Childhood Sexual Abuse CSA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Childhood Sexual Abuse CSA

Description:

Childhood Sexual Abuse CSA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jayp3
Category:
Tags: csa | abuse | childhood | sexual

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Childhood Sexual Abuse CSA


1
Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA) HIV
  • 20 of MSM report CSA and substantial numbers
    report severe CSA trauma.
  • CSA is associated for MSM with a wide range of
    sexual, psychological, and interpersonal problems
    in adulthood Catania et al., 1999
  • CSA is a significant correlate of high risk
    sexual behaviors Paul et al., 2001.
  • CSA is central to a syndemic of sexual and mental
    health problems among MSM Stall et al., 2003

2
Defining Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA)
  • Assessing coerced sex
  • By direct query
  • By inference of power inequities in relationship
    (age differentials the most frequently used
    measure)

3
CSA screening question
  • Thinking back from your childhood to the
    present, have you ever been forced or frightened
    by someone into doing something sexually that you
    did not want to do? (Nos confirmed by asking
    if they felt differently at the time if so, they
    were included in coerced group.)
  • 20 reported CSA before age 18.

4
Age and CSA Prevalence
plt.01
5
First CSA Perpetrator
  • Friend/acquaintance/neighbor 34
  • Stranger 24
  • Other Relative 15
  • Sibling 9
  • Step-parent/Parental figure 5
  • Authority figure (doctor, etc.) 5
  • Parent 4
  • Other 3
  • Date/boyfriend 1

6
No. CSA Occasions
  • Once 31
  • 2 x 23
  • 3 - 5 x 28
  • 6 x 21

7
Level of Force
  • Physical Force/Weapons 44
  • Threats of Physical Violence 9

8
Sexual Activity in 1st Event
  • NO PENATRATIVE ACTS (touching/fondling) 20
  • Forced to watch 88
  • Fondled sexually 85
  • Forced to touch 74
  • ANY PENATRATIVE SEX 80
  • Oral sex (respondent receptive) 45
  • Anal intercourse (actual/attempted) 44
  • Oral sex (respondent insertive) 42
  • Anal penetration-digit/object 35
  • Vaginal intercourse 2

9
CSA Experience
  • Situation ? Flight/Fright
  • Prevent Active Coping
  • Helplessness
  • Perpetrator ? Adult Betrayal
  • Control Strategies
  • Modeling
  • Sex-?ualization? ? Sex Guilt, Anxiety
  • Preoccupation
  • Aggression
  • Commodity

10
Examples of CSA Adult Outcomes
  • Regulatory Deficits
  • Depression, Suicide
  • Escape/Avoidance coping
  • Self-Identity, Esteem problems
  • Low Interpersonal trust
  • Poor sexual health
  • Sexual Problems
  • Sex Trade
  • Rough Sex

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Key Findings Primary Partners
  • CSA Greater Depression
  • Greater Depression Increased BEA/CEA
    Coping
  • BEA Coping Poor Risk Appraisal
  • Poor Risk Appraisal More Risk Behavior

14
Key Findings Secondary Partners
  • CSA Increased Anger, Depression,
    Escape-Avoidance Coping
  • Depression Increased Cognitive Escape-Avoidance
    (CEA) Coping
  • Anger Increased CEA Coping, Decreased Adaptive
    Coping, More Aggressive Sexual Scripts
  • Coping
  • Increased Adaptive Better Sexual Skills
  • Increased BEA Poor Risk Appraisal
  • Increased CEA Poor Sexual Skills
  • Poor Risk Appraisal Poor Skills, More Risk
    Behavior
  • Aggressive Scripts Poor Sexual Skills
  • Poor Sexual Skills More Risk Behavior

15
Men with Primary vs. Secondary Partners
Ns 57, 105 for Primary/Secondary
16
Conclusions
  • Motivational and Coping Factors are key mediating
    components of CSA and High Risk Sexual Behavior
    and their effects are further mediated through
    socio-sexual scripts and regulatory skills
  • Strategies that focus exclusively on prevention
    skill building will fail for MSM with more severe
    CSA histories

17
Conclusions cont.
  • Sex with secondary partners produces a more
    complicated model, sex with primary partners
    yields a simpler model.
  • Interpersonal regulatory skills figure less into
    the primary partner model.
  • This may suggest that MSM with CSA histories who
    are engaged in primary relationships were either
    less affected over the long term by their trauma
    (e.g., had greater resilience, more post trauma
    support) or have obtained professional help with
    resolving the emotional, sexual, and
    interpersonal issues resulting from CSA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com