Title: Learning Through Service
1Learning Through Service
- CMUN 10 Service Learning Assignment
- Fall 2008
2Status
- Status is an individuals importance to the
group - High Status
- Low Status
- Status Achievers
- Status Seekers
3High Status
- Shown more deference
- Are listened to more often
- Asked for advice more often
- Rewarded with greater share of goods
- Bigger car/office/salary
- Receive more recognition for contributions
- High Status group members talk more often to
other high status members/total group - Are more likely to have a leadership role-person
with the highest status is usually the leader - Have more influence on the process than low
status members
4Low Status
- Direct conversation to high status, not low
status group members. - Communicate more positive messages to high status
members - More likely to complain about the task they have
been assigned (victim mentality) - Are more likely to have comments ignored
- Communicate more irrelevant information
5Power Bases
- Legitimate Power
- Those elected/chosen
- Referent Power
- Those we allow to have power because we admire
them - Expert Power
- Those with knowledge/experience
- Reward Power
- Those able to reward others performance (grades)
- Coercive Power
- Those able to use threats/blackmail
6The Gender Issue
7Power/Status and Gender
- Do men and women have different power bases in
our society? - How does culture impact the issue of power/status
and gender?
Communication Website Deborah TannenMen and
Women in Conversation is Cross-Cultural
Communication
8Men vs. Women
9Group Activity
- Divide into gender based groups
- All men in one group
- All women in one group
10Group Activity
- As a group of men/women you are to
brainstorm answers to questions that will be
given. - Record all ideas without censoring
- Look over list and mark those ideas that apply to
75 of the population
11Group Activity
- As a group of men/women who are
representative of all men/women, give your first
thoughts to the following - How do you think members of the other sex see
themselves as members of a group? - How do you think they think you see yourselves as
members of a group?
12Group Activity
How do you think members of the other sex
see themselves as members of a group?
13Group Activity
How do you think they think you see
yourselves as members of a group?
14Group Activity
- How do perceptions impact
- what happens
- Socially
- Academically
- Professionally
15Comparing Approaches
Gender and Conflict
- Males
- Demanding and competitive
- Verbally aggressive
- Give orders
- Focus on content
- Females
- Cooperativeness, compromise, and accommodation
- More likely to engage in protracted negotiation
- Make proposals and give reasons for their
positions - Focus on feelings
Communication Website John Gray Men are from
Mars
16Collectivist vs. Individualist
17Diversity and Conflict
- Cultural values influence attitudes toward
conflict - Individualist cultures
- Conflict used to air differences
- Handled openly and directly
- Step along the problem-solving path
- Collectivist cultures
- Conflict perceived as a threat
- Efforts made to suppress it in public
- Dysfunctional, distressing, and dangerous
18Culture Quiz
- You are invited to give a presentation at a
business meeting in Malaysia. After the meeting
is on its way for half an hour, you still have
not started discussing business - but the hosts
are asking questions about your country, your
family etc. What do you do? Choose the correct
answerA Continue talking until my hosts signal
that they are ready to move over to business
negotiations. B Start to mix business issues
and private issues in order to finally start
giving the presentation. C Friendly ask my
hosts if I could start my presentation now.D
Stop talking and start giving the presentation.
19Answer A
- Building trust and establishing personal
relationships are more important in collectivist
countries like Malaysia than business facts.
Therefore it is important to build up trust and
get friendly with you counterparts, rather than
sticking to your business presentation.
20Collectivist vs. Individualist
- Rites of passage
- Western/Individualistic
- degrees/promotions/material objects
- Individual achievement is not related to group
- Collectivist
- recognition of pride for group, not just
individual - Individual achievement/failure group
achievement/failure
21Group Assignment I
- Work on group assignment
- Meet in Library after brief break for
research/internet
22Learning Through Service
- CMUN 10 Service Learning Assignment
- Fall 2008
23Group Goals, Structure, and Climate
- Goals motivation for existing
- Structure positions/roles
- Climate emotional atmosphere
- Patterns of communication
- Norms
- Effective climate characteristics
- Supportiveness
- Participative decision making
- Trust among group members
- Openness and candor
- High performance goals
24Group vs. Individual Goals
- Goals
- Group goals transcend individual goals.
- The goal motivation for existing
- Individual goals
- Camaraderie and fellowship
- Rubbing elbows
- Professional/political connections
- Prestige of membership
- Genuine interest in group activities and goals
25Communication Competence
- Communicative behavior that is both effective
and appropriate in a given context.
26 Levels of Competence
- Conscious incompetence
- We know that we dont know
- Conscious competence
- We must work consciously to perform skill
- Unconscious competence
- Skill becomes second nature to us
- Equation for Competence
- Competence motivation knowledge skill
27Organizational Culture Impacts Group Climate
- Shared assumptions, values, beliefs, language,
symbols, and meaning systems that hold the
organization together. - Patterns of sustained communicative acts or
behaviors - Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
- Defensive vs. Supportive environment
- Confirming vs. disconfirming responses
- Listening Skills
- Is developed by the group-your choice!
28Trust
- Trust must be earned
- Trust develops when you can predict how another
will behave under certain circumstances-and they
do as expected - Trust is always a gamble
- Previous experiences in small group settings will
influence how you are able to trust others to do
tasks as agreed
29Small Groups The Trust Factor
- We have talked about Roles vs. Size
- Now we must address Trust vs. Distrust
30 Small Group Model
- ROLES
- Task helps accomplish the groups goal
- Maintenance defines the groups social
atmosphere - Example A member who works to create a
harmonic, peaceful atmosphere is performing
maintenance on the group - Individual contribution of individual toward
group goal - -can be counter productive to group goals.
Some one who is more interested in what they can
get out of the group process, than what they can
contribute.
31The Trust Factor
- High Trust equals
- High Performance
- Low Trust equals
- Low Performance
32Collaboration Goals of The Group ProcessThe
Me vs. We Syndrome
- Me
- I want to get this done so I can do other things.
- I will do only what I have to do
- or
- I will do it all, since I can trust no one else
to do it right, or fast enough
- We
- As a group, we need to produce a quality
presentation - We will all work together collaboratively to find
a way to achieve our goal - We will allow the time needed to accomplish our
goal, and remember that the process is just as
important as the end result.
33Group vs. Individual Rights
34Individual Rights
- To be the judge of your own behavior
- To express you beliefs and feelings
- To ask for respect
- To give self credit
- To change your mind with more information
- To make mistakes
- To offer no justification
- To offer no justification
- To be disliked
- To decide not to be assertive
- To say, I dont know I dont understand
No - I dont care.
- To decide not to be assertive
- To be disliked
35Individual Responsibilities
- To allow others different opinions
- To be constructive
- To give respect
- To give others credit
- To be sensitive to others
- To listen to others
- To explain changes to people who are affected by
the change - To allow others to make mistakes
- To deal with the consequences of your behavior
- To be flexible
36Five Stage Model of Group Development
- Forming Introductions coming togetherfirst
agenda (uncertainty/apprehension/ex
citement/interest) - Storming Testing (breaking limits/
challenges/nonparticipation fear/anxiety/loss of
control) - Norming Reaching agreement/safeguards/defining
the agenda/acquiring skills/ contracting with
rules and procedures to follow as group members - (relief/stability/commitment/negotiation
- Performing Undertaking group task
- Mourning Ending/hanging on/leaving
early/forward planning/departing
(Sadness/joy/regret /celebration/
anticlimax/anticipation)
37The Johari Window
- Psychological testing device that allows us to
examine both how we view ourselves, and how
others view us.
38Conflict
- Conflict means different things to different
people - Conflict is not necessarily bad, just different
- Conflict is, disagreement over available options
caused by seemingly incompatible goals among
group members and their thinking that others can
keep them from achieving their goals
39Gender, Culture, and Personal Styles
- Men and women focus on different aspects of the
groups life - The cultural background of group members affects
the nature of communication in the group/team - Class Discussion How did the video describe
gender communication at work? What were the
major themes on this topic? How would you apply
the same principles to cultural communication, as
well.
40(No Transcript)
41Comparing Approaches
Gender and Conflict
- Males
- Demanding and competitive
- Verbally aggressive
- Give orders
- Focus on content
- Females
- Cooperativeness, compromise, and accommodation
- More likely to engage in protracted negotiation
- Make proposals and give reasons for their
positions - Focus on feelings
42Diversity and Conflict
- Cultural values influence attitudes toward
conflict - Individualist cultures
- Conflict used to air differences
- Handled openly and directly
- Step along the problem-solving path
- Collectivist cultures
- Conflict perceived as a threat
- Efforts made to suppress it in public
- Dysfunctional, distressing, and dangerous
43GROUP THINK
- Preservation of group harmony
- Suppression of dissenting opinions
- Wish to complete task quickly
- impedes effective group functioning
- Limits critical thinking
- Used to avoid conflict
- Self censoring/Member censoring
44Communication Conflict Styles
- Avoider/Closed remove self from conflict
- Accommodator/Hidden overvalues relationships/
undervalues own goals - Compromiser tries to find a middle ground
- Competitive Forcer/Blind win-lose
orientation/personal goals paramount - Problem-Solving Collaborator/Open win-win
orientation
Communication Studies Website Conflict - An
Essential Ingredient For Growth
45Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem Solving
46Closed Style
- Task focused
- Productive in interpersonal free environments
- Need security
- Prescriptive guidance.
- ?Maintains neutrality at all costs ?
- Conflict?
- Removes self from group
- physically
- mentally when conflict arises
- Assertiveness/cooperation not valued
-
-
47Closed Style
- How do you communicate with such a person?
- Very carefully
- Needs safe working environment
- Explain rules/chain of command.
- NO personal issues
- Dont expect participation in meetings
48Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem Solving
49Blind Style
- Task focused
- Know what they want.
- Well-organized
- Not afraid to exercise authority
- Very demanding
- Their way is the best.
- Punitive with the failure of others.
-
-
50Blind Style
- How do you communicate with such a person?
- Follow through
- Follow chain of command
- Dont expect interpersonal connection
- Dont keep them waiting
51BlindCompetition
- Personal goals 1
- Conflict is a win lose situation
- High respect for power and authority
-
- BUT winners and losers grapple for power
- If you win this person might just be waiting
for you to make a mistake so they can regain
power -
-
-
-
52Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem Solving
53Hidden Style
- Process/Relational focus
- Fun to be around
- Good listeners
- Good interpersonal skills
- Unable to give opinions or ideas
- Distrustful of meanings
- Views conflict as destructive
- Harmony important at all times
- Works to smooth over conflicts
-
-
-
-
-
-
54Hidden Style
- How do you communicate with such a person?
- Dont expect full disclosure
- Good at acting open
- Motivate with
- public praise
- social standing
- Listen carefully
- Keep your opinions to a minimum
- Expect comments to be searched for double
meanings -
-
-
-
-
-
55Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem
Solving
56Open Style
- Task and Process focused
- Flexible with the needs of a group, or individual
- Able to collaborate and accepting of other
communication styles - Can accept constructive criticism.
- Easily discloses personal information
- Less impressed with the show and more impressed
with factual information - Can be seen as ineffective by Blind group members
who want results in a more timely manner
57Open Style
- So, how do you communicate with such a person?
- Be honest and open, but use tact
- Look at all sides of the problem
- Share/disclose personal information
- Accept shared responsibility
- Give constructive criticism
- Avoid being pushy or manipulative
- Treat them as equals
58Communication Conflict Styles
Closed
Hidden Avoidance/Withdrawal
Accommodation
Smoothing
Compromising
(any style) Blind
Open Competition
Collaborative/
Problem Solving
59Compromise
- Middle of the road approach
- Agreeable solution/Feelings important
- High quality second
- Willing to sacrifice to reach a compromise
- Compromise is the second choice
-
60Resolving Conflicts
- Cooperative vs. Competitive Conflict
- Cooperative willingness to share rewards to
resolve conflicts - Seek mutually beneficial way to resolve
disagreement - Win-win situation
- Competitive all-or-nothing must defeat other
participants - See winning as a test of personal worth
- Win-lose situation
- Transform conflict from competitive to
cooperative - Effective communication techniques
- Role reversal
61Resolving Conflicts
- Focus on the problem, not the person
- Problem approach
- It is not the evidence you mentioned or the
logic used to consider the validity and value of
that evidence, but the conclusions drawn from
that information that I find wrong - Person approach
- You always try to force your ideas on us. Its
probably because you are just a man/woman
62Negotiation
- Goal setting
- Situational knowledge
- Formal vs. informal bargaining
- Communication competence/presenting a position
- Dimensions of negotiating/strategies, tactics,
and behaviors - Information management
- Concessions
- Positioning
- ?
63Negotiation
- Goal setting
- Planned
- Structured
- Strategic (future based)
- Two or more positions
- Different goals ? mutually desired outcome
- Give and take
- Concessions/compromise expected
64Negotiation
- Situational knowledge
- Formal bargaining
- Reoccurring issues Labor management contract
negotiations - Deliberation
- Confrontation
- Goal setting important!
- Planned
- Structured
- Strategic
65Negotiation
- Situational knowledge
- Informal bargaining
- Spontaneous issues
- Resolution of divergent goals
- Work schedules
- Office space
- Roles
- Evenprices of goods/services
66Negotiation
- Communication competence
- Presenting a position
- Dimensions of negotiating/strategies, tactics,
and behaviors - Information management
- Personal goals vs. group goals
- Concessions
- Should serve both partys goals
- Positioning
- Focusing on issues that are important to you
67Productive vs. Destructive Results
- Productive all participants are satisfied and
believe they have gained something - Cooperative problem-solving methods
- Willingness to trust each other
- Destructive all participants are dissatisfied
and believe they have lost something - Win-lose encounters characterized by
misconceptions and misperceptions inaccurate,
sketchy, and disruptive communication - Hesitancy to trust each other
68 69Persuasion and Worldviews
- Persuasion is the ability to get people to do
what you want them to do - Uses Aristotles Three Proofs
- Considers Worldviews
- Employs courage at all levels
- Courage is what it takes to stand up and
speak courage is also what it takes to sit down
and listen. - Sir Winston Churchill
70ARISTOTLES THREE PERSUASIVE PROOFS
- ETHOS Speaker Credibility
- Competence
- Goodwill
- Character
- LOGOS Logical Appeal/Reasoning
- Drawing conclusions from evidence
- Inductive vs. Deductive
- PATHOS Emotional Appeal
- Appeals to the listeners needs, wants, desires,
etc. -
71Habits that Hinder ThinkingEthical Reasoning
vs. Reasoning Fallacies
- Ethical speakers do not use reasoning fallacies
- Argumentum ad Hominem old fashion name calling,
or an attack on the person and not the issue in
question - Red Herring using an irrelevant issue or
distraction to divert the focus to another issue
(think of a BAD smell) - False Division/Dichotomy Polarization of
options, when in reality there exists many
options of choice. - Post Hoc (False Cause) Identification of an
issue as the cause of another problem, when there
is not relationship - Argumentum ad Populum (bandwagon) But,
everyone is doing it! An appeal to popular
opinion - Argumentum ad Verecudiam Appeal to authority,
or the testimony of someone who is not a true
expert
72Speaking Persuasively
- Attitude A learned predisposition
- response favorable/unfavorable
- Our likes and dislikes change easily
- Our beliefs or values harder to change.
- Belief The degree of confidence
- Perception of true or false.
- highly central a beliefs hard to change
- Value An enduring conception of right or wrong,
good or bad. - least likely to change over time.
73The Worldview
- Beliefs reflect worldview
- Beliefsbuilding blocks of attitudes
- Attitudes visible through behavior
FINAL EXAM TOPIC
74How DO You Know What You Know?
- Epistemology
- How we learn
- Develop our breath and depth of knowledge
- Beliefs, attitudes, and values
- Diversity of experiences
- Family
- Religion
- Education
- Socioeconomics
- Culture
75Worldview vs. Evidence
- Exact same evidence 2 different conclusions
- It is not the evidence you mentioned or the
logic used to consider the validity and value of
that evidence, but the conclusions drawn from
that information that I find wrong - Internal noise can hinder the listener
- Agreement/disagreement w/ worldview
- Perception vs. Truth
76Worldview and Small Group Communication
- Small groups are impacted by and impact the
interaction of group members - Group Discussion How would the worldview of the
following members play out in a discussion of
religious beliefs? - Lupe Female, 46, married with 3 children,
Hispanic, Catholic - Tom Male, 34, unmarried, no children,
Caucasian, Jewish - Joe Male, 22, unmarried, 1 child, Caucasian,
Atheist - Cindy Female, 29, married, 2 children, African
American, Evangelical Christian - Mei Female, 39, divorced, 4 children, Chinese,
Agnostic - Sandy Female, 18, single, no children,
Christian - Ahmed Male, 26, single, no children, Muslim
77Worldview and Small Group Communication
- How did the worldview of the group members impact
the process and discussion? - Climate
- confirming/disconfirming messages
- Nonverbal communication
- Individual rights/responsibilities
78Handling Group Conflict How to Disagree Without
Becoming Disagreeable
- Define conflict and explain how you feel when
involved in a group conflict - Define groupthink and explain its consequences
- Distinguish between competitive and cooperative
conflict orientations - Identify how to use the conflict grid and the
benefits and problems that can result from
effective and ineffective handling of group
conflict - Identify behaviors that can be used to resolve
conflicts effectively
79Conflict
- Conflict means different things to different
people - Conflict is not necessarily bad, just different
- Conflict is, disagreement over available options
caused by seemingly incompatible goals among
group members and their thinking that others can
keep them from achieving their goals (p. 373).
"In the middle of difficulty lies
opportunity." - Albert
Einstein
80Resolving Conflicts
- Cooperative vs. Competitive Conflict
- Cooperative willingness to share rewards to
resolve conflicts - Seek mutually beneficial way to resolve
disagreement - Win-win situation
- Competitive all-or-nothing must defeat other
participants - See winning as a test of personal worth
- Win-lose situation
- Transform conflict from competitive to
cooperative - Effective communication techniques
- Role reversal
81Productive vs. Destructive Results
- Productive all participants are satisfied and
believe they have gained something - Cooperative problem-solving methods
- Willingness to trust each other
- Destructive all participants are dissatisfied
and believe they have lost something - Win-lose encounters characterized by
misconceptions and misperceptions inaccurate,
sketchy, and disruptive communication - Hesitancy to trust each other
82Collectivist vs. Individualist
- Rites of passage
- Western/Individualistic
- degrees/promotions/material objects
- Individual achievement is not related to group
- Individual goals more important than group goals
- Collectivist
- recognition of pride for group, not just
individual - Individual achievement/failure group
achievement/failure
83Collectivist vs. Individualist
- Strategies to use
- Develop mindfulness
- Be flexible
- Tolerate uncertainty and ambiguity
- Resist stereotyping, negative judgments
- Ask questions and listen
- Be other oriented
84GROUP THINK
85Group Think
- A type of thought exhibited by group members who
try to minimize conflict and reach consensus
without critically testing, analyzing, and
evaluating ideas. - Groups need for unanimity overrides individual
member motivation to realistically appraise
alternative courses of action
86- Group think occurs
- Critical thinking is not encouraged or rewarded
- Members believe that their group can do no wrong
(arrogance) - Members are too concerned about justifying their
actions - Members often believe that they have reached a
true consensus - Members are too concerned about reinforcing the
leaders beliefs
- Desire for consensus overrides analysis
- Group feels secure
- Rationalization of decision
- Groups morality
- Us vs. Them
- Members censor comments
- Direct pressure to dissenting members
- Gate keeper of disturbing outside ideas or
opinions - Can be related to paradigm shift resistance
- Silence consensus
87What does it like? Symptoms of Group
think
- Incomplete survey of alternatives
- Incomplete survey of objectives
- Failure to examine risks of preferred choice
- Poor information search
- Selective bias in processing information at hand
- Failure to reappraise alternatives
- Failure to work out contingency plans
88Challenger Columbia Explosions
89Organizational Culture
- Shared assumptions, values, beliefs, language,
symbols, and meaning systems that hold the
organization together. - Patterns of sustained communicative acts or
behaviors - Cultures develop over time
- Cultures are VERY difficult to change
- Requires drastic measures to make impact on
organizational culture
90NASAs Environment
- Shuttle as a bus
- Lack of funds
- Cancelled flights
- Communication between NASA and Morton-Thiokol
91- Shuttle operation
- Lack of escape pods
- Maintenance
92- How O rings work
- Need for a flexible rocket
- Failure rate
93How Cold is Cold
- Ice only in the shade or everywhere?
- Who is responsible?
94How is the decision made?
- NASA tele- conference
- Morton off line
95Group Think in Action
96Group Think
- A type of thought exhibited by group members who
try to minimize conflict and reach consensus
without critically testing, analyzing, and
evaluating ideas. - Groups need for unanimity overrides individual
member motivation to realistically appraise
alternative courses of action
97Suggestions to Reduce Group Think
- Gatekeeper should encourage critical, independent
thinking - Group members should be sensitive to status
differences that may affect decision making - Invite an outsider to the group to evaluate the
groups decision-making process - Assign a group member the role of devils
advocate - Ask group members to subdivide into smaller
groups (or work individually) and to consider
potential problems with the suggested solutions
98End of Presentation