Big Bang and Beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Big Bang and Beyond

Description:

Physical properties of the matter. Strength of the fundamental forces ... According to the physical properties of Beryllium-8, stars cannot burn beyond Helium ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: CHE6164
Category:
Tags: bang | beyond

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Big Bang and Beyond


1
Big Bang and Beyond
  • Did someone monkeyed with the laws of nature ?

2
Theories of the Origin of the Universe
  • Theological Theories
  • Greek Mythology (Chaos)
  • Hinduism (Cosmic sleep of gods)
  • Chinese creation myth (Pangu)
  • Biblical account of the creation (God)
  • Scientific Theories
  • Continuous creation
  • Big Bang Theory the commonly accepted theory

3
(No Transcript)
4
Big Bang
  • Technically, there was no bang
  • Technically, galaxies are not moving away from
    each other
  • Reality space expands
  • When there are more space between galaxies, they
    move away from each other
  • Analogy dots on an expanding balloon
  • Isaiah 4512
  • I have stretched out the heavens...
  • Its only ancient document that mentions an
    expanding Universe

5
Evidence for the Big Bang
  • Theory predicts an expanding universe
  • Confirm by Red Shift (Doppler effect) in spectrum
  • Theory predicts cosmic background radiation
  • Background radiation was discovered in 1964 by
    Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who later won the
    Nobel Prize for this discovery

6
Beyond the Big Bang
  • Big Bang Theory explains how the Universe first
    started but leaves many unanswered questions
  • Time, Space and Matter were created in the Big
    Bang
  • Before the bang, there were no time, no space and
    no matter
  • Physics has not solved the question Whats
    before the Big Bang
  • If I hear a small bang, I will ask Who or what
    caused it
  • So Who or what caused the Big Bang ?
  • Other factors determine how the Universe will
    develop
  • Amount of matter in the Universe
  • Physical properties of the matter
  • Strength of the fundamental forces

7
Fundamental Forces in Physics
  • Gravitational force
  • Attractive force between objects with mass
  • Weakest, long range
  • Electromagnetic force
  • Attractive and repulsive
  • Long range, 1039 times stronger than gravity
  • Nuclear Weak force
  • Cause neutrons to decade into a protons
  • Range lt10-17 m, 1028 times stronger than gravity
  • Nuclear Strong force
  • Hold the nucleus together
  • Range lt10-15 m, 1041 times stronger than gravity

8
Gravitational Force
  • Law of Gravity
  • M mass of one object
  • m mass of second object
  • G 6.67 x 10-11 Nm2/kg2
  • r distance between the objects

9
Electro-Magnetic Force
  • Coulomb Law
  • Strength of EM-force determines how strongly
    electrons in an atom are held in orbit

proton
electron
10
Nuclear Weak-force
  • Repelling force that cause beta-decay

proton
neutron
anti-neutrino
electron (beta-particle)
The strength of the nuclear weak-force determines
how fast neutrons are converted into protons and
electrons
11
Nuclear Strong-force
  • Hold nucleus together by overcoming the repelling
    protons in nucleus
  • Strength of the nuclear strong-force determines
    how fast nuclear reactions will proceed

proton
neutron
neutron
proton
12
Thinkering with the Force...
  • Fact
  • The fundamental forces in nature have strength
    that is determined by a number of physical
    constants
  • For example gravitational constant in the Law
    of Gravity, Coulumb constant in the
    Electro-magnetic force
  • Question what would happen to the Universe if
    the values of these physical constant were
    changed ?
  • Say, what would happen if the gravitational (or
    some other) constant would be off a little bit ?
  • We would surely weight a bit more on EarthBUT...
  • Physicists did NOT expect earth-shattering
    consequences

13
Precondition for Life
  • Stars of the right type for sustaining life
    supportable planets only can occur during a
    certain range of ages for the universe.
  • stars of the right type only can form for a
    narrow range of values of the gravitational
    constant
  • Living cells consists of light and heavy elements
    (Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, and metals such as
    Iron, Copper, ect)
  • To make both light and heavy elements, the
    strengths of the fundamental forces must lie
    within a very narrow range of values
  • Many many other preconditions exists

14
Amazing Findings...
  • Brandon Carter presented his ideas about the
    anthropic principle in 1973 in Poland during
    the 500th birthday of Copernicus
  • The anthropic principle states that
  • All the seemingly arbitrary and unrelated
    constants in physics have one strange thing in
    common these are precisely the value you need
    if you want to have a universe capable of
    sustaining life
  • Astronomer Fred Hoyle once said
  • A commonsense interpretation of the facts
    suggests that a SUPERINTELLECT has MONKEYED with
    physics . . . and that there are no blind forces
    worth speaking about in nature.
  • And Fred Hoyle was an..Atheist

15
The strength of the Gravitational force
  • If gravitational force was made a bit stronger,
    stars will be more massive and burn more
    violently and unstable
  • More harmful radiation to life deadly to life
  • If gravitational force was made a bit weaker,
    stars are too light and do not become
    super-novae
  • Element heavier than iron are only formed when
    stars explode as a super-novae no life possible
    without them

16
The strength of the EM-force
  • If the electro-magnetic force is slightly weaker
  • Too weak to hold electrons in orbits about nuclei
  • Universe will consists of loose protons and
    electrons, no atoms, and thus no life will be
    possible
  • If the electro-magnetic force is slightly
    stronger
  • atom could not "share" an electron orbit with
    other atoms
  • No chemical reactions possible and no life

proton
electron
17
Strength of the Nuclear Weak-force
  • If Nuclear Weak-force is made a bit stronger
  • neutrons would decay more readily, and there
    would be little to no neutrons left
  • Neutrons are necessary to form heavier elements
    used in living cells no neutrons, no heavy
    elements, no life.
  • If Nuclear Weak-force is made a bit weaker
  • Plenty of neutrons will be available
  • Stars can use neutrons to burn most or all of the
    hydrogen into helium (and subsequently to heavy
    elements)
  • But little or no hydrogen will be left no
    hydrogen, no water, and no life

18
Strength of the Nuclear Strong-force
  • If Nuclear Strong-force is made a bit stronger
  • Nuclear reactions will be very efficient (fast)
  • Most or all hydrogen will be converted to Helium
    and then on into Iron
  • No hydrogen, no water, and thus, no life
    possible
  • If Nuclear Strong-force is made a bit weaker
  • Force is too weak to overcome electro-magnetic
    repulsion of protons in nuclei
  • multi-proton nuclei would not hold together
  • No carbon or oxygen, no proteins, no water, and
    thus no life possible

19
Thats just the beginning...
  • Many more amazing coincidences that make life
    possible have been discovered
  • The composition of our sun is just right, the
    distance of the Earth to the sun is just right,
    the size of the Earth is just right, the orbit of
    the Earth is just right, the size of our moon is
    just right and even the giant planets (Jupiter)
    are just right for life on Earth
  • Other amazing coincidences makes it possible
    for the stars and galaxies to form

20
A coincidence at nuclear scale
  • The following is an account of a series of
    amazing coincidences in nature that dazed an
    atheist astronomer and many others
  • I have to take you into nuclear Physics
  • Brace for the ride please ask questions if you
    dont understand something

21
Nuclear Reaction
  • Electrons can only occupy a number of specific
    orbits around the nucleus each orbit represents
    a certain energy level
  • So also, nucleus of atoms can occupy a number of
    specific energy levels
  • In a nuclear reaction, the Law of Conservation of
    Energy must hold

Kinetic nuclear energy before Kinetic
nuclear energy after
22
Nuclear Reaction 2
  • When nuclei collide, they form a new nucleus
  • If the energy level of the new nucleus is very
    different from one of its natural energy state,
    the new nucleus is unstable and will decompose
    (radio-activity)

23
Nuclear Resonance
  • If sum total of kinetic and nuclear energy before
    and after are very close to each other, the
    nuclear reaction will proceed very rapidly
  • In such case, we say there is Nuclear Resonance
  • Resonance between atomic nuclei depends on
  • Structure of the nuclei involved
  • Temperature under which the nuclear reaction
    takes place
  • Resonance between atomic nuclei are extremely
    rare in nature.

24
Nuclear Reaction in Stars
  • Matter are converted into energy in stars through
    a number of nuclear reactions
  • The three primary nuclear reactions (after these,
    the star is almost burned up) are
  • Proton-proton cycle
  • Helium fusion
  • Carbon cycle

25
Proton-proton cycle
  • The proton-proton cycle will burn Hydrogen into
    Helium (first phase of star development)
  • When all Hydrogen are burned, phase 2 kicks in

26
Helium Fusion
  • After all the Hydrogen is converted to Helium,
    the star converts Helium to. What ?
  • Here we have a major problem...
  • When two Helium nuclei are fused into
    Beryllium-8, the resulting Beryllium-8 isotope is
    highly unstable
  • Beryllium-8 has a half life of 10-16 seconds !!!

Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
lt 0.0000000000000001 sec
According to the physics of Beryllium-8, stars
cannot burn Helium
27
A Stellar Mystery
  • Dilemma
  • According to the physical properties of
    Beryllium-8, stars cannot burn beyond Helium
  • Yet, Helium is being converted in Carbon in stars
    all the time
  • First proposed solution Triple collision

Helium
Carbon-12
Helium
Helium
Triple collisions are extremely rare and the
rarity cannot explain the abundance of carbon
28
Ed Salpeters solution...
  • Faced with the dilemma that stars convert Helium
    into Carbon at great rate, and no plausible
    explanation for this process, the astrophysicist
    Ed Salpeter proposed the following solution in
    1952

Helium
Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
BUT Beryllium is extremely unstable
Carbon-12
29
Fred Hoyles insight
  • Fred Hoyle realized that the only way that
    Salpeters solution can produce Carbon at the
    rate that is happening in stars is

Helium
Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
Nuclear resonance !!! (Very fast reaction)
Problem there is no known energy level of the
Carbon-12 nucleus that is near the sum total
energy values of He and Be
Carbon-12
30
Fred Hoyles wild guess
  • So Fred Hoyle hypothesized (guessed) that there
    must be such a natural energy level of the
    Carbon-12 nucleus
  • Hoyle calculated the temperature inside a large
    star to be about 100 million degrees
  • and worked out how much kinetic energy this would
    give to the particles rushing around in the
    star's atmosphere.
  • Knowing the masses of both beryllium-8 and
    Helium, his hypothesis predicted that there must
    be an excited state at an energy of 7.6 million
    electron volts in the nucleus Carbon-12
  • I did tell you that nuclei resonance was rare
    everyone was skeptical about Hoyles
    prediction...
  • A team at Cal. Tech. led by Willy Fowler (later a
    Nobel Prize winner) began the search for the
    mysterious resonant state in carbon-12, and
    discovered it - just 4 percent above Hoyle's
    prediction !!!

31
Yet another amazing coincidence...
  • We are not out of the wood yet... Heavier
    elements must be formed specifically
  • You want to form Oxygen (necessary for life !)
  • But you want to keep some Carbon (also necessary
    for life)

Carbon-12
Oxygen-16
Helium
32
A missed resonance
  • In order to have this nuclear reaction going
  • You need a natural energy level of Oxygen-16
    close to the sum total of the energy levels of
    Carbon-12 and Helium
  • But not too close - if the level is too close,
    most or all Carbon-12 will be converted, so you
    want this energy level to be off a bit

Carbon-12
Oxygen-16
Helium
33
Another coincidence
  • Wellthey did find that resonance level of
    Oxygen-16 and it did miss the resonance level to
    slow the production of Oxygen-16
  • These two coincidences caused atheist atronomer
    Fred Hoyle to comment
  • If you wanted to produce carbon and oxygen in
    roughly equal quantities by stellar
    nucleosynthesis, these are the two basic levels
    you would have to fix, and your fixing would have
    to be just about where these levels are actually
    found to be....
  • A commonsense interpretation of the facts
    suggests that a SUPERINTELLECT has MONKEYED with
    physics . . . and that there are no blind forces
    worth speaking about in nature

34
Flatness-oldness problem
  • The following incredibly precise tweaking of the
    Universe is known as the Flatness-oldness problem
  • The amount of matter created in the Big Bang has
    a profound impact on how the Universe will
    develop
  • Matter attract and will pull the Universe back
    together towards one point
  • There is a critical amount where the attraction
    will halt the expansion and the Universe will
    slow down and stop expanding
  • If the total mass in the Universe is less than
    critical, the Universe will keep expanding
  • If the total mass in the Universe is more than
    critical, the Universe will stop expanding and
    contract (Big Crunch)

35
Place your bet...
  • Suppose X represents the critical mass of the
    Universe, what do you think that the total of
    mass of the Universe is ?
  • There are so many possible values to pick from
    for the total mass of the Universe
  • An does it matter how much mass there is in the
    Universe ?? (You will be amazed by the results)

0
X
36
Some results from Theoretic Physics
37
Interpretations of the results
  • IF the density of the matter after 1 nsec from
    the Big Bang is equal to 447,225,917,218,507,401,2
    84,017 mg/cc, the Universe would have collapsed
    by now.
  • IF the density of the matter after 1 nsec from
    the Big Bang is equal to 447,225,917,218,507,401,2
    84,015 mg/cc, the Universe expands so rapidly
    that galaxies and stars cannot form.
  • To get the (flat) Universe in which we (probably)
    live in, the density of the matter after 1 nsec
    from the Big Bang must be equal to
    447,225,917,218,507,401,284,016 mg/cc not one
    gm more nor one gm less
  • No wonder than many scientists believe that, the
    Universe was designed

38
And there is much more...
  • There are many more examples of coincidences in
    nature without which life could not have
    developed
  • Science has coined a term to describe these
    strange coincidences Anthropic Principle (The
    Universe is destined to support (human) life)
  • For more examples
  • http//cheungpc.mathcs.emory.edu

39
(Not) The End (just
out of time)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com