Nicholas Harrigan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Nicholas Harrigan

Description:

Directors of major conservative think tanks. Directors, councils and policy committees of the four major business associations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: heds
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nicholas Harrigan


1
  • Nicholas Harrigan
  • Nuffield College and Australian National
    University
  • 31 January 2008

For Party or for Power? Social networks and
corporate political strategy.
2
For Party or for Power? Social networks and
corporate political strategy.
  • Purpose of presentation
  • The most comprehensive dataset on corporate
    political, social and economic characteristics
    available today.
  • Show the fundamental mechanisms driving corporate
    political strategy.
  • Discuss the implications for politics in modern
    liberal democracies.

3
For Party or for Power? Social networks and
corporate political strategy.
  • This analysis was not possible a decade ago
  • Growth of computer power and availability of
    large social, political and economic databases.
  • maturation of social network analysis as a
    methodology.

4
The question
  • What are the fundamental social mechanisms which
    drive the political strategies of corporations?
  • Why should we care?
  • Two major pressures on political elites
  • who votes for them.
  • who funds them.

5
Party Voting Party Funding
  • We have a comprehensive understanding of voting
    behaviour
  • detailed empirical modelling
  • major cleavages and categories
  • social, economic and ideological mechanisms
  • We cannot say the same about the major funding
    group corporations
  • 50-80 of funding is private (Aus UK)
  • Corporations are the largest donors
  • We dont know the fundamental categories, or
    mechanisms.

6
Data
  • Test all major hypothesis, one model, largest,
    most comprehensive and most recent dataset
  • Directors, councils and policy committees of the
    four major business associations
  • 200 richest persons
  • 40 largest defence contracts
  • And National Schools Database, census data for
    all 40,000 census collection districts,
    socio-economic status data for parents of all
    schools, school fees, school sporting
    associations, club reciprocal membership, etc.
  • 2,000 largest enterprises
  • 7,500 directors in 10,000 directors positions
  • profitability, revenue, employees, industry, etc.
  • 20 largest shareholders
  • 33,000 persons in Whos Who
  • school attendance
  • club membership
  • 8,000 political donations
  • 350 government committees and enterprises
  • Directors of major conservative think tanks

7
Case Study
  • One fundamental division
  • Partisan corporations donate only to the
    conservative parties (The Coalition)
  • Hedging corporations donate to both major
    parties.
  • Note there are virtually no Labor-only donors.
  • How do these divisions relate to the social
    networks and attributes of corporations and
    directors?
  • What does this reveal about corporate political
    strategy?

8
Conceptual Model
9
Results
10
Implications
  • Given these dynamics within the funding
    constituency, what are the implications for
    party strategy?
  • Labor Parties
  • Labor party money is bad money
  • Political rent unearned profits from
    controlling levers of state power
  • From the core of the corporate community, (large,
    regulated, membership of government committees)

11
Implications
  • Conservative Parties
  • No preferential treatment by the centres of
    corporate community
  • Still receive rent but no advantage
  • Traditional upper class and directors
    institutions do not provide coherence for
    collective action clubs and schools
  • Clubs and schools bolster hedging corporations

12
Implications
  • Conservative Parties Advantages
  • Smaller corporations outsiders
  • No self-interest in state except the collective
    interest
  • Not large enough or in right industry to enter
    into symbiotic relationship with state
  • Conservative Think Tanks
  • Bolster conservative partisanship amongst the
    centre of the corporate community
  • Super-Rich
  • Autonomy to act ideologically
  • Example Lord Michael Ashcroft.

13
Conclusion
  • We know who votes for our political parties
  • But what are the political dynamics of those who
    funds our parties?
  • This methodology and substantive findings present
    promising way forward
  • Interdisciplinary research politics, sociology
    and economic behaviour ideally suited to
    Nuffield College.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com