of
    being investigated should take into account
  • Impact in terms of furnishing proof of concept
  • Strategic importance
  • Alignment with current or near-term initiatives
  • Think outside-in
  • Quite often, building the business case for
    customer centricity is the most effective way to
    secure organizational and managerial engagement
    in the remainder of the linkage effort

54
Recommended Process
  • Create linkage and integration steering team
  • Develop the linkage blueprint
  • Conduct inventory of existing data and assess
    feasibility of linkage analysis
  • Identify and prioritize links to be investigated
  • Locate and assemble relevant data required to
    perform analyses
  • Analyze data to establish linkages and test
    hypothesized relationships
  • Refine and deploy the linkage results in
    marketing planning and action
  • Use learning as a basis for ROI simulations and
    other what if scenario evaluations
  • Align key variables and optimize performance
    targets for upstream metrics

55
Locate and Assemble the Data
  • This is almost never as easy as initially
    expected because of
  • Data structure
  • So-called legacy systems
  • Data ownership and stewardship
  • Availability of compatible identifiers or
    match-and-merge hooks
  • Data assembly and preparation is likely to take
    more time than originally planned.
  • Additional considerations include
  • Privacy and confidentiality
  • Data security procedures
  • Legal and regulatory issues

56
Overall Summary and Conclusion
57
In Conclusion
  • Linkage research and analysis can be used to
    inject energy and momentum into existing
    measurement programs.
  • Providing management with the confidence that
    customer loyalty links to the financial success
    of the firm can help market research managers
    earn a seat at the table.
  • Linkage analysis also allows a firm to review
    each measurement data point with greater
    intelligence to ensure that it leads to the
    desired marketplace and financial success, e.g.
  • Does the employee engagement index lead to
    superior customer experience
  • Does the process measure lead to superior
    customer experience
  • Does customer loyalty lead to improved results
  • While linkage analysis is exciting, the
    associated process is complex and challenging.
  • The ability to follow a robust process however
    ensures the success of not only linkage research
    and analysis, but also of linking various
    measurement programs into one comprehensive
    decision support framework.
  • In case study after case study, we have observed
    that once successful, such efforts provide
    extreme value to all the investments made in
    various organizational programs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com